Beyond Tracking and Detracking: The Dimensions of Organizational Differentiation in Schools
Schools use an array of strategies to match curricula and instruction to students’ heterogeneous skills. Although generations of scholars have debated “tracking” and its consequences, the literature fails to account for diversity of school-level sorting practices. In this article, we draw on the wor...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sociology of education 2019-07, Vol.92 (3), p.293-322 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 322 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 293 |
container_title | Sociology of education |
container_volume | 92 |
creator | Domina, Thurston McEachin, Andrew Hanselman, Paul Agarwal, Priyanka Hwang, NaYoung Lewis, Ryan W. |
description | Schools use an array of strategies to match curricula and instruction to students’ heterogeneous skills. Although generations of scholars have debated “tracking” and its consequences, the literature fails to account for diversity of school-level sorting practices. In this article, we draw on the work of Sørensen and others to articulate and develop empirical measures of five distinct dimensions of within-school cross-classroom tracking systems: (1) the degree of curricular differentiation, (2) the extent to which sorting practices generate skills-homogeneous classrooms, (3) the rate at which students enroll in advanced courses, (4) the extent to which students move between tracks over time, and (5) the relationship between track assignments across subject areas. Analyses of longitudinal administrative data following approximately 20,000 eighth graders enrolled in 23 middle schools through the 10th grade indicate that these dimensions of tracking are empirically separable and have divergent relationships with student achievement and the production of inequality. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0038040719851879 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2243417407</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1219711</ericid><jstor_id>48588685</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_0038040719851879</sage_id><sourcerecordid>48588685</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-39577a31968a7a5e8ca95fb2a35af6b557da26c0b0ae19a7f32f6e9842a3d18c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUDtPwzAQthBIhMLOAqrEbPDFsX0eoZSXKrGUObq4TtUCSbHTof--rlIViYVbTqfvdfoYuwRxC2DMnRASRSEMWFSAxh6xDKy0HJWRxyzbwXyHn7KzGJcijdaYsesHv2mb2XAayH0umvmQ0vHou_15zk5q-or-Yr8H7ONpPB298Mn78-vofsKdVLLj0ipjSILVSIaUR0dW1VVOUlGtK6XMjHLtRCXIgyVTy7zW3mKRGDNAJwfspvddhfZn7WNXLtt1aFJkmeeFLMCk1xNL9CwX2hiDr8tVWHxT2JQgyl0L5d8WkuSql_iwcAf6-A1ysAYg4bzHI839b-j_fsvYteFgWKBC1KjkFkkXbI0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2243417407</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Beyond Tracking and Detracking: The Dimensions of Organizational Differentiation in Schools</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Domina, Thurston ; McEachin, Andrew ; Hanselman, Paul ; Agarwal, Priyanka ; Hwang, NaYoung ; Lewis, Ryan W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Domina, Thurston ; McEachin, Andrew ; Hanselman, Paul ; Agarwal, Priyanka ; Hwang, NaYoung ; Lewis, Ryan W.</creatorcontrib><description>Schools use an array of strategies to match curricula and instruction to students’ heterogeneous skills. Although generations of scholars have debated “tracking” and its consequences, the literature fails to account for diversity of school-level sorting practices. In this article, we draw on the work of Sørensen and others to articulate and develop empirical measures of five distinct dimensions of within-school cross-classroom tracking systems: (1) the degree of curricular differentiation, (2) the extent to which sorting practices generate skills-homogeneous classrooms, (3) the rate at which students enroll in advanced courses, (4) the extent to which students move between tracks over time, and (5) the relationship between track assignments across subject areas. Analyses of longitudinal administrative data following approximately 20,000 eighth graders enrolled in 23 middle schools through the 10th grade indicate that these dimensions of tracking are empirically separable and have divergent relationships with student achievement and the production of inequality.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0038-0407</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-8573</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0038040719851879</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications, Inc</publisher><subject>Ability Grouping ; Academic Achievement ; Advanced Courses ; Classrooms ; Correlation ; Curricula ; Differentiation ; Educational attainment ; Educational Opportunities ; English ; English Language Learners ; Enrollment Trends ; Equal Education ; Ethnicity ; Grade 10 ; Grade 7 ; Grade 8 ; Grade 9 ; High Achievement ; Homogeneous Grouping ; Inequality ; Language Arts ; Longitudinal Studies ; Low Achievement ; Mathematics Achievement ; Mathematics Instruction ; Middle School Students ; Middle schools ; Public Schools ; School Districts ; Schools ; Skills ; Student Characteristics ; Student Records ; Students ; Teaching ; Track System (Education) ; Tracking</subject><ispartof>Sociology of education, 2019-07, Vol.92 (3), p.293-322</ispartof><rights>American Sociological Association 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-39577a31968a7a5e8ca95fb2a35af6b557da26c0b0ae19a7f32f6e9842a3d18c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-39577a31968a7a5e8ca95fb2a35af6b557da26c0b0ae19a7f32f6e9842a3d18c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48588685$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48588685$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,21819,27924,27925,30999,33774,43621,43622,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1219711$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Domina, Thurston</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McEachin, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanselman, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agarwal, Priyanka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hwang, NaYoung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Ryan W.</creatorcontrib><title>Beyond Tracking and Detracking: The Dimensions of Organizational Differentiation in Schools</title><title>Sociology of education</title><addtitle>Sociol Educ</addtitle><description>Schools use an array of strategies to match curricula and instruction to students’ heterogeneous skills. Although generations of scholars have debated “tracking” and its consequences, the literature fails to account for diversity of school-level sorting practices. In this article, we draw on the work of Sørensen and others to articulate and develop empirical measures of five distinct dimensions of within-school cross-classroom tracking systems: (1) the degree of curricular differentiation, (2) the extent to which sorting practices generate skills-homogeneous classrooms, (3) the rate at which students enroll in advanced courses, (4) the extent to which students move between tracks over time, and (5) the relationship between track assignments across subject areas. Analyses of longitudinal administrative data following approximately 20,000 eighth graders enrolled in 23 middle schools through the 10th grade indicate that these dimensions of tracking are empirically separable and have divergent relationships with student achievement and the production of inequality.</description><subject>Ability Grouping</subject><subject>Academic Achievement</subject><subject>Advanced Courses</subject><subject>Classrooms</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Curricula</subject><subject>Differentiation</subject><subject>Educational attainment</subject><subject>Educational Opportunities</subject><subject>English</subject><subject>English Language Learners</subject><subject>Enrollment Trends</subject><subject>Equal Education</subject><subject>Ethnicity</subject><subject>Grade 10</subject><subject>Grade 7</subject><subject>Grade 8</subject><subject>Grade 9</subject><subject>High Achievement</subject><subject>Homogeneous Grouping</subject><subject>Inequality</subject><subject>Language Arts</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Low Achievement</subject><subject>Mathematics Achievement</subject><subject>Mathematics Instruction</subject><subject>Middle School Students</subject><subject>Middle schools</subject><subject>Public Schools</subject><subject>School Districts</subject><subject>Schools</subject><subject>Skills</subject><subject>Student Characteristics</subject><subject>Student Records</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Track System (Education)</subject><subject>Tracking</subject><issn>0038-0407</issn><issn>1939-8573</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUDtPwzAQthBIhMLOAqrEbPDFsX0eoZSXKrGUObq4TtUCSbHTof--rlIViYVbTqfvdfoYuwRxC2DMnRASRSEMWFSAxh6xDKy0HJWRxyzbwXyHn7KzGJcijdaYsesHv2mb2XAayH0umvmQ0vHou_15zk5q-or-Yr8H7ONpPB298Mn78-vofsKdVLLj0ipjSILVSIaUR0dW1VVOUlGtK6XMjHLtRCXIgyVTy7zW3mKRGDNAJwfspvddhfZn7WNXLtt1aFJkmeeFLMCk1xNL9CwX2hiDr8tVWHxT2JQgyl0L5d8WkuSql_iwcAf6-A1ysAYg4bzHI839b-j_fsvYteFgWKBC1KjkFkkXbI0</recordid><startdate>20190701</startdate><enddate>20190701</enddate><creator>Domina, Thurston</creator><creator>McEachin, Andrew</creator><creator>Hanselman, Paul</creator><creator>Agarwal, Priyanka</creator><creator>Hwang, NaYoung</creator><creator>Lewis, Ryan W.</creator><general>Sage Publications, Inc</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>American Sociological Association</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190701</creationdate><title>Beyond Tracking and Detracking</title><author>Domina, Thurston ; McEachin, Andrew ; Hanselman, Paul ; Agarwal, Priyanka ; Hwang, NaYoung ; Lewis, Ryan W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-39577a31968a7a5e8ca95fb2a35af6b557da26c0b0ae19a7f32f6e9842a3d18c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Ability Grouping</topic><topic>Academic Achievement</topic><topic>Advanced Courses</topic><topic>Classrooms</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Curricula</topic><topic>Differentiation</topic><topic>Educational attainment</topic><topic>Educational Opportunities</topic><topic>English</topic><topic>English Language Learners</topic><topic>Enrollment Trends</topic><topic>Equal Education</topic><topic>Ethnicity</topic><topic>Grade 10</topic><topic>Grade 7</topic><topic>Grade 8</topic><topic>Grade 9</topic><topic>High Achievement</topic><topic>Homogeneous Grouping</topic><topic>Inequality</topic><topic>Language Arts</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Low Achievement</topic><topic>Mathematics Achievement</topic><topic>Mathematics Instruction</topic><topic>Middle School Students</topic><topic>Middle schools</topic><topic>Public Schools</topic><topic>School Districts</topic><topic>Schools</topic><topic>Skills</topic><topic>Student Characteristics</topic><topic>Student Records</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Track System (Education)</topic><topic>Tracking</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Domina, Thurston</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McEachin, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanselman, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agarwal, Priyanka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hwang, NaYoung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Ryan W.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Sociology of education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Domina, Thurston</au><au>McEachin, Andrew</au><au>Hanselman, Paul</au><au>Agarwal, Priyanka</au><au>Hwang, NaYoung</au><au>Lewis, Ryan W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1219711</ericid><atitle>Beyond Tracking and Detracking: The Dimensions of Organizational Differentiation in Schools</atitle><jtitle>Sociology of education</jtitle><addtitle>Sociol Educ</addtitle><date>2019-07-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>92</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>293</spage><epage>322</epage><pages>293-322</pages><issn>0038-0407</issn><eissn>1939-8573</eissn><abstract>Schools use an array of strategies to match curricula and instruction to students’ heterogeneous skills. Although generations of scholars have debated “tracking” and its consequences, the literature fails to account for diversity of school-level sorting practices. In this article, we draw on the work of Sørensen and others to articulate and develop empirical measures of five distinct dimensions of within-school cross-classroom tracking systems: (1) the degree of curricular differentiation, (2) the extent to which sorting practices generate skills-homogeneous classrooms, (3) the rate at which students enroll in advanced courses, (4) the extent to which students move between tracks over time, and (5) the relationship between track assignments across subject areas. Analyses of longitudinal administrative data following approximately 20,000 eighth graders enrolled in 23 middle schools through the 10th grade indicate that these dimensions of tracking are empirically separable and have divergent relationships with student achievement and the production of inequality.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>Sage Publications, Inc</pub><doi>10.1177/0038040719851879</doi><tpages>30</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0038-0407 |
ispartof | Sociology of education, 2019-07, Vol.92 (3), p.293-322 |
issn | 0038-0407 1939-8573 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2243417407 |
source | Access via SAGE; Sociological Abstracts; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Ability Grouping Academic Achievement Advanced Courses Classrooms Correlation Curricula Differentiation Educational attainment Educational Opportunities English English Language Learners Enrollment Trends Equal Education Ethnicity Grade 10 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 9 High Achievement Homogeneous Grouping Inequality Language Arts Longitudinal Studies Low Achievement Mathematics Achievement Mathematics Instruction Middle School Students Middle schools Public Schools School Districts Schools Skills Student Characteristics Student Records Students Teaching Track System (Education) Tracking |
title | Beyond Tracking and Detracking: The Dimensions of Organizational Differentiation in Schools |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T08%3A51%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Beyond%20Tracking%20and%20Detracking:%20The%20Dimensions%20of%20Organizational%20Differentiation%20in%20Schools&rft.jtitle=Sociology%20of%20education&rft.au=Domina,%20Thurston&rft.date=2019-07-01&rft.volume=92&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=293&rft.epage=322&rft.pages=293-322&rft.issn=0038-0407&rft.eissn=1939-8573&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0038040719851879&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E48588685%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2243417407&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1219711&rft_jstor_id=48588685&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0038040719851879&rfr_iscdi=true |