Supporting knowledge construction in elementary engineering design

Engineering design learning experiences are increasingly offered as part of elementary school, but research on how to support young learners’ knowledge construction during classroom engineering is still preliminary. Questions remain about how classroom supports can make engineering thinking visible...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Science education (Salem, Mass.) Mass.), 2019-07, Vol.103 (4), p.952-978
Hauptverfasser: Wendell, Kristen B., Andrews, Chelsea J., Paugh, Patricia
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 978
container_issue 4
container_start_page 952
container_title Science education (Salem, Mass.)
container_volume 103
creator Wendell, Kristen B.
Andrews, Chelsea J.
Paugh, Patricia
description Engineering design learning experiences are increasingly offered as part of elementary school, but research on how to support young learners’ knowledge construction during classroom engineering is still preliminary. Questions remain about how classroom supports can make engineering thinking visible so that students build engineering knowledge along with engineering products. We report results from a case study of an 11‐day teaching experiment in two elementary classrooms. With the classroom teachers, we guided fourth and fifth graders to document their design iterations with a digital notebooking tool, participate in whole‐class design talks, and create and exhibit posters with “stomp rocket” design recommendations. We conducted a microethnographic analysis of students’ interactions with these notebooking, talk, and poster tools. Our findings characterize how students constructed engineering design knowledge through the discourse of sense‐making about rocket phenomena, decision‐making for specific rocket iterations, and representation‐making for external audiences. These results have implications for elementary engineering instruction: it appears productive for learning to structure whole‐class design talks around representations of sequences of prototypes over time, rather than focusing only on current or best physical prototypes, and to structure engineering curriculum units so that they culminate with student‐generated sets of design recommendations, rather than single design solutions.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/sce.21518
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2234505348</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2234505348</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2978-802e197041e824ac6047508a3faa97b6d10eb62934aa67aa8387592f1705f2153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EEqUw8A8iMTGkPdtx7IxQlQ-pEkNBYrPc9BK5pHawE1X996SElemW533v7iHklsKMArB5LHHGqKDqjEwoFCplXH6ekwkAz1PFWX5JrmLcAVAqGJuQx3Xftj501tXJl_OHBrc1JqV3sQt92VnvEusSbHCPrjPhmKCrrUMMp8AWo63dNbmoTBPx5m9OycfT8n3xkq7enl8XD6u0ZIVUqQKGtJCQUVQsM2UOmRSgDK-MKeQm31LATc4KnhmTS2MUV1IUrKISRDW8xKfkbuxtg__uMXZ65_vghpWaMZ4JEDxTA3U_UmXwMQasdBvsfrhcU9AnRXpQpH8VDex8ZA-2weP_oF4vlmPiB_KlZxs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2234505348</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Supporting knowledge construction in elementary engineering design</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>Wendell, Kristen B. ; Andrews, Chelsea J. ; Paugh, Patricia</creator><creatorcontrib>Wendell, Kristen B. ; Andrews, Chelsea J. ; Paugh, Patricia</creatorcontrib><description>Engineering design learning experiences are increasingly offered as part of elementary school, but research on how to support young learners’ knowledge construction during classroom engineering is still preliminary. Questions remain about how classroom supports can make engineering thinking visible so that students build engineering knowledge along with engineering products. We report results from a case study of an 11‐day teaching experiment in two elementary classrooms. With the classroom teachers, we guided fourth and fifth graders to document their design iterations with a digital notebooking tool, participate in whole‐class design talks, and create and exhibit posters with “stomp rocket” design recommendations. We conducted a microethnographic analysis of students’ interactions with these notebooking, talk, and poster tools. Our findings characterize how students constructed engineering design knowledge through the discourse of sense‐making about rocket phenomena, decision‐making for specific rocket iterations, and representation‐making for external audiences. These results have implications for elementary engineering instruction: it appears productive for learning to structure whole‐class design talks around representations of sequences of prototypes over time, rather than focusing only on current or best physical prototypes, and to structure engineering curriculum units so that they culminate with student‐generated sets of design recommendations, rather than single design solutions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0036-8326</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-237X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/sce.21518</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Wiley Periodicals Inc</publisher><subject>Classrooms ; Design engineering ; design notebook ; Educational Experiments ; Elementary education ; Elementary Schools ; engineering design ; engineering discourse ; Engineering Education ; epistemic tools ; Grade 5 ; knowledge building ; Science education</subject><ispartof>Science education (Salem, Mass.), 2019-07, Vol.103 (4), p.952-978</ispartof><rights>2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2978-802e197041e824ac6047508a3faa97b6d10eb62934aa67aa8387592f1705f2153</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2978-802e197041e824ac6047508a3faa97b6d10eb62934aa67aa8387592f1705f2153</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3270-6596</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fsce.21518$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fsce.21518$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,1419,27931,27932,45581,45582</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wendell, Kristen B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrews, Chelsea J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paugh, Patricia</creatorcontrib><title>Supporting knowledge construction in elementary engineering design</title><title>Science education (Salem, Mass.)</title><description>Engineering design learning experiences are increasingly offered as part of elementary school, but research on how to support young learners’ knowledge construction during classroom engineering is still preliminary. Questions remain about how classroom supports can make engineering thinking visible so that students build engineering knowledge along with engineering products. We report results from a case study of an 11‐day teaching experiment in two elementary classrooms. With the classroom teachers, we guided fourth and fifth graders to document their design iterations with a digital notebooking tool, participate in whole‐class design talks, and create and exhibit posters with “stomp rocket” design recommendations. We conducted a microethnographic analysis of students’ interactions with these notebooking, talk, and poster tools. Our findings characterize how students constructed engineering design knowledge through the discourse of sense‐making about rocket phenomena, decision‐making for specific rocket iterations, and representation‐making for external audiences. These results have implications for elementary engineering instruction: it appears productive for learning to structure whole‐class design talks around representations of sequences of prototypes over time, rather than focusing only on current or best physical prototypes, and to structure engineering curriculum units so that they culminate with student‐generated sets of design recommendations, rather than single design solutions.</description><subject>Classrooms</subject><subject>Design engineering</subject><subject>design notebook</subject><subject>Educational Experiments</subject><subject>Elementary education</subject><subject>Elementary Schools</subject><subject>engineering design</subject><subject>engineering discourse</subject><subject>Engineering Education</subject><subject>epistemic tools</subject><subject>Grade 5</subject><subject>knowledge building</subject><subject>Science education</subject><issn>0036-8326</issn><issn>1098-237X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EEqUw8A8iMTGkPdtx7IxQlQ-pEkNBYrPc9BK5pHawE1X996SElemW533v7iHklsKMArB5LHHGqKDqjEwoFCplXH6ekwkAz1PFWX5JrmLcAVAqGJuQx3Xftj501tXJl_OHBrc1JqV3sQt92VnvEusSbHCPrjPhmKCrrUMMp8AWo63dNbmoTBPx5m9OycfT8n3xkq7enl8XD6u0ZIVUqQKGtJCQUVQsM2UOmRSgDK-MKeQm31LATc4KnhmTS2MUV1IUrKISRDW8xKfkbuxtg__uMXZ65_vghpWaMZ4JEDxTA3U_UmXwMQasdBvsfrhcU9AnRXpQpH8VDex8ZA-2weP_oF4vlmPiB_KlZxs</recordid><startdate>201907</startdate><enddate>201907</enddate><creator>Wendell, Kristen B.</creator><creator>Andrews, Chelsea J.</creator><creator>Paugh, Patricia</creator><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3270-6596</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201907</creationdate><title>Supporting knowledge construction in elementary engineering design</title><author>Wendell, Kristen B. ; Andrews, Chelsea J. ; Paugh, Patricia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2978-802e197041e824ac6047508a3faa97b6d10eb62934aa67aa8387592f1705f2153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Classrooms</topic><topic>Design engineering</topic><topic>design notebook</topic><topic>Educational Experiments</topic><topic>Elementary education</topic><topic>Elementary Schools</topic><topic>engineering design</topic><topic>engineering discourse</topic><topic>Engineering Education</topic><topic>epistemic tools</topic><topic>Grade 5</topic><topic>knowledge building</topic><topic>Science education</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wendell, Kristen B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrews, Chelsea J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paugh, Patricia</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Science education (Salem, Mass.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wendell, Kristen B.</au><au>Andrews, Chelsea J.</au><au>Paugh, Patricia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Supporting knowledge construction in elementary engineering design</atitle><jtitle>Science education (Salem, Mass.)</jtitle><date>2019-07</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>103</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>952</spage><epage>978</epage><pages>952-978</pages><issn>0036-8326</issn><eissn>1098-237X</eissn><abstract>Engineering design learning experiences are increasingly offered as part of elementary school, but research on how to support young learners’ knowledge construction during classroom engineering is still preliminary. Questions remain about how classroom supports can make engineering thinking visible so that students build engineering knowledge along with engineering products. We report results from a case study of an 11‐day teaching experiment in two elementary classrooms. With the classroom teachers, we guided fourth and fifth graders to document their design iterations with a digital notebooking tool, participate in whole‐class design talks, and create and exhibit posters with “stomp rocket” design recommendations. We conducted a microethnographic analysis of students’ interactions with these notebooking, talk, and poster tools. Our findings characterize how students constructed engineering design knowledge through the discourse of sense‐making about rocket phenomena, decision‐making for specific rocket iterations, and representation‐making for external audiences. These results have implications for elementary engineering instruction: it appears productive for learning to structure whole‐class design talks around representations of sequences of prototypes over time, rather than focusing only on current or best physical prototypes, and to structure engineering curriculum units so that they culminate with student‐generated sets of design recommendations, rather than single design solutions.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Wiley Periodicals Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/sce.21518</doi><tpages>27</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3270-6596</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0036-8326
ispartof Science education (Salem, Mass.), 2019-07, Vol.103 (4), p.952-978
issn 0036-8326
1098-237X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2234505348
source Access via Wiley Online Library; Education Source
subjects Classrooms
Design engineering
design notebook
Educational Experiments
Elementary education
Elementary Schools
engineering design
engineering discourse
Engineering Education
epistemic tools
Grade 5
knowledge building
Science education
title Supporting knowledge construction in elementary engineering design
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-05T11%3A56%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Supporting%20knowledge%20construction%20in%20elementary%20engineering%20design&rft.jtitle=Science%20education%20(Salem,%20Mass.)&rft.au=Wendell,%20Kristen%20B.&rft.date=2019-07&rft.volume=103&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=952&rft.epage=978&rft.pages=952-978&rft.issn=0036-8326&rft.eissn=1098-237X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/sce.21518&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2234505348%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2234505348&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true