2363-PUB: The Efficacy of Low vs. High FDA-Approved SGLT2 Inhibitor Dose Compared with DPP-4 Inhibitors: A Meta-analysis

All FDA-approved SGLT2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are currently available in two doses. While most SGLT2i have demonstrated CV benefit, there may be a difference in hemoglobin A1c (A1c) reduction between both doses. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of both SGLT2i doses compared to maxi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diabetes (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2019-06, Vol.68 (Supplement_1)
Hauptverfasser: UHRIG, JARROD, MISHRIKY, BASEM M., PAGE, STEPHANIE O., SEWELL, KERRY, POWELL, JAMES R., PATIL, SHIVAJIRAO P., CUMMINGS, DOYLE M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue Supplement_1
container_start_page
container_title Diabetes (New York, N.Y.)
container_volume 68
creator UHRIG, JARROD
MISHRIKY, BASEM M.
PAGE, STEPHANIE O.
SEWELL, KERRY
POWELL, JAMES R.
PATIL, SHIVAJIRAO P.
CUMMINGS, DOYLE M.
description All FDA-approved SGLT2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are currently available in two doses. While most SGLT2i have demonstrated CV benefit, there may be a difference in hemoglobin A1c (A1c) reduction between both doses. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of both SGLT2i doses compared to maximum DPP-4 inhibitor (DPP-4i) dose. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and CINAHL for randomized trials comparing at least one FDA-approved SGLT2i dose to maximum DPP-4i dose in type 2 diabetes and reporting a change in A1c. We performed two separate analyses according to dose (low SGLT2i dose vs. DPP-4i and high SGLT2i dose vs. DPP-4i). We included 12 trials. There was a significantly greater A1c reduction favoring lower SGLT2i dose compared to DPP-4i at ≥52 weeks (w) but not at ≤26 w (MD [95% CI] = -0.12% [-0.23, -0.02] and 0.00% [-0.06, 0.07] respectively) with an absolute A1c reduction of -0.76% vs. -0.75% at ≤26 w and -0.71% vs. -0.58% at ≥52 w respectively. When comparing higher SGLT2i dose vs. DPP-4i, there was a significantly greater A1c reduction for SGLT2i at ≤26 and ≥52 w (MD [95% CI] = -0.13% [-0.20, -0.05] and -0.26% [-0.36, -0.16] respectively) with an absolute A1c reduction of -0.91% vs. -0.77% at ≤26 w and -0.83% vs. -0.55% at ≥52 w respectively. We conclude that low SGLT2i dose had similar A1c reduction as DPP-4i in early treatment but became significant as treatment was prolonged. Higher SGLT2i dose is favored over DPP-4i.
doi_str_mv 10.2337/db19-2363-PUB
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2248401351</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2248401351</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1101-c45e3fb119a9b34a14664177fbea4f89556c2377131c575442ff899126ca76c93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkE1LAzEQhoMoWKtH7wHPqZkku2l6W_sNFQu24G3Jpom7pW3Wzba1_94tVWQOA_M-DC8PQo9AO4xz-bzKQBHGY07my5cr1ALFFeFMflyjFqXACEglb9FdCGtKadxMC33_8T28yC0eOlcYbU7YOzzzR3wIHTwpPnM8GiQkKcvKH-wKv49nC4anu7zIitpXeOCDxX2_LXXVpMeizvFgPifiHwk9nOBXW2uid3pzCkW4RzdOb4J9-N1ttBwNF_0Jmb2Np_1kRgwABWJEZLnLAJRWGRcaRBwLkNJlVgvXVVEUG8alBA4mkpEQzDVXBSw2WsZG8TZ6uvxtun_tbajTtd9XTYmQMia6ggKPoKHIhTKVD6GyLi2rYqurUwo0PctNz3LTs6y0kcV_AEFgaIs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2248401351</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>2363-PUB: The Efficacy of Low vs. High FDA-Approved SGLT2 Inhibitor Dose Compared with DPP-4 Inhibitors: A Meta-analysis</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>UHRIG, JARROD ; MISHRIKY, BASEM M. ; PAGE, STEPHANIE O. ; SEWELL, KERRY ; POWELL, JAMES R. ; PATIL, SHIVAJIRAO P. ; CUMMINGS, DOYLE M.</creator><creatorcontrib>UHRIG, JARROD ; MISHRIKY, BASEM M. ; PAGE, STEPHANIE O. ; SEWELL, KERRY ; POWELL, JAMES R. ; PATIL, SHIVAJIRAO P. ; CUMMINGS, DOYLE M.</creatorcontrib><description>All FDA-approved SGLT2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are currently available in two doses. While most SGLT2i have demonstrated CV benefit, there may be a difference in hemoglobin A1c (A1c) reduction between both doses. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of both SGLT2i doses compared to maximum DPP-4 inhibitor (DPP-4i) dose. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and CINAHL for randomized trials comparing at least one FDA-approved SGLT2i dose to maximum DPP-4i dose in type 2 diabetes and reporting a change in A1c. We performed two separate analyses according to dose (low SGLT2i dose vs. DPP-4i and high SGLT2i dose vs. DPP-4i). We included 12 trials. There was a significantly greater A1c reduction favoring lower SGLT2i dose compared to DPP-4i at ≥52 weeks (w) but not at ≤26 w (MD [95% CI] = -0.12% [-0.23, -0.02] and 0.00% [-0.06, 0.07] respectively) with an absolute A1c reduction of -0.76% vs. -0.75% at ≤26 w and -0.71% vs. -0.58% at ≥52 w respectively. When comparing higher SGLT2i dose vs. DPP-4i, there was a significantly greater A1c reduction for SGLT2i at ≤26 and ≥52 w (MD [95% CI] = -0.13% [-0.20, -0.05] and -0.26% [-0.36, -0.16] respectively) with an absolute A1c reduction of -0.91% vs. -0.77% at ≤26 w and -0.83% vs. -0.55% at ≥52 w respectively. We conclude that low SGLT2i dose had similar A1c reduction as DPP-4i in early treatment but became significant as treatment was prolonged. Higher SGLT2i dose is favored over DPP-4i.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-1797</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-327X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2337/db19-2363-PUB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: American Diabetes Association</publisher><subject>Diabetes ; Diabetes mellitus ; Diabetes mellitus (non-insulin dependent) ; FDA approval ; Hemoglobin</subject><ispartof>Diabetes (New York, N.Y.), 2019-06, Vol.68 (Supplement_1)</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Diabetes Association Jun 1, 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1101-c45e3fb119a9b34a14664177fbea4f89556c2377131c575442ff899126ca76c93</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>UHRIG, JARROD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MISHRIKY, BASEM M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PAGE, STEPHANIE O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SEWELL, KERRY</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>POWELL, JAMES R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PATIL, SHIVAJIRAO P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CUMMINGS, DOYLE M.</creatorcontrib><title>2363-PUB: The Efficacy of Low vs. High FDA-Approved SGLT2 Inhibitor Dose Compared with DPP-4 Inhibitors: A Meta-analysis</title><title>Diabetes (New York, N.Y.)</title><description>All FDA-approved SGLT2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are currently available in two doses. While most SGLT2i have demonstrated CV benefit, there may be a difference in hemoglobin A1c (A1c) reduction between both doses. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of both SGLT2i doses compared to maximum DPP-4 inhibitor (DPP-4i) dose. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and CINAHL for randomized trials comparing at least one FDA-approved SGLT2i dose to maximum DPP-4i dose in type 2 diabetes and reporting a change in A1c. We performed two separate analyses according to dose (low SGLT2i dose vs. DPP-4i and high SGLT2i dose vs. DPP-4i). We included 12 trials. There was a significantly greater A1c reduction favoring lower SGLT2i dose compared to DPP-4i at ≥52 weeks (w) but not at ≤26 w (MD [95% CI] = -0.12% [-0.23, -0.02] and 0.00% [-0.06, 0.07] respectively) with an absolute A1c reduction of -0.76% vs. -0.75% at ≤26 w and -0.71% vs. -0.58% at ≥52 w respectively. When comparing higher SGLT2i dose vs. DPP-4i, there was a significantly greater A1c reduction for SGLT2i at ≤26 and ≥52 w (MD [95% CI] = -0.13% [-0.20, -0.05] and -0.26% [-0.36, -0.16] respectively) with an absolute A1c reduction of -0.91% vs. -0.77% at ≤26 w and -0.83% vs. -0.55% at ≥52 w respectively. We conclude that low SGLT2i dose had similar A1c reduction as DPP-4i in early treatment but became significant as treatment was prolonged. Higher SGLT2i dose is favored over DPP-4i.</description><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Diabetes mellitus</subject><subject>Diabetes mellitus (non-insulin dependent)</subject><subject>FDA approval</subject><subject>Hemoglobin</subject><issn>0012-1797</issn><issn>1939-327X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkE1LAzEQhoMoWKtH7wHPqZkku2l6W_sNFQu24G3Jpom7pW3Wzba1_94tVWQOA_M-DC8PQo9AO4xz-bzKQBHGY07my5cr1ALFFeFMflyjFqXACEglb9FdCGtKadxMC33_8T28yC0eOlcYbU7YOzzzR3wIHTwpPnM8GiQkKcvKH-wKv49nC4anu7zIitpXeOCDxX2_LXXVpMeizvFgPifiHwk9nOBXW2uid3pzCkW4RzdOb4J9-N1ttBwNF_0Jmb2Np_1kRgwABWJEZLnLAJRWGRcaRBwLkNJlVgvXVVEUG8alBA4mkpEQzDVXBSw2WsZG8TZ6uvxtun_tbajTtd9XTYmQMia6ggKPoKHIhTKVD6GyLi2rYqurUwo0PctNz3LTs6y0kcV_AEFgaIs</recordid><startdate>20190601</startdate><enddate>20190601</enddate><creator>UHRIG, JARROD</creator><creator>MISHRIKY, BASEM M.</creator><creator>PAGE, STEPHANIE O.</creator><creator>SEWELL, KERRY</creator><creator>POWELL, JAMES R.</creator><creator>PATIL, SHIVAJIRAO P.</creator><creator>CUMMINGS, DOYLE M.</creator><general>American Diabetes Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190601</creationdate><title>2363-PUB: The Efficacy of Low vs. High FDA-Approved SGLT2 Inhibitor Dose Compared with DPP-4 Inhibitors: A Meta-analysis</title><author>UHRIG, JARROD ; MISHRIKY, BASEM M. ; PAGE, STEPHANIE O. ; SEWELL, KERRY ; POWELL, JAMES R. ; PATIL, SHIVAJIRAO P. ; CUMMINGS, DOYLE M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1101-c45e3fb119a9b34a14664177fbea4f89556c2377131c575442ff899126ca76c93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Diabetes mellitus</topic><topic>Diabetes mellitus (non-insulin dependent)</topic><topic>FDA approval</topic><topic>Hemoglobin</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>UHRIG, JARROD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MISHRIKY, BASEM M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PAGE, STEPHANIE O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SEWELL, KERRY</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>POWELL, JAMES R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PATIL, SHIVAJIRAO P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CUMMINGS, DOYLE M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>Diabetes (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>UHRIG, JARROD</au><au>MISHRIKY, BASEM M.</au><au>PAGE, STEPHANIE O.</au><au>SEWELL, KERRY</au><au>POWELL, JAMES R.</au><au>PATIL, SHIVAJIRAO P.</au><au>CUMMINGS, DOYLE M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>2363-PUB: The Efficacy of Low vs. High FDA-Approved SGLT2 Inhibitor Dose Compared with DPP-4 Inhibitors: A Meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Diabetes (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><date>2019-06-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>Supplement_1</issue><issn>0012-1797</issn><eissn>1939-327X</eissn><abstract>All FDA-approved SGLT2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are currently available in two doses. While most SGLT2i have demonstrated CV benefit, there may be a difference in hemoglobin A1c (A1c) reduction between both doses. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of both SGLT2i doses compared to maximum DPP-4 inhibitor (DPP-4i) dose. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and CINAHL for randomized trials comparing at least one FDA-approved SGLT2i dose to maximum DPP-4i dose in type 2 diabetes and reporting a change in A1c. We performed two separate analyses according to dose (low SGLT2i dose vs. DPP-4i and high SGLT2i dose vs. DPP-4i). We included 12 trials. There was a significantly greater A1c reduction favoring lower SGLT2i dose compared to DPP-4i at ≥52 weeks (w) but not at ≤26 w (MD [95% CI] = -0.12% [-0.23, -0.02] and 0.00% [-0.06, 0.07] respectively) with an absolute A1c reduction of -0.76% vs. -0.75% at ≤26 w and -0.71% vs. -0.58% at ≥52 w respectively. When comparing higher SGLT2i dose vs. DPP-4i, there was a significantly greater A1c reduction for SGLT2i at ≤26 and ≥52 w (MD [95% CI] = -0.13% [-0.20, -0.05] and -0.26% [-0.36, -0.16] respectively) with an absolute A1c reduction of -0.91% vs. -0.77% at ≤26 w and -0.83% vs. -0.55% at ≥52 w respectively. We conclude that low SGLT2i dose had similar A1c reduction as DPP-4i in early treatment but became significant as treatment was prolonged. Higher SGLT2i dose is favored over DPP-4i.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>American Diabetes Association</pub><doi>10.2337/db19-2363-PUB</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0012-1797
ispartof Diabetes (New York, N.Y.), 2019-06, Vol.68 (Supplement_1)
issn 0012-1797
1939-327X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2248401351
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Diabetes
Diabetes mellitus
Diabetes mellitus (non-insulin dependent)
FDA approval
Hemoglobin
title 2363-PUB: The Efficacy of Low vs. High FDA-Approved SGLT2 Inhibitor Dose Compared with DPP-4 Inhibitors: A Meta-analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T21%3A35%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=2363-PUB:%20The%20Efficacy%20of%20Low%20vs.%20High%20FDA-Approved%20SGLT2%20Inhibitor%20Dose%20Compared%20with%20DPP-4%20Inhibitors:%20A%20Meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Diabetes%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=UHRIG,%20JARROD&rft.date=2019-06-01&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=Supplement_1&rft.issn=0012-1797&rft.eissn=1939-327X&rft_id=info:doi/10.2337/db19-2363-PUB&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2248401351%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2248401351&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true