Environmental Impact Study of Bagasse Valorization Routes
India is the world’s second largest producer of sugarcane and a major manufacturer of molasses-derived ethanol. The sugarcane produced is widely used in the production of sugar and 1G ethanol, leaving behind a huge amount of bagasse as waste. However, sugarcane bagasse also has some end-use value, f...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Waste and biomass valorization 2019-07, Vol.10 (7), p.2067-2078 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2078 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 2067 |
container_title | Waste and biomass valorization |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Joglekar, Saurabh N. Tandulje, Akshay P. Mandavgane, Sachin A. Kulkarni, Bhaskar D. |
description | India is the world’s second largest producer of sugarcane and a major manufacturer of molasses-derived ethanol. The sugarcane produced is widely used in the production of sugar and 1G ethanol, leaving behind a huge amount of bagasse as waste. However, sugarcane bagasse also has some end-use value, for example, its utilization for the production of methanol, 2G ethanol, and electricity. Although the technologies for the production of these value-added products are well established, it is important to analyze the social, economic, and environmental impacts associated with their production processes. This work compares the environmental impacts of various sugarcane conversion processes on the life cycle basis. The functional unit used is 1 Ton of sugarcane cultivated on field. Four routes were identified for bagasse utilization: (i) conversion to methanol (route 1), (ii) conversion to ethanol via a two-stage dilute acid process (route 2), (iii) conversion to ethanol via an enzymatic process (route 3), and (iv) electricity generation (route 4). The comparison of bagasse management scenarios to obtain various products is made based on midpoint indicators, such as global warming potential, acidification potential, eutrophication potential, ozone depletion potential, and photochemical ozone creation potential. It was observed that methanol production had the highest environmental indicator values. Ethanol production processes and cogeneration process have nearly similar impacts, although it can be said that cogeneration is more eco-friendly. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12649-018-0198-9 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2238624879</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2238624879</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-3b0ace0993b831733b06f2022fa9dbbf9b3bf2fff717658f28579f3726fbb3fb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLAzEQx4MoWGo_gLcFz6vJpM3jqKVqoSD4wltItpmypd3UJCvUT98tK3ryMMwM_B_wI-SS0WtGqbxJDMRYl5SpbrQq9QkZMCVlCWLycfp7j9k5GaW0ppQCYwq4HBA9a77qGJqtb7LdFPPtzla5eMntcl8ELO7syqbki3e7CbH-trkOTfEc2uzTBTlDu0l-9LOH5O1-9jp9LBdPD_Pp7aKsOBO55I7aylOtuVOcSd79AoECoNVL51A77hAQUTIpJgpBTaRGLkGgcxwdH5KrPncXw2frUzbr0MamqzQAXAkYK6k7FetVVQwpRY9mF-utjXvDqDlCMj0k00EyR0jm6IHekzpts_LxL_l_0wHT7mlM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2238624879</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Environmental Impact Study of Bagasse Valorization Routes</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Joglekar, Saurabh N. ; Tandulje, Akshay P. ; Mandavgane, Sachin A. ; Kulkarni, Bhaskar D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Joglekar, Saurabh N. ; Tandulje, Akshay P. ; Mandavgane, Sachin A. ; Kulkarni, Bhaskar D.</creatorcontrib><description>India is the world’s second largest producer of sugarcane and a major manufacturer of molasses-derived ethanol. The sugarcane produced is widely used in the production of sugar and 1G ethanol, leaving behind a huge amount of bagasse as waste. However, sugarcane bagasse also has some end-use value, for example, its utilization for the production of methanol, 2G ethanol, and electricity. Although the technologies for the production of these value-added products are well established, it is important to analyze the social, economic, and environmental impacts associated with their production processes. This work compares the environmental impacts of various sugarcane conversion processes on the life cycle basis. The functional unit used is 1 Ton of sugarcane cultivated on field. Four routes were identified for bagasse utilization: (i) conversion to methanol (route 1), (ii) conversion to ethanol via a two-stage dilute acid process (route 2), (iii) conversion to ethanol via an enzymatic process (route 3), and (iv) electricity generation (route 4). The comparison of bagasse management scenarios to obtain various products is made based on midpoint indicators, such as global warming potential, acidification potential, eutrophication potential, ozone depletion potential, and photochemical ozone creation potential. It was observed that methanol production had the highest environmental indicator values. Ethanol production processes and cogeneration process have nearly similar impacts, although it can be said that cogeneration is more eco-friendly.