Transforming institutional quality in resource curse contexts: The Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative in Myanmar

Many resource-rich countries face the paradoxical situation that their wealth in natural resources coincides with low economic and human development rates. To address this so-called resource curse, academics and practitioners turn their hopes to institutional quality. Yet whether, how and with what...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Resources policy 2019-06, Vol.61, p.200-209
Hauptverfasser: Vijge, Marjanneke J., Metcalfe, Robin, Wallbott, Linda, Oberlack, Christoph
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 209
container_issue
container_start_page 200
container_title Resources policy
container_volume 61
creator Vijge, Marjanneke J.
Metcalfe, Robin
Wallbott, Linda
Oberlack, Christoph
description Many resource-rich countries face the paradoxical situation that their wealth in natural resources coincides with low economic and human development rates. To address this so-called resource curse, academics and practitioners turn their hopes to institutional quality. Yet whether, how and with what consequences institutional quality is transformed in resource curse contexts remains poorly understood, especially so at subnational levels. The most widely implemented initiative that seeks to address the resource curse through enhanced institutional quality is the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI). This article analyses to what extent and how the EITI transforms institutional quality at national and subnational levels in Myanmar, focusing on transparency, civil society participation and accountability. We show that many transformations go beyond the official EITI process and report. While the EITI report itself is not heavily used by civil society organisations (CSOs), the EITI process motivated CSOs to gather data and organise themselves both around and beyond EITI-related issues at subnational levels. Such participatory processes of constituting transparency improved relations between the (regional) government, CSOs and private companies, but also created new forms of in- and exclusion among civil society. While avenues opened up for CSOs to demand accountability regarding the impacts of resource extraction, the extent to which they are able to trigger action of extractive industry actors in their region remains limited. In conclusion, we argue that transformations in institutional quality are not characterised by a linear trajectory from transparency in the form of the EITI report to accountability, facilitated by civil society participation in EITI multi-stakeholder groups, as the EITI standard posits. Rather, transformations in institutional quality are characterised by spin-offs, dynamic interlinkages, trade-offs, limitations and a reinforcing cycle between participation and transparency within and beyond the EITI. •We analyse how the EITI transforms institutional quality in Myanmar, a resource curse context.•We focus on (interlinkages between) transparency, participation and accountability.•Transformations are mostly not in line with the EITI’s theory of change.•They are characterised by reinforcing cycles, interlinkages and unexpected spin-offs.•This should be acknowledged in enhancing/analysing institutional quality in resource curs
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.02.006
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2247644408</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301420717303975</els_id><sourcerecordid>2247644408</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-9041ff5e06067d49c99a1fc09726eadbfb26b64866356bb8a2c3c63e9e82508c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEFPwzAMhSMEEmPwG6jEucVJ07TlNk0DJg1xGecoTV3ItLVbkk6b-PNkK-LKxZas52e_j5B7CgkFKh5XiUXX9XbbrRMGtEyAJQDigoxokadxLji9JCNIgcacQX5NbpxbAUCWF2JEvpdWta7p7Ma0n5FpnTe-96Zr1Tra9Wpt_DFMo-GExkj31oXatR4P3j1Fyy-MZgdvlfZmj9G8rXvnrUEXnY23ymKrj2FuvFFnSXB7O6p2o-wtuWrU2uHdbx-Tj-fZcvoaL95f5tPJItacZT4ugdOmyRAEiLzmpS5LRRsNZc4EqrpqKiYqwQsh0kxUVaGYTrVIscSCZVDodEweBt-t7XY9Oi9XIUxI6CRjPADiHIqgygeVtp1zFhu5tSZ8eZQU5Im0XMk_0vJEWgKTgXTYnAybGELsDVrptAmxsTYWtZd1Z_71-AFay490</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2247644408</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Transforming institutional quality in resource curse contexts: The Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative in Myanmar</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Vijge, Marjanneke J. ; Metcalfe, Robin ; Wallbott, Linda ; Oberlack, Christoph</creator><creatorcontrib>Vijge, Marjanneke J. ; Metcalfe, Robin ; Wallbott, Linda ; Oberlack, Christoph</creatorcontrib><description>Many resource-rich countries face the paradoxical situation that their wealth in natural resources coincides with low economic and human development rates. To address this so-called resource curse, academics and practitioners turn their hopes to institutional quality. Yet whether, how and with what consequences institutional quality is transformed in resource curse contexts remains poorly understood, especially so at subnational levels. The most widely implemented initiative that seeks to address the resource curse through enhanced institutional quality is the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI). This article analyses to what extent and how the EITI transforms institutional quality at national and subnational levels in Myanmar, focusing on transparency, civil society participation and accountability. We show that many transformations go beyond the official EITI process and report. While the EITI report itself is not heavily used by civil society organisations (CSOs), the EITI process motivated CSOs to gather data and organise themselves both around and beyond EITI-related issues at subnational levels. Such participatory processes of constituting transparency improved relations between the (regional) government, CSOs and private companies, but also created new forms of in- and exclusion among civil society. While avenues opened up for CSOs to demand accountability regarding the impacts of resource extraction, the extent to which they are able to trigger action of extractive industry actors in their region remains limited. In conclusion, we argue that transformations in institutional quality are not characterised by a linear trajectory from transparency in the form of the EITI report to accountability, facilitated by civil society participation in EITI multi-stakeholder groups, as the EITI standard posits. Rather, transformations in institutional quality are characterised by spin-offs, dynamic interlinkages, trade-offs, limitations and a reinforcing cycle between participation and transparency within and beyond the EITI. •We analyse how the EITI transforms institutional quality in Myanmar, a resource curse context.