Physiognomic changes in response to herbivory increase carbon allocation to roots in a temperate grassland of central Argentina
In most temperate grasslands, cattle grazing can promote physiognomic changes on plant communities, as well as changes in species growth patterns. Through these changes in vegetation, cattle grazing can generate changes in allocation to total, fine and coarse root biomass, which can further affect e...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Plant ecology 2019-08, Vol.220 (7/8), p.699-709 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 709 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7/8 |
container_start_page | 699 |
container_title | Plant ecology |
container_volume | 220 |
creator | Sarquis, Agustín Pestoni, Sofía Cingolani, Ana María Harguindeguy, Natalia Pérez |
description | In most temperate grasslands, cattle grazing can promote physiognomic changes on plant communities, as well as changes in species growth patterns. Through these changes in vegetation, cattle grazing can generate changes in allocation to total, fine and coarse root biomass, which can further affect ecosystem processes. The objective of this work was to evaluate differences in root biomass, in the proportions of fine and coarse root biomass and in root C:N ratio across physiognomies from 0 to 30 cm. We selected plots of grazing lawns (associated to relatively high stocking rates), and plots of thin and thick tussock grasslands (associated to relatively low stocking rates) within the Pampa de Achala system in central Argentina. We found that total, coarse, and fine root biomass were highest in grazing lawns, intermediate in thin tussock grasslands, and lowest in thick tussock grasslands. Thick tussock grasslands showed the highest relative proportion of fine roots while root C: N ratio did not vary among physiognomies. Higher root biomass in lawns was probably caused by the dominance of species that allocate more biomass to roots than to shoots, as well as by the complementarity of soil resource extraction and by compensatory root growth in response to herbivory. In addition, and contrary to what was expected based on their above-ground attributes, thick tussock grasslands presented higher proportion of fine roots, which suggests a more acquisitive resource use strategy. However, root C:N from thick tussock grasslands did not differ from other physiognomies which might indicate there are not clear differences in below-ground resource use strategies. Our results show that grassland root biomass in this study system can increase in patches associated to higher cattle grazing due to changes in plant composition and physiognomy, while changes in root quality seem to be uncoupled from the above-ground traits. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11258-019-00945-w |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2236945091</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A593835768</galeid><jstor_id>48702760</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A593835768</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-d64e61c06782ac0f4f2beff05773b1fa39bbb93df828b51b4cb86709bb32f0f23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFrHCEUxofSQtM0_0CgIPQ8yVPH0TkuoU0LgfbQnEVdnXWZ1a2ahj31X89rpqS34sHH5_fzPd7XdZcUriiAvK6UMqF6oFMPMA2if3zVnVEheS9AsNdYcyV6YFy-7d7VugdAjIuz7vf33anGPKd8iI64nUmzryQmUnw95lQ9aZnsfLHxVy4nfHDFG1SdKTYnYpYlO9MilugrObdn2JDmD0dfTPNkLqbWxaQtyYE4n1oxC9mUGauYzPvuTTBL9Rd_7_Pu_vOnHzdf-rtvt19vNne94wpavx0HP1IHo1TMOAhDYNaHAEJKbmkwfLLWTnwbFFNWUDs4q0YJqHIWIDB-3n1c_z2W_PPB16b3-aEkbKkZ4yOuDCaKrqvVNZvF65hCxmkdnq3H9eTkQ0R9IyauuJCjQoCtgCu51uKDPpZ4MOWkKeg_yeg1GY3J6Odk9CNCfIUqmnHf5d8s_6U-rNS-tlxe-gxKApMj8Cfeqp3b</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2236945091</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Physiognomic changes in response to herbivory increase carbon allocation to roots in a temperate grassland of central Argentina</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Sarquis, Agustín ; Pestoni, Sofía ; Cingolani, Ana María ; Harguindeguy, Natalia Pérez</creator><creatorcontrib>Sarquis, Agustín ; Pestoni, Sofía ; Cingolani, Ana María ; Harguindeguy, Natalia Pérez</creatorcontrib><description>In most temperate grasslands, cattle grazing can promote physiognomic changes on plant communities, as well as changes in species growth patterns. Through these changes in vegetation, cattle grazing can generate changes in allocation to total, fine and coarse root biomass, which can further affect ecosystem processes. The objective of this work was to evaluate differences in root biomass, in the proportions of fine and coarse root biomass and in root C:N ratio across physiognomies from 0 to 30 cm. We selected plots of grazing lawns (associated to relatively high stocking rates), and plots of thin and thick tussock grasslands (associated to relatively low stocking rates) within the Pampa de Achala system in central Argentina. We found that total, coarse, and fine root biomass were highest in grazing lawns, intermediate in thin tussock grasslands, and lowest in thick tussock grasslands. Thick tussock grasslands showed the highest relative proportion of fine roots while root C: N ratio did not vary among physiognomies. Higher root biomass in lawns was probably caused by the dominance of species that allocate more biomass to roots than to shoots, as well as by the complementarity of soil resource extraction and by compensatory root growth in response to herbivory. In addition, and contrary to what was expected based on their above-ground attributes, thick tussock grasslands presented higher proportion of fine roots, which suggests a more acquisitive resource use strategy. However, root C:N from thick tussock grasslands did not differ from other physiognomies which might indicate there are not clear differences in below-ground resource use strategies. Our results show that grassland root biomass in this study system can increase in patches associated to higher cattle grazing due to changes in plant composition and physiognomy, while changes in root quality seem to be uncoupled from the above-ground traits.