Centric fusion differences among Oryx dammah, O.gazella, and O.leucoryx (Artiodactyla, Bovidae)
G- and C-banded karyotypes of the genus Oryx were compared using the standard karyotype of Bos taurus. Chromosomal complements were 2n = 56 in O. gazella gazella, 2n = 58 in O. g. beisa and O. g. callotis, 2n = 56-58 in O. dammah, and 2n = 57-58 in O. leucoryx. The number of autosomal arms in all ka...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cytogenetic and genome research 1999-01, Vol.86 (1), p.74 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 74 |
container_title | Cytogenetic and genome research |
container_volume | 86 |
creator | Kumamoto, A T Charter, S J Kingswood, S C O A Ryder D S Gallagher Jr |
description | G- and C-banded karyotypes of the genus Oryx were compared using the standard karyotype of Bos taurus. Chromosomal complements were 2n = 56 in O. gazella gazella, 2n = 58 in O. g. beisa and O. g. callotis, 2n = 56-58 in O. dammah, and 2n = 57-58 in O. leucoryx. The number of autosomal arms in all karyotypes was 58. Nearly all variation in diploid number was the result of three independent centric fusions, but one 2n = 57 specimen of O. g. gazella deviated from the normal complement of 2n = 56 due to XXY aneuploidy. A 2;17 centric fusion was fixed in O. g. gazella, whereas O. g. beisa and O. g. callotis lacked this fusion and had indistinguishable karyotypes. Oryx dammah was polymorphic for a 2;15 centric fusion, and O. leucoryx was polymorphic for an 18;19 centric fusion. The five Oryx taxa shared a fixed 1;25 centric fusion; the small acrocentric element involved in the 1;25 fusion was identified by fluorescence in situ hybridization using a cosmid specific to Bos chromosome 25. The X and Y chromosomes were also conserved among the five taxa. Oryx g. gazella differed from the other Oryx species because of the fixed 2;17 centric fusion. This difference reflects an apparently longer period of geographic isolation between O. g. gazella and other populations of Oryx, and it is consistent with the classification of O. gazella and O. beisa as distinct species (see Kingdon, 1997). The lack of monobrachial relationships among the Oryx taxa indicates that sterility barriers between species have not developed. Viability of hybrid offspring constitutes a threat to captive breeding programs designed for endangered species conservation; in the case of Oryx, the 2;15, 2;17, and 18;19 metacentrics could serve as marker chromosomes for assessing hybridization between certain Oryx taxa. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_224243626</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>45150180</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_2242436263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjs0KgkAYRYcoyH7eYWhVoOE_tiwp2rlp0U4-nE8b0Zma0ciePoVo3ereyzmLOyKG47u-FQW76_jXI2dKZlqXtu1EfhAaJI1RNIpnNG81l4IynueoUGSoKdRSFDRR3YsyqGu4mTTZFvDGqgKTgmD9rLDN5GCs96rhkkHWdAM9yCdngJsFmeRQaVx-c05Wp-MlPlt3JR8t6iYtZatEj1LX7T96oRt6f0kf4OVEcA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>224243626</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Centric fusion differences among Oryx dammah, O.gazella, and O.leucoryx (Artiodactyla, Bovidae)</title><source>Karger e-journals Complete Collection</source><creator>Kumamoto, A T ; Charter, S J ; Kingswood, S C ; O A Ryder D S Gallagher Jr</creator><creatorcontrib>Kumamoto, A T ; Charter, S J ; Kingswood, S C ; O A Ryder D S Gallagher Jr</creatorcontrib><description>G- and C-banded karyotypes of the genus Oryx were compared using the standard karyotype of Bos taurus. Chromosomal complements were 2n = 56 in O. gazella gazella, 2n = 58 in O. g. beisa and O. g. callotis, 2n = 56-58 in O. dammah, and 2n = 57-58 in O. leucoryx. The number of autosomal arms in all karyotypes was 58. Nearly all variation in diploid number was the result of three independent centric fusions, but one 2n = 57 specimen of O. g. gazella deviated from the normal complement of 2n = 56 due to XXY aneuploidy. A 2;17 centric fusion was fixed in O. g. gazella, whereas O. g. beisa and O. g. callotis lacked this fusion and had indistinguishable karyotypes. Oryx dammah was polymorphic for a 2;15 centric fusion, and O. leucoryx was polymorphic for an 18;19 centric fusion. The five Oryx taxa shared a fixed 1;25 centric fusion; the small acrocentric element involved in the 1;25 fusion was identified by fluorescence in situ hybridization using a cosmid specific to Bos chromosome 25. The X and Y chromosomes were also conserved among the five taxa. Oryx g. gazella differed from the other Oryx species because of the fixed 2;17 centric fusion. This difference reflects an apparently longer period of geographic isolation between O. g. gazella and other populations of Oryx, and it is consistent with the classification of O. gazella and O. beisa as distinct species (see Kingdon, 1997). The lack of monobrachial relationships among the Oryx taxa indicates that sterility barriers between species have not developed. Viability of hybrid offspring constitutes a threat to captive breeding programs designed for endangered species conservation; in the case of Oryx, the 2;15, 2;17, and 18;19 metacentrics could serve as marker chromosomes for assessing hybridization between certain Oryx taxa.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1424-8581</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1424-859X</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CGCGBR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: S. Karger AG</publisher><ispartof>Cytogenetic and genome research, 1999-01, Vol.86 (1), p.74</ispartof><rights>Copyright S. Karger AG 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kumamoto, A T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Charter, S J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kingswood, S C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O A Ryder D S Gallagher Jr</creatorcontrib><title>Centric fusion differences among Oryx dammah, O.gazella, and O.leucoryx (Artiodactyla, Bovidae)</title><title>Cytogenetic and genome research</title><description>G- and C-banded karyotypes of the genus Oryx were compared using the standard karyotype of Bos taurus. Chromosomal complements were 2n = 56 in O. gazella gazella, 2n = 58 in O. g. beisa and O. g. callotis, 2n = 56-58 in O. dammah, and 2n = 57-58 in O. leucoryx. The number of autosomal arms in all karyotypes was 58. Nearly all variation in diploid number was the result of three independent centric fusions, but one 2n = 57 specimen of O. g. gazella deviated from the normal complement of 2n = 56 due to XXY aneuploidy. A 2;17 centric fusion was fixed in O. g. gazella, whereas O. g. beisa and O. g. callotis lacked this fusion and had indistinguishable karyotypes. Oryx dammah was polymorphic for a 2;15 centric fusion, and O. leucoryx was polymorphic for an 18;19 centric fusion. The five Oryx taxa shared a fixed 1;25 centric fusion; the small acrocentric element involved in the 1;25 fusion was identified by fluorescence in situ hybridization using a cosmid specific to Bos chromosome 25. The X and Y chromosomes were also conserved among the five taxa. Oryx g. gazella differed from the other Oryx species because of the fixed 2;17 centric fusion. This difference reflects an apparently longer period of geographic isolation between O. g. gazella and other populations of Oryx, and it is consistent with the classification of O. gazella and O. beisa as distinct species (see Kingdon, 1997). The lack of monobrachial relationships among the Oryx taxa indicates that sterility barriers between species have not developed. Viability of hybrid offspring constitutes a threat to captive breeding programs designed for endangered species conservation; in the case of Oryx, the 2;15, 2;17, and 18;19 metacentrics could serve as marker chromosomes for assessing hybridization between certain Oryx taxa.