Policy Point-Counterpoint: The Good and The Bad of the Social Media Revolution

Social media comprises a significant share of human interaction, commanding an increasing proportion of time and social space. Whole generations have now been born into the world of social media. The ubiquitous presence of social media--whether it be Facebook, Twitter, Snapchat, Instagram, YouTube,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International social science review 2019-04, Vol.95 (1), p.1-9
1. Verfasser: Lewis, J Scott
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 9
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title International social science review
container_volume 95
creator Lewis, J Scott
description Social media comprises a significant share of human interaction, commanding an increasing proportion of time and social space. Whole generations have now been born into the world of social media. The ubiquitous presence of social media--whether it be Facebook, Twitter, Snapchat, Instagram, YouTube, or Reddit--has made it a strong agent of socialization, a force that significantly shapes a person's beliefs, values, and behaviors.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2238525179</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A590127515</galeid><sourcerecordid>A590127515</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g2019-5d9a3b1a3c1e095eb4140c1bc7aff4a4e6aca566c6982a5e08f68f803fc9022a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNzd1LwzAQAPAiCs7p_xDwyYdKkjZt4tscOoebDp34WG7pZWZ0ibap6H9v_QAd7EHu4T743d1O1ONJwmOaMrUb9SjPZcwTKvejg6ZZUUol5awX3cx8ZfU7mXnrQjz0rQtYP382Z2T-hGTkfUnAlV_NOZTEGxK68t5rCxWZYmmB3OGrr9pgvTuM9gxUDR795H70cHkxH17Fk9vReDiYxEtOmYpFqSBZMEg0Q6oELlKWUs0WOgdjUkgxAw0iy3SmJAeBVJpMGkkToxXlHJJ-dPx997n2Ly02oVj5tnbdy4LzRAouWK5-1RIqLKwzPtSg17bRxUAoyngumOhUvEUt0WENlXdobDfe8KdbfBclrq3eunCysdCZgG9hCW3TFNez8b_tePr4134ADbCQTQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2238525179</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Policy Point-Counterpoint: The Good and The Bad of the Social Media Revolution</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Free E- Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Lewis, J Scott</creator><creatorcontrib>Lewis, J Scott</creatorcontrib><description>Social media comprises a significant share of human interaction, commanding an increasing proportion of time and social space. Whole generations have now been born into the world of social media. The ubiquitous presence of social media--whether it be Facebook, Twitter, Snapchat, Instagram, YouTube, or Reddit--has made it a strong agent of socialization, a force that significantly shapes a person's beliefs, values, and behaviors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-2308</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2332-0419</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Winfield: Pi Gamma Mu</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Collaboration ; Credit scoring ; Democratization ; Encyclopedias ; Higher education ; Mass media ; Participation ; Political aspects ; Politics ; Social aspects ; Social capital ; Social change ; Social exclusion ; Social media ; Social networks ; Social space ; Socialization ; Society ; Values ; Zuckerberg, Mark</subject><ispartof>International social science review, 2019-04, Vol.95 (1), p.1-9</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 Pi Gamma Mu</rights><rights>Copyright Pi Gamma Mu 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27321,33751</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lewis, J Scott</creatorcontrib><title>Policy Point-Counterpoint: The Good and The Bad of the Social Media Revolution</title><title>International social science review</title><description>Social media comprises a significant share of human interaction, commanding an increasing proportion of time and social space. Whole generations have now been born into the world of social media. The ubiquitous presence of social media--whether it be Facebook, Twitter, Snapchat, Instagram, YouTube, or Reddit--has made it a strong agent of socialization, a force that significantly shapes a person's beliefs, values, and behaviors.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Credit scoring</subject><subject>Democratization</subject><subject>Encyclopedias</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Mass media</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Political aspects</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Social capital</subject><subject>Social change</subject><subject>Social exclusion</subject><subject>Social media</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Social space</subject><subject>Socialization</subject><subject>Society</subject><subject>Values</subject><subject>Zuckerberg, Mark</subject><issn>0278-2308</issn><issn>2332-0419</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>KPI</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNzd1LwzAQAPAiCs7p_xDwyYdKkjZt4tscOoebDp34WG7pZWZ0ibap6H9v_QAd7EHu4T743d1O1ONJwmOaMrUb9SjPZcwTKvejg6ZZUUol5awX3cx8ZfU7mXnrQjz0rQtYP382Z2T-hGTkfUnAlV_NOZTEGxK68t5rCxWZYmmB3OGrr9pgvTuM9gxUDR795H70cHkxH17Fk9vReDiYxEtOmYpFqSBZMEg0Q6oELlKWUs0WOgdjUkgxAw0iy3SmJAeBVJpMGkkToxXlHJJ-dPx997n2Ly02oVj5tnbdy4LzRAouWK5-1RIqLKwzPtSg17bRxUAoyngumOhUvEUt0WENlXdobDfe8KdbfBclrq3eunCysdCZgG9hCW3TFNez8b_tePr4134ADbCQTQ</recordid><startdate>20190401</startdate><enddate>20190401</enddate><creator>Lewis, J Scott</creator><general>Pi Gamma Mu</general><scope>IMW</scope><scope>KPI</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190401</creationdate><title>Policy Point-Counterpoint: The Good and The Bad of the Social Media Revolution</title><author>Lewis, J Scott</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g2019-5d9a3b1a3c1e095eb4140c1bc7aff4a4e6aca566c6982a5e08f68f803fc9022a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Credit scoring</topic><topic>Democratization</topic><topic>Encyclopedias</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Mass media</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Political aspects</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Social capital</topic><topic>Social change</topic><topic>Social exclusion</topic><topic>Social media</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Social space</topic><topic>Socialization</topic><topic>Society</topic><topic>Values</topic><topic>Zuckerberg, Mark</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lewis, J Scott</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale In Context: World History</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Global Issues</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>International social science review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lewis, J Scott</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Policy Point-Counterpoint: The Good and The Bad of the Social Media Revolution</atitle><jtitle>International social science review</jtitle><date>2019-04-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>95</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>9</epage><pages>1-9</pages><issn>0278-2308</issn><eissn>2332-0419</eissn><abstract>Social media comprises a significant share of human interaction, commanding an increasing proportion of time and social space. Whole generations have now been born into the world of social media. The ubiquitous presence of social media--whether it be Facebook, Twitter, Snapchat, Instagram, YouTube, or Reddit--has made it a strong agent of socialization, a force that significantly shapes a person's beliefs, values, and behaviors.</abstract><cop>Winfield</cop><pub>Pi Gamma Mu</pub><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0278-2308
ispartof International social science review, 2019-04, Vol.95 (1), p.1-9
issn 0278-2308
2332-0419
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2238525179
source Jstor Complete Legacy; EBSCOhost Political Science Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Free E- Journals; Sociological Abstracts; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete
subjects Analysis
Collaboration
Credit scoring
Democratization
Encyclopedias
Higher education
Mass media
Participation
Political aspects
Politics
Social aspects
Social capital
Social change
Social exclusion
Social media
Social networks
Social space
Socialization
Society
Values
Zuckerberg, Mark
title Policy Point-Counterpoint: The Good and The Bad of the Social Media Revolution
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T12%3A50%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Policy%20Point-Counterpoint:%20The%20Good%20and%20The%20Bad%20of%20the%20Social%20Media%20Revolution&rft.jtitle=International%20social%20science%20review&rft.au=Lewis,%20J%20Scott&rft.date=2019-04-01&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=9&rft.pages=1-9&rft.issn=0278-2308&rft.eissn=2332-0419&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA590127515%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2238525179&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A590127515&rfr_iscdi=true