Are Hindu Representations of the Divine Prototypically Structured?

Although a great deal has been learned about the perceived attributes of God, systematic research on the cognitive structure of deity representations is lacking. Because extant research focuses almost exclusively on the Christian God, the present studies investigate the representation of deities in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psychology of religion and spirituality 2019-05, Vol.11 (2), p.101-110
Hauptverfasser: Fincham, Frank D, May, Ross W, Kamble, Shanmukh V
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 110
container_issue 2
container_start_page 101
container_title Psychology of religion and spirituality
container_volume 11
creator Fincham, Frank D
May, Ross W
Kamble, Shanmukh V
description Although a great deal has been learned about the perceived attributes of God, systematic research on the cognitive structure of deity representations is lacking. Because extant research focuses almost exclusively on the Christian God, the present studies investigate the representation of deities in a polytheistic religion, Hinduism. Prototype theory informs 4 studies on how conceptualizations of Gods are structured. Using student and community samples, features of Gods are identified, feature centrality is documented, and centrality influence on cognition is evaluated. Studies 1 (feature identification task) and 2 (centrality rating task) produced considerable overlap in feature frequency documentation and feature centrality across the student and community samples, with "God is love" being the most frequently listed feature and most central feature in both samples. Study 3 showed that feature centrality influenced memory recall and recognition. Thus, cognitive representation of the divine in Hinduism is consistent with that of the prototype structure commonly found in the representation of natural objects. Study 4 identified boundary conditions for religious priming. Deity priming influenced ratings of central, but not peripheral, characteristics, only for respondents who rated themselves as closer to God(s). The implications of these results, especially for research on the impact of religious concepts on subsequent behavior, are discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/rel0000166
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2236164020</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2005209443</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a323t-6099b20e1c598c0ca70acdc1e463adb87acf42fd87d37adf57ac4788f929957f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK5e_AUFb0p1krRpc5J1_VhhQfHjHLJpgl1qWyfpQv-9WVfw5lxmeHlmBh5CTilcUuDFFdoGYlEh9siEyoynNBds_2emKQXGDsmR92sAEXM-ITcztMmibqshebE9Wm_boEPdtT7pXBI-bHJbb-rWJs_YhS6MfW1004zJa8DBhAFtdX1MDpxuvD357VPyfn_3Nl-ky6eHx_lsmWrOeEgFSLliYKnJZWnA6AK0qQy1meC6WpWFNi5jriqLihe6cnkMsqIsnWRS5oXjU3K2u9tj9zVYH9S6G7CNLxVjXFCRAYN_KYCcgcwyHqnzHWWw8x6tUz3WnxpHRUFtTao_kxG-2MG616r3o9EYatNYbwbE6GvLKkoVi5uUfwOHAnTc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2005209443</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Are Hindu Representations of the Divine Prototypically Structured?</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Fincham, Frank D ; May, Ross W ; Kamble, Shanmukh V</creator><contributor>Oman, Doug ; Park, Crystal L</contributor><creatorcontrib>Fincham, Frank D ; May, Ross W ; Kamble, Shanmukh V ; Oman, Doug ; Park, Crystal L</creatorcontrib><description>Although a great deal has been learned about the perceived attributes of God, systematic research on the cognitive structure of deity representations is lacking. Because extant research focuses almost exclusively on the Christian God, the present studies investigate the representation of deities in a polytheistic religion, Hinduism. Prototype theory informs 4 studies on how conceptualizations of Gods are structured. Using student and community samples, features of Gods are identified, feature centrality is documented, and centrality influence on cognition is evaluated. Studies 1 (feature identification task) and 2 (centrality rating task) produced considerable overlap in feature frequency documentation and feature centrality across the student and community samples, with "God is love" being the most frequently listed feature and most central feature in both samples. Study 3 showed that feature centrality influenced memory recall and recognition. Thus, cognitive representation of the divine in Hinduism is consistent with that of the prototype structure commonly found in the representation of natural objects. Study 4 identified boundary conditions for religious priming. Deity priming influenced ratings of central, but not peripheral, characteristics, only for respondents who rated themselves as closer to God(s). The implications of these results, especially for research on the impact of religious concepts on subsequent behavior, are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1941-1022</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-1562</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/rel0000166</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Educational Publishing Foundation</publisher><subject>Artistic representation (Imitation) ; Cognition ; Cognitive models ; Cognitive Processes ; Cognitive structures ; Comparative religion ; Deities ; Female ; God ; God Concepts ; Hinduism ; Human ; Male ; Memory ; Mental representation ; Priming ; Prototype theory ; Religion ; Test Construction</subject><ispartof>Psychology of religion and spirituality, 2019-05, Vol.11 (2), p.101-110</ispartof><rights>2018 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2018, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association May 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a323t-6099b20e1c598c0ca70acdc1e463adb87acf42fd87d37adf57ac4788f929957f3</citedby><orcidid>0000-0001-5081-2283</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,30976</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Oman, Doug</contributor><contributor>Park, Crystal L</contributor><creatorcontrib>Fincham, Frank D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>May, Ross W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamble, Shanmukh V</creatorcontrib><title>Are Hindu Representations of the Divine Prototypically Structured?</title><title>Psychology of religion and spirituality</title><description>Although a great deal has been learned about the perceived attributes of God, systematic research on the cognitive structure of deity representations is lacking. Because extant research focuses almost exclusively on the Christian God, the present studies investigate the representation of deities in a polytheistic religion, Hinduism. Prototype theory informs 4 studies on how conceptualizations of Gods are structured. Using student and community samples, features of Gods are identified, feature centrality is documented, and centrality influence on cognition is evaluated. Studies 1 (feature identification task) and 2 (centrality rating task) produced considerable overlap in feature frequency documentation and feature centrality across the student and community samples, with "God is love" being the most frequently listed feature and most central feature in both samples. Study 3 showed that feature centrality influenced memory recall and recognition. Thus, cognitive representation of the divine in Hinduism is consistent with that of the prototype structure commonly found in the representation of natural objects. Study 4 identified boundary conditions for religious priming. Deity priming influenced ratings of central, but not peripheral, characteristics, only for respondents who rated themselves as closer to God(s). The implications of these results, especially for research on the impact of religious concepts on subsequent behavior, are discussed.</description><subject>Artistic representation (Imitation)</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cognitive models</subject><subject>Cognitive Processes</subject><subject>Cognitive structures</subject><subject>Comparative religion</subject><subject>Deities</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>God</subject><subject>God Concepts</subject><subject>Hinduism</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Mental representation</subject><subject>Priming</subject><subject>Prototype theory</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Test Construction</subject><issn>1941-1022</issn><issn>1943-1562</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK5e_AUFb0p1krRpc5J1_VhhQfHjHLJpgl1qWyfpQv-9WVfw5lxmeHlmBh5CTilcUuDFFdoGYlEh9siEyoynNBds_2emKQXGDsmR92sAEXM-ITcztMmibqshebE9Wm_boEPdtT7pXBI-bHJbb-rWJs_YhS6MfW1004zJa8DBhAFtdX1MDpxuvD357VPyfn_3Nl-ky6eHx_lsmWrOeEgFSLliYKnJZWnA6AK0qQy1meC6WpWFNi5jriqLihe6cnkMsqIsnWRS5oXjU3K2u9tj9zVYH9S6G7CNLxVjXFCRAYN_KYCcgcwyHqnzHWWw8x6tUz3WnxpHRUFtTao_kxG-2MG616r3o9EYatNYbwbE6GvLKkoVi5uUfwOHAnTc</recordid><startdate>201905</startdate><enddate>201905</enddate><creator>Fincham, Frank D</creator><creator>May, Ross W</creator><creator>Kamble, Shanmukh V</creator><general>Educational Publishing Foundation</general><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5081-2283</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201905</creationdate><title>Are Hindu Representations of the Divine Prototypically Structured?</title><author>Fincham, Frank D ; May, Ross W ; Kamble, Shanmukh V</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a323t-6099b20e1c598c0ca70acdc1e463adb87acf42fd87d37adf57ac4788f929957f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Artistic representation (Imitation)</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cognitive models</topic><topic>Cognitive Processes</topic><topic>Cognitive structures</topic><topic>Comparative religion</topic><topic>Deities</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>God</topic><topic>God Concepts</topic><topic>Hinduism</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Mental representation</topic><topic>Priming</topic><topic>Prototype theory</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Test Construction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fincham, Frank D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>May, Ross W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamble, Shanmukh V</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Psychology of religion and spirituality</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fincham, Frank D</au><au>May, Ross W</au><au>Kamble, Shanmukh V</au><au>Oman, Doug</au><au>Park, Crystal L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Are Hindu Representations of the Divine Prototypically Structured?</atitle><jtitle>Psychology of religion and spirituality</jtitle><date>2019-05</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>101</spage><epage>110</epage><pages>101-110</pages><issn>1941-1022</issn><eissn>1943-1562</eissn><abstract>Although a great deal has been learned about the perceived attributes of God, systematic research on the cognitive structure of deity representations is lacking. Because extant research focuses almost exclusively on the Christian God, the present studies investigate the representation of deities in a polytheistic religion, Hinduism. Prototype theory informs 4 studies on how conceptualizations of Gods are structured. Using student and community samples, features of Gods are identified, feature centrality is documented, and centrality influence on cognition is evaluated. Studies 1 (feature identification task) and 2 (centrality rating task) produced considerable overlap in feature frequency documentation and feature centrality across the student and community samples, with "God is love" being the most frequently listed feature and most central feature in both samples. Study 3 showed that feature centrality influenced memory recall and recognition. Thus, cognitive representation of the divine in Hinduism is consistent with that of the prototype structure commonly found in the representation of natural objects. Study 4 identified boundary conditions for religious priming. Deity priming influenced ratings of central, but not peripheral, characteristics, only for respondents who rated themselves as closer to God(s). The implications of these results, especially for research on the impact of religious concepts on subsequent behavior, are discussed.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Educational Publishing Foundation</pub><doi>10.1037/rel0000166</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5081-2283</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1941-1022
ispartof Psychology of religion and spirituality, 2019-05, Vol.11 (2), p.101-110
issn 1941-1022
1943-1562
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2236164020
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES
subjects Artistic representation (Imitation)
Cognition
Cognitive models
Cognitive Processes
Cognitive structures
Comparative religion
Deities
Female
God
God Concepts
Hinduism
Human
Male
Memory
Mental representation
Priming
Prototype theory
Religion
Test Construction
title Are Hindu Representations of the Divine Prototypically Structured?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T13%3A42%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Are%20Hindu%20Representations%20of%20the%20Divine%20Prototypically%20Structured?&rft.jtitle=Psychology%20of%20religion%20and%20spirituality&rft.au=Fincham,%20Frank%20D&rft.date=2019-05&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=101&rft.epage=110&rft.pages=101-110&rft.issn=1941-1022&rft.eissn=1943-1562&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/rel0000166&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2005209443%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2005209443&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true