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1877-2641</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1877-265X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12649-018-0198-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Acidification ; Bagasse ; Climate change ; Cogeneration ; Conversion ; Economic analysis ; Electricity ; Engineering ; Environment ; Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology ; Environmental impact ; Environmental indicators ; Environmental studies ; Ethanol ; Eutrophication ; Global warming ; Industrial Pollution Prevention ; Life cycles ; Methanol ; Molasses ; Original Paper ; Ozone ; Ozone depletion ; Photochemicals ; Renewable and Green Energy ; Sugar ; Sugarcane ; Waste Management/Waste Technology</subject><ispartof>Waste and biomass valorization, 2019-07, Vol.10 (7), p.2067-2078</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Nature B.V. 2019</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-3b0ace0993b831733b06f2022fa9dbbf9b3bf2fff717658f28579f3726fbb3fb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-3b0ace0993b831733b06f2022fa9dbbf9b3bf2fff717658f28579f3726fbb3fb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12649-018-0198-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12649-018-0198-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Joglekar, Saurabh N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tandulje, Akshay P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mandavgane, Sachin A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kulkarni, Bhaskar D.</creatorcontrib><title>Environmental Impact Study of Bagasse Valorization Routes</title><title>Waste and biomass valorization</title><addtitle>Waste Biomass Valor</addtitle><description>India is the world’s second largest producer of sugarcane and a major manufacturer of molasses-derived ethanol. The sugarcane produced is widely used in the production of sugar and 1G ethanol, leaving behind a huge amount of bagasse as waste. However, sugarcane bagasse also has some end-use value, for example, its utilization for the production of methanol, 2G ethanol, and electricity. Although the technologies for the production of these value-added products are well established, it is important to analyze the social, economic, and environmental impacts associated with their production processes. This work compares the environmental impacts of various sugarcane conversion processes on the life cycle basis. The functional unit used is 1 Ton of sugarcane cultivated on field. Four routes were identified for bagasse utilization: (i) conversion to methanol (route 1), (ii) conversion to ethanol via a two-stage dilute acid process (route 2), (iii) conversion to ethanol via an enzymatic process (route 3), and (iv) electricity generation (route 4). The comparison of bagasse management scenarios to obtain various products is made based on midpoint indicators, such as global warming potential, acidification potential, eutrophication potential, ozone depletion potential, and photochemical ozone creation potential. It was observed that methanol production had the highest environmental indicator values. Ethanol production processes and cogeneration process have nearly similar impacts, although it can be said that cogeneration is more eco-friendly.</description><subject>Acidification</subject><subject>Bagasse</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Cogeneration</subject><subject>Conversion</subject><subject>Economic analysis</subject><subject>Electricity</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Environmental indicators</subject><subject>Environmental studies</subject><subject>Ethanol</subject><subject>Eutrophication</subject><subject>Global warming</subject><subject>Industrial Pollution Prevention</subject><subject>Life cycles</subject><subject>Methanol</subject><subject>Molasses</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Ozone</subject><subject>Ozone depletion</subject><subject>Photochemicals</subject><subject>Renewable and Green Energy</subject><subject>Sugar</subject><subject>Sugarcane</subject><subject>Waste Management/Waste Technology</subject><issn>1877-2641</issn><issn>1877-265X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEtLAzEQx4MoWGo_gLcFz6vJpM3jqKVqoSD4wltItpmypd3UJCvUT98tK3ryMMwM_B_wI-SS0WtGqbxJDMRYl5SpbrQq9QkZMCVlCWLycfp7j9k5GaW0ppQCYwq4HBA9a77qGJqtb7LdFPPtzla5eMntcl8ELO7syqbki3e7CbH-trkOTfEc2uzTBTlDu0l-9LOH5O1-9jp9LBdPD_Pp7aKsOBO55I7aylOtuVOcSd79AoECoNVL51A77hAQUTIpJgpBTaRGLkGgcxwdH5KrPncXw2frUzbr0MamqzQAXAkYK6k7FetVVQwpRY9mF-utjXvDqDlCMj0k00EyR0jm6IHekzpts_LxL_l_0wHT7mlM</recordid><startdate>20190701</startdate><enddate>20190701</enddate><creator>Joglekar, Saurabh N.</creator><creator>Tandulje, Akshay P.</creator><creator>Mandavgane, Sachin A.</creator><creator>Kulkarni, Bhaskar D.