</description><issn>1424-8581</issn><issn>1424-859X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjs0KgkAYRYcoyH7eYWhVoOE_tiwp2rlp0U4-nE8b0Zma0ciePoVo3ereyzmLOyKG47u-FQW76_jXI2dKZlqXtu1EfhAaJI1RNIpnNG81l4IynueoUGSoKdRSFDRR3YsyqGu4mTTZFvDGqgKTgmD9rLDN5GCs96rhkkHWdAM9yCdngJsFmeRQaVx-c05Wp-MlPlt3JR8t6iYtZatEj1LX7T96oRt6f0kf4OVEcA</recordid><startdate>19990101</startdate><enddate>19990101</enddate><creator>Kumamoto, A T</creator><creator>Charter, S J</creator><creator>Kingswood, S C</creator><creator>O A Ryder D S Gallagher Jr</creator><general>S. Karger AG</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990101</creationdate><title>Centric fusion differences among Oryx dammah, O.gazella, and O.leucoryx (Artiodactyla, Bovidae)</title><author>Kumamoto, A T ; Charter, S J ; Kingswood, S C ; O A Ryder D S Gallagher Jr</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_2242436263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kumamoto, A T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Charter, S J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kingswood, S C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O A Ryder D S Gallagher Jr</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Cytogenetic and genome research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kumamoto, A T</au><au>Charter, S J</au><au>Kingswood, S C</au><au>O A Ryder D S Gallagher Jr</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Centric fusion differences among Oryx dammah, O.gazella, and O.leucoryx (Artiodactyla, Bovidae)</atitle><jtitle>Cytogenetic and genome research</jtitle><date>1999-01-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>86</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>74</spage><pages>74-</pages><issn>1424-8581</issn><eissn>1424-859X</eissn><coden>CGCGBR</coden><abstract>G- and C-banded karyotypes of the genus Oryx were compared using the standard karyotype of Bos taurus. Chromosomal complements were 2n = 56 in O. gazella gazella, 2n = 58 in O. g. beisa and O. g. callotis, 2n = 56-58 in O. dammah, and 2n = 57-58 in O. leucoryx. The number of autosomal arms in all karyotypes was 58. Nearly all variation in diploid number was the result of three independent centric fusions, but one 2n = 57 specimen of O. g. gazella deviated from the normal complement of 2n = 56 due to XXY aneuploidy. A 2;17 centric fusion was fixed in O. g. gazella, whereas O. g. beisa and O. g. callotis lacked this fusion and had indistinguishable karyotypes. Oryx dammah was polymorphic for a 2;15 centric fusion, and O. leucoryx was polymorphic for an 18;19 centric fusion. The five Oryx taxa shared a fixed 1;25 centric fusion; the small acrocentric element involved in the 1;25 fusion was identified by fluorescence in situ hybridization using a cosmid specific to Bos chromosome 25. The X and Y chromosomes were also conserved among the five taxa. Oryx g. gazella differed from the other Oryx species because of the fixed 2;17 centric fusion. This difference reflects an apparently longer period of geographic isolation between O. g. gazella and other populations of Oryx, and it is consistent with the classification of O. gazella and O. beisa as distinct species (see Kingdon, 1997). The lack of monobrachial relationships among the Oryx taxa indicates that sterility barriers between species have not developed. Viability of hybrid offspring constitutes a threat to captive breeding programs designed for endangered species conservation; in the case of Oryx, the 2;15, 2;17, and 18;19 metacentrics could serve as marker chromosomes for assessing hybridization between certain Oryx taxa.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>S. Karger AG</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1424-8581 |
ispartof | Cytogenetic and genome research, 1999-01, Vol.86 (1), p.74 |
issn | 1424-8581 1424-859X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_224243626 |
source | Karger e-journals Complete Collection |
title | Centric fusion differences among Oryx dammah, O.gazella, and O.leucoryx (Artiodactyla, Bovidae) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T19%3A52%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Centric%20fusion%20differences%20among%20Oryx%20dammah,%20O.gazella,%20and%20O.leucoryx%20(Artiodactyla,%20Bovidae)&rft.jtitle=Cytogenetic%20and%20genome%20research&rft.au=Kumamoto,%20A%20T&rft.date=1999-01-01&rft.volume=86&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=74&rft.pages=74-&rft.issn=1424-8581&rft.eissn=1424-859X&rft.coden=CGCGBR&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E45150180%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=224243626&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |