An Assessment of Country of Origin Effects Under Alternative Presentation Formats
Empirical research concerning the effects of country of origin (COO) on consumers' evaluative reactions to products has produced mixed and sometimes inconsistent results. Potential explanations for this situation include differences in the countries considered, populations sampled, and products...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 1994-07, Vol.22 (3), p.274-282 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 282 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 274 |
| container_title | Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science |
| container_volume | 22 |
| creator | Lim, Jeen-Su Darley, William K Summers, John O |
| description | Empirical research concerning the effects of country of origin (COO) on consumers' evaluative reactions to products has produced mixed and sometimes inconsistent results. Potential explanations for this situation include differences in the countries considered, populations sampled, and products investigated, among other things. The results of 3 experiments designed to investigate the impact of 3 presentation formats (single cue, explicit multiple cues, and implicit multiple cues) on COO effects for 4 evaluative reactions (perceived quality, product evaluations other than quality, affect, and purchase intentions) are presented. COO effects were strongest for the single-cue format and weakest for the implicit multiple-cues condition. Perception of product quality was most strongly affected by COO, followed by product evaluations other than quality; COO had its smallest effect on purchase intention. Implications of these results and future research directions are discussed. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0092070394223008 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_224865442</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1308077111</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c213t-7782940739336f8cd789b9e5aa62998bacecb99e3ea95ec4648eb3486adbc6a63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1LAzEQxYMoWD_uHoOeVycfu0mOS2lVKFTBnpdsOitb2k1NUqH_vVnqSfA0b3i_GR6PkDsGj4wp9QRgOCgQRnIuAPQZmbCy5IXSXJ6TyWgXo39JrmLcAIAUlZyQ93qgdYwY4w6HRH1Hp_4wpHAc5TL0n_1AZ12HLkW6GtYYaL1NGAab-m-kbwFjPsuLH-jch51N8YZcdHYb8fZ3XpPVfPYxfSkWy-fXab0oHGciFSoHMxKUMEJUnXZrpU1rsLS24sbo1jp0rTEo0JoSnaykxlZIXdl16ypbiWtyf_q7D_7rgDE1G3_Iwbax4TxzpZQ8Qw__QUyABqUYY5mCE-WCjzFg1-xDv7Ph2DBoxnabv-2KH2tfa0k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1308077111</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An Assessment of Country of Origin Effects Under Alternative Presentation Formats</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Lim, Jeen-Su ; Darley, William K ; Summers, John O</creator><creatorcontrib>Lim, Jeen-Su ; Darley, William K ; Summers, John O</creatorcontrib><description>Empirical research concerning the effects of country of origin (COO) on consumers' evaluative reactions to products has produced mixed and sometimes inconsistent results. Potential explanations for this situation include differences in the countries considered, populations sampled, and products investigated, among other things. The results of 3 experiments designed to investigate the impact of 3 presentation formats (single cue, explicit multiple cues, and implicit multiple cues) on COO effects for 4 evaluative reactions (perceived quality, product evaluations other than quality, affect, and purchase intentions) are presented. COO effects were strongest for the single-cue format and weakest for the implicit multiple-cues condition. Perception of product quality was most strongly affected by COO, followed by product evaluations other than quality; COO had its smallest effect on purchase intention. Implications of these results and future research directions are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0092-0703</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-7824</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0092070394223008</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAMSDE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Greenwich, Conn., etc: JAI Press, etc</publisher><subject>Attitude surveys ; Comparative analysis ; Consumer attitudes ; Consumer electronics ; US imports ; Variance analysis</subject><ispartof>Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 1994-07, Vol.22 (3), p.274-282</ispartof><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Summer 1994</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c213t-7782940739336f8cd789b9e5aa62998bacecb99e3ea95ec4648eb3486adbc6a63</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27869,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lim, Jeen-Su</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darley, William K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Summers, John O</creatorcontrib><title>An Assessment of Country of Origin Effects Under Alternative Presentation Formats</title><title>Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science</title><description>Empirical research concerning the effects of country of origin (COO) on consumers' evaluative reactions to products has produced mixed and sometimes inconsistent results. Potential explanations for this situation include differences in the countries considered, populations sampled, and products investigated, among other things. The results of 3 experiments designed to investigate the impact of 3 presentation formats (single cue, explicit multiple cues, and implicit multiple cues) on COO effects for 4 evaluative reactions (perceived quality, product evaluations other than quality, affect, and purchase intentions) are presented. COO effects were strongest for the single-cue format and weakest for the implicit multiple-cues condition. Perception of product quality was most strongly affected by COO, followed by product evaluations other than quality; COO had its smallest effect on purchase intention. Implications of these results and future research directions are discussed.</description><subject>Attitude surveys</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Consumer attitudes</subject><subject>Consumer electronics</subject><subject>US imports</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><issn>0092-0703</issn><issn>1552-7824</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1LAzEQxYMoWD_uHoOeVycfu0mOS2lVKFTBnpdsOitb2k1NUqH_vVnqSfA0b3i_GR6PkDsGj4wp9QRgOCgQRnIuAPQZmbCy5IXSXJ6TyWgXo39JrmLcAIAUlZyQ93qgdYwY4w6HRH1Hp_4wpHAc5TL0n_1AZ12HLkW6GtYYaL1NGAab-m-kbwFjPsuLH-jch51N8YZcdHYb8fZ3XpPVfPYxfSkWy-fXab0oHGciFSoHMxKUMEJUnXZrpU1rsLS24sbo1jp0rTEo0JoSnaykxlZIXdl16ypbiWtyf_q7D_7rgDE1G3_Iwbax4TxzpZQ8Qw__QUyABqUYY5mCE-WCjzFg1-xDv7Ph2DBoxnabv-2KH2tfa0k</recordid><startdate>19940701</startdate><enddate>19940701</enddate><creator>Lim, Jeen-Su</creator><creator>Darley, William K</creator><creator>Summers, John O</creator><general>JAI Press, etc</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IBDFT</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19940701</creationdate><title>An Assessment of Country of Origin Effects Under Alternative Presentation Formats</title><author>Lim, Jeen-Su ; Darley, William K ; Summers, John O</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c213t-7782940739336f8cd789b9e5aa62998bacecb99e3ea95ec4648eb3486adbc6a63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Attitude surveys</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Consumer attitudes</topic><topic>Consumer electronics</topic><topic>US imports</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lim, Jeen-Su</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darley, William K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Summers, John O</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 27</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><jtitle>Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lim, Jeen-Su</au><au>Darley, William K</au><au>Summers, John O</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An Assessment of Country of Origin Effects Under Alternative Presentation Formats</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science</jtitle><date>1994-07-01</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>274</spage><epage>282</epage><pages>274-282</pages><issn>0092-0703</issn><eissn>1552-7824</eissn><coden>JAMSDE</coden><abstract>Empirical research concerning the effects of country of origin (COO) on consumers' evaluative reactions to products has produced mixed and sometimes inconsistent results. Potential explanations for this situation include differences in the countries considered, populations sampled, and products investigated, among other things. The results of 3 experiments designed to investigate the impact of 3 presentation formats (single cue, explicit multiple cues, and implicit multiple cues) on COO effects for 4 evaluative reactions (perceived quality, product evaluations other than quality, affect, and purchase intentions) are presented. COO effects were strongest for the single-cue format and weakest for the implicit multiple-cues condition. Perception of product quality was most strongly affected by COO, followed by product evaluations other than quality; COO had its smallest effect on purchase intention. Implications of these results and future research directions are discussed.</abstract><cop>Greenwich, Conn., etc</cop><pub>JAI Press, etc</pub><doi>10.1177/0092070394223008</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0092-0703 |
| ispartof | Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 1994-07, Vol.22 (3), p.274-282 |
| issn | 0092-0703 1552-7824 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_224865442 |
| source | SpringerNature Journals; Periodicals Index Online; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
| subjects | Attitude surveys Comparative analysis Consumer attitudes Consumer electronics US imports Variance analysis |
| title | An Assessment of Country of Origin Effects Under Alternative Presentation Formats |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T16%3A32%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20Assessment%20of%20Country%20of%20Origin%20Effects%20Under%20Alternative%20Presentation%20Formats&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20Academy%20of%20Marketing%20Science&rft.au=Lim,%20Jeen-Su&rft.date=1994-07-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=274&rft.epage=282&rft.pages=274-282&rft.issn=0092-0703&rft.eissn=1552-7824&rft.coden=JAMSDE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0092070394223008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1308077111%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1308077111&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |