Analysis of Lard in Lipstick Formulation Using FTIR Spectroscopy and Multivariate Calibration: A Comparison of Three Extraction Methods
Analysis of lard extracted from lipstick formulation containing castor oil has been performed using FTIR spectroscopic method combined with multivariate calibration. Three different extraction methods were compared, namely saponification method followed by liquid/liquid extraction with hexane/dichlo...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Oleo Science 2016, Vol.65(10), pp.815-824 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 824 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 10 |
| container_start_page | 815 |
| container_title | Journal of Oleo Science |
| container_volume | 65 |
| creator | Waskitho, Dri Lukitaningsih, Endang Sudjadi Rohman, Abdul |
| description | Analysis of lard extracted from lipstick formulation containing castor oil has been performed using FTIR spectroscopic method combined with multivariate calibration. Three different extraction methods were compared, namely saponification method followed by liquid/liquid extraction with hexane/dichlorometane/ethanol/water, saponification method followed by liquid/liquid extraction with dichloromethane/ethanol/water, and Bligh & Dyer method using chloroform/methanol/water as extracting solvent. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of lard were performed using principle component (PCA) and partial least square (PLS) analysis, respectively. The results showed that, in all samples prepared by the three extraction methods, PCA was capable of identifying lard at wavelength region of 1200-800 cm–1 with the best result was obtained by Bligh & Dyer method. Furthermore, PLS analysis at the same wavelength region used for qualification showed that Bligh and Dyer was the most suitable extraction method with the highest determination coefficient (R2) and the lowest root mean square error of calibration (RMSEC) as well as root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP) values. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.5650/jos.ess15294 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2232557030</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2232557030</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c598t-158aba41ea6135cfc45065689b627728e1cf5e9593bc4951ee09da0e5f68a20e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFUU2P0zAQtRCI_YAbZ2SJK1lsJ5PE3Kpou6zUFRJ0z5HjTLYOaRxsB9FfwN9et92Wy9jye_PezDMhHzi7gRzYl976G_Seg5DZK3LJ06xI0hTE68MdklJCcUGuvO8Zi-9QvCUXoigEZIW8JP8Woxp23nhqO7pSrqVmpCsz-WD0L7q0bjsPKhg70kdvxie6XN__oD8n1MFZr-20o2ps6cM8BPNHOaMC0koNpnGHpq90QSu7nSLio0S0WG8cIr39G5zSB9kHDBvb-nfkTacGj-9fzmvyuLxdV9-S1fe7-2qxSjTIMiQcStWojKPKeQq60xmwHPJSNvl-pxK57gAlyLTRmQSOyGSrGEKXl0owTK_Jp6Pu5OzvGX2oezu7mIGvhUhFjIelLLI-H1k6bukddvXkzFa5Xc1ZvU89dvn6lHqkf3wRnZsttmfyKeZIuDsSImq0Guw4mBH_W7d9YQeMkoLxvGZxpejDmKhZySEWkYkiYyAhKlVHpd4H9YRnK-Xihw14mCuH_ZixngY8o3qjXI1j-gy-0q6G</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2232557030</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analysis of Lard in Lipstick Formulation Using FTIR Spectroscopy and Multivariate Calibration: A Comparison of Three Extraction Methods</title><source>J-STAGE Free</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Waskitho, Dri ; Lukitaningsih, Endang ; Sudjadi ; Rohman, Abdul</creator><creatorcontrib>Waskitho, Dri ; Lukitaningsih, Endang ; Sudjadi ; Rohman, Abdul ; District of Bali ; Research Center of Halal Products ; Gadjah Mada University ; Faculty of Pharmacy ; The National Agency of Drug and Food Control ; Central Kalimantan</creatorcontrib><description>Analysis of lard extracted from lipstick formulation containing castor oil has been performed using FTIR spectroscopic method combined with multivariate calibration. Three different extraction methods were compared, namely saponification method followed by liquid/liquid extraction with hexane/dichlorometane/ethanol/water, saponification method followed by liquid/liquid extraction with dichloromethane/ethanol/water, and Bligh & Dyer method using chloroform/methanol/water as extracting solvent. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of lard were performed using principle component (PCA) and partial least square (PLS) analysis, respectively. The results showed that, in all samples prepared by the three extraction methods, PCA was capable of identifying lard at wavelength region of 1200-800 cm–1 with the best result was obtained by Bligh & Dyer method. Furthermore, PLS analysis at the same wavelength region used for qualification showed that Bligh and Dyer was the most suitable extraction method with the highest determination coefficient (R2) and the lowest root mean square error of calibration (RMSEC) as well as root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP) values.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1345-8957</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1347-3352</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5650/jos.ess15294</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27725479</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Japan: Japan Oil Chemists' Society</publisher><subject>Calibration ; Castor oil ; Chemistry, Pharmaceutical ; Chloroform ; Cosmetics - chemistry ; Dichloromethane ; Dietary Fats - analysis ; Ethanol ; Fourier transforms ; FTIR spectrophotometry ; Identification methods ; Infrared spectroscopy ; lard ; Lipstick ; Mean square errors ; Methods ; Multivariate Analysis ; partial least square ; principle component analysis ; Qualitative analysis ; Quantitative analysis ; Root-mean-square errors ; Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared</subject><ispartof>Journal of Oleo Science, 2016, Vol.65(10), pp.815-824</ispartof><rights>2016 by Japan Oil Chemists' Society</rights><rights>Copyright Japan Science and Technology Agency 2016</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c598t-158aba41ea6135cfc45065689b627728e1cf5e9593bc4951ee09da0e5f68a20e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c598t-158aba41ea6135cfc45065689b627728e1cf5e9593bc4951ee09da0e5f68a20e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1881,4022,27922,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27725479$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Waskitho, Dri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lukitaningsih, Endang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sudjadi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rohman, Abdul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>District of Bali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Research Center of Halal Products</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gadjah Mada University</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faculty of Pharmacy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>The National Agency of Drug and Food Control</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Central Kalimantan</creatorcontrib><title>Analysis of Lard in Lipstick Formulation Using FTIR Spectroscopy and Multivariate Calibration: A Comparison of Three Extraction Methods</title><title>Journal of Oleo Science</title><addtitle>J Oleo Sci</addtitle><description>Analysis of lard extracted from lipstick formulation containing castor oil has been performed using FTIR spectroscopic method combined with multivariate calibration. Three different extraction methods were compared, namely saponification method followed by liquid/liquid extraction with hexane/dichlorometane/ethanol/water, saponification method followed by liquid/liquid extraction with dichloromethane/ethanol/water, and Bligh & Dyer method using chloroform/methanol/water as extracting solvent. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of lard were performed using principle component (PCA) and partial least square (PLS) analysis, respectively. The results showed that, in all samples prepared by the three extraction methods, PCA was capable of identifying lard at wavelength region of 1200-800 cm–1 with the best result was obtained by Bligh & Dyer method. Furthermore, PLS analysis at the same wavelength region used for qualification showed that Bligh and Dyer was the most suitable extraction method with the highest determination coefficient (R2) and the lowest root mean square error of calibration (RMSEC) as well as root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP) values.</description><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Castor oil</subject><subject>Chemistry, Pharmaceutical</subject><subject>Chloroform</subject><subject>Cosmetics - chemistry</subject><subject>Dichloromethane</subject><subject>Dietary Fats - analysis</subject><subject>Ethanol</subject><subject>Fourier transforms</subject><subject>FTIR spectrophotometry</subject><subject>Identification methods</subject><subject>Infrared spectroscopy</subject><subject>lard</subject><subject>Lipstick</subject><subject>Mean square errors</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>partial least square</subject><subject>principle component analysis</subject><subject>Qualitative analysis</subject><subject>Quantitative analysis</subject><subject>Root-mean-square errors</subject><subject>Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared</subject><issn>1345-8957</issn><issn>1347-3352</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFUU2P0zAQtRCI_YAbZ2SJK1lsJ5PE3Kpou6zUFRJ0z5HjTLYOaRxsB9FfwN9et92Wy9jye_PezDMhHzi7gRzYl976G_Seg5DZK3LJ06xI0hTE68MdklJCcUGuvO8Zi-9QvCUXoigEZIW8JP8Woxp23nhqO7pSrqVmpCsz-WD0L7q0bjsPKhg70kdvxie6XN__oD8n1MFZr-20o2ps6cM8BPNHOaMC0koNpnGHpq90QSu7nSLio0S0WG8cIr39G5zSB9kHDBvb-nfkTacGj-9fzmvyuLxdV9-S1fe7-2qxSjTIMiQcStWojKPKeQq60xmwHPJSNvl-pxK57gAlyLTRmQSOyGSrGEKXl0owTK_Jp6Pu5OzvGX2oezu7mIGvhUhFjIelLLI-H1k6bukddvXkzFa5Xc1ZvU89dvn6lHqkf3wRnZsttmfyKeZIuDsSImq0Guw4mBH_W7d9YQeMkoLxvGZxpejDmKhZySEWkYkiYyAhKlVHpd4H9YRnK-Xihw14mCuH_ZixngY8o3qjXI1j-gy-0q6G</recordid><startdate>2016</startdate><enddate>2016</enddate><creator>Waskitho, Dri</creator><creator>Lukitaningsih, Endang</creator><creator>Sudjadi</creator><creator>Rohman, Abdul</creator><general>Japan Oil Chemists' Society</general><general>Japan Science and Technology Agency</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2016</creationdate><title>Analysis of Lard in Lipstick Formulation Using FTIR Spectroscopy and Multivariate Calibration: A Comparison of Three Extraction Methods</title><author>Waskitho, Dri ; Lukitaningsih, Endang ; Sudjadi ; Rohman, Abdul</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c598t-158aba41ea6135cfc45065689b627728e1cf5e9593bc4951ee09da0e5f68a20e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Castor