Are Hindu Representations of the Divine Prototypically Structured?
Although a great deal has been learned about the perceived attributes of God, systematic research on the cognitive structure of deity representations is lacking. Because extant research focuses almost exclusively on the Christian God, the present studies investigate the representation of deities in...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Psychology of religion and spirituality 2019-05, Vol.11 (2), p.101-110 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 110 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 101 |
container_title | Psychology of religion and spirituality |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Fincham, Frank D May, Ross W Kamble, Shanmukh V |
description | Although a great deal has been learned about the perceived attributes of God, systematic research on the cognitive structure of deity representations is lacking. Because extant research focuses almost exclusively on the Christian God, the present studies investigate the representation of deities in a polytheistic religion, Hinduism. Prototype theory informs 4 studies on how conceptualizations of Gods are structured. Using student and community samples, features of Gods are identified, feature centrality is documented, and centrality influence on cognition is evaluated. Studies 1 (feature identification task) and 2 (centrality rating task) produced considerable overlap in feature frequency documentation and feature centrality across the student and community samples, with "God is love" being the most frequently listed feature and most central feature in both samples. Study 3 showed that feature centrality influenced memory recall and recognition. Thus, cognitive representation of the divine in Hinduism is consistent with that of the prototype structure commonly found in the representation of natural objects. Study 4 identified boundary conditions for religious priming. Deity priming influenced ratings of central, but not peripheral, characteristics, only for respondents who rated themselves as closer to God(s). The implications of these results, especially for research on the impact of religious concepts on subsequent behavior, are discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/rel0000166 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2236164020</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2005209443</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a323t-6099b20e1c598c0ca70acdc1e463adb87acf42fd87d37adf57ac4788f929957f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK5e_AUFb0p1krRpc5J1_VhhQfHjHLJpgl1qWyfpQv-9WVfw5lxmeHlmBh5CTilcUuDFFdoGYlEh9siEyoynNBds_2emKQXGDsmR92sAEXM-ITcztMmibqshebE9Wm_boEPdtT7pXBI-bHJbb-rWJs_YhS6MfW1004zJa8DBhAFtdX1MDpxuvD357VPyfn_3Nl-ky6eHx_lsmWrOeEgFSLliYKnJZWnA6AK0qQy1meC6WpWFNi5jriqLihe6cnkMsqIsnWRS5oXjU3K2u9tj9zVYH9S6G7CNLxVjXFCRAYN_KYCcgcwyHqnzHWWw8x6tUz3WnxpHRUFtTao_kxG-2MG616r3o9EYatNYbwbE6GvLKkoVi5uUfwOHAnTc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2005209443</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Are Hindu Representations of the Divine Prototypically Structured?</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Fincham, Frank D ; May, Ross W ; Kamble, Shanmukh V</creator><contributor>Oman, Doug ; Park, Crystal L</contributor><creatorcontrib>Fincham, Frank D ; May, Ross W ; Kamble, Shanmukh V ; Oman, Doug ; Park, Crystal L</creatorcontrib><description>Although a great deal has been learned about the perceived attributes of God, systematic research on the cognitive structure of deity representations is lacking. Because extant research focuses almost exclusively on the Christian God, the present studies investigate the representation of deities in a polytheistic religion, Hinduism. Prototype theory informs 4 studies on how conceptualizations of Gods are structured. Using student and community samples, features of Gods are identified, feature centrality is documented, and centrality influence on cognition is evaluated. Studies 1 (feature identification task) and 2 (centrality rating task) produced considerable overlap in feature frequency documentation and feature centrality across the student and community samples, with "God is love" being the most frequently listed feature and most central feature in both samples. Study 3 showed that feature centrality influenced memory recall and recognition. Thus, cognitive representation of the divine in Hinduism is consistent with that of the prototype structure commonly found in the representation of natural objects. Study 4 identified boundary conditions for religious priming. Deity priming influenced ratings of central, but not peripheral, characteristics, only for respondents who rated themselves as closer to God(s). The implications of these results, especially for research on the impact of religious concepts on subsequent behavior, are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1941-1022</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-1562</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/rel0000166</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Educational Publishing Foundation</publisher><subject>Artistic representation (Imitation) ; Cognition ; Cognitive models ; Cognitive Processes ; Cognitive structures ; Comparative religion ; Deities ; Female ; God ; God Concepts ; Hinduism ; Human ; Male ; Memory ; Mental representation ; Priming ; Prototype theory ; Religion ; Test Construction</subject><ispartof>Psychology of religion and spirituality, 2019-05, Vol.11 (2), p.101-110</ispartof><rights>2018 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2018, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association May 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a323t-6099b20e1c598c0ca70acdc1e463adb87acf42fd87d37adf57ac4788f929957f3</citedby><orcidid>0000-0001-5081-2283</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,30976</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Oman, Doug</contributor><contributor>Park, Crystal L</contributor><creatorcontrib>Fincham, Frank D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>May, Ross W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamble, Shanmukh V</creatorcontrib><title>Are Hindu Representations of the Divine Prototypically Structured?</title><title>Psychology of religion and spirituality</title><description>Although a great deal has been learned about the perceived attributes of God, systematic research on the cognitive structure of deity representations is lacking. Because extant research focuses almost exclusively on the Christian God, the present studies investigate the representation of deities in a polytheistic religion, Hinduism. Prototype theory informs 4 studies on how conceptualizations of Gods are structured. Using student and community samples, features of Gods are identified, feature centrality is documented, and centrality influence on cognition is evaluated. Studies 1 (feature identification task) and 2 (centrality rating task) produced considerable overlap in feature frequency documentation and feature centrality across the student and community samples, with "God is love" being the most frequently listed feature and most central feature in both samples. Study 3 showed that feature centrality influenced memory recall and recognition. Thus, cognitive representation of the divine in Hinduism is consistent with that of the prototype structure commonly found in the representation of natural objects. Study 4 identified boundary conditions for religious priming. Deity priming influenced ratings of central, but not peripheral, characteristics, only for respondents who rated themselves as closer to God(s). The implications of these results, especially for research on the impact of religious concepts on subsequent behavior, are discussed.</description><subject>Artistic representation (Imitation)</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cognitive models</subject><subject>Cognitive Processes</subject><subject>Cognitive structures</subject><subject>Comparative religion</subject><subject>Deities</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>God</subject><subject>God Concepts</subject><subject>Hinduism</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Mental representation</subject><subject>Priming</subject><subject>Prototype theory</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Test Construction</subject><issn>1941-1022</issn><issn>1943-1562</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK5e_AUFb0p1krRpc5J1_VhhQfHjHLJpgl1qWyfpQv-9WVfw5lxmeHlmBh5CTilcUuDFFdoGYlEh9siEyoynNBds_2emKQXGDsmR92sAEXM-ITcztMmibqshebE9Wm_boEPdtT7pXBI-bHJbb-rWJs_YhS6MfW1004zJa8DBhAFtdX1MDpxuvD357VPyfn_3Nl-ky6eHx_lsmWrOeEgFSLliYKnJZWnA6AK0qQy1meC6WpWFNi5jriqLihe6cnkMsqIsnWRS5oXjU3K2u9tj9zVYH9S6G7CNLxVjXFCRAYN_KYCcgcwyHqnzHWWw8x6tUz3WnxpHRUFtTao_kxG-2MG616r3o9EYatNYbwbE6GvLKkoVi5uUfwOHAnTc</recordid><startdate>201905</startdate><enddate>201905</enddate><creator>Fincham, Frank D</creator><creator>May, Ross W</creator><creator>Kamble, Shanmukh V</creator><general>Educational Publishing Foundation</general><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5081-2283</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201905</creationdate><title>Are Hindu Representations of the Divine Prototypically Structured?</title><author>Fincham, Frank D ; May, Ross W ; Kamble, Shanmukh V</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a323t-6099b20e1c598c0ca70acdc1e463adb87acf42fd87d37adf57ac4788f929957f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Artistic representation (Imitation)</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cognitive models</topic><topic>Cognitive Processes</topic><topic>Cognitive structures</topic><topic>Comparative religion</topic><topic>Deities</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>God</topic><topic>God Concepts</topic><topic>Hinduism</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Mental representation</topic><topic>Priming</topic><topic>Prototype theory</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Test Construction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fincham, Frank D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>May, Ross W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamble, Shanmukh V</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Psychology of religion and spirituality</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fincham, Frank D</au><au>May, Ross W</au><au>Kamble, Shanmukh V</au><au>Oman, Doug</au><au>Park, Crystal L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Are Hindu Representations of the Divine Prototypically Structured?</atitle><jtitle>Psychology of religion and spirituality</jtitle><date>2019-05</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>101</spage><epage>110</epage><pages>101-110</pages><issn>1941-1022</issn><eissn>1943-1562</eissn><abstract>Although a great deal has been learned about the perceived attributes of God, systematic research on the cognitive structure of deity representations is lacking. Because extant research focuses almost exclusively on the Christian God, the present studies investigate the representation of deities in a polytheistic religion, Hinduism. Prototype theory informs 4 studies on how conceptualizations of Gods are structured. Using student and community samples, features of Gods are identified, feature centrality is documented, and centrality influence on cognition is evaluated. Studies 1 (feature identification task) and 2 (centrality rating task) produced considerable overlap in feature frequency documentation and feature centrality across the student and community samples, with "God is love" being the most frequently listed feature and most central feature in both samples. Study 3 showed that feature centrality influenced memory recall and recognition. Thus, cognitive representation of the divine in Hinduism is consistent with that of the prototype structure commonly found in the representation of natural objects. Study 4 identified boundary conditions for religious priming. Deity priming influenced ratings of central, but not peripheral, characteristics, only for respondents who rated themselves as closer to God(s). The implications of these results, especially for research on the impact of religious concepts on subsequent behavior, are discussed.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Educational Publishing Foundation</pub><doi>10.1037/rel0000166</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5081-2283</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1941-1022 |
ispartof | Psychology of religion and spirituality, 2019-05, Vol.11 (2), p.101-110 |
issn | 1941-1022 1943-1562 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2236164020 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES |
subjects | Artistic representation (Imitation) Cognition Cognitive models Cognitive Processes Cognitive structures Comparative religion Deities Female God God Concepts Hinduism Human Male Memory Mental representation Priming Prototype theory Religion Test Construction |
title | Are Hindu Representations of the Divine Prototypically Structured? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T13%3A42%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Are%20Hindu%20Representations%20of%20the%20Divine%20Prototypically%20Structured?&rft.jtitle=Psychology%20of%20religion%20and%20spirituality&rft.au=Fincham,%20Frank%20D&rft.date=2019-05&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=101&rft.epage=110&rft.pages=101-110&rft.issn=1941-1022&rft.eissn=1943-1562&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/rel0000166&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2005209443%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2005209443&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |