A data-driven approach to sampling matrix selection for compressive sensing
Sampling is a fundamental aspect of any implementation of compressive sensing. Typically, the choice of sampling method is guided by the reconstruction basis. However, this approach can be problematic with respect to certain hardware constraints and is not responsive to domain-specific context. We p...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | arXiv.org 2019-06 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | arXiv.org |
container_volume | |
creator | Farnell, Elin Kvinge, Henry Dixon, John P Dupuis, Julia R Kirby, Michael Peterson, Chris Schundler, Elizabeth C Smith, Christian W |
description | Sampling is a fundamental aspect of any implementation of compressive sensing. Typically, the choice of sampling method is guided by the reconstruction basis. However, this approach can be problematic with respect to certain hardware constraints and is not responsive to domain-specific context. We propose a method for defining an order for a sampling basis that is optimal with respect to capturing variance in data, thus allowing for meaningful sensing at any desired level of compression. We focus on the Walsh-Hadamard sampling basis for its relevance to hardware constraints, but our approach applies to any sampling basis of interest. We illustrate the effectiveness of our method on the Physical Sciences Inc. Fabry-P\'{e}rot interferometer sensor multispectral dataset, the Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Lab FTIR-based longwave infrared sensor hyperspectral dataset, and a Colorado State University Swiss Ranger depth image dataset. The spectral datasets consist of simulant experiments, including releases of chemicals such as GAA and SF6. We combine our sampling and reconstruction with the adaptive coherence estimator (ACE) and bulk coherence for chemical detection and we incorporate an algorithmic threshold for ACE values to determine the presence or absence of a chemical. We compare results across sampling methods in this context. We have successful chemical detection at a compression rate of 90%. For all three datasets, we compare our sampling approach to standard orderings of sampling basis such as random, sequency, and an analog of sequency that we term `frequency.' In one instance, the peak signal to noise ratio was improved by over 30% across a test set of depth images. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2245971441</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2245971441</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_22459714413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjLEKwjAURYMgWLT_8MC5kL6kVkcRRXB1L6FNNaVNYl4qfr4Z_ACnO5xz7oJlKERZ7CXiiuVEA-ccdzVWlcjY7QidiqrognlrC8r74FT7hOiA1ORHYx8wqRjMB0iPuo3GWehdgNZNPmiilCViKYkbtuzVSDr_7ZptL-f76Vqkz9esKTaDm4NNqEGU1aEupSzFf9YXOF89ow</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2245971441</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A data-driven approach to sampling matrix selection for compressive sensing</title><source>Open Access: Freely Accessible Journals by multiple vendors</source><creator>Farnell, Elin ; Kvinge, Henry ; Dixon, John P ; Dupuis, Julia R ; Kirby, Michael ; Peterson, Chris ; Schundler, Elizabeth C ; Smith, Christian W</creator><creatorcontrib>Farnell, Elin ; Kvinge, Henry ; Dixon, John P ; Dupuis, Julia R ; Kirby, Michael ; Peterson, Chris ; Schundler, Elizabeth C ; Smith, Christian W</creatorcontrib><description>Sampling is a fundamental aspect of any implementation of compressive sensing. Typically, the choice of sampling method is guided by the reconstruction basis. However, this approach can be problematic with respect to certain hardware constraints and is not responsive to domain-specific context. We propose a method for defining an order for a sampling basis that is optimal with respect to capturing variance in data, thus allowing for meaningful sensing at any desired level of compression. We focus on the Walsh-Hadamard sampling basis for its relevance to hardware constraints, but our approach applies to any sampling basis of interest. We illustrate the effectiveness of our method on the Physical Sciences Inc. Fabry-P\'{e}rot interferometer sensor multispectral dataset, the Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Lab FTIR-based longwave infrared sensor hyperspectral dataset, and a Colorado State University Swiss Ranger depth image dataset. The spectral datasets consist of simulant experiments, including releases of chemicals such as GAA and SF6. We combine our sampling and reconstruction with the adaptive coherence estimator (ACE) and bulk coherence for chemical detection and we incorporate an algorithmic threshold for ACE values to determine the presence or absence of a chemical. We compare results across sampling methods in this context. We have successful chemical detection at a compression rate of 90%. For all three datasets, we compare our sampling approach to standard orderings of sampling basis such as random, sequency, and an analog of sequency that we term `frequency.' In one instance, the peak signal to noise ratio was improved by over 30% across a test set of depth images.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Adaptive sampling ; Coherence ; Datasets ; Detection ; Hardware ; Infrared detectors ; Organic chemistry ; Physical sciences ; Reconstruction ; Sampling methods ; Signal to noise ratio</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2019-06</ispartof><rights>2019. This work is published under http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Farnell, Elin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kvinge, Henry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dixon, John P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dupuis, Julia R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirby, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peterson, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schundler, Elizabeth C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Christian W</creatorcontrib><title>A data-driven approach to sampling matrix selection for compressive sensing</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>Sampling is a fundamental aspect of any implementation of compressive sensing. Typically, the choice of sampling method is guided by the reconstruction basis. However, this approach can be problematic with respect to certain hardware constraints and is not responsive to domain-specific context. We propose a method for defining an order for a sampling basis that is optimal with respect to capturing variance in data, thus allowing for meaningful sensing at any desired level of compression. We focus on the Walsh-Hadamard sampling basis for its relevance to hardware constraints, but our approach applies to any sampling basis of interest. We illustrate the effectiveness of our method on the Physical Sciences Inc. Fabry-P\'{e}rot interferometer sensor multispectral dataset, the Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Lab FTIR-based longwave infrared sensor hyperspectral dataset, and a Colorado State University Swiss Ranger depth image dataset. The spectral datasets consist of simulant experiments, including releases of chemicals such as GAA and SF6. We combine our sampling and reconstruction with the adaptive coherence estimator (ACE) and bulk coherence for chemical detection and we incorporate an algorithmic threshold for ACE values to determine the presence or absence of a chemical. We compare results across sampling methods in this context. We have successful chemical detection at a compression rate of 90%. For all three datasets, we compare our sampling approach to standard orderings of sampling basis such as random, sequency, and an analog of sequency that we term `frequency.' In one instance, the peak signal to noise ratio was improved by over 30% across a test set of depth images.</description><subject>Adaptive sampling</subject><subject>Coherence</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Detection</subject><subject>Hardware</subject><subject>Infrared detectors</subject><subject>Organic chemistry</subject><subject>Physical sciences</subject><subject>Reconstruction</subject><subject>Sampling methods</subject><subject>Signal to noise ratio</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjLEKwjAURYMgWLT_8MC5kL6kVkcRRXB1L6FNNaVNYl4qfr4Z_ACnO5xz7oJlKERZ7CXiiuVEA-ccdzVWlcjY7QidiqrognlrC8r74FT7hOiA1ORHYx8wqRjMB0iPuo3GWehdgNZNPmiilCViKYkbtuzVSDr_7ZptL-f76Vqkz9esKTaDm4NNqEGU1aEupSzFf9YXOF89ow</recordid><startdate>20190620</startdate><enddate>20190620</enddate><creator>Farnell, Elin</creator><creator>Kvinge, Henry</creator><creator>Dixon, John P</creator><creator>Dupuis, Julia R</creator><creator>Kirby, Michael</creator><creator>Peterson, Chris</creator><creator>Schundler, Elizabeth C</creator><creator>Smith, Christian W</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190620</creationdate><title>A data-driven approach to sampling matrix selection for compressive sensing</title><author>Farnell, Elin ; Kvinge, Henry ; Dixon, John P ; Dupuis, Julia R ; Kirby, Michael ; Peterson, Chris ; Schundler, Elizabeth C ; Smith, Christian W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_22459714413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adaptive sampling</topic><topic>Coherence</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Detection</topic><topic>Hardware</topic><topic>Infrared detectors</topic><topic>Organic chemistry</topic><topic>Physical sciences</topic><topic>Reconstruction</topic><topic>Sampling methods</topic><topic>Signal to noise ratio</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Farnell, Elin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kvinge, Henry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dixon, John P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dupuis, Julia R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirby, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peterson, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schundler, Elizabeth C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Christian W</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Farnell, Elin</au><au>Kvinge, Henry</au><au>Dixon, John P</au><au>Dupuis, Julia R</au><au>Kirby, Michael</au><au>Peterson, Chris</au><au>Schundler, Elizabeth C</au><au>Smith, Christian W</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>A data-driven approach to sampling matrix selection for compressive sensing</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2019-06-20</date><risdate>2019</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>Sampling is a fundamental aspect of any implementation of compressive sensing. Typically, the choice of sampling method is guided by the reconstruction basis. However, this approach can be problematic with respect to certain hardware constraints and is not responsive to domain-specific context. We propose a method for defining an order for a sampling basis that is optimal with respect to capturing variance in data, thus allowing for meaningful sensing at any desired level of compression. We focus on the Walsh-Hadamard sampling basis for its relevance to hardware constraints, but our approach applies to any sampling basis of interest. We illustrate the effectiveness of our method on the Physical Sciences Inc. Fabry-P\'{e}rot interferometer sensor multispectral dataset, the Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Lab FTIR-based longwave infrared sensor hyperspectral dataset, and a Colorado State University Swiss Ranger depth image dataset. The spectral datasets consist of simulant experiments, including releases of chemicals such as GAA and SF6. We combine our sampling and reconstruction with the adaptive coherence estimator (ACE) and bulk coherence for chemical detection and we incorporate an algorithmic threshold for ACE values to determine the presence or absence of a chemical. We compare results across sampling methods in this context. We have successful chemical detection at a compression rate of 90%. For all three datasets, we compare our sampling approach to standard orderings of sampling basis such as random, sequency, and an analog of sequency that we term `frequency.' In one instance, the peak signal to noise ratio was improved by over 30% across a test set of depth images.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 2331-8422 |
ispartof | arXiv.org, 2019-06 |
issn | 2331-8422 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2245971441 |
source | Open Access: Freely Accessible Journals by multiple vendors |
subjects | Adaptive sampling Coherence Datasets Detection Hardware Infrared detectors Organic chemistry Physical sciences Reconstruction Sampling methods Signal to noise ratio |
title | A data-driven approach to sampling matrix selection for compressive sensing |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T09%3A11%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=A%20data-driven%20approach%20to%20sampling%20matrix%20selection%20for%20compressive%20sensing&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Farnell,%20Elin&rft.date=2019-06-20&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2245971441%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2245971441&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |