Summary Judgment and the Vanishing Trial: Implications of the Litigation Matrix
Redish examines the implications of the declining number of federal court trials for the litigation system. Changes in the law of summary judgment show a causal connection to this decline in trials, and a reduction in the current ambiguity of summary judgment and in the scope of judicial interpretiv...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Stanford law review 2005-04, Vol.57 (5), p.1329-1359 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1359 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 1329 |
| container_title | Stanford law review |
| container_volume | 57 |
| creator | Redish, Martin H. |
| description | Redish examines the implications of the declining number of federal court trials for the litigation system. Changes in the law of summary judgment show a causal connection to this decline in trials, and a reduction in the current ambiguity of summary judgment and in the scope of judicial interpretive discretion would do much to offset it. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_224067452</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A132872681</galeid><jstor_id>40040219</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A132872681</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g415t-ee89ed91d2f569bc5e045dba42b088da227587e09c4396fd50cdf5086ac9f9843</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0kFLwzAUAOAiCs7pTxCKnjxU0jRpE28ydE6qO2x6LVny2mW06UxSmP_euu0yGCLvEHh8L-_xkpNgEPOER4yy-DQYIJSwiGcpPQ8unFshhGJK2SCYzrqmEfY7fO1U1YDxoTAq9EsIP4XRbqlNFc6tFvVDOGnWtZbC69a4sC23KNdeV9tU-Ca81ZvL4KwUtYOr_TkMPp6f5qOXKJ-OJ6PHPKpITH0EwDgoHitc0pQvJAVEqFoIgheIMSUwzijLAHFJEp6WiiKpSopYKiQvOSPJMLjZ3bu27VcHzhertrOmb1lgTFCaEYp7dLtDlaih0KZsvRWy0U4Wj3GCWYZTFvcqOqIqMGBF3RoodZ8-8PdHfB8KGi2PFtwdFPTGw8ZXonOumMze_23ZOP9r8L2VbV1DBUW_79H00F_v_Mr51hZrq39fviAIEYT7z_IDwkmqEA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>224067452</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Summary Judgment and the Vanishing Trial: Implications of the Litigation Matrix</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Redish, Martin H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Redish, Martin H.</creatorcontrib><description>Redish examines the implications of the declining number of federal court trials for the litigation system. Changes in the law of summary judgment show a causal connection to this decline in trials, and a reduction in the current ambiguity of summary judgment and in the scope of judicial interpretive discretion would do much to offset it.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0038-9765</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-8581</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SLRVDK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Stanford: Stanford University School of Law</publisher><subject>Civil procedure ; Defendants ; Federal courts ; Government regulation ; Judicial discretion ; Juries ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Legal judgments ; Legal reform ; Litigants ; Litigation ; Normativity ; Plaintiffs ; State court decisions ; Summary judgment ; Summary judgments ; Trends ; Trials</subject><ispartof>Stanford law review, 2005-04, Vol.57 (5), p.1329-1359</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2005 Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2005 Stanford Law School</rights><rights>Copyright Stanford University Law School Apr 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40040219$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40040219$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,57998,58231</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Redish, Martin H.</creatorcontrib><title>Summary Judgment and the Vanishing Trial: Implications of the Litigation Matrix</title><title>Stanford law review</title><addtitle>Stanford Law Review</addtitle><description>Redish examines the implications of the declining number of federal court trials for the litigation system. Changes in the law of summary judgment show a causal connection to this decline in trials, and a reduction in the current ambiguity of summary judgment and in the scope of judicial interpretive discretion would do much to offset it.</description><subject>Civil procedure</subject><subject>Defendants</subject><subject>Federal courts</subject><subject>Government regulation</subject><subject>Judicial discretion</subject><subject>Juries</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Legal judgments</subject><subject>Legal reform</subject><subject>Litigants</subject><subject>Litigation</subject><subject>Normativity</subject><subject>Plaintiffs</subject><subject>State court decisions</subject><subject>Summary judgment</subject><subject>Summary judgments</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>Trials</subject><issn>0038-9765</issn><issn>1939-8581</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqN0kFLwzAUAOAiCs7pTxCKnjxU0jRpE28ydE6qO2x6LVny2mW06UxSmP_euu0yGCLvEHh8L-_xkpNgEPOER4yy-DQYIJSwiGcpPQ8unFshhGJK2SCYzrqmEfY7fO1U1YDxoTAq9EsIP4XRbqlNFc6tFvVDOGnWtZbC69a4sC23KNdeV9tU-Ca81ZvL4KwUtYOr_TkMPp6f5qOXKJ-OJ6PHPKpITH0EwDgoHitc0pQvJAVEqFoIgheIMSUwzijLAHFJEp6WiiKpSopYKiQvOSPJMLjZ3bu27VcHzhertrOmb1lgTFCaEYp7dLtDlaih0KZsvRWy0U4Wj3GCWYZTFvcqOqIqMGBF3RoodZ8-8PdHfB8KGi2PFtwdFPTGw8ZXonOumMze_23ZOP9r8L2VbV1DBUW_79H00F_v_Mr51hZrq39fviAIEYT7z_IDwkmqEA</recordid><startdate>20050401</startdate><enddate>20050401</enddate><creator>Redish, Martin H.</creator><general>Stanford University School of Law</general><general>Stanford Law School</general><general>Stanford University, Stanford Law School</general><scope>8GL</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>ILT</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>K9.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050401</creationdate><title>Summary Judgment and the Vanishing Trial: Implications of the Litigation Matrix</title><author>Redish, Martin H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g415t-ee89ed91d2f569bc5e045dba42b088da227587e09c4396fd50cdf5086ac9f9843</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Civil procedure</topic><topic>Defendants</topic><topic>Federal courts</topic><topic>Government regulation</topic><topic>Judicial discretion</topic><topic>Juries</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Legal judgments</topic><topic>Legal reform</topic><topic>Litigants</topic><topic>Litigation</topic><topic>Normativity</topic><topic>Plaintiffs</topic><topic>State court decisions</topic><topic>Summary judgment</topic><topic>Summary judgments</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>Trials</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Redish, Martin H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>Gale OneFile: LegalTrac</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Stanford law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Redish, Martin H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Summary Judgment and the Vanishing Trial: Implications of the Litigation Matrix</atitle><jtitle>Stanford law review</jtitle><addtitle>Stanford Law Review</addtitle><date>2005-04-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1329</spage><epage>1359</epage><pages>1329-1359</pages><issn>0038-9765</issn><eissn>1939-8581</eissn><coden>SLRVDK</coden><abstract>Redish examines the implications of the declining number of federal court trials for the litigation system. Changes in the law of summary judgment show a causal connection to this decline in trials, and a reduction in the current ambiguity of summary judgment and in the scope of judicial interpretive discretion would do much to offset it.</abstract><cop>Stanford</cop><pub>Stanford University School of Law</pub><tpages>31</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0038-9765 |
| ispartof | Stanford law review, 2005-04, Vol.57 (5), p.1329-1359 |
| issn | 0038-9765 1939-8581 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_224067452 |
| source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Jstor Complete Legacy |
| subjects | Civil procedure Defendants Federal courts Government regulation Judicial discretion Juries Laws, regulations and rules Legal judgments Legal reform Litigants Litigation Normativity Plaintiffs State court decisions Summary judgment Summary judgments Trends Trials |
| title | Summary Judgment and the Vanishing Trial: Implications of the Litigation Matrix |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T00%3A12%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Summary%20Judgment%20and%20the%20Vanishing%20Trial:%20Implications%20of%20the%20Litigation%20Matrix&rft.jtitle=Stanford%20law%20review&rft.au=Redish,%20Martin%20H.&rft.date=2005-04-01&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1329&rft.epage=1359&rft.pages=1329-1359&rft.issn=0038-9765&rft.eissn=1939-8581&rft.coden=SLRVDK&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA132872681%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=224067452&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A132872681&rft_jstor_id=40040219&rfr_iscdi=true |