ORIGINALISM VERSUS LIVING CONSTITUTIONALISM: THE CONCEPTUAL STRUCTURE OF THE GREAT DEBATE

ORIGINALISM VERSUS LIVING CONSTITUTIONALISM: THE CONCEPTUAL STRUCTURE OF THE GREAT DEBATE

The great debate between originalism and living constitutionalism ought to focus on the merits, including normative arguments for and against various forms of each theory. Frequently, however, discussion turns to disputes about definitions and concepts. This Essay investigates the conceptual structu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Northwestern University law review 2019-01, Vol.113 (6), p.1243-1296
1. Verfasser: Solum, Lawrence B
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Constitutional law
Debates
Disputes
Legal studies
Provisions
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1296
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1243
container_title Northwestern University law review
container_volume 113
creator Solum, Lawrence B
description The great debate between originalism and living constitutionalism ought to focus on the merits, including normative arguments for and against various forms of each theory. Frequently, however, discussion turns to disputes about definitions and concepts. This Essay investigates the conceptual structure of the great debate. It lays out a variety of issues that arise when theorists attempt to define "originalism" and "living constitutionalism" and proposes criteria for settling definitional disputes.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2243438920</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2243438920</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p183t-6b1d9ed1e46044d82be4de8d39fb3ee43deaf62328a0f001a349ed0c7b41dfc03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjstOwzAURL0AiVL6D5ZYR7r2dfNgZ4KbWjJxldiVWFVJ7SwqREvT_j-Bshppzmhm7sgMgBcJLjP2QB7H8QAAjC2zGfmwja50LY1u3-lWNa1vqdFbXVe0tHXrtPNO2xt_oW6tfu1SbZyXhrau8aXzjaJ29ceqRklH39SrdOqJ3A_d5xgX_zonfqVcuU6MrXQpTXJiOV6StGehiIFFkYIQIed9FCHmAYuhxxgFhtgNKUeedzBMrzsUUxz2WS9YGPaAc_J86z2dj9_XOF52h-P1_DVN7jgXKDAvOOAPwTdF_g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2243438920</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>ORIGINALISM VERSUS LIVING CONSTITUTIONALISM: THE CONCEPTUAL STRUCTURE OF THE GREAT DEBATE</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Solum, Lawrence B</creator><creatorcontrib>Solum, Lawrence B</creatorcontrib><description>The great debate between originalism and living constitutionalism ought to focus on the merits, including normative arguments for and against various forms of each theory. Frequently, however, discussion turns to disputes about definitions and concepts. This Essay investigates the conceptual structure of the great debate. It lays out a variety of issues that arise when theorists attempt to define "originalism" and "living constitutionalism" and proposes criteria for settling definitional disputes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0029-3571</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: Northwestern University (on behalf of School of Law)</publisher><subject>Constitutional law ; Debates ; Disputes ; Legal studies ; Provisions</subject><ispartof>Northwestern University law review, 2019-01, Vol.113 (6), p.1243-1296</ispartof><rights>Copyright Northwestern University (on behalf of School of Law) 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Solum, Lawrence B</creatorcontrib><title>ORIGINALISM VERSUS LIVING CONSTITUTIONALISM: THE CONCEPTUAL STRUCTURE OF THE GREAT DEBATE</title><title>Northwestern University law review</title><description>The great debate between originalism and living constitutionalism ought to focus on the merits, including normative arguments for and against various forms of each theory. Frequently, however, discussion turns to disputes about definitions and concepts. This Essay investigates the conceptual structure of the great debate. It lays out a variety of issues that arise when theorists attempt to define "originalism" and "living constitutionalism" and proposes criteria for settling definitional disputes.</description><subject>Constitutional law</subject><subject>Debates</subject><subject>Disputes</subject><subject>Legal studies</subject><subject>Provisions</subject><issn>0029-3571</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNotjstOwzAURL0AiVL6D5ZYR7r2dfNgZ4KbWjJxldiVWFVJ7SwqREvT_j-Bshppzmhm7sgMgBcJLjP2QB7H8QAAjC2zGfmwja50LY1u3-lWNa1vqdFbXVe0tHXrtPNO2xt_oW6tfu1SbZyXhrau8aXzjaJ29ceqRklH39SrdOqJ3A_d5xgX_zonfqVcuU6MrXQpTXJiOV6StGehiIFFkYIQIed9FCHmAYuhxxgFhtgNKUeedzBMrzsUUxz2WS9YGPaAc_J86z2dj9_XOF52h-P1_DVN7jgXKDAvOOAPwTdF_g</recordid><startdate>20190101</startdate><enddate>20190101</enddate><creator>Solum, Lawrence B</creator><general>Northwestern University (on behalf of School of Law)</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190101</creationdate><title>ORIGINALISM VERSUS LIVING CONSTITUTIONALISM: THE CONCEPTUAL STRUCTURE OF THE GREAT DEBATE</title><author>Solum, Lawrence B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p183t-6b1d9ed1e46044d82be4de8d39fb3ee43deaf62328a0f001a349ed0c7b41dfc03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Constitutional law</topic><topic>Debates</topic><topic>Disputes</topic><topic>Legal studies</topic><topic>Provisions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Solum, Lawrence B</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Northwestern University law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Solum, Lawrence B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>ORIGINALISM VERSUS LIVING CONSTITUTIONALISM: THE CONCEPTUAL STRUCTURE OF THE GREAT DEBATE</atitle><jtitle>Northwestern University law review</jtitle><date>2019-01-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>113</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1243</spage><epage>1296</epage><pages>1243-1296</pages><issn>0029-3571</issn><abstract>The great debate between originalism and living constitutionalism ought to focus on the merits, including normative arguments for and against various forms of each theory. Frequently, however, discussion turns to disputes about definitions and concepts. This Essay investigates the conceptual structure of the great debate. It lays out a variety of issues that arise when theorists attempt to define "originalism" and "living constitutionalism" and proposes criteria for settling definitional disputes.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>Northwestern University (on behalf of School of Law)</pub><tpages>54</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0029-3571
ispartof Northwestern University law review, 2019-01, Vol.113 (6), p.1243-1296
issn 0029-3571
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2243438920
source HeinOnline Law Journal Library
subjects Constitutional law
Debates
Disputes
Legal studies
Provisions
title ORIGINALISM VERSUS LIVING CONSTITUTIONALISM: THE CONCEPTUAL STRUCTURE OF THE GREAT DEBATE
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T08%3A46%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=ORIGINALISM%20VERSUS%20LIVING%20CONSTITUTIONALISM:%20THE%20CONCEPTUAL%20STRUCTURE%20OF%20THE%20GREAT%20DEBATE&rft.jtitle=Northwestern%20University%20law%20review&rft.au=Solum,%20Lawrence%20B&rft.date=2019-01-01&rft.volume=113&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1243&rft.epage=1296&rft.pages=1243-1296&rft.issn=0029-3571&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2243438920%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2243438920&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true