•We focus on (interlinkages between) transparency, participation and accountability.•Transformations are mostly not in line with the EITI’s theory of change.•They are characterised by reinforcing cycles, interlinkages and unexpected spin-offs.•This should be acknowledged in enhancing/analysing institutional quality in resource curse contexts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4207</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7641</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.02.006</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Academic staff ; Accountability ; Citizen participation ; Civil society ; Closely held corporations ; Economic development ; Extraction ; Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) ; Human development ; Institutional quality ; Mining industry ; Myanmar/Burma ; Natural resources ; Participation ; Quality ; Resource curse ; Spin dynamics ; Transformations ; Transparency ; Wealth</subject><ispartof>Resources policy, 2019-06, Vol.61, p.200-209</ispartof><rights>2019 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Jun 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-9041ff5e06067d49c99a1fc09726eadbfb26b64866356bb8a2c3c63e9e82508c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-9041ff5e06067d49c99a1fc09726eadbfb26b64866356bb8a2c3c63e9e82508c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420717303975$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27845,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vijge, Marjanneke J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Metcalfe, Robin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallbott, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oberlack, Christoph</creatorcontrib><title>Transforming institutional quality in resource curse contexts: The Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative in Myanmar</title><title>Resources policy</title><description>Many resource-rich countries face the paradoxical situation that their wealth in natural resources coincides with low economic and human development rates. To address this so-called resource curse, academics and practitioners turn their hopes to institutional quality. Yet whether, how and with what consequences institutional quality is transformed in resource curse contexts remains poorly understood, especially so at subnational levels. The most widely implemented initiative that seeks to address the resource curse through enhanced institutional quality is the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI). This article analyses to what extent and how the EITI transforms institutional quality at national and subnational levels in Myanmar, focusing on transparency, civil society participation and accountability. We show that many transformations go beyond the official EITI process and report. While the EITI report itself is not heavily used by civil society organisations (CSOs), the EITI process motivated CSOs to gather data and organise themselves both around and beyond EITI-related issues at subnational levels. Such participatory processes of constituting transparency improved relations between the (regional) government, CSOs and private companies, but also created new forms of in- and exclusion among civil society. While avenues opened up for CSOs to demand accountability regarding the impacts of resource extraction, the extent to which they are able to trigger action of extractive industry actors in their region remains limited. In conclusion, we argue that transformations in institutional quality are not characterised by a linear trajectory from transparency in the form of the EITI report to accountability, facilitated by civil society participation in EITI multi-stakeholder groups, as the EITI standard posits. Rather, transformations in institutional quality are characterised by spin-offs, dynamic interlinkages, trade-offs, limitations and a reinforcing cycle between participation and transparency within and beyond the EITI. •We analyse how the EITI transforms institutional quality in Myanmar, a resource curse context.•We focus on (interlinkages between) transparency, participation and accountability.•Transformations are mostly not in line with the EITI’s theory of change.•They are characterised by reinforcing cycles, interlinkages and unexpected spin-offs.•This should be acknowledged in enhancing/analysing institutional quality in resource curse contexts.</description><subject>Academic staff</subject><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Citizen participation</subject><subject>Civil society</subject><subject>Closely held corporations</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Extraction</subject><subject>Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI)</subject><subject>Human development</subject><subject>Institutional quality</subject><subject>Mining industry</subject><subject>Myanmar/Burma</subject><subject>Natural resources</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>Resource curse</subject><subject>Spin dynamics</subject><subject>Transformations</subject><subject>Transparency</subject><subject>Wealth</subject><issn>0301-4207</issn><issn>1873-7641</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEFPwzAMhSMEEmPwG6jEucVJ07TlNk0DJg1xGecoTV3ItLVbkk6b-PNkK-LKxZas52e_j5B7CgkFKh5XiUXX9XbbrRMGtEyAJQDigoxokadxLji9JCNIgcacQX5NbpxbAUCWF2JEvpdWta7p7Ma0n5FpnTe-96Zr1Tra9Wpt_DFMo-GExkj31oXatR4P3j1Fyy-MZgdvlfZmj9G8rXvnrUEXnY23ymKrj2FuvFFnSXB7O6p2o-wtuWrU2uHdbx-Tj-fZcvoaL95f5tPJItacZT4ugdOmyRAEiLzmpS5LRRsNZc4EqrpqKiYqwQsh0kxUVaGYTrVIscSCZVDodEweBt-t7XY9Oi9XIUxI6CRjPADiHIqgygeVtp1zFhu5tSZ8eZQU5Im0XMk_0vJEWgKTgXTYnAybGELsDVrptAmxsTYWtZd1Z_71-AFay490</recordid><startdate>201906</startdate><enddate>201906</enddate><creator>Vijge, Marjanneke J.</creator><creator>Metcalfe, Robin</creator><creator>Wallbott, Linda</creator><creator>Oberlack, Christoph</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201906</creationdate><title>Transforming institutional quality in resource curse contexts: The Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative in Myanmar</title><author>Vijge, Marjanneke J. ; Metcalfe, Robin ; Wallbott, Linda ; Oberlack, Christoph</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-9041ff5e06067d49c99a1fc09726eadbfb26b64866356bb8a2c3c63e9e82508c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Academic staff</topic><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Citizen participation</topic><topic>Civil society</topic><topic>Closely held corporations</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Extraction</topic><topic>Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI)</topic><topic>Human development</topic><topic>Institutional quality</topic><topic>Mining industry</topic><topic>Myanmar/Burma</topic><topic>Natural resources</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>Resource curse</topic><topic>Spin dynamics</topic><topic>Transformations</topic><topic>Transparency</topic><topic>Wealth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vijge, Marjanneke J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Metcalfe, Robin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallbott, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oberlack, Christoph</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Resources policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vijge, Marjanneke J.</au><au>Metcalfe, Robin</au><au>Wallbott, Linda</au><au>Oberlack, Christoph</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Transforming institutional quality in resource curse contexts: The Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative in Myanmar</atitle><jtitle>Resources policy</jtitle><date>2019-06</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>61</volume><spage>200</spage><epage>209</epage><pages>200-209</pages><issn>0301-4207</issn><eissn>1873-7641</eissn><abstract>Many resource-rich countries face the paradoxical situation that their wealth in natural resources coincides with low economic and human development rates. To address this so-called resource curse, academics and practitioners turn their hopes to institutional quality. Yet whether, how and with what consequences institutional quality is transformed in resource curse contexts remains poorly understood, especially so at subnational levels. The most widely implemented initiative that seeks to address the resource curse through enhanced institutional quality is the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI). This article analyses to what extent and how the EITI transforms institutional quality at national and subnational levels in Myanmar, focusing on transparency, civil society participation and accountability. We show that many transformations go beyond the official EITI process and report. While the EITI report itself is not heavily used by civil society organisations (CSOs), the EITI process motivated CSOs to gather data and organise themselves both around and beyond EITI-related issues at subnational levels. Such participatory processes of constituting transparency improved relations between the (regional) government, CSOs and private companies, but also created new forms of in- and exclusion among civil society. While avenues opened up for CSOs to demand accountability regarding the impacts of resource extraction, the extent to which they are able to trigger action of extractive industry actors in their region remains limited. In conclusion, we argue that transformations in institutional quality are not characterised by a linear trajectory from transparency in the form of the EITI report to accountability, facilitated by civil society participation in EITI multi-stakeholder groups, as the EITI standard posits. Rather, transformations in institutional quality are characterised by spin-offs, dynamic interlinkages, trade-offs, limitations and a reinforcing cycle between participation and transparency within and beyond the EITI. •We analyse how the EITI transforms institutional quality in Myanmar, a resource curse context.•We focus on (interlinkages between) transparency, participation and accountability.•Transformations are mostly not in line with the EITI’s theory of change.•They are characterised by reinforcing cycles, interlinkages and unexpected spin-offs.•This should be acknowledged in enhancing/analysing institutional quality in resource curse contexts.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.02.006</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-4207
ispartof Resources policy, 2019-06, Vol.61, p.200-209
issn 0301-4207
1873-7641
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2247644408
source PAIS Index; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Academic staff
Accountability
Citizen participation
Civil society
Closely held corporations
Economic development
Extraction
Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI)
Human development
Institutional quality
Mining industry
Myanmar/Burma
Natural resources
Participation
Quality
Resource curse
Spin dynamics
Transformations
Transparency
Wealth
title Transforming institutional quality in resource curse contexts: The Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative in Myanmar
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T23%3A44%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Transforming%20institutional%20quality%20in%20resource%20curse%20contexts:%20The%20Extractive%20Industries%20Transparency%20Initiative%20in%20Myanmar&rft.jtitle=Resources%20policy&rft.au=Vijge,%20Marjanneke%20J.&rft.date=2019-06&rft.volume=61&rft.spage=200&rft.epage=209&rft.pages=200-209&rft.issn=0301-4207&rft.eissn=1873-7641&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.02.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2247644408%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2247644408&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0301420717303975&rfr_iscdi=true