Transforming institutional quality in resource curse contexts: The Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative in Myanmar
Many resource-rich countries face the paradoxical situation that their wealth in natural resources coincides with low economic and human development rates. To address this so-called resource curse, academics and practitioners turn their hopes to institutional quality. Yet whether, how and with what...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Resources policy 2019-06, Vol.61, p.200-209 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 209 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 200 |
container_title | Resources policy |
container_volume | 61 |
creator | Vijge, Marjanneke J. Metcalfe, Robin Wallbott, Linda Oberlack, Christoph |
description | Many resource-rich countries face the paradoxical situation that their wealth in natural resources coincides with low economic and human development rates. To address this so-called resource curse, academics and practitioners turn their hopes to institutional quality. Yet whether, how and with what consequences institutional quality is transformed in resource curse contexts remains poorly understood, especially so at subnational levels. The most widely implemented initiative that seeks to address the resource curse through enhanced institutional quality is the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI). This article analyses to what extent and how the EITI transforms institutional quality at national and subnational levels in Myanmar, focusing on transparency, civil society participation and accountability. We show that many transformations go beyond the official EITI process and report. While the EITI report itself is not heavily used by civil society organisations (CSOs), the EITI process motivated CSOs to gather data and organise themselves both around and beyond EITI-related issues at subnational levels. Such participatory processes of constituting transparency improved relations between the (regional) government, CSOs and private companies, but also created new forms of in- and exclusion among civil society. While avenues opened up for CSOs to demand accountability regarding the impacts of resource extraction, the extent to which they are able to trigger action of extractive industry actors in their region remains limited. In conclusion, we argue that transformations in institutional quality are not characterised by a linear trajectory from transparency in the form of the EITI report to accountability, facilitated by civil society participation in EITI multi-stakeholder groups, as the EITI standard posits. Rather, transformations in institutional quality are characterised by spin-offs, dynamic interlinkages, trade-offs, limitations and a reinforcing cycle between participation and transparency within and beyond the EITI.
•We analyse how the EITI transforms institutional quality in Myanmar, a resource curse context.•We focus on (interlinkages between) transparency, participation and accountability.•Transformations are mostly not in line with the EITI’s theory of change.•They are characterised by reinforcing cycles, interlinkages and unexpected spin-offs.•This should be acknowledged in enhancing/analysing institutional quality in resource curs |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.02.006 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2247644408</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301420717303975</els_id><sourcerecordid>2247644408</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-9041ff5e06067d49c99a1fc09726eadbfb26b64866356bb8a2c3c63e9e82508c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEFPwzAMhSMEEmPwG6jEucVJ07TlNk0DJg1xGecoTV3ItLVbkk6b-PNkK-LKxZas52e_j5B7CgkFKh5XiUXX9XbbrRMGtEyAJQDigoxokadxLji9JCNIgcacQX5NbpxbAUCWF2JEvpdWta7p7Ma0n5FpnTe-96Zr1Tra9Wpt_DFMo-GExkj31oXatR4P3j1Fyy-MZgdvlfZmj9G8rXvnrUEXnY23ymKrj2FuvFFnSXB7O6p2o-wtuWrU2uHdbx-Tj-fZcvoaL95f5tPJItacZT4ugdOmyRAEiLzmpS5LRRsNZc4EqrpqKiYqwQsh0kxUVaGYTrVIscSCZVDodEweBt-t7XY9Oi9XIUxI6CRjPADiHIqgygeVtp1zFhu5tSZ8eZQU5Im0XMk_0vJEWgKTgXTYnAybGELsDVrptAmxsTYWtZd1Z_71-AFay490</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2247644408</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Transforming institutional quality in resource curse contexts: The Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative in Myanmar</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Vijge, Marjanneke J. ; Metcalfe, Robin ; Wallbott, Linda ; Oberlack, Christoph</creator><creatorcontrib>Vijge, Marjanneke J. ; Metcalfe, Robin ; Wallbott, Linda ; Oberlack, Christoph</creatorcontrib><description>Many resource-rich countries face the paradoxical situation that their wealth in natural resources coincides with low economic and human development rates. To address this so-called resource curse, academics and practitioners turn their hopes to institutional quality. Yet whether, how and with what consequences institutional quality is transformed in resource curse contexts remains poorly understood, especially so at subnational levels. The most widely implemented initiative that seeks to address the resource curse through enhanced institutional quality is the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI). This article analyses to what extent and how the EITI transforms institutional quality at national and subnational levels in Myanmar, focusing on transparency, civil society participation and accountability. We show that many transformations go beyond the official EITI process and report. While the EITI report itself is not heavily used by civil society organisations (CSOs), the EITI process motivated CSOs to gather data and organise themselves both around and beyond EITI-related issues at subnational levels. Such participatory processes of constituting transparency improved relations between the (regional) government, CSOs and private companies, but also created new forms of in- and exclusion among civil society. While avenues opened up for CSOs to demand accountability regarding the impacts of resource extraction, the extent to which they are able to trigger action of extractive industry actors in their region remains limited. In conclusion, we argue that transformations in institutional quality are not characterised by a linear trajectory from transparency in the form of the EITI report to accountability, facilitated by civil society participation in EITI multi-stakeholder groups, as the EITI standard posits. Rather, transformations in institutional quality are characterised by spin-offs, dynamic interlinkages, trade-offs, limitations and a reinforcing cycle between participation and transparency within and beyond the EITI.
•We analyse how the EITI transforms institutional quality in Myanmar, a resource curse context.•We focus on (interlinkages between) transparency, participation and accountability.•Transformations are mostly not in line with the EITI’s theory of change.•They are characterised by reinforcing cycles, interlinkages and unexpected spin-offs.•This should be acknowledged in enhancing/analysing institutional quality in resource curse contexts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4207</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7641</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.02.006</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Academic staff ; Accountability ; Citizen participation ; Civil society ; Closely held corporations ; Economic development ; Extraction ; Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) ; Human development ; Institutional quality ; Mining industry ; Myanmar/Burma ; Natural resources ; Participation ; Quality ; Resource curse ; Spin dynamics ; Transformations ; Transparency ; Wealth</subject><ispartof>Resources policy, 2019-06, Vol.61, p.200-209</ispartof><rights>2019 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Jun 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-9041ff5e06067d49c99a1fc09726eadbfb26b64866356bb8a2c3c63e9e82508c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-9041ff5e06067d49c99a1fc09726eadbfb26b64866356bb8a2c3c63e9e82508c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420717303975$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27845,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vijge, Marjanneke J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Metcalfe, Robin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallbott, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oberlack, Christoph</creatorcontrib><title>Transforming institutional quality in resource curse contexts: The Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative in Myanmar</title><title>Resources policy</title><description>Many resource-rich countries face the paradoxical situation that their wealth in natural resources coincides with low economic and human development rates. To address this so-called resource curse, academics and practitioners turn their hopes to institutional quality. Yet whether, how and with what consequences institutional quality is transformed in resource curse contexts remains poorly understood, especially so at subnational levels. The most widely implemented initiative that seeks to address the resource curse through enhanced institutional quality is the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI). This article analyses to what extent and how the EITI transforms institutional quality at national and subnational levels in Myanmar, focusing on transparency, civil society participation and accountability. We show that many transformations go beyond the official EITI process and report. While the EITI report itself is not heavily used by civil society organisations (CSOs), the EITI process motivated CSOs to gather data and organise themselves both around and beyond EITI-related issues at subnational levels. Such participatory processes of constituting transparency improved relations between the (regional) government, CSOs and private companies, but also created new forms of in- and exclusion among civil society. While avenues opened up for CSOs to demand accountability regarding the impacts of resource extraction, the extent to which they are able to trigger action of extractive industry actors in their region remains limited. In conclusion, we argue that transformations in institutional quality are not characterised by a linear trajectory from transparency in the form of the EITI report to accountability, facilitated by civil society participation in EITI multi-stakeholder groups, as the EITI standard posits. Rather, transformations in institutional quality are characterised by spin-offs, dynamic interlinkages, trade-offs, limitations and a reinforcing cycle between participation and transparency within and beyond the EITI.
•We analyse how the EITI transforms institutional quality in Myanmar, a resource curse context.•We focus on (interlinkages between) transparency, participation and accountability.•Transformations are mostly not in line with the EITI’s theory of change.•They are characterised by reinforcing cycles, interlinkages and unexpected spin-offs.•This should be acknowledged in enhancing/analysing institutional quality in resource curse contexts.</description><subject>Academic staff</subject><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Citizen participation</subject><subject>Civil society</subject><subject>Closely held corporations</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Extraction</subject><subject>Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI)</subject><subject>Human development</subject><subject>Institutional quality</subject><subject>Mining industry</subject><subject>Myanmar/Burma</subject><subject>Natural resources</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>Resource curse</subject><subject>Spin dynamics</subject><subject>Transformations</subject><subject>Transparency</subject><subject>Wealth</subject><issn>0301-4207</issn><issn>1873-7641</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEFPwzAMhSMEEmPwG6jEucVJ07TlNk0DJg1xGecoTV3ItLVbkk6b-PNkK-LKxZas52e_j5B7CgkFKh5XiUXX9XbbrRMGtEyAJQDigoxokadxLji9JCNIgcacQX5NbpxbAUCWF2JEvpdWta7p7Ma0n5FpnTe-96Zr1Tra9Wpt_DFMo-GExkj31oXatR4P3j1Fyy-MZgdvlfZmj9G8rXvnrUEXnY23ymKrj2FuvFFnSXB7O6p2o-wtuWrU2uHdbx-Tj-fZcvoaL95f5tPJItacZT4ugdOmyRAEiLzmpS5LRRsNZc4EqrpqKiYqwQsh0kxUVaGYTrVIscSCZVDodEweBt-t7XY9Oi9XIUxI6CRjPADiHIqgygeVtp1zFhu5tSZ8eZQU5Im0XMk_0vJEWgKTgXTYnAybGELsDVrptAmxsTYWtZd1Z_71-AFay490</recordid><startdate>201906</startdate><enddate>201906</enddate><creator>Vijge, Marjanneke J.</creator><creator>Metcalfe, Robin</creator><creator>Wallbott, Linda</creator><creator>Oberlack, Christoph</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201906</creationdate><title>Transforming institutional quality in resource curse contexts: The Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative in Myanmar</title><author>Vijge, Marjanneke J. ; Metcalfe, Robin ; Wallbott, Linda ; Oberlack, Christoph</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-9041ff5e06067d49c99a1fc09726eadbfb26b64866356bb8a2c3c63e9e82508c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Academic staff</topic><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Citizen participation</topic><topic>Civil society</topic><topic>Closely held corporations</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Extraction</topic><topic>Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI)</topic><topic>Human development</topic><topic>Institutional quality</topic><topic>Mining industry</topic><topic>Myanmar/Burma</topic><topic>Natural resources</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>Resource curse</topic><topic>Spin dynamics</topic><topic>Transformations</topic><topic>Transparency</topic><topic>Wealth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vijge, Marjanneke J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Metcalfe, Robin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallbott, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oberlack, Christoph</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Resources policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vijge, Marjanneke J.</au><au>Metcalfe, Robin</au><au>Wallbott, Linda</au><au>Oberlack, Christoph</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Transforming institutional quality in resource curse contexts: The Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative in Myanmar</atitle><jtitle>Resources policy</jtitle><date>2019-06</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>61</volume><spage>200</spage><epage>209</epage><pages>200-209</pages><issn>0301-4207</issn><eissn>1873-7641</eissn><abstract>Many resource-rich countries face the paradoxical situation that their wealth in natural resources coincides with low economic and human development rates. To address this so-called resource curse, academics and practitioners turn their hopes to institutional quality. Yet whether, how and with what consequences institutional quality is transformed in resource curse contexts remains poorly understood, especially so at subnational levels. The most widely implemented initiative that seeks to address the resource curse through enhanced institutional quality is the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI). This article analyses to what extent and how the EITI transforms institutional quality at national and subnational levels in Myanmar, focusing on transparency, civil society participation and accountability. We show that many transformations go beyond the official EITI process and report. While the EITI report itself is not heavily used by civil society organisations (CSOs), the EITI process motivated CSOs to gather data and organise themselves both around and beyond EITI-related issues at subnational levels. Such participatory processes of constituting transparency improved relations between the (regional) government, CSOs and private companies, but also created new forms of in- and exclusion among civil society. While avenues opened up for CSOs to demand accountability regarding the impacts of resource extraction, the extent to which they are able to trigger action of extractive industry actors in their region remains limited. In conclusion, we argue that transformations in institutional quality are not characterised by a linear trajectory from transparency in the form of the EITI report to accountability, facilitated by civil society participation in EITI multi-stakeholder groups, as the EITI standard posits. Rather, transformations in institutional quality are characterised by spin-offs, dynamic interlinkages, trade-offs, limitations and a reinforcing cycle between participation and transparency within and beyond the EITI.
•We analyse how the EITI transforms institutional quality in Myanmar, a resource curse context.•We focus on (interlinkages between) transparency, participation and accountability.•Transformations are mostly not in line with the EITI’s theory of change.•They are characterised by reinforcing cycles, interlinkages and unexpected spin-offs.•This should be acknowledged in enhancing/analysing institutional quality in resource curse contexts.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.02.006</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0301-4207 |
ispartof | Resources policy, 2019-06, Vol.61, p.200-209 |
issn | 0301-4207 1873-7641 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2247644408 |
source | PAIS Index; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Academic staff Accountability Citizen participation Civil society Closely held corporations Economic development Extraction Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) Human development Institutional quality Mining industry Myanmar/Burma Natural resources Participation Quality Resource curse Spin dynamics Transformations Transparency Wealth |
title | Transforming institutional quality in resource curse contexts: The Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative in Myanmar |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T23%3A44%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Transforming%20institutional%20quality%20in%20resource%20curse%20contexts:%20The%20Extractive%20Industries%20Transparency%20Initiative%20in%20Myanmar&rft.jtitle=Resources%20policy&rft.au=Vijge,%20Marjanneke%20J.&rft.date=2019-06&rft.volume=61&rft.spage=200&rft.epage=209&rft.pages=200-209&rft.issn=0301-4207&rft.eissn=1873-7641&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.02.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2247644408%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2247644408&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0301420717303975&rfr_iscdi=true |