oil</topic><topic>Chemistry, Pharmaceutical</topic><topic>Chloroform</topic><topic>Cosmetics - chemistry</topic><topic>Dichloromethane</topic><topic>Dietary Fats - analysis</topic><topic>Ethanol</topic><topic>Fourier transforms</topic><topic>FTIR spectrophotometry</topic><topic>Identification methods</topic><topic>Infrared spectroscopy</topic><topic>lard</topic><topic>Lipstick</topic><topic>Mean square errors</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>partial least square</topic><topic>principle component analysis</topic><topic>Qualitative analysis</topic><topic>Quantitative analysis</topic><topic>Root-mean-square errors</topic><topic>Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Waskitho, Dri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lukitaningsih, Endang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sudjadi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rohman, Abdul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>District of Bali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Research Center of Halal Products</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gadjah Mada University</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faculty of Pharmacy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>The National Agency of Drug and Food Control</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Central Kalimantan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><jtitle>Journal of Oleo Science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Waskitho, Dri</au><au>Lukitaningsih, Endang</au><au>Sudjadi</au><au>Rohman, Abdul</au><aucorp>District of Bali</aucorp><aucorp>Research Center of Halal Products</aucorp><aucorp>Gadjah Mada University</aucorp><aucorp>Faculty of Pharmacy</aucorp><aucorp>The National Agency of Drug and Food Control</aucorp><aucorp>Central Kalimantan</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Analysis of Lard in Lipstick Formulation Using FTIR Spectroscopy and Multivariate Calibration: A Comparison of Three Extraction Methods</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Oleo Science</jtitle><addtitle>J Oleo Sci</addtitle><date>2016</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>815</spage><epage>824</epage><pages>815-824</pages><issn>1345-8957</issn><eissn>1347-3352</eissn><abstract>Analysis of lard extracted from lipstick formulation containing castor oil has been performed using FTIR spectroscopic method combined with multivariate calibration. Three different extraction methods were compared, namely saponification method followed by liquid/liquid extraction with hexane/dichlorometane/ethanol/water, saponification method followed by liquid/liquid extraction with dichloromethane/ethanol/water, and Bligh & Dyer method using chloroform/methanol/water as extracting solvent. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of lard were performed using principle component (PCA) and partial least square (PLS) analysis, respectively. The results showed that, in all samples prepared by the three extraction methods, PCA was capable of identifying lard at wavelength region of 1200-800 cm–1 with the best result was obtained by Bligh & Dyer method. Furthermore, PLS analysis at the same wavelength region used for qualification showed that Bligh and Dyer was the most suitable extraction method with the highest determination coefficient (R2) and the lowest root mean square error of calibration (RMSEC) as well as root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP) values.</abstract><cop>Japan</cop><pub>Japan Oil Chemists' Society</pub><pmid>27725479</pmid><doi>10.5650/jos.ess15294</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1345-8957 |
| ispartof | Journal of Oleo Science, 2016, Vol.65(10), pp.815-824 |
| issn | 1345-8957 1347-3352 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2232557030 |
| source | J-STAGE Free; MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
| subjects | Calibration Castor oil Chemistry, Pharmaceutical Chloroform Cosmetics - chemistry Dichloromethane Dietary Fats - analysis Ethanol Fourier transforms FTIR spectrophotometry Identification methods Infrared spectroscopy lard Lipstick Mean square errors Methods Multivariate Analysis partial least square principle component analysis Qualitative analysis Quantitative analysis Root-mean-square errors Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared |
| title | Analysis of Lard in Lipstick Formulation Using FTIR Spectroscopy and Multivariate Calibration: A Comparison of Three Extraction Methods |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T10%3A29%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analysis%20of%20Lard%20in%20Lipstick%20Formulation%20Using%20FTIR%20Spectroscopy%20and%20Multivariate%20Calibration:%20A%20Comparison%20of%20Three%20Extraction%20Methods&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Oleo%20Science&rft.au=Waskitho,%20Dri&rft.aucorp=District%20of%20Bali&rft.date=2016&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=815&rft.epage=824&rft.pages=815-824&rft.issn=1345-8957&rft.eissn=1347-3352&rft_id=info:doi/10.5650/jos.ess15294&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2232557030%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2232557030&rft_id=info:pmid/27725479&rfr_iscdi=true |