Short-Term Effect of Helicopter-Based Capture on Movements of a Social Ungulate

Capture and handling of wildlife is often an important component of studies where detailed demographic, behavioral, physiological, or health data are required. Yet, capturing and handling wildlife is sometimes controversial and lacking public support because of concern about effects on individuals....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of wildlife management 2019-05, Vol.83 (4), p.830-837
Hauptverfasser: JUNG, THOMAS S., KONKOLICS, SEAN M., KUKKA, PIIA M., MAJCHRZAK, YASMINE N., MENZIES, ALLYSON K., OAKLEY, MICHELLE P., PEERS, MICHAEL J.L., STUDD, EMILY K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 837
container_issue 4
container_start_page 830
container_title The Journal of wildlife management
container_volume 83
creator JUNG, THOMAS S.
KONKOLICS, SEAN M.
KUKKA, PIIA M.
MAJCHRZAK, YASMINE N.
MENZIES, ALLYSON K.
OAKLEY, MICHELLE P.
PEERS, MICHAEL J.L.
STUDD, EMILY K.
description Capture and handling of wildlife is often an important component of studies where detailed demographic, behavioral, physiological, or health data are required. Yet, capturing and handling wildlife is sometimes controversial and lacking public support because of concern about effects on individuals. Investigating potential effects of capturing wildlife is also important to inform data-censoring protocols when using information obtained from captured animals. We investigated the short-term effect of helicopter-based capture and handling on movements of free-ranging bison (Bison bison) that were chemically immobilized in Yukon, Canada. We examined daily movement rates, home range size, and displacement of global positioning system-collared individuals immediately after capture and for 20 days thereafter. Our results indicate that there is a minimal short-term effect of helicopter-based capture on bison movements. Significant differences from apparent pre-capture movement behavior were observed only within 24 hours after capture. We observed variation among individuals, however, with some animals taking up to 10 days to return to apparent pre-capture movement rates, whereas others had no measurable response to capture. Despite individual variation, >80% of individuals had returned to apparent pre-capture movement behavior within the first 5 days after capture. Furthermore, sex-based effects were evident: females increased their daily movement rates, home range size, and displacement after capture, whereas males had either no effect or decreased movement rates. Our results suggest that movement rates are altered for only a short period after capture and, therefore, should not have severe negative effects on bison using our protocols. Accordingly, researchers should censor the first 10 days after capture from their analyses to avoid using biased information. Our study should also help inform public discourse regarding capturing and handling wildlife for research or management purposes.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jwmg.21640
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2232515754</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26689584</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26689584</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3230-f3850da7700d08c565168659f3a02b112e55fb65c03ed2ecb29cb8241bd9f6ba3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9LwzAUgIMoOKcX70LBm9CZH02aHnXMTdnYYRt6K2mazJa2mUnq2H9vZ9Wjp3d43_cefABcIzhCEOL7cl9vRxixCJ6AAUpIHGKO4lMw6JY4pBF6OwcXzpUQEoQ4G4Dl6t1YH66VrYOJ1kr6wOhgpqpCmp1XNnwUTuXBWOx8a1VgmmBhPlWtGu-OoAhWRhaiCjbNtq2EV5fgTIvKqaufOQSbp8l6PAvny-nz-GEeSoIJDDXhFOYijiHMIZeUUcQ4o4kmAuIMIawo1RmjEhKVYyUznMiM4whleaJZJsgQ3PZ3d9Z8tMr5tDStbbqXKcYEU0RjGnXUXU9Ja5yzSqc7W9TCHlIE02Ow9Bgs_Q7WwaiH90WlDv-Q6cvrYvrr3PRO6byxfw5mjCeUR-QLvbh2Ig</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2232515754</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Short-Term Effect of Helicopter-Based Capture on Movements of a Social Ungulate</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>JUNG, THOMAS S. ; KONKOLICS, SEAN M. ; KUKKA, PIIA M. ; MAJCHRZAK, YASMINE N. ; MENZIES, ALLYSON K. ; OAKLEY, MICHELLE P. ; PEERS, MICHAEL J.L. ; STUDD, EMILY K.</creator><creatorcontrib>JUNG, THOMAS S. ; KONKOLICS, SEAN M. ; KUKKA, PIIA M. ; MAJCHRZAK, YASMINE N. ; MENZIES, ALLYSON K. ; OAKLEY, MICHELLE P. ; PEERS, MICHAEL J.L. ; STUDD, EMILY K.</creatorcontrib><description>Capture and handling of wildlife is often an important component of studies where detailed demographic, behavioral, physiological, or health data are required. Yet, capturing and handling wildlife is sometimes controversial and lacking public support because of concern about effects on individuals. Investigating potential effects of capturing wildlife is also important to inform data-censoring protocols when using information obtained from captured animals. We investigated the short-term effect of helicopter-based capture and handling on movements of free-ranging bison (Bison bison) that were chemically immobilized in Yukon, Canada. We examined daily movement rates, home range size, and displacement of global positioning system-collared individuals immediately after capture and for 20 days thereafter. Our results indicate that there is a minimal short-term effect of helicopter-based capture on bison movements. Significant differences from apparent pre-capture movement behavior were observed only within 24 hours after capture. We observed variation among individuals, however, with some animals taking up to 10 days to return to apparent pre-capture movement rates, whereas others had no measurable response to capture. Despite individual variation, &gt;80% of individuals had returned to apparent pre-capture movement behavior within the first 5 days after capture. Furthermore, sex-based effects were evident: females increased their daily movement rates, home range size, and displacement after capture, whereas males had either no effect or decreased movement rates. Our results suggest that movement rates are altered for only a short period after capture and, therefore, should not have severe negative effects on bison using our protocols. Accordingly, researchers should censor the first 10 days after capture from their analyses to avoid using biased information. Our study should also help inform public discourse regarding capturing and handling wildlife for research or management purposes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-541X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-2817</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.21640</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bethesda: Wiley</publisher><subject>animal welfare ; Animals ; bison ; Bison bison ; Buffalo ; chemical immobilization ; Demographics ; Global positioning systems ; GPS ; GPS collar ; Helicopters ; Home range ; Management and Conservation ; Materials handling ; movement rates ; Organic chemistry ; Wildlife ; wildlife capture and handling</subject><ispartof>The Journal of wildlife management, 2019-05, Vol.83 (4), p.830-837</ispartof><rights>2019 The Wildlife Society</rights><rights>The Wildlife Society, 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3230-f3850da7700d08c565168659f3a02b112e55fb65c03ed2ecb29cb8241bd9f6ba3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3230-f3850da7700d08c565168659f3a02b112e55fb65c03ed2ecb29cb8241bd9f6ba3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2681-6852</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26689584$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26689584$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554,57995,58228</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>JUNG, THOMAS S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KONKOLICS, SEAN M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KUKKA, PIIA M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MAJCHRZAK, YASMINE N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MENZIES, ALLYSON K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OAKLEY, MICHELLE P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PEERS, MICHAEL J.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STUDD, EMILY K.</creatorcontrib><title>Short-Term Effect of Helicopter-Based Capture on Movements of a Social Ungulate</title><title>The Journal of wildlife management</title><description>Capture and handling of wildlife is often an important component of studies where detailed demographic, behavioral, physiological, or health data are required. Yet, capturing and handling wildlife is sometimes controversial and lacking public support because of concern about effects on individuals. Investigating potential effects of capturing wildlife is also important to inform data-censoring protocols when using information obtained from captured animals. We investigated the short-term effect of helicopter-based capture and handling on movements of free-ranging bison (Bison bison) that were chemically immobilized in Yukon, Canada. We examined daily movement rates, home range size, and displacement of global positioning system-collared individuals immediately after capture and for 20 days thereafter. Our results indicate that there is a minimal short-term effect of helicopter-based capture on bison movements. Significant differences from apparent pre-capture movement behavior were observed only within 24 hours after capture. We observed variation among individuals, however, with some animals taking up to 10 days to return to apparent pre-capture movement rates, whereas others had no measurable response to capture. Despite individual variation, &gt;80% of individuals had returned to apparent pre-capture movement behavior within the first 5 days after capture. Furthermore, sex-based effects were evident: females increased their daily movement rates, home range size, and displacement after capture, whereas males had either no effect or decreased movement rates. Our results suggest that movement rates are altered for only a short period after capture and, therefore, should not have severe negative effects on bison using our protocols. Accordingly, researchers should censor the first 10 days after capture from their analyses to avoid using biased information. Our study should also help inform public discourse regarding capturing and handling wildlife for research or management purposes.</description><subject>animal welfare</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>bison</subject><subject>Bison bison</subject><subject>Buffalo</subject><subject>chemical immobilization</subject><subject>Demographics</subject><subject>Global positioning systems</subject><subject>GPS</subject><subject>GPS collar</subject><subject>Helicopters</subject><subject>Home range</subject><subject>Management and Conservation</subject><subject>Materials handling</subject><subject>movement rates</subject><subject>Organic chemistry</subject><subject>Wildlife</subject><subject>wildlife capture and handling</subject><issn>0022-541X</issn><issn>1937-2817</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM9LwzAUgIMoOKcX70LBm9CZH02aHnXMTdnYYRt6K2mazJa2mUnq2H9vZ9Wjp3d43_cefABcIzhCEOL7cl9vRxixCJ6AAUpIHGKO4lMw6JY4pBF6OwcXzpUQEoQ4G4Dl6t1YH66VrYOJ1kr6wOhgpqpCmp1XNnwUTuXBWOx8a1VgmmBhPlWtGu-OoAhWRhaiCjbNtq2EV5fgTIvKqaufOQSbp8l6PAvny-nz-GEeSoIJDDXhFOYijiHMIZeUUcQ4o4kmAuIMIawo1RmjEhKVYyUznMiM4whleaJZJsgQ3PZ3d9Z8tMr5tDStbbqXKcYEU0RjGnXUXU9Ja5yzSqc7W9TCHlIE02Ow9Bgs_Q7WwaiH90WlDv-Q6cvrYvrr3PRO6byxfw5mjCeUR-QLvbh2Ig</recordid><startdate>20190501</startdate><enddate>20190501</enddate><creator>JUNG, THOMAS S.</creator><creator>KONKOLICS, SEAN M.</creator><creator>KUKKA, PIIA M.</creator><creator>MAJCHRZAK, YASMINE N.</creator><creator>MENZIES, ALLYSON K.</creator><creator>OAKLEY, MICHELLE P.</creator><creator>PEERS, MICHAEL J.L.</creator><creator>STUDD, EMILY K.</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2681-6852</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190501</creationdate><title>Short-Term Effect of Helicopter-Based Capture on Movements of a Social Ungulate</title><author>JUNG, THOMAS S. ; KONKOLICS, SEAN M. ; KUKKA, PIIA M. ; MAJCHRZAK, YASMINE N. ; MENZIES, ALLYSON K. ; OAKLEY, MICHELLE P. ; PEERS, MICHAEL J.L. ; STUDD, EMILY K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3230-f3850da7700d08c565168659f3a02b112e55fb65c03ed2ecb29cb8241bd9f6ba3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>animal welfare</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>bison</topic><topic>Bison bison</topic><topic>Buffalo</topic><topic>chemical immobilization</topic><topic>Demographics</topic><topic>Global positioning systems</topic><topic>GPS</topic><topic>GPS collar</topic><topic>Helicopters</topic><topic>Home range</topic><topic>Management and Conservation</topic><topic>Materials handling</topic><topic>movement rates</topic><topic>Organic chemistry</topic><topic>Wildlife</topic><topic>wildlife capture and handling</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>JUNG, THOMAS S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KONKOLICS, SEAN M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KUKKA, PIIA M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MAJCHRZAK, YASMINE N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MENZIES, ALLYSON K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OAKLEY, MICHELLE P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PEERS, MICHAEL J.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STUDD, EMILY K.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>JUNG, THOMAS S.</au><au>KONKOLICS, SEAN M.</au><au>KUKKA, PIIA M.</au><au>MAJCHRZAK, YASMINE N.</au><au>MENZIES, ALLYSON K.</au><au>OAKLEY, MICHELLE P.</au><au>PEERS, MICHAEL J.L.</au><au>STUDD, EMILY K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Short-Term Effect of Helicopter-Based Capture on Movements of a Social Ungulate</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle><date>2019-05-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>83</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>830</spage><epage>837</epage><pages>830-837</pages><issn>0022-541X</issn><eissn>1937-2817</eissn><abstract>Capture and handling of wildlife is often an important component of studies where detailed demographic, behavioral, physiological, or health data are required. Yet, capturing and handling wildlife is sometimes controversial and lacking public support because of concern about effects on individuals. Investigating potential effects of capturing wildlife is also important to inform data-censoring protocols when using information obtained from captured animals. We investigated the short-term effect of helicopter-based capture and handling on movements of free-ranging bison (Bison bison) that were chemically immobilized in Yukon, Canada. We examined daily movement