Sociological perspectives, family policy, family law and children: Adult thinking and sociological tinkering
In recent years, sociological theorizing as part of the analysis of modernization has paid increasing attention to notions of individualism in relation to marriage and domestic relationships. Carol Smart has analysed some recent developments in family law, especially the Children Act 1989 and the Fa...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of social welfare & family law 1999-01, Vol.21 (1), p.23-39 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 39 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 23 |
container_title | The Journal of social welfare & family law |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | James, Adrian L. Richards, Martin P.M. |
description | In recent years, sociological theorizing as part of the analysis of modernization has paid increasing attention to notions of individualism in relation to marriage and domestic relationships. Carol Smart has analysed some recent developments in family law, especially the Children Act 1989 and the Family Law Act 1996, in the light of these theoretical developments. While welcoming this attempt to analyse developments in family law in the light of developing sociological theory, we believe that Smarts arguments are rooted in a sociological tradition, which, together with other disciplines, has failed to recognize sufficiently the importance of children as social actors and the issues that arise from this, such as the rights of children, both in the context of law and family life. We argue that it is time for sociologists and policy-makers alike to give serious consideration to the implications of the issues in the light of recent developments, which make such recognition essential. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/09649069908410551 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_224803418</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>51985813</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4398-4648d8b4b0e09c07f2537c4b0a228d0f3e9d0b99967da3f9067d713df4e3d0873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV9rFTEQxUNR6KXtB-jbIiI-uHZmk80m4kspWoWCD-pzyM2fNpq7WZO91vvtze1ti7RQn4bh_M4ZZoaQY4S3CAJOQHImgUsJgiH0Pe6RBTIuW8k7fEYWW73dAvvkqJSwBIrVIHq5IPFrMiHFdBmMjs3kcpmcmcNvV940Xq9C3DRTisFs7tuorxs92sZchWizG981p3Yd52a-CuPPMF7eiOXf1LkKLlfpkDz3OhZ3dFsPyPePH76dfWovvpx_Pju9aA2jUrSMM2HFki3BgTQw-K6ng6mt7jphwVMnLSyllHywmvq62GAHpNYzRy2IgR6QV7vcKadfa1dmtQrFuBj16NK6KI6cI_ZdBV8_CdYzIcOB3mS-eID-SOs81jVU1zEBlKGoEO4gk1Mp2Xk15bDSeaMQ1PZV6tGrquflbbAu9Vo-69GEcm_sAHvKoGLvd1gYfcorfZ1ytGrWm5jynYc-NWX4r_2RS81_ZvoX_u634A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>224803418</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sociological perspectives, family policy, family law and children: Adult thinking and sociological tinkering</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Taylor & Francis:Master (3349 titles)</source><creator>James, Adrian L. ; Richards, Martin P.M.</creator><creatorcontrib>James, Adrian L. ; Richards, Martin P.M.</creatorcontrib><description>In recent years, sociological theorizing as part of the analysis of modernization has paid increasing attention to notions of individualism in relation to marriage and domestic relationships. Carol Smart has analysed some recent developments in family law, especially the Children Act 1989 and the Family Law Act 1996, in the light of these theoretical developments. While welcoming this attempt to analyse developments in family law in the light of developing sociological theory, we believe that Smarts arguments are rooted in a sociological tradition, which, together with other disciplines, has failed to recognize sufficiently the importance of children as social actors and the issues that arise from this, such as the rights of children, both in the context of law and family life. We argue that it is time for sociologists and policy-makers alike to give serious consideration to the implications of the issues in the light of recent developments, which make such recognition essential.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0964-9069</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-9621</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/09649069908410551</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JSWLEY</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basingstoke: Taylor & Francis Group</publisher><subject>Children ; Children & youth ; Families ; family ; Family law ; Family Policy ; Family Research ; Jurisprudence ; law ; Policy ; Public policy ; Rights ; Sociological perspectives ; Sociological Theory ; Sociology ; Sociology of law and criminology ; Sociology of law and justice</subject><ispartof>The Journal of social welfare & family law, 1999-01, Vol.21 (1), p.23-39</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 1999</rights><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Sweet & Maxwell Stevens Journals 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4398-4648d8b4b0e09c07f2537c4b0a228d0f3e9d0b99967da3f9067d713df4e3d0873</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4398-4648d8b4b0e09c07f2537c4b0a228d0f3e9d0b99967da3f9067d713df4e3d0873</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/09649069908410551$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09649069908410551$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925,31000,33774,33775,59647,60436</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2015340$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>James, Adrian L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richards, Martin P.M.</creatorcontrib><title>Sociological perspectives, family policy, family law and children: Adult thinking and sociological tinkering</title><title>The Journal of social welfare & family law</title><description>In recent years, sociological theorizing as part of the analysis of modernization has paid increasing attention to notions of individualism in relation to marriage and domestic relationships. Carol Smart has analysed some recent developments in family law, especially the Children Act 1989 and the Family Law Act 1996, in the light of these theoretical developments. While welcoming this attempt to analyse developments in family law in the light of developing sociological theory, we believe that Smarts arguments are rooted in a sociological tradition, which, together with other disciplines, has failed to recognize sufficiently the importance of children as social actors and the issues that arise from this, such as the rights of children, both in the context of law and family life. We argue that it is time for sociologists and policy-makers alike to give serious consideration to the implications of the issues in the light of recent developments, which make such recognition essential.</description><subject>Children</subject><subject>Children & youth</subject><subject>Families</subject><subject>family</subject><subject>Family law</subject><subject>Family Policy</subject><subject>Family Research</subject><subject>Jurisprudence</subject><subject>law</subject><subject>Policy</subject><subject>Public policy</subject><subject>Rights</subject><subject>Sociological perspectives</subject><subject>Sociological Theory</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Sociology of law and criminology</subject><subject>Sociology of law and justice</subject><issn>0964-9069</issn><issn>1469-9621</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkV9rFTEQxUNR6KXtB-jbIiI-uHZmk80m4kspWoWCD-pzyM2fNpq7WZO91vvtze1ti7RQn4bh_M4ZZoaQY4S3CAJOQHImgUsJgiH0Pe6RBTIuW8k7fEYWW73dAvvkqJSwBIrVIHq5IPFrMiHFdBmMjs3kcpmcmcNvV940Xq9C3DRTisFs7tuorxs92sZchWizG981p3Yd52a-CuPPMF7eiOXf1LkKLlfpkDz3OhZ3dFsPyPePH76dfWovvpx_Pju9aA2jUrSMM2HFki3BgTQw-K6ng6mt7jphwVMnLSyllHywmvq62GAHpNYzRy2IgR6QV7vcKadfa1dmtQrFuBj16NK6KI6cI_ZdBV8_CdYzIcOB3mS-eID-SOs81jVU1zEBlKGoEO4gk1Mp2Xk15bDSeaMQ1PZV6tGrquflbbAu9Vo-69GEcm_sAHvKoGLvd1gYfcorfZ1ytGrWm5jynYc-NWX4r_2RS81_ZvoX_u634A</recordid><startdate>19990101</startdate><enddate>19990101</enddate><creator>James, Adrian L.</creator><creator>Richards, Martin P.M.</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990101</creationdate><title>Sociological perspectives, family policy, family law and children: Adult thinking and sociological tinkering</title><author>James, Adrian L. ; Richards, Martin P.M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4398-4648d8b4b0e09c07f2537c4b0a228d0f3e9d0b99967da3f9067d713df4e3d0873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Children</topic><topic>Children & youth</topic><topic>Families</topic><topic>family</topic><topic>Family law</topic><topic>Family Policy</topic><topic>Family Research</topic><topic>Jurisprudence</topic><topic>law</topic><topic>Policy</topic><topic>Public policy</topic><topic>Rights</topic><topic>Sociological perspectives</topic><topic>Sociological Theory</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Sociology of law and criminology</topic><topic>Sociology of law and justice</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>James, Adrian L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richards, Martin P.M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of social welfare & family law</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>James, Adrian L.</au><au>Richards, Martin P.M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sociological perspectives, family policy, family law and children: Adult thinking and sociological tinkering</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of social welfare & family law</jtitle><date>1999-01-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>23</spage><epage>39</epage><pages>23-39</pages><issn>0964-9069</issn><eissn>1469-9621</eissn><coden>JSWLEY</coden><abstract>In recent years, sociological theorizing as part of the analysis of modernization has paid increasing attention to notions of individualism in relation to marriage and domestic relationships. Carol Smart has analysed some recent developments in family law, especially the Children Act 1989 and the Family Law Act 1996, in the light of these theoretical developments. While welcoming this attempt to analyse developments in family law in the light of developing sociological theory, we believe that Smarts arguments are rooted in a sociological tradition, which, together with other disciplines, has failed to recognize sufficiently the importance of children as social actors and the issues that arise from this, such as the rights of children, both in the context of law and family life. We argue that it is time for sociologists and policy-makers alike to give serious consideration to the implications of the issues in the light of recent developments, which make such recognition essential.</abstract><cop>Basingstoke</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/09649069908410551</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0964-9069 |
ispartof | The Journal of social welfare & family law, 1999-01, Vol.21 (1), p.23-39 |
issn | 0964-9069 1469-9621 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_224803418 |
source | Sociological Abstracts; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Taylor & Francis:Master (3349 titles) |
subjects | Children Children & youth Families family Family law Family Policy Family Research Jurisprudence law Policy Public policy Rights Sociological perspectives Sociological Theory Sociology Sociology of law and criminology Sociology of law and justice |
title | Sociological perspectives, family policy, family law and children: Adult thinking and sociological tinkering |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T15%3A47%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sociological%20perspectives,%20family%20policy,%20family%20law%20and%20children:%20Adult%20thinking%20and%20sociological%20tinkering&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20social%20welfare%20&%20family%20law&rft.au=James,%20Adrian%20L.&rft.date=1999-01-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=23&rft.epage=39&rft.pages=23-39&rft.issn=0964-9069&rft.eissn=1469-9621&rft.coden=JSWLEY&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/09649069908410551&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E51985813%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=224803418&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |