PTU-058 RFA for dysplastic barrett’s oesophagus: 10-years of experience from the east midlands
IntroductionRadiofrequency ablation (RFA) is the recommended therapy for flat high grade dysplasia (HGD) and residual Barrett’s oesophagus (BO) after endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) to reduce the risk of metachronous neoplasia. We aim to assess safety and effectiveness from the East Midlands Barr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Gut 2019-06, Vol.68 (Suppl 2), p.A143 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | Suppl 2 |
container_start_page | A143 |
container_title | Gut |
container_volume | 68 |
creator | White, JR Ortiz-Fernández-Sordo, J Santiago-García, J Reddiar, D De Caestecker, J Cole, A Kaye, P Ragunath, K |
description | IntroductionRadiofrequency ablation (RFA) is the recommended therapy for flat high grade dysplasia (HGD) and residual Barrett’s oesophagus (BO) after endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) to reduce the risk of metachronous neoplasia. We aim to assess safety and effectiveness from the East Midlands Barrett’s RFA database.MethodsData was analysed on patients referred to Nottingham University Hospital for RFA therapy to treat dysplastic BO between 2008 and 2018. The main outcome measures included complete remission of dysplasia (CRD), complete remission of intestinal metaplasia (CRIM), recurrent rates of BO, HGD and adenocarcinoma, procedural complications, treatment failure rates and median follow up prior to discharge back to the referring hospital. RFA techniques involved the use of circumferential and focal ablation every three months until the BO was obliterated. Follow up endoscopy and biopsy of original BO length was performed 3 and 12 months after the last RFA session and annually thereafter unless there was evidence of recurrent disease.Results221 patients were included in the analysis. Median age was 67.72 (±9.2) years, the male: female ratio was 4:1, median BO length was C2 (IQR:6) M6 (IQR:5), 59.8% had EMR prior to RFA. The proportion of patients having RFA with a previous histological diagnosis of LGD, HGD and intramucosal adenocarcinoma (IMC) was 22%, 44.8% and 32.2% respectively. The median number of RFA sessions was 3 (IQR:2). The rates of CRD and CRIM were 93.2% and 91.3%. Adjuvant ablation techniques were required in less than half of patients: APC 38% with median sessions of 1(1-4) and 1 excision biopsy session in 9.4% of patients. Severe oesophagitis delayed treatment in 12.1% and hiatus hernia repair surgery was required in 1.3% of patients. Stricture rates were 5.4% requiring a median of 2 (IQR:6) dilatations and bleeding requiring hospital admission was 0.45%. RFA failed or was abandoned in 6.3% of patients. Metachronous lesions development during RFA treatment phase warranting further therapy in 14.9% patients: BO (2.7%) LGD (0.9%) HGD (5%) and IMC (6.3%). Metachronous lesions and BO developed after CRIM in 5% requiring further therapy and 0.9% developed invasive cancer. Median follow up post CRD/CRIM was 20.1 (±28.9) months. The survival rate over the 10-year study period was 94.6% with the majority of deaths due to unrelated disease.ConclusionsThis 10-year data demonstrates that RFA therapy is effective in achieving eradication of BO an |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-BSGAbstracts.271 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_bmj_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2241255216</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2241255216</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b1301-b6d1a0f891f0793c26e36d06c35f7f9d0c5815a1cebba854dfadd8122c801e633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpN0MtKAzEUBuAgCtbqOwR0m5qTzCXjrhZbhYKi7TpkJkk7w9xMZsDuuvEhfL0-iVPqwtWBw38ufAjdAZ0A8Oh-03dFXRJGISGPH4tp6junss5PWAxnaARBJAhnQpyjEaUQkzAOkkt05X1BKRUigRFK31ZrQkNx2H-_z6fYNg7rnW9L5bs8w6lyznTdYf_jcWN8027VpvcPGCjZGeWGpsXmqzUuN3VmsHVNhbutwWYYx1WuS1Vrf40urCq9ufmrY7SeP61mz2T5uniZTZckBU6BpJEGRe3wlaVxwjMWGR5pGmU8tLFNNM1CAaGCzKSpEmGgrdJaAGOZoGAizsfo9rS3dc1nb3wni6Z39XBSMhYAC0MG0ZCKT6m0KmTr8kq5nQQqj6DyBCqPoPI_qBxA-S_zUHBy</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2241255216</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>PTU-058 RFA for dysplastic barrett’s oesophagus: 10-years of experience from the east midlands</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>White, JR ; Ortiz-Fernández-Sordo, J ; Santiago-García, J ; Reddiar, D ; De Caestecker, J ; Cole, A ; Kaye, P ; Ragunath, K</creator><creatorcontrib>White, JR ; Ortiz-Fernández-Sordo, J ; Santiago-García, J ; Reddiar, D ; De Caestecker, J ; Cole, A ; Kaye, P ; Ragunath, K</creatorcontrib><description>IntroductionRadiofrequency ablation (RFA) is the recommended therapy for flat high grade dysplasia (HGD) and residual Barrett’s oesophagus (BO) after endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) to reduce the risk of metachronous neoplasia. We aim to assess safety and effectiveness from the East Midlands Barrett’s RFA database.MethodsData was analysed on patients referred to Nottingham University Hospital for RFA therapy to treat dysplastic BO between 2008 and 2018. The main outcome measures included complete remission of dysplasia (CRD), complete remission of intestinal metaplasia (CRIM), recurrent rates of BO, HGD and adenocarcinoma, procedural complications, treatment failure rates and median follow up prior to discharge back to the referring hospital. RFA techniques involved the use of circumferential and focal ablation every three months until the BO was obliterated. Follow up endoscopy and biopsy of original BO length was performed 3 and 12 months after the last RFA session and annually thereafter unless there was evidence of recurrent disease.Results221 patients were included in the analysis. Median age was 67.72 (±9.2) years, the male: female ratio was 4:1, median BO length was C2 (IQR:6) M6 (IQR:5), 59.8% had EMR prior to RFA. The proportion of patients having RFA with a previous histological diagnosis of LGD, HGD and intramucosal adenocarcinoma (IMC) was 22%, 44.8% and 32.2% respectively. The median number of RFA sessions was 3 (IQR:2). The rates of CRD and CRIM were 93.2% and 91.3%. Adjuvant ablation techniques were required in less than half of patients: APC 38% with median sessions of 1(1-4) and 1 excision biopsy session in 9.4% of patients. Severe oesophagitis delayed treatment in 12.1% and hiatus hernia repair surgery was required in 1.3% of patients. Stricture rates were 5.4% requiring a median of 2 (IQR:6) dilatations and bleeding requiring hospital admission was 0.45%. RFA failed or was abandoned in 6.3% of patients. Metachronous lesions development during RFA treatment phase warranting further therapy in 14.9% patients: BO (2.7%) LGD (0.9%) HGD (5%) and IMC (6.3%). Metachronous lesions and BO developed after CRIM in 5% requiring further therapy and 0.9% developed invasive cancer. Median follow up post CRD/CRIM was 20.1 (±28.9) months. The survival rate over the 10-year study period was 94.6% with the majority of deaths due to unrelated disease.ConclusionsThis 10-year data demonstrates that RFA therapy is effective in achieving eradication of BO and dysplasia with a favourable safety profile.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0017-5749</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-3288</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-BSGAbstracts.271</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><subject>Adenocarcinoma ; Adenomatous polyposis coli ; Barrett's esophagus ; Biopsy ; Dysplasia ; Endoscopy ; Eradication ; Esophagitis ; Hernia ; Intestine ; Invasiveness ; Metaplasia ; Mucosa ; Patients ; Remission ; Stricture ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>Gut, 2019-06, Vol.68 (Suppl 2), p.A143</ispartof><rights>2019, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><rights>2019 2019, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>White, JR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ortiz-Fernández-Sordo, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santiago-García, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reddiar, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Caestecker, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cole, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaye, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ragunath, K</creatorcontrib><title>PTU-058 RFA for dysplastic barrett’s oesophagus: 10-years of experience from the east midlands</title><title>Gut</title><description>IntroductionRadiofrequency ablation (RFA) is the recommended therapy for flat high grade dysplasia (HGD) and residual Barrett’s oesophagus (BO) after endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) to reduce the risk of metachronous neoplasia. We aim to assess safety and effectiveness from the East Midlands Barrett’s RFA database.MethodsData was analysed on patients referred to Nottingham University Hospital for RFA therapy to treat dysplastic BO between 2008 and 2018. The main outcome measures included complete remission of dysplasia (CRD), complete remission of intestinal metaplasia (CRIM), recurrent rates of BO, HGD and adenocarcinoma, procedural complications, treatment failure rates and median follow up prior to discharge back to the referring hospital. RFA techniques involved the use of circumferential and focal ablation every three months until the BO was obliterated. Follow up endoscopy and biopsy of original BO length was performed 3 and 12 months after the last RFA session and annually thereafter unless there was evidence of recurrent disease.Results221 patients were included in the analysis. Median age was 67.72 (±9.2) years, the male: female ratio was 4:1, median BO length was C2 (IQR:6) M6 (IQR:5), 59.8% had EMR prior to RFA. The proportion of patients having RFA with a previous histological diagnosis of LGD, HGD and intramucosal adenocarcinoma (IMC) was 22%, 44.8% and 32.2% respectively. The median number of RFA sessions was 3 (IQR:2). The rates of CRD and CRIM were 93.2% and 91.3%. Adjuvant ablation techniques were required in less than half of patients: APC 38% with median sessions of 1(1-4) and 1 excision biopsy session in 9.4% of patients. Severe oesophagitis delayed treatment in 12.1% and hiatus hernia repair surgery was required in 1.3% of patients. Stricture rates were 5.4% requiring a median of 2 (IQR:6) dilatations and bleeding requiring hospital admission was 0.45%. RFA failed or was abandoned in 6.3% of patients. Metachronous lesions development during RFA treatment phase warranting further therapy in 14.9% patients: BO (2.7%) LGD (0.9%) HGD (5%) and IMC (6.3%). Metachronous lesions and BO developed after CRIM in 5% requiring further therapy and 0.9% developed invasive cancer. Median follow up post CRD/CRIM was 20.1 (±28.9) months. The survival rate over the 10-year study period was 94.6% with the majority of deaths due to unrelated disease.ConclusionsThis 10-year data demonstrates that RFA therapy is effective in achieving eradication of BO and dysplasia with a favourable safety profile.</description><subject>Adenocarcinoma</subject><subject>Adenomatous polyposis coli</subject><subject>Barrett's esophagus</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Dysplasia</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Eradication</subject><subject>Esophagitis</subject><subject>Hernia</subject><subject>Intestine</subject><subject>Invasiveness</subject><subject>Metaplasia</subject><subject>Mucosa</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Remission</subject><subject>Stricture</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>0017-5749</issn><issn>1468-3288</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpN0MtKAzEUBuAgCtbqOwR0m5qTzCXjrhZbhYKi7TpkJkk7w9xMZsDuuvEhfL0-iVPqwtWBw38ufAjdAZ0A8Oh-03dFXRJGISGPH4tp6junss5PWAxnaARBJAhnQpyjEaUQkzAOkkt05X1BKRUigRFK31ZrQkNx2H-_z6fYNg7rnW9L5bs8w6lyznTdYf_jcWN8027VpvcPGCjZGeWGpsXmqzUuN3VmsHVNhbutwWYYx1WuS1Vrf40urCq9ufmrY7SeP61mz2T5uniZTZckBU6BpJEGRe3wlaVxwjMWGR5pGmU8tLFNNM1CAaGCzKSpEmGgrdJaAGOZoGAizsfo9rS3dc1nb3wni6Z39XBSMhYAC0MG0ZCKT6m0KmTr8kq5nQQqj6DyBCqPoPI_qBxA-S_zUHBy</recordid><startdate>201906</startdate><enddate>201906</enddate><creator>White, JR</creator><creator>Ortiz-Fernández-Sordo, J</creator><creator>Santiago-García, J</creator><creator>Reddiar, D</creator><creator>De Caestecker, J</creator><creator>Cole, A</creator><creator>Kaye, P</creator><creator>Ragunath, K</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201906</creationdate><title>PTU-058 RFA for dysplastic barrett’s oesophagus: 10-years of experience from the east midlands</title><author>White, JR ; Ortiz-Fernández-Sordo, J ; Santiago-García, J ; Reddiar, D ; De Caestecker, J ; Cole, A ; Kaye, P ; Ragunath, K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b1301-b6d1a0f891f0793c26e36d06c35f7f9d0c5815a1cebba854dfadd8122c801e633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adenocarcinoma</topic><topic>Adenomatous polyposis coli</topic><topic>Barrett's esophagus</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Dysplasia</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Eradication</topic><topic>Esophagitis</topic><topic>Hernia</topic><topic>Intestine</topic><topic>Invasiveness</topic><topic>Metaplasia</topic><topic>Mucosa</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Remission</topic><topic>Stricture</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>White, JR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ortiz-Fernández-Sordo, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santiago-García, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reddiar, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Caestecker, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cole, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaye, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ragunath, K</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Gut</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>White, JR</au><au>Ortiz-Fernández-Sordo, J</au><au>Santiago-García, J</au><au>Reddiar, D</au><au>De Caestecker, J</au><au>Cole, A</au><au>Kaye, P</au><au>Ragunath, K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>PTU-058 RFA for dysplastic barrett’s oesophagus: 10-years of experience from the east midlands</atitle><jtitle>Gut</jtitle><date>2019-06</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>Suppl 2</issue><spage>A143</spage><pages>A143-</pages><issn>0017-5749</issn><eissn>1468-3288</eissn><abstract>IntroductionRadiofrequency ablation (RFA) is the recommended therapy for flat high grade dysplasia (HGD) and residual Barrett’s oesophagus (BO) after endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) to reduce the risk of metachronous neoplasia. We aim to assess safety and effectiveness from the East Midlands Barrett’s RFA database.MethodsData was analysed on patients referred to Nottingham University Hospital for RFA therapy to treat dysplastic BO between 2008 and 2018. The main outcome measures included complete remission of dysplasia (CRD), complete remission of intestinal metaplasia (CRIM), recurrent rates of BO, HGD and adenocarcinoma, procedural complications, treatment failure rates and median follow up prior to discharge back to the referring hospital. RFA techniques involved the use of circumferential and focal ablation every three months until the BO was obliterated. Follow up endoscopy and biopsy of original BO length was performed 3 and 12 months after the last RFA session and annually thereafter unless there was evidence of recurrent disease.Results221 patients were included in the analysis. Median age was 67.72 (±9.2) years, the male: female ratio was 4:1, median BO length was C2 (IQR:6) M6 (IQR:5), 59.8% had EMR prior to RFA. The proportion of patients having RFA with a previous histological diagnosis of LGD, HGD and intramucosal adenocarcinoma (IMC) was 22%, 44.8% and 32.2% respectively. The median number of RFA sessions was 3 (IQR:2). The rates of CRD and CRIM were 93.2% and 91.3%. Adjuvant ablation techniques were required in less than half of patients: APC 38% with median sessions of 1(1-4) and 1 excision biopsy session in 9.4% of patients. Severe oesophagitis delayed treatment in 12.1% and hiatus hernia repair surgery was required in 1.3% of patients. Stricture rates were 5.4% requiring a median of 2 (IQR:6) dilatations and bleeding requiring hospital admission was 0.45%. RFA failed or was abandoned in 6.3% of patients. Metachronous lesions development during RFA treatment phase warranting further therapy in 14.9% patients: BO (2.7%) LGD (0.9%) HGD (5%) and IMC (6.3%). Metachronous lesions and BO developed after CRIM in 5% requiring further therapy and 0.9% developed invasive cancer. Median follow up post CRD/CRIM was 20.1 (±28.9) months. The survival rate over the 10-year study period was 94.6% with the majority of deaths due to unrelated disease.ConclusionsThis 10-year data demonstrates that RFA therapy is effective in achieving eradication of BO and dysplasia with a favourable safety profile.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><doi>10.1136/gutjnl-2019-BSGAbstracts.271</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0017-5749 |
ispartof | Gut, 2019-06, Vol.68 (Suppl 2), p.A143 |
issn | 0017-5749 1468-3288 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2241255216 |
source | PubMed Central |
subjects | Adenocarcinoma Adenomatous polyposis coli Barrett's esophagus Biopsy Dysplasia Endoscopy Eradication Esophagitis Hernia Intestine Invasiveness Metaplasia Mucosa Patients Remission Stricture Surgery |
title | PTU-058 RFA for dysplastic barrett’s oesophagus: 10-years of experience from the east midlands |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T22%3A26%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_bmj_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=PTU-058%E2%80%85RFA%20for%20dysplastic%20barrett%E2%80%99s%20oesophagus:%2010-years%20of%20experience%20from%20the%20east%20midlands&rft.jtitle=Gut&rft.au=White,%20JR&rft.date=2019-06&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=Suppl%202&rft.spage=A143&rft.pages=A143-&rft.issn=0017-5749&rft.eissn=1468-3288&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/gutjnl-2019-BSGAbstracts.271&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_bmj_p%3E2241255216%3C/proquest_bmj_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2241255216&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |