A cross-cultural analysis of driving behavior under critical situations: A driving simulator study
•Participants’ risk avoiding behaviors are sensitive to cultural difference in this study.•Chinese participants maintain a higher speed in the stated scenario.•Chinese participants have a longer reaction time than German participants in the stated scenario. Driving simulators are useful tools for tr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Transportation research. Part F, Traffic psychology and behaviour Traffic psychology and behaviour, 2019-04, Vol.62, p.483-493 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 493 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 483 |
container_title | Transportation research. Part F, Traffic psychology and behaviour |
container_volume | 62 |
creator | Wang, Wuhong Cheng, Qian Li, Chenggang André, Dietrich Jiang, Xiaobei |
description | •Participants’ risk avoiding behaviors are sensitive to cultural difference in this study.•Chinese participants maintain a higher speed in the stated scenario.•Chinese participants have a longer reaction time than German participants in the stated scenario.
Driving simulators are useful tools for traffic safety researches as they can create repeatable scenarios that cannot be easily created in real world. The present study investigated whether there existed significant differences in risk-avoiding behaviors between Chinese and German young male student drivers when interacting with vulnerable traffic participants. Twenty Chinese and twenty-one German young male drivers were recruited to perform a series of simulated driving including three scenarios of traffic conflict: (1) motorbike lane violation (2) pedestrian crossing urban street (3) Animal (wild boar) crossing highway road. A questionnaire-based survey about subjective assessment of the severity of the conflicts was conducted after experiment. Using data collected from the driving simulator and questionnaire, differences in risk-avoiding behaviors between two groups of drivers were tested. Results showed that Chinese young male drivers would maintain a higher speed in scenario (1), they also had a higher score of severity of conflicts in scenario (1) and (3). German young male drivers had a shorter reaction time under the same time-to-collision (TTC) in scenario (3), and they had a shorter reaction time in the case of a longer time-to-collision (TTC) in scenario (1). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.trf.2019.02.007 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2237560938</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1369847818304017</els_id><sourcerecordid>2237560938</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-59e609de2fdda20e5354134a2357a7622c1b6412a0d04abb4b5c91fab1bd4a173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKw0AUhgdRsFYfwF3AdeJcM4muSvEGBTe6HuYWnZAmdS6Fvr1TIy5dnbP4vp9zfgCuEawQRPVtX0XfVRiitoK4gpCfgAVqOCkZQ_w076Ruy4by5hxchNBDCClGfAHUqtB-CqHUaYjJy6GQoxwOwYVi6grj3d6NH4Wyn3LvJl-k0VifDRedzmxwMcnopjHcFas_OrhtGmTMeIjJHC7BWSeHYK9-5xK8Pz68rZ_LzevTy3q1KTVhJJastTVsjcWdMRJDywijiFCJCeOS1xhrpGqKsIQGUqkUVUy3qJMKKUMl4mQJbubcnZ--kg1R9FPy-ZsgMCac5XTSZArN1M_b3nZi591W-oNAUByrFL3IVYpjlQJikavMzv3s2Hz-3lkvgnZ21NY4b3UUZnL_2N__BX1y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2237560938</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A cross-cultural analysis of driving behavior under critical situations: A driving simulator study</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Wang, Wuhong ; Cheng, Qian ; Li, Chenggang ; André, Dietrich ; Jiang, Xiaobei</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Wuhong ; Cheng, Qian ; Li, Chenggang ; André, Dietrich ; Jiang, Xiaobei</creatorcontrib><description>•Participants’ risk avoiding behaviors are sensitive to cultural difference in this study.•Chinese participants maintain a higher speed in the stated scenario.•Chinese participants have a longer reaction time than German participants in the stated scenario.
Driving simulators are useful tools for traffic safety researches as they can create repeatable scenarios that cannot be easily created in real world. The present study investigated whether there existed significant differences in risk-avoiding behaviors between Chinese and German young male student drivers when interacting with vulnerable traffic participants. Twenty Chinese and twenty-one German young male drivers were recruited to perform a series of simulated driving including three scenarios of traffic conflict: (1) motorbike lane violation (2) pedestrian crossing urban street (3) Animal (wild boar) crossing highway road. A questionnaire-based survey about subjective assessment of the severity of the conflicts was conducted after experiment. Using data collected from the driving simulator and questionnaire, differences in risk-avoiding behaviors between two groups of drivers were tested. Results showed that Chinese young male drivers would maintain a higher speed in scenario (1), they also had a higher score of severity of conflicts in scenario (1) and (3). German young male drivers had a shorter reaction time under the same time-to-collision (TTC) in scenario (3), and they had a shorter reaction time in the case of a longer time-to-collision (TTC) in scenario (1).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1369-8478</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5517</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2019.02.007</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Cross-cultural ; Motorcycles ; Pedestrian crossings ; Questionnaires ; Reaction time ; Risk-avoiding behavior ; Safety management ; Simulation ; Simulators ; Subjective assessment ; Traffic accidents & safety ; Traffic conflicts ; Traffic safety ; Truck drivers ; Young adults</subject><ispartof>Transportation research. Part F, Traffic psychology and behaviour, 2019-04, Vol.62, p.483-493</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Apr 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-59e609de2fdda20e5354134a2357a7622c1b6412a0d04abb4b5c91fab1bd4a173</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-59e609de2fdda20e5354134a2357a7622c1b6412a0d04abb4b5c91fab1bd4a173</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.02.007$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Wuhong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Qian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Chenggang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>André, Dietrich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Xiaobei</creatorcontrib><title>A cross-cultural analysis of driving behavior under critical situations: A driving simulator study</title><title>Transportation research. Part F, Traffic psychology and behaviour</title><description>•Participants’ risk avoiding behaviors are sensitive to cultural difference in this study.•Chinese participants maintain a higher speed in the stated scenario.•Chinese participants have a longer reaction time than German participants in the stated scenario.
Driving simulators are useful tools for traffic safety researches as they can create repeatable scenarios that cannot be easily created in real world. The present study investigated whether there existed significant differences in risk-avoiding behaviors between Chinese and German young male student drivers when interacting with vulnerable traffic participants. Twenty Chinese and twenty-one German young male drivers were recruited to perform a series of simulated driving including three scenarios of traffic conflict: (1) motorbike lane violation (2) pedestrian crossing urban street (3) Animal (wild boar) crossing highway road. A questionnaire-based survey about subjective assessment of the severity of the conflicts was conducted after experiment. Using data collected from the driving simulator and questionnaire, differences in risk-avoiding behaviors between two groups of drivers were tested. Results showed that Chinese young male drivers would maintain a higher speed in scenario (1), they also had a higher score of severity of conflicts in scenario (1) and (3). German young male drivers had a shorter reaction time under the same time-to-collision (TTC) in scenario (3), and they had a shorter reaction time in the case of a longer time-to-collision (TTC) in scenario (1).</description><subject>Cross-cultural</subject><subject>Motorcycles</subject><subject>Pedestrian crossings</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Reaction time</subject><subject>Risk-avoiding behavior</subject><subject>Safety management</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Simulators</subject><subject>Subjective assessment</subject><subject>Traffic accidents & safety</subject><subject>Traffic conflicts</subject><subject>Traffic safety</subject><subject>Truck drivers</subject><subject>Young adults</subject><issn>1369-8478</issn><issn>1873-5517</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtKw0AUhgdRsFYfwF3AdeJcM4muSvEGBTe6HuYWnZAmdS6Fvr1TIy5dnbP4vp9zfgCuEawQRPVtX0XfVRiitoK4gpCfgAVqOCkZQ_w076Ruy4by5hxchNBDCClGfAHUqtB-CqHUaYjJy6GQoxwOwYVi6grj3d6NH4Wyn3LvJl-k0VifDRedzmxwMcnopjHcFas_OrhtGmTMeIjJHC7BWSeHYK9-5xK8Pz68rZ_LzevTy3q1KTVhJJastTVsjcWdMRJDywijiFCJCeOS1xhrpGqKsIQGUqkUVUy3qJMKKUMl4mQJbubcnZ--kg1R9FPy-ZsgMCac5XTSZArN1M_b3nZi591W-oNAUByrFL3IVYpjlQJikavMzv3s2Hz-3lkvgnZ21NY4b3UUZnL_2N__BX1y</recordid><startdate>20190401</startdate><enddate>20190401</enddate><creator>Wang, Wuhong</creator><creator>Cheng, Qian</creator><creator>Li, Chenggang</creator><creator>André, Dietrich</creator><creator>Jiang, Xiaobei</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190401</creationdate><title>A cross-cultural analysis of driving behavior under critical situations: A driving simulator study</title><author>Wang, Wuhong ; Cheng, Qian ; Li, Chenggang ; André, Dietrich ; Jiang, Xiaobei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-59e609de2fdda20e5354134a2357a7622c1b6412a0d04abb4b5c91fab1bd4a173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Cross-cultural</topic><topic>Motorcycles</topic><topic>Pedestrian crossings</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Reaction time</topic><topic>Risk-avoiding behavior</topic><topic>Safety management</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Simulators</topic><topic>Subjective assessment</topic><topic>Traffic accidents & safety</topic><topic>Traffic conflicts</topic><topic>Traffic safety</topic><topic>Truck drivers</topic><topic>Young adults</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Wuhong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Qian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Chenggang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>André, Dietrich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Xiaobei</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Transportation research. Part F, Traffic psychology and behaviour</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Wuhong</au><au>Cheng, Qian</au><au>Li, Chenggang</au><au>André, Dietrich</au><au>Jiang, Xiaobei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A cross-cultural analysis of driving behavior under critical situations: A driving simulator study</atitle><jtitle>Transportation research. Part F, Traffic psychology and behaviour</jtitle><date>2019-04-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>62</volume><spage>483</spage><epage>493</epage><pages>483-493</pages><issn>1369-8478</issn><eissn>1873-5517</eissn><abstract>•Participants’ risk avoiding behaviors are sensitive to cultural difference in this study.•Chinese participants maintain a higher speed in the stated scenario.•Chinese participants have a longer reaction time than German participants in the stated scenario.
Driving simulators are useful tools for traffic safety researches as they can create repeatable scenarios that cannot be easily created in real world. The present study investigated whether there existed significant differences in risk-avoiding behaviors between Chinese and German young male student drivers when interacting with vulnerable traffic participants. Twenty Chinese and twenty-one German young male drivers were recruited to perform a series of simulated driving including three scenarios of traffic conflict: (1) motorbike lane violation (2) pedestrian crossing urban street (3) Animal (wild boar) crossing highway road. A questionnaire-based survey about subjective assessment of the severity of the conflicts was conducted after experiment. Using data collected from the driving simulator and questionnaire, differences in risk-avoiding behaviors between two groups of drivers were tested. Results showed that Chinese young male drivers would maintain a higher speed in scenario (1), they also had a higher score of severity of conflicts in scenario (1) and (3). German young male drivers had a shorter reaction time under the same time-to-collision (TTC) in scenario (3), and they had a shorter reaction time in the case of a longer time-to-collision (TTC) in scenario (1).</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.trf.2019.02.007</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1369-8478 |
ispartof | Transportation research. Part F, Traffic psychology and behaviour, 2019-04, Vol.62, p.483-493 |
issn | 1369-8478 1873-5517 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2237560938 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Cross-cultural Motorcycles Pedestrian crossings Questionnaires Reaction time Risk-avoiding behavior Safety management Simulation Simulators Subjective assessment Traffic accidents & safety Traffic conflicts Traffic safety Truck drivers Young adults |
title | A cross-cultural analysis of driving behavior under critical situations: A driving simulator study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T12%3A47%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20cross-cultural%20analysis%20of%20driving%20behavior%20under%20critical%20situations:%20A%20driving%20simulator%20study&rft.jtitle=Transportation%20research.%20Part%20F,%20Traffic%20psychology%20and%20behaviour&rft.au=Wang,%20Wuhong&rft.date=2019-04-01&rft.volume=62&rft.spage=483&rft.epage=493&rft.pages=483-493&rft.issn=1369-8478&rft.eissn=1873-5517&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.trf.2019.02.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2237560938%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2237560938&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1369847818304017&rfr_iscdi=true |