Policy Point-Counterpoint: The Good and The Bad of the Social Media Revolution
Social media comprises a significant share of human interaction, commanding an increasing proportion of time and social space. Whole generations have now been born into the world of social media. The ubiquitous presence of social media--whether it be Facebook, Twitter, Snapchat, Instagram, YouTube,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International social science review 2019-04, Vol.95 (1), p.1-9 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 9 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | International social science review |
container_volume | 95 |
creator | Lewis, J Scott |
description | Social media comprises a significant share of human interaction, commanding an increasing proportion of time and social space. Whole generations have now been born into the world of social media. The ubiquitous presence of social media--whether it be Facebook, Twitter, Snapchat, Instagram, YouTube, or Reddit--has made it a strong agent of socialization, a force that significantly shapes a person's beliefs, values, and behaviors. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2238525179</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A590127515</galeid><sourcerecordid>A590127515</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g2019-5d9a3b1a3c1e095eb4140c1bc7aff4a4e6aca566c6982a5e08f68f803fc9022a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNzd1LwzAQAPAiCs7p_xDwyYdKkjZt4tscOoebDp34WG7pZWZ0ibap6H9v_QAd7EHu4T743d1O1ONJwmOaMrUb9SjPZcwTKvejg6ZZUUol5awX3cx8ZfU7mXnrQjz0rQtYP382Z2T-hGTkfUnAlV_NOZTEGxK68t5rCxWZYmmB3OGrr9pgvTuM9gxUDR795H70cHkxH17Fk9vReDiYxEtOmYpFqSBZMEg0Q6oELlKWUs0WOgdjUkgxAw0iy3SmJAeBVJpMGkkToxXlHJJ-dPx997n2Ly02oVj5tnbdy4LzRAouWK5-1RIqLKwzPtSg17bRxUAoyngumOhUvEUt0WENlXdobDfe8KdbfBclrq3eunCysdCZgG9hCW3TFNez8b_tePr4134ADbCQTQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2238525179</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Policy Point-Counterpoint: The Good and The Bad of the Social Media Revolution</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Free E- Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Lewis, J Scott</creator><creatorcontrib>Lewis, J Scott</creatorcontrib><description>Social media comprises a significant share of human interaction, commanding an increasing proportion of time and social space. Whole generations have now been born into the world of social media. The ubiquitous presence of social media--whether it be Facebook, Twitter, Snapchat, Instagram, YouTube, or Reddit--has made it a strong agent of socialization, a force that significantly shapes a person's beliefs, values, and behaviors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-2308</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2332-0419</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Winfield: Pi Gamma Mu</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Collaboration ; Credit scoring ; Democratization ; Encyclopedias ; Higher education ; Mass media ; Participation ; Political aspects ; Politics ; Social aspects ; Social capital ; Social change ; Social exclusion ; Social media ; Social networks ; Social space ; Socialization ; Society ; Values ; Zuckerberg, Mark</subject><ispartof>International social science review, 2019-04, Vol.95 (1), p.1-9</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 Pi Gamma Mu</rights><rights>Copyright Pi Gamma Mu 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27321,33751</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lewis, J Scott</creatorcontrib><title>Policy Point-Counterpoint: The Good and The Bad of the Social Media Revolution</title><title>International social science review</title><description>Social media comprises a significant share of human interaction, commanding an increasing proportion of time and social space. Whole generations have now been born into the world of social media. The ubiquitous presence of social media--whether it be Facebook, Twitter, Snapchat, Instagram, YouTube, or Reddit--has made it a strong agent of socialization, a force that significantly shapes a person's beliefs, values, and behaviors.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Credit scoring</subject><subject>Democratization</subject><subject>Encyclopedias</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Mass media</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Political aspects</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Social capital</subject><subject>Social change</subject><subject>Social exclusion</subject><subject>Social media</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Social space</subject><subject>Socialization</subject><subject>Society</subject><subject>Values</subject><subject>Zuckerberg, Mark</subject><issn>0278-2308</issn><issn>2332-0419</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>KPI</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNzd1LwzAQAPAiCs7p_xDwyYdKkjZt4tscOoebDp34WG7pZWZ0ibap6H9v_QAd7EHu4T743d1O1ONJwmOaMrUb9SjPZcwTKvejg6ZZUUol5awX3cx8ZfU7mXnrQjz0rQtYP382Z2T-hGTkfUnAlV_NOZTEGxK68t5rCxWZYmmB3OGrr9pgvTuM9gxUDR795H70cHkxH17Fk9vReDiYxEtOmYpFqSBZMEg0Q6oELlKWUs0WOgdjUkgxAw0iy3SmJAeBVJpMGkkToxXlHJJ-dPx997n2Ly02oVj5tnbdy4LzRAouWK5-1RIqLKwzPtSg17bRxUAoyngumOhUvEUt0WENlXdobDfe8KdbfBclrq3eunCysdCZgG9hCW3TFNez8b_tePr4134ADbCQTQ</recordid><startdate>20190401</startdate><enddate>20190401</enddate><creator>Lewis, J Scott</creator><general>Pi Gamma Mu</general><scope>IMW</scope><scope>KPI</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190401</creationdate><title>Policy Point-Counterpoint: The Good and The Bad of the Social Media Revolution</title><author>Lewis, J Scott</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g2019-5d9a3b1a3c1e095eb4140c1bc7aff4a4e6aca566c6982a5e08f68f803fc9022a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Credit scoring</topic><topic>Democratization</topic><topic>Encyclopedias</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Mass media</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Political aspects</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Social capital</topic><topic>Social change</topic><topic>Social exclusion</topic><topic>Social media</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Social space</topic><topic>Socialization</topic><topic>Society</topic><topic>Values</topic><topic>Zuckerberg, Mark</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lewis, J Scott</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale In Context: World History</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Global Issues</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>International social science review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lewis, J Scott</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Policy Point-Counterpoint: The Good and The Bad of the Social Media Revolution</atitle><jtitle>International social science review</jtitle><date>2019-04-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>95</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>9</epage><pages>1-9</pages><issn>0278-2308</issn><eissn>2332-0419</eissn><abstract>Social media comprises a significant share of human interaction, commanding an increasing proportion of time and social space. Whole generations have now been born into the world of social media. The ubiquitous presence of social media--whether it be Facebook, Twitter, Snapchat, Instagram, YouTube, or Reddit--has made it a strong agent of socialization, a force that significantly shapes a person's beliefs, values, and behaviors.</abstract><cop>Winfield</cop><pub>Pi Gamma Mu</pub><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0278-2308 |
ispartof | International social science review, 2019-04, Vol.95 (1), p.1-9 |
issn | 0278-2308 2332-0419 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2238525179 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; EBSCOhost Political Science Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Free E- Journals; Sociological Abstracts; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
subjects | Analysis Collaboration Credit scoring Democratization Encyclopedias Higher education Mass media Participation Political aspects Politics Social aspects Social capital Social change Social exclusion Social media Social networks Social space Socialization Society Values Zuckerberg, Mark |
title | Policy Point-Counterpoint: The Good and The Bad of the Social Media Revolution |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T12%3A50%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Policy%20Point-Counterpoint:%20The%20Good%20and%20The%20Bad%20of%20the%20Social%20Media%20Revolution&rft.jtitle=International%20social%20science%20review&rft.au=Lewis,%20J%20Scott&rft.date=2019-04-01&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=9&rft.pages=1-9&rft.issn=0278-2308&rft.eissn=2332-0419&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA590127515%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2238525179&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A590127515&rfr_iscdi=true |