The Nature of Causality and the Design of Integration Research

Efforts to integrate psychological and theological insights hinge on conceptions of causality, which are frequently implicit and unexamined. Aristotle postulated four forms of causality, subsequent to which psychology and theology selected competing forms. Scientific efforts in psychology follow lar...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of psychology and theology 1999-09, Vol.27 (3), p.207-218
1. Verfasser: Timpe, Randie L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 218
container_issue 3
container_start_page 207
container_title Journal of psychology and theology
container_volume 27
creator Timpe, Randie L.
description Efforts to integrate psychological and theological insights hinge on conceptions of causality, which are frequently implicit and unexamined. Aristotle postulated four forms of causality, subsequent to which psychology and theology selected competing forms. Scientific efforts in psychology follow largely from efficient cause views, whereas theology utilizes conceptions traditionally of final cause format. In addition to simple but powerful linear models, psychologists employ interactive and feedback models that overcome the deficiencies of the linear sequence. The nature of the linear, interactive, and feedback models restructure integration efforts to link psychology and theology in research and model building activities. The postmodern emphases in contemporary psychology and theology reflect dissatisfactions with traditional causal notions which, too, re-engineer integration.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/009164719902700301
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_223672652</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>46105022</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c225t-5540cb430200413a1562757f7d842f43e070a9910df9b10a25fb290b3b4de6a83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkEFLwzAYhoMoWKd_wFPxXv2-L0nTXASpTgdDQea5pG2ydcx2Julh_96VefP0Hp6H94WXsVuEe0SlHgA05kKh1kAKgAOesYQ4FRliTucsmYRsMi7ZVQhbACBR8IQ9rjY2fTdx9DYdXFqaMZhdFw-p6ds0HtmzDd26n9iij3btTeyGPv20wRrfbK7ZhTO7YG_-csa-5i-r8i1bfrwuyqdl1hDJmEkpoKkFBwIQyA3KnJRUTrWFICe4BQVGa4TW6RrBkHQ1aah5LVqbm4LP2N2pd--Hn9GGWG2H0ffHyYqI54pySUeJTlLjhxC8ddXed9_GHyqEarqp-n8T_wXzH1dO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>223672652</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Nature of Causality and the Design of Integration Research</title><source>SAGE Journals Online</source><creator>Timpe, Randie L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Timpe, Randie L.</creatorcontrib><description>Efforts to integrate psychological and theological insights hinge on conceptions of causality, which are frequently implicit and unexamined. Aristotle postulated four forms of causality, subsequent to which psychology and theology selected competing forms. Scientific efforts in psychology follow largely from efficient cause views, whereas theology utilizes conceptions traditionally of final cause format. In addition to simple but powerful linear models, psychologists employ interactive and feedback models that overcome the deficiencies of the linear sequence. The nature of the linear, interactive, and feedback models restructure integration efforts to link psychology and theology in research and model building activities. The postmodern emphases in contemporary psychology and theology reflect dissatisfactions with traditional causal notions which, too, re-engineer integration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0091-6471</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2328-1162</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/009164719902700301</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>La Mirada: Sage Publications Ltd</publisher><subject>Behavior ; Causality ; Feedback ; Metaphysics ; Postmodernism ; Psychologists ; Psychology ; Science ; Theology</subject><ispartof>Journal of psychology and theology, 1999-09, Vol.27 (3), p.207-218</ispartof><rights>Copyright Rosemead Graduate School of Professional Psychology Fall 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c225t-5540cb430200413a1562757f7d842f43e070a9910df9b10a25fb290b3b4de6a83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Timpe, Randie L.</creatorcontrib><title>The Nature of Causality and the Design of Integration Research</title><title>Journal of psychology and theology</title><description>Efforts to integrate psychological and theological insights hinge on conceptions of causality, which are frequently implicit and unexamined. Aristotle postulated four forms of causality, subsequent to which psychology and theology selected competing forms. Scientific efforts in psychology follow largely from efficient cause views, whereas theology utilizes conceptions traditionally of final cause format. In addition to simple but powerful linear models, psychologists employ interactive and feedback models that overcome the deficiencies of the linear sequence. The nature of the linear, interactive, and feedback models restructure integration efforts to link psychology and theology in research and model building activities. The postmodern emphases in contemporary psychology and theology reflect dissatisfactions with traditional causal notions which, too, re-engineer integration.