The First Days of School in the Classrooms of Two More Effective and Four Less Effective Primary-Grades Teachers

We observed 6 primary-grades teachers in public and private schools in this study. Based on mid-year observations, 2 of these teachers were much more effective compared to the other 4 in producing greater student engagement and literacy progress, as determined by video and observation data of multip...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Elementary school journal 2004-03, Vol.104 (4), p.269-287
Hauptverfasser: Bohn, Catherine M., Roehrig, Alysia D., Pressley, Michael
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 287
container_issue 4
container_start_page 269
container_title The Elementary school journal
container_volume 104
creator Bohn, Catherine M.
Roehrig, Alysia D.
Pressley, Michael
description We observed 6 primary-grades teachers in public and private schools in this study. Based on mid-year observations, 2 of these teachers were much more effective compared to the other 4 in producing greater student engagement and literacy progress, as determined by video and observation data of multiple content areas and as rated by the Classroom AIMS instrument. These 2 more effective teachers began the school year differently than the other teachers, again documented through observation of their teaching. Consistent with previous studies, the 2 more effective teachers did more to establish routines and procedures at the beginning of the year. In addition, compared to the less effective teachers, on the first days of school the more effective teachers offered more engaging activities, more enthusiastically introduced reading and writing, indicated higher expectations, praised specific accomplishments of students, pointed out when specific students were behaving in a praiseworthy fashion, and encouraged student self-regulation. In short, the first days of school were very different in the classes taught by the more effective teachers from those taught by the less effective teachers.
doi_str_mv 10.1086/499753
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_224521254</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ696175</ericid><jstor_id>3202942</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3202942</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c288t-d80e29eb22d4ad6df2852f0f27f140cc9982571f7fc6f80b8680ffe701d69f1f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkEtLAzEQgIMoWF-_wEPw4G01mU2yyVFqW5WKgut5SfOgW9qmJlul_97oSvE0zHwf80LogpIbSqS4ZUpVvDxAA8o5KyRU6hANCKFlwZVkx-gkpUVOuSr5AG3qucPjNqYO3-tdwsHjNzMPYYnbNe4yGy51SjGE1S-rvwJ-DtHhkffOdO2nw3pt8ThsI566lP7VX2O70nFXTKK2LuHaaTN3MZ2hI6-XyZ3_xVP0Ph7Vw4di-jJ5HN5NCwNSdoWVxIFyMwDLtBXWg-TgiYfKU0aMUUoCr6ivvBFekpkUkuTRFaFWKE99eYqu-r6bGD62LnXNIi-5ziMbAMaBAmdZuu4lE0O-0vlm02_dUNL8PLPpn5nFy150sTV7afQklKCZ7_EidSHueQkEFIPyG1Q9eCs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>224521254</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The First Days of School in the Classrooms of Two More Effective and Four Less Effective Primary-Grades Teachers</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Bohn, Catherine M. ; Roehrig, Alysia D. ; Pressley, Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Bohn, Catherine M. ; Roehrig, Alysia D. ; Pressley, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>We observed 6 primary-grades teachers in public and private schools in this study. Based on mid-year observations, 2 of these teachers were much more effective compared to the other 4 in producing greater student engagement and literacy progress, as determined by video and observation data of multiple content areas and as rated by the Classroom AIMS instrument. These 2 more effective teachers began the school year differently than the other teachers, again documented through observation of their teaching. Consistent with previous studies, the 2 more effective teachers did more to establish routines and procedures at the beginning of the year. In addition, compared to the less effective teachers, on the first days of school the more effective teachers offered more engaging activities, more enthusiastically introduced reading and writing, indicated higher expectations, praised specific accomplishments of students, pointed out when specific students were behaving in a praiseworthy fashion, and encouraged student self-regulation. In short, the first days of school were very different in the classes taught by the more effective teachers from those taught by the less effective teachers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-5984</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1554-8279</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/499753</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ELSJA2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Academic Achievement ; Classroom environment ; Classroom management ; Classroom Observation Techniques ; Classroom observations ; Classroom Techniques ; Comparative Analysis ; Elementary School Teachers ; Elementary schools ; Emergent Literacy ; Enthusiasm ; Learner Engagement ; Literature ; Mathematics Achievement ; Observational research ; Private Schools ; Public Schools ; Reading instruction ; School schedules ; Standardized Tests ; Student Motivation ; Teacher Effectiveness ; Teachers ; Teaching methods ; Writing instruction</subject><ispartof>The Elementary school journal, 2004-03, Vol.104 (4), p.269-287</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2004 The University of Chicago</rights><rights>Copyright University of Chicago, acting through its Press Mar 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c288t-d80e29eb22d4ad6df2852f0f27f140cc9982571f7fc6f80b8680ffe701d69f1f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c288t-d80e29eb22d4ad6df2852f0f27f140cc9982571f7fc6f80b8680ffe701d69f1f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3202942$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3202942$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ696175$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bohn, Catherine M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roehrig, Alysia D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pressley, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>The First Days of School in the Classrooms of Two More Effective and Four Less Effective Primary-Grades Teachers</title><title>The Elementary school journal</title><description>We observed 6 primary-grades teachers in public and private schools in this study. Based on mid-year observations, 2 of these teachers were much more effective compared to the other 4 in producing greater student engagement and literacy progress, as determined by video and observation data of multiple content areas and as rated by the Classroom AIMS instrument. These 2 more effective teachers began the school year differently than the other teachers, again documented through observation of their teaching. Consistent with previous studies, the 2 more effective teachers did more to establish routines and procedures at the beginning of the year. In addition, compared to the less effective teachers, on the first days of school the more effective teachers offered more engaging activities, more enthusiastically introduced reading and writing, indicated higher expectations, praised specific accomplishments of students, pointed out when specific students were behaving in a praiseworthy fashion, and encouraged student self-regulation. In short, the first days of school were very different in the classes taught by the more effective teachers from those taught by the less effective teachers.</description><subject>Academic Achievement</subject><subject>Classroom environment</subject><subject>Classroom management</subject><subject>Classroom Observation Techniques</subject><subject>Classroom observations</subject><subject>Classroom Techniques</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Elementary School Teachers</subject><subject>Elementary schools</subject><subject>Emergent Literacy</subject><subject>Enthusiasm</subject><subject>Learner Engagement</subject><subject>Literature</subject><subject>Mathematics Achievement</subject><subject>Observational research</subject><subject>Private Schools</subject><subject>Public Schools</subject><subject>Reading instruction</subject><subject>School schedules</subject><subject>Standardized Tests</subject><subject>Student Motivation</subject><subject>Teacher Effectiveness</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching methods</subject><subject>Writing instruction</subject><issn>0013-5984</issn><issn>1554-8279</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkEtLAzEQgIMoWF-_wEPw4G01mU2yyVFqW5WKgut5SfOgW9qmJlul_97oSvE0zHwf80LogpIbSqS4ZUpVvDxAA8o5KyRU6hANCKFlwZVkx-gkpUVOuSr5AG3qucPjNqYO3-tdwsHjNzMPYYnbNe4yGy51SjGE1S-rvwJ-DtHhkffOdO2nw3pt8ThsI566lP7VX2O70nFXTKK2LuHaaTN3MZ2hI6-XyZ3_xVP0Ph7Vw4di-jJ5HN5NCwNSdoWVxIFyMwDLtBXWg-TgiYfKU0aMUUoCr6ivvBFekpkUkuTRFaFWKE99eYqu-r6bGD62LnXNIi-5ziMbAMaBAmdZuu4lE0O-0vlm02_dUNL8PLPpn5nFy150sTV7afQklKCZ7_EidSHueQkEFIPyG1Q9eCs</recordid><startdate>20040301</startdate><enddate>20040301</enddate><creator>Bohn, Catherine M.</creator><creator>Roehrig, Alysia D.</creator><creator>Pressley, Michael</creator><general>University of Chicago Press</general><general>University of Chicago Press, Journals Division</general><general>University of Chicago, acting through its Press</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040301</creationdate><title>The First Days of School in the Classrooms of Two More Effective and Four Less Effective Primary-Grades Teachers</title><author>Bohn, Catherine M. ; Roehrig, Alysia D. ; Pressley, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c288t-d80e29eb22d4ad6df2852f0f27f140cc9982571f7fc6f80b8680ffe701d69f1f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Academic Achievement</topic><topic>Classroom environment</topic><topic>Classroom management</topic><topic>Classroom Observation Techniques</topic><topic>Classroom observations</topic><topic>Classroom Techniques</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Elementary School Teachers</topic><topic>Elementary schools</topic><topic>Emergent Literacy</topic><topic>Enthusiasm</topic><topic>Learner Engagement</topic><topic>Literature</topic><topic>Mathematics Achievement</topic><topic>Observational research</topic><topic>Private Schools</topic><topic>Public Schools</topic><topic>Reading instruction</topic><topic>School schedules</topic><topic>Standardized Tests</topic><topic>Student Motivation</topic><topic>Teacher Effectiveness</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching methods</topic><topic>Writing instruction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bohn, Catherine M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roehrig, Alysia D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pressley, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Elementary school journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bohn, Catherine M.</au><au>Roehrig, Alysia D.</au><au>Pressley, Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ696175</ericid><atitle>The First Days of School in the Classrooms of Two More Effective and Four Less Effective Primary-Grades Teachers</atitle><jtitle>The Elementary school journal</jtitle><date>2004-03-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>104</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>269</spage><epage>287</epage><pages>269-287</pages><issn>0013-5984</issn><eissn>1554-8279</eissn><coden>ELSJA2</coden><abstract>We observed 6 primary-grades teachers in public and private schools in this study. Based on mid-year observations, 2 of these teachers were much more effective compared to the other 4 in producing greater student engagement and literacy progress, as determined by video and observation data of multiple content areas and as rated by the Classroom AIMS instrument. These 2 more effective teachers began the school year differently than the other teachers, again documented through observation of their teaching. Consistent with previous studies, the 2 more effective teachers did more to establish routines and procedures at the beginning of the year. In addition, compared to the less effective teachers, on the first days of school the more effective teachers offered more engaging activities, more enthusiastically introduced reading and writing, indicated higher expectations, praised specific accomplishments of students, pointed out when specific students were behaving in a praiseworthy fashion, and encouraged student self-regulation. In short, the first days of school were very different in the classes taught by the more effective teachers from those taught by the less effective teachers.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>University of Chicago Press</pub><doi>10.1086/499753</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0013-5984
ispartof The Elementary school journal, 2004-03, Vol.104 (4), p.269-287
issn 0013-5984
1554-8279
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_224521254
source JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EBSCOhost Education Source
subjects Academic Achievement
Classroom environment
Classroom management
Classroom Observation Techniques
Classroom observations
Classroom Techniques
Comparative Analysis
Elementary School Teachers
Elementary schools
Emergent Literacy
Enthusiasm
Learner Engagement
Literature
Mathematics Achievement
Observational research
Private Schools
Public Schools
Reading instruction
School schedules
Standardized Tests
Student Motivation
Teacher Effectiveness
Teachers
Teaching methods
Writing instruction
title The First Days of School in the Classrooms of Two More Effective and Four Less Effective Primary-Grades Teachers
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T14%3A41%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20First%20Days%20of%20School%20in%20the%20Classrooms%20of%20Two%20More%20Effective%20and%20Four%20Less%20Effective%20Primary-Grades%20Teachers&rft.jtitle=The%20Elementary%20school%20journal&rft.au=Bohn,%20Catherine%20M.&rft.date=2004-03-01&rft.volume=104&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=269&rft.epage=287&rft.pages=269-287&rft.issn=0013-5984&rft.eissn=1554-8279&rft.coden=ELSJA2&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/499753&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3202942%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=224521254&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ696175&rft_jstor_id=3202942&rfr_iscdi=true