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1385-0237</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-5052</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11258-019-00945-w</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Science + Business Media</publisher><subject>Applied Ecology ; Biodiversity ; Biomass ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Cattle ; Community & Population Ecology ; Complementarity ; Ecology ; Grasslands ; Grazing ; Growth patterns ; Herbivores ; Herbivory ; Life Sciences ; Plant communities ; Plant Ecology ; Plant growth ; Roots ; Shoots ; Stocking ; Stocking rates ; Terrestial Ecology</subject><ispartof>Plant ecology, 2019-08, Vol.220 (7/8), p.699-709</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2019</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 Springer</rights><rights>Plant Ecology is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-d64e61c06782ac0f4f2beff05773b1fa39bbb93df828b51b4cb86709bb32f0f23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-d64e61c06782ac0f4f2beff05773b1fa39bbb93df828b51b4cb86709bb32f0f23</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5089-600X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48702760$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48702760$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sarquis, Agustín</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pestoni, Sofía</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cingolani, Ana María</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harguindeguy, Natalia Pérez</creatorcontrib><title>Physiognomic changes in response to herbivory increase carbon allocation to roots in a temperate grassland of central Argentina</title><title>Plant ecology</title><addtitle>Plant Ecol</addtitle><description>In most temperate grasslands, cattle grazing can promote physiognomic changes on plant communities, as well as changes in species growth patterns. Through these changes in vegetation, cattle grazing can generate changes in allocation to total, fine and coarse root biomass, which can further affect ecosystem processes. The objective of this work was to evaluate differences in root biomass, in the proportions of fine and coarse root biomass and in root C:N ratio across physiognomies from 0 to 30 cm. We selected plots of grazing lawns (associated to relatively high stocking rates), and plots of thin and thick tussock grasslands (associated to relatively low stocking rates) within the Pampa de Achala system in central Argentina. We found that total, coarse, and fine root biomass were highest in grazing lawns, intermediate in thin tussock grasslands, and lowest in thick tussock grasslands. Thick tussock grasslands showed the highest relative proportion of fine roots while root C: N ratio did not vary among physiognomies. Higher root biomass in lawns was probably caused by the dominance of species that allocate more biomass to roots than to shoots, as well as by the complementarity of soil resource extraction and by compensatory root growth in response to herbivory. In addition, and contrary to what was expected based on their above-ground attributes, thick tussock grasslands presented higher proportion of fine roots, which suggests a more acquisitive resource use strategy. However, root C:N from thick tussock grasslands did not differ from other physiognomies which might indicate there are not clear differences in below-ground resource use strategies. Our results show that grassland root biomass in this study system can increase in patches associated to higher cattle grazing due to changes in plant composition and physiognomy, while changes in root quality seem to be uncoupled from the above-ground traits.</description><subject>Applied Ecology</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Community & Population Ecology</subject><subject>Complementarity</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Grasslands</subject><subject>Grazing</subject><subject>Growth patterns</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>Herbivory</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Plant communities</subject><subject>Plant Ecology</subject><subject>Plant growth</subject><subject>Roots</subject><subject>Shoots</subject><subject>Stocking</subject><subject>Stocking rates</subject><subject>Terrestial Ecology</subject><issn>1385-0237</issn><issn>1573-5052</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcFrHCEUxofSQtM0_0CgIPQ8yVPH0TkuoU0LgfbQnEVdnXWZ1a2ahj31X89rpqS34sHH5_fzPd7XdZcUriiAvK6UMqF6oFMPMA2if3zVnVEheS9AsNdYcyV6YFy-7d7VugdAjIuz7vf33anGPKd8iI64nUmzryQmUnw95lQ9aZnsfLHxVy4nfHDFG1SdKTYnYpYlO9MilugrObdn2JDmD0dfTPNkLqbWxaQtyYE4n1oxC9mUGauYzPvuTTBL9Rd_7_Pu_vOnHzdf-rtvt19vNne94wpavx0HP1IHo1TMOAhDYNaHAEJKbmkwfLLWTnwbFFNWUDs4q0YJqHIWIDB-3n1c_z2W_PPB16b3-aEkbKkZ4yOuDCaKrqvVNZvF65hCxmkdnq3H9eTkQ0R9IyauuJCjQoCtgCu51uKDPpZ4MOWkKeg_yeg1GY3J6Odk9CNCfIUqmnHf5d8s_6U-rNS-tlxe-gxKApMj8Cfeqp3b</recordid><startdate>20190801</startdate><enddate>20190801</enddate><creator>Sarquis, Agustín</creator><creator>Pestoni, Sofía</creator><creator>Cingolani, Ana María</creator><creator>Harguindeguy, Natalia Pérez</creator><general>Springer Science + Business Media</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5089-600X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190801</creationdate><title>Physiognomic changes in response to herbivory increase carbon allocation to roots in a temperate grassland of central Argentina</title><author>Sarquis, Agustín ; Pestoni, Sofía ; Cingolani, Ana María ; Harguindeguy, Natalia Pérez</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-d64e61c06782ac0f4f2beff05773b1fa39bbb93df828b51b4cb86709bb32f0f23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Applied Ecology</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Community & Population Ecology</topic><topic>Complementarity</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Grasslands</topic><topic>Grazing</topic><topic>Growth patterns</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>Herbivory</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Plant communities</topic><topic>Plant Ecology</topic><topic>Plant growth</topic><topic>Roots</topic><topic>Shoots</topic><topic>Stocking</topic><topic>Stocking rates</topic><topic>Terrestial Ecology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sarquis, Agustín</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pestoni, Sofía</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cingolani, Ana María</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harguindeguy, Natalia Pérez</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Plant ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sarquis, Agustín</au><au>Pestoni, Sofía</au><au>Cingolani, Ana María</au><au>Harguindeguy, Natalia Pérez</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Physiognomic changes in response to herbivory increase carbon allocation to roots in a temperate grassland of central Argentina</atitle><jtitle>Plant ecology</jtitle><stitle>Plant Ecol</stitle><date>2019-08-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>220</volume><issue>7/8</issue><spage>699</spage><epage>709</epage><pages>699-709</pages><issn>1385-0237</issn><eissn>1573-5052</eissn><abstract>In most temperate grasslands, cattle grazing can promote physiognomic changes on plant communities, as well as changes in species growth patterns. Through these changes in vegetation, cattle grazing can generate changes in allocation to total, fine and coarse root biomass, which can further affect ecosystem processes. The objective of this work was to evaluate differences in root biomass, in the proportions of fine and coarse root biomass and in root C:N ratio across physiognomies from 0 to 30 cm. We selected plots of grazing lawns (associated to relatively high stocking rates), and plots of thin and thick tussock grasslands (associated to relatively low stocking rates) within the Pampa de Achala system in central Argentina. We found that total, coarse, and fine root biomass were highest in grazing lawns, intermediate in thin tussock grasslands, and lowest in thick tussock grasslands. Thick tussock grasslands showed the highest relative proportion of fine roots while root C: N ratio did not vary among physiognomies. Higher root biomass in lawns was probably caused by the dominance of species that allocate more biomass to roots than to shoots, as well as by the complementarity of soil resource extraction and by compensatory root growth in response to herbivory. In addition, and contrary to what was expected based on their above-ground attributes, thick tussock grasslands presented higher proportion of fine roots, which suggests a more acquisitive resource use strategy. However, root C:N from thick tussock grasslands did not differ from other physiognomies which might indicate there are not clear differences in below-ground resource use strategies. Our results show that grassland root biomass in this study system can increase in patches associated to higher cattle grazing due to changes in plant composition and physiognomy, while changes in root quality seem to be uncoupled from the above-ground traits.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Science + Business Media</pub><doi>10.1007/s11258-019-00945-w</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5089-600X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1385-0237 |
ispartof | Plant ecology, 2019-08, Vol.220 (7/8), p.699-709 |
issn | 1385-0237 1573-5052 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2236945091 |
source | SpringerNature Journals; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | Applied Ecology Biodiversity Biomass Biomedical and Life Sciences Cattle Community & Population Ecology Complementarity Ecology Grasslands Grazing Growth patterns Herbivores Herbivory Life Sciences Plant communities Plant Ecology Plant growth Roots Shoots Stocking Stocking rates Terrestial Ecology |
title | Physiognomic changes in response to herbivory increase carbon allocation to roots in a temperate grassland of central Argentina |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T23%3A15%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Physiognomic%20changes%20in%20response%20to%20herbivory%20increase%20carbon%20allocation%20to%20roots%20in%20a%20temperate%20grassland%20of%20central%20Argentina&rft.jtitle=Plant%20ecology&rft.au=Sarquis,%20Agust%C3%ADn&rft.date=2019-08-01&rft.volume=220&rft.issue=7/8&rft.spage=699&rft.epage=709&rft.pages=699-709&rft.issn=1385-0237&rft.eissn=1573-5052&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11258-019-00945-w&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA593835768%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2236945091&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A593835768&rft_jstor_id=48702760&rfr_iscdi=true |