</description><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Causality</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Metaphysics</subject><subject>Postmodernism</subject><subject>Psychologists</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Theology</subject><issn>0091-6471</issn><issn>2328-1162</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>88H</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>M2N</sourceid><recordid>eNplkEFLwzAYhoMoWKd_wFPxXv2-L0nTXASpTgdDQea5pG2ydcx2Julh_96VefP0Hp6H94WXsVuEe0SlHgA05kKh1kAKgAOesYQ4FRliTucsmYRsMi7ZVQhbACBR8IQ9rjY2fTdx9DYdXFqaMZhdFw-p6ds0HtmzDd26n9iij3btTeyGPv20wRrfbK7ZhTO7YG_-csa-5i-r8i1bfrwuyqdl1hDJmEkpoKkFBwIQyA3KnJRUTrWFICe4BQVGa4TW6RrBkHQ1aah5LVqbm4LP2N2pd--Hn9GGWG2H0ffHyYqI54pySUeJTlLjhxC8ddXed9_GHyqEarqp-n8T_wXzH1dO</recordid><startdate>19990901</startdate><enddate>19990901</enddate><creator>Timpe, Randie L.</creator><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88H</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2N</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990901</creationdate><title>The Nature of Causality and the Design of Integration Research</title><author>Timpe, Randie L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c225t-5540cb430200413a1562757f7d842f43e070a9910df9b10a25fb290b3b4de6a83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Causality</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Metaphysics</topic><topic>Postmodernism</topic><topic>Psychologists</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Theology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Timpe, Randie L.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Religion Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology Database</collection><collection>Religion Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of psychology and theology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Timpe, Randie L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Nature of Causality and the Design of Integration Research</atitle><jtitle>Journal of psychology and theology</jtitle><date>1999-09-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>207</spage><epage>218</epage><pages>207-218</pages><issn>0091-6471</issn><eissn>2328-1162</eissn><abstract>Efforts to integrate psychological and theological insights hinge on conceptions of causality, which are frequently implicit and unexamined. Aristotle postulated four forms of causality, subsequent to which psychology and theology selected competing forms. Scientific efforts in psychology follow largely from efficient cause views, whereas theology utilizes conceptions traditionally of final cause format. In addition to simple but powerful linear models, psychologists employ interactive and feedback models that overcome the deficiencies of the linear sequence. The nature of the linear, interactive, and feedback models restructure integration efforts to link psychology and theology in research and model building activities. The postmodern emphases in contemporary psychology and theology reflect dissatisfactions with traditional causal notions which, too, re-engineer integration.</abstract><cop>La Mirada</cop><pub>Sage Publications Ltd</pub><doi>10.1177/009164719902700301</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0091-6471
ispartof Journal of psychology and theology, 1999-09, Vol.27 (3), p.207-218
issn 0091-6471
2328-1162
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_223672652
source SAGE Journals Online
subjects Behavior
Causality
Feedback
Metaphysics
Postmodernism
Psychologists
Psychology
Science
Theology
title The Nature of Causality and the Design of Integration Research
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T19%3A47%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Nature%20of%20Causality%20and%20the%20Design%20of%20Integration%20Research&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20psychology%20and%20theology&rft.au=Timpe,%20Randie%20L.&rft.date=1999-09-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=207&rft.epage=218&rft.pages=207-218&rft.issn=0091-6471&rft.eissn=2328-1162&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/009164719902700301&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E46105022%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=223672652&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true