Dialogic strategies and outcomes: An analysis of environmental advocacy groups’ Facebook profiles

Previous studies of advocacy groups’ Web sites suggest that the use of dialogic strategies could lead to greater dialogic communication. This study examined whether dialogic strategies utilized by environmental advocacy groups via their social networking profiles lead to greater dialogic engagement...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Public relations review 2009-09, Vol.35 (3), p.317-319
Hauptverfasser: Bortree, Denise Sevick, Seltzer, Trent
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 319
container_issue 3
container_start_page 317
container_title Public relations review
container_volume 35
creator Bortree, Denise Sevick
Seltzer, Trent
description Previous studies of advocacy groups’ Web sites suggest that the use of dialogic strategies could lead to greater dialogic communication. This study examined whether dialogic strategies utilized by environmental advocacy groups via their social networking profiles lead to greater dialogic engagement between organizations and visitors. This study offers the first examination of the relationship between the creation of an online space for dialogue and actual dialogic engagement by identifying and measuring six dialogic outcomes.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.05.002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_224939484</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0363811109000691</els_id><sourcerecordid>1779447121</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-798c543b6293332c293551a15a3100f4a67558ba5efb350857380f5371098ce83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFOwzAQRS0EEqVwAxYW-4RxHDcJC6SqUECqxAbWluNOKoc0DnYSqTuuwfU4Ca7CmtWXRvP_zH-EXDOIGbDFbR13Q-lwjBOAIgYRAyQnZMbyjEep4NkpmQFf8ChnjJ2TC-9rABAFEzOiH4xq7M5o6nunetwZ9FS1W2qHXts9-ju6bMNANQdvPLUVxXY0zrZ7bHvVULUdrVb6QHfODp3_-fqma6WxtPaDds5WpkF_Sc4q1Xi8-tM5eV8_vq2eo83r08tquYk0L4o-yopci5SXi6TgnCc6iBBMMaE4A6hStciEyEslsCq5gFxkPIcq1GMQnJjzObmZcsPhzwF9L2s7uPC6l0mSFrxI8zQspdOSdtZ7h5XsnNkrd5AM5JGmrOVEUx5pShAy0Ay2-8mGocBo0EmvDbYat8ah7uXWmv8DfgHhsICF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>224939484</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dialogic strategies and outcomes: An analysis of environmental advocacy groups’ Facebook profiles</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Bortree, Denise Sevick ; Seltzer, Trent</creator><creatorcontrib>Bortree, Denise Sevick ; Seltzer, Trent</creatorcontrib><description>Previous studies of advocacy groups’ Web sites suggest that the use of dialogic strategies could lead to greater dialogic communication. This study examined whether dialogic strategies utilized by environmental advocacy groups via their social networking profiles lead to greater dialogic engagement between organizations and visitors. This study offers the first examination of the relationship between the creation of an online space for dialogue and actual dialogic engagement by identifying and measuring six dialogic outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0363-8111</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4537</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.05.002</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PREREL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Silver Spring: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Advocacy ; Correlation analysis ; Dialogic communication ; Environmental advocacy ; Environmental protection ; Online relationship building ; Public relations ; Social networking sites ; Social networks ; Studies ; Websites</subject><ispartof>Public relations review, 2009-09, Vol.35 (3), p.317-319</ispartof><rights>2009 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Sep 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-798c543b6293332c293551a15a3100f4a67558ba5efb350857380f5371098ce83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-798c543b6293332c293551a15a3100f4a67558ba5efb350857380f5371098ce83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0363811109000691$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27843,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bortree, Denise Sevick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seltzer, Trent</creatorcontrib><title>Dialogic strategies and outcomes: An analysis of environmental advocacy groups’ Facebook profiles</title><title>Public relations review</title><description>Previous studies of advocacy groups’ Web sites suggest that the use of dialogic strategies could lead to greater dialogic communication. This study examined whether dialogic strategies utilized by environmental advocacy groups via their social networking profiles lead to greater dialogic engagement between organizations and visitors. This study offers the first examination of the relationship between the creation of an online space for dialogue and actual dialogic engagement by identifying and measuring six dialogic outcomes.</description><subject>Advocacy</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Dialogic communication</subject><subject>Environmental advocacy</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Online relationship building</subject><subject>Public relations</subject><subject>Social networking sites</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Websites</subject><issn>0363-8111</issn><issn>1873-4537</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEFOwzAQRS0EEqVwAxYW-4RxHDcJC6SqUECqxAbWluNOKoc0DnYSqTuuwfU4Ca7CmtWXRvP_zH-EXDOIGbDFbR13Q-lwjBOAIgYRAyQnZMbyjEep4NkpmQFf8ChnjJ2TC-9rABAFEzOiH4xq7M5o6nunetwZ9FS1W2qHXts9-ju6bMNANQdvPLUVxXY0zrZ7bHvVULUdrVb6QHfODp3_-fqma6WxtPaDds5WpkF_Sc4q1Xi8-tM5eV8_vq2eo83r08tquYk0L4o-yopci5SXi6TgnCc6iBBMMaE4A6hStciEyEslsCq5gFxkPIcq1GMQnJjzObmZcsPhzwF9L2s7uPC6l0mSFrxI8zQspdOSdtZ7h5XsnNkrd5AM5JGmrOVEUx5pShAy0Ay2-8mGocBo0EmvDbYat8ah7uXWmv8DfgHhsICF</recordid><startdate>20090901</startdate><enddate>20090901</enddate><creator>Bortree, Denise Sevick</creator><creator>Seltzer, Trent</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090901</creationdate><title>Dialogic strategies and outcomes: An analysis of environmental advocacy groups’ Facebook profiles</title><author>Bortree, Denise Sevick ; Seltzer, Trent</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-798c543b6293332c293551a15a3100f4a67558ba5efb350857380f5371098ce83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Advocacy</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Dialogic communication</topic><topic>Environmental advocacy</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Online relationship building</topic><topic>Public relations</topic><topic>Social networking sites</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Websites</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bortree, Denise Sevick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seltzer, Trent</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Public relations review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bortree, Denise Sevick</au><au>Seltzer, Trent</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dialogic strategies and outcomes: An analysis of environmental advocacy groups’ Facebook profiles</atitle><jtitle>Public relations review</jtitle><date>2009-09-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>317</spage><epage>319</epage><pages>317-319</pages><issn>0363-8111</issn><eissn>1873-4537</eissn><coden>PREREL</coden><abstract>Previous studies of advocacy groups’ Web sites suggest that the use of dialogic strategies could lead to greater dialogic communication. This study examined whether dialogic strategies utilized by environmental advocacy groups via their social networking profiles lead to greater dialogic engagement between organizations and visitors. This study offers the first examination of the relationship between the creation of an online space for dialogue and actual dialogic engagement by identifying and measuring six dialogic outcomes.</abstract><cop>Silver Spring</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.05.002</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0363-8111
ispartof Public relations review, 2009-09, Vol.35 (3), p.317-319
issn 0363-8111
1873-4537
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_224939484
source PAIS Index; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Advocacy
Correlation analysis
Dialogic communication
Environmental advocacy
Environmental protection
Online relationship building
Public relations
Social networking sites
Social networks
Studies
Websites
title Dialogic strategies and outcomes: An analysis of environmental advocacy groups’ Facebook profiles
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T17%3A33%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dialogic%20strategies%20and%20outcomes:%20An%20analysis%20of%20environmental%20advocacy%20groups%E2%80%99%20Facebook%20profiles&rft.jtitle=Public%20relations%20review&rft.au=Bortree,%20Denise%20Sevick&rft.date=2009-09-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=317&rft.epage=319&rft.pages=317-319&rft.issn=0363-8111&rft.eissn=1873-4537&rft.coden=PREREL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.05.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1779447121%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=224939484&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0363811109000691&rfr_iscdi=true