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190701</creationdate><title>Environmental Impact Study of Bagasse Valorization Routes</title><author>Joglekar, Saurabh N. ; Tandulje, Akshay P. ; Mandavgane, Sachin A. ; Kulkarni, Bhaskar D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-3b0ace0993b831733b06f2022fa9dbbf9b3bf2fff717658f28579f3726fbb3fb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Acidification</topic><topic>Bagasse</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Cogeneration</topic><topic>Conversion</topic><topic>Economic analysis</topic><topic>Electricity</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Environmental indicators</topic><topic>Environmental studies</topic><topic>Ethanol</topic><topic>Eutrophication</topic><topic>Global warming</topic><topic>Industrial Pollution Prevention</topic><topic>Life cycles</topic><topic>Methanol</topic><topic>Molasses</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Ozone</topic><topic>Ozone depletion</topic><topic>Photochemicals</topic><topic>Renewable and Green Energy</topic><topic>Sugar</topic><topic>Sugarcane</topic><topic>Waste Management/Waste Technology</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Joglekar, Saurabh N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tandulje, Akshay P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mandavgane, Sachin A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kulkarni, Bhaskar D.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Waste and biomass valorization</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Joglekar, Saurabh N.</au><au>Tandulje, Akshay P.</au><au>Mandavgane, Sachin A.</au><au>Kulkarni, Bhaskar D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Environmental Impact Study of Bagasse Valorization Routes</atitle><jtitle>Waste and biomass valorization</jtitle><stitle>Waste Biomass Valor</stitle><date>2019-07-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>2067</spage><epage>2078</epage><pages>2067-2078</pages><issn>1877-2641</issn><eissn>1877-265X</eissn><abstract>India is the world’s second largest producer of sugarcane and a major manufacturer of molasses-derived ethanol. The sugarcane produced is widely used in the production of sugar and 1G ethanol, leaving behind a huge amount of bagasse as waste. However, sugarcane bagasse also has some end-use value, for example, its utilization for the production of methanol, 2G ethanol, and electricity. Although the technologies for the production of these value-added products are well established, it is important to analyze the social, economic, and environmental impacts associated with their production processes. This work compares the environmental impacts of various sugarcane conversion processes on the life cycle basis. The functional unit used is 1 Ton of sugarcane cultivated on field. Four routes were identified for bagasse utilization: (i) conversion to methanol (route 1), (ii) conversion to ethanol via a two-stage dilute acid process (route 2), (iii) conversion to ethanol via an enzymatic process (route 3), and (iv) electricity generation (route 4). The comparison of bagasse management scenarios to obtain various products is made based on midpoint indicators, such as global warming potential, acidification potential, eutrophication potential, ozone depletion potential, and photochemical ozone creation potential. It was observed that methanol production had the highest environmental indicator values. Ethanol production processes and cogeneration process have nearly similar impacts, although it can be said that cogeneration is more eco-friendly.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s12649-018-0198-9</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1877-2641 |
ispartof | Waste and biomass valorization, 2019-07, Vol.10 (7), p.2067-2078 |
issn | 1877-2641 1877-265X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2238624879 |
source | SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Acidification Bagasse Climate change Cogeneration Conversion Economic analysis Electricity Engineering Environment Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology Environmental impact Environmental indicators Environmental studies Ethanol Eutrophication Global warming Industrial Pollution Prevention Life cycles Methanol Molasses Original Paper Ozone Ozone depletion Photochemicals Renewable and Green Energy Sugar Sugarcane Waste Management/Waste Technology |
title | Environmental Impact Study of Bagasse Valorization Routes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T05%3A54%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Environmental%20Impact%20Study%20of%20Bagasse%20Valorization%20Routes&rft.jtitle=Waste%20and%20biomass%20valorization&rft.au=Joglekar,%20Saurabh%20N.&rft.date=2019-07-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=2067&rft.epage=2078&rft.pages=2067-2078&rft.issn=1877-2641&rft.eissn=1877-265X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12649-018-0198-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2238624879%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2238624879&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |