Spatial Segregation Measures: A Methodological Review
Quantitative indices of segregation are powerful tools for summarising the spatial relationships between population groups and thereby providing the basis for analysis and public policy intervention. While the broad concept of segregation may be intuitive, measurement is challenging because of the c...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie 2019-07, Vol.110 (3), p.235-250 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 250 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 235 |
container_title | Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie |
container_volume | 110 |
creator | Yao, Jing Wong, David W.S. Bailey, Nick Minton, Jonathan |
description | Quantitative indices of segregation are powerful tools for summarising the spatial relationships between population groups and thereby providing the basis for analysis and public policy intervention. While the broad concept of segregation may be intuitive, measurement is challenging because of the complexity of varied dimensions and spatial arrangements. Many traditional measures can be criticised for over‐simplification or over‐reduction, not least in their treatment of geographical space. Over the last several decades, however, a series of measures has been developed to explicitly incorporate the spatial arrangement of population groups as well as their interactions. This paper reviews the development of spatial segregation measures, particularly focusing on the mathematical formulation of spatial arrangement/relations. In addition, several related issues are discussed, including representation of spatial interaction, spatial scale and statistical inferences. Also, this paper presents an overview of existing software tools that are readily available for calculating some of the reviewed measures. Finally, discussions on challenges and future research are provided. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/tesg.12305 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2241357146</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2241357146</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3375-fe284ef68da19f33e84ee785c7ac8fea5021044ec8611acfda447dedfae110a83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kNFLwzAQxoMoWKcv_gUF34TOXJM0nW9jzClMBDvBtxDSS-2oy0w6x_57M-uz93Lfwe_u4z5CroGOIdZdj6EZQ86oOCEJ8EJmk6JgpyShlNNMcvl-Ti5CWFNKQVCeEFFtdd_qLq2w8dhE7TbpM-qw8xju02nU_YerXeea1kTsFb9b3F-SM6u7gFd_fUTeHuar2WO2fFk8zabLzDAmRWYxLznaoqw1TCxjGCeUpTBSm9KiFjQHyjmasgDQxtaac1ljbTUCUF2yEbkZ7m69-9ph6NXa7fwmWqo858CEjD9G6nagjHcheLRq69tP7Q8KqDrGoo6xqN9YIgwDvG87PPxDqtW8Wgw7P5TEZM4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2241357146</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Spatial Segregation Measures: A Methodological Review</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><creator>Yao, Jing ; Wong, David W.S. ; Bailey, Nick ; Minton, Jonathan</creator><creatorcontrib>Yao, Jing ; Wong, David W.S. ; Bailey, Nick ; Minton, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><description>Quantitative indices of segregation are powerful tools for summarising the spatial relationships between population groups and thereby providing the basis for analysis and public policy intervention. While the broad concept of segregation may be intuitive, measurement is challenging because of the complexity of varied dimensions and spatial arrangements. Many traditional measures can be criticised for over‐simplification or over‐reduction, not least in their treatment of geographical space. Over the last several decades, however, a series of measures has been developed to explicitly incorporate the spatial arrangement of population groups as well as their interactions. This paper reviews the development of spatial segregation measures, particularly focusing on the mathematical formulation of spatial arrangement/relations. In addition, several related issues are discussed, including representation of spatial interaction, spatial scale and statistical inferences. Also, this paper presents an overview of existing software tools that are readily available for calculating some of the reviewed measures. Finally, discussions on challenges and future research are provided.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0040-747X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-9663</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/tesg.12305</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Utrecht: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>geographical information system (GIS) ; Measurement ; Public policy ; quantitative indices ; Segregation ; Simplification ; spatial</subject><ispartof>Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 2019-07, Vol.110 (3), p.235-250</ispartof><rights>2018 Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG</rights><rights>2019 Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3375-fe284ef68da19f33e84ee785c7ac8fea5021044ec8611acfda447dedfae110a83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3375-fe284ef68da19f33e84ee785c7ac8fea5021044ec8611acfda447dedfae110a83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Ftesg.12305$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Ftesg.12305$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yao, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, David W.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bailey, Nick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minton, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><title>Spatial Segregation Measures: A Methodological Review</title><title>Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie</title><description>Quantitative indices of segregation are powerful tools for summarising the spatial relationships between population groups and thereby providing the basis for analysis and public policy intervention. While the broad concept of segregation may be intuitive, measurement is challenging because of the complexity of varied dimensions and spatial arrangements. Many traditional measures can be criticised for over‐simplification or over‐reduction, not least in their treatment of geographical space. Over the last several decades, however, a series of measures has been developed to explicitly incorporate the spatial arrangement of population groups as well as their interactions. This paper reviews the development of spatial segregation measures, particularly focusing on the mathematical formulation of spatial arrangement/relations. In addition, several related issues are discussed, including representation of spatial interaction, spatial scale and statistical inferences. Also, this paper presents an overview of existing software tools that are readily available for calculating some of the reviewed measures. Finally, discussions on challenges and future research are provided.</description><subject>geographical information system (GIS)</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Public policy</subject><subject>quantitative indices</subject><subject>Segregation</subject><subject>Simplification</subject><subject>spatial</subject><issn>0040-747X</issn><issn>1467-9663</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kNFLwzAQxoMoWKcv_gUF34TOXJM0nW9jzClMBDvBtxDSS-2oy0w6x_57M-uz93Lfwe_u4z5CroGOIdZdj6EZQ86oOCEJ8EJmk6JgpyShlNNMcvl-Ti5CWFNKQVCeEFFtdd_qLq2w8dhE7TbpM-qw8xju02nU_YerXeea1kTsFb9b3F-SM6u7gFd_fUTeHuar2WO2fFk8zabLzDAmRWYxLznaoqw1TCxjGCeUpTBSm9KiFjQHyjmasgDQxtaac1ljbTUCUF2yEbkZ7m69-9ph6NXa7fwmWqo858CEjD9G6nagjHcheLRq69tP7Q8KqDrGoo6xqN9YIgwDvG87PPxDqtW8Wgw7P5TEZM4</recordid><startdate>201907</startdate><enddate>201907</enddate><creator>Yao, Jing</creator><creator>Wong, David W.S.</creator><creator>Bailey, Nick</creator><creator>Minton, Jonathan</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201907</creationdate><title>Spatial Segregation Measures: A Methodological Review</title><author>Yao, Jing ; Wong, David W.S. ; Bailey, Nick ; Minton, Jonathan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3375-fe284ef68da19f33e84ee785c7ac8fea5021044ec8611acfda447dedfae110a83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>geographical information system (GIS)</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Public policy</topic><topic>quantitative indices</topic><topic>Segregation</topic><topic>Simplification</topic><topic>spatial</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yao, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, David W.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bailey, Nick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minton, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yao, Jing</au><au>Wong, David W.S.</au><au>Bailey, Nick</au><au>Minton, Jonathan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Spatial Segregation Measures: A Methodological Review</atitle><jtitle>Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie</jtitle><date>2019-07</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>110</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>235</spage><epage>250</epage><pages>235-250</pages><issn>0040-747X</issn><eissn>1467-9663</eissn><abstract>Quantitative indices of segregation are powerful tools for summarising the spatial relationships between population groups and thereby providing the basis for analysis and public policy intervention. While the broad concept of segregation may be intuitive, measurement is challenging because of the complexity of varied dimensions and spatial arrangements. Many traditional measures can be criticised for over‐simplification or over‐reduction, not least in their treatment of geographical space. Over the last several decades, however, a series of measures has been developed to explicitly incorporate the spatial arrangement of population groups as well as their interactions. This paper reviews the development of spatial segregation measures, particularly focusing on the mathematical formulation of spatial arrangement/relations. In addition, several related issues are discussed, including representation of spatial interaction, spatial scale and statistical inferences. Also, this paper presents an overview of existing software tools that are readily available for calculating some of the reviewed measures. Finally, discussions on challenges and future research are provided.</abstract><cop>Utrecht</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/tesg.12305</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0040-747X |
ispartof | Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 2019-07, Vol.110 (3), p.235-250 |
issn | 0040-747X 1467-9663 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2241357146 |
source | Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals |
subjects | geographical information system (GIS) Measurement Public policy quantitative indices Segregation Simplification spatial |
title | Spatial Segregation Measures: A Methodological Review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T07%3A25%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Spatial%20Segregation%20Measures:%20A%20Methodological%20Review&rft.jtitle=Tijdschrift%20voor%20economische%20en%20sociale%20geografie&rft.au=Yao,%20Jing&rft.date=2019-07&rft.volume=110&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=235&rft.epage=250&rft.pages=235-250&rft.issn=0040-747X&rft.eissn=1467-9663&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/tesg.12305&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2241357146%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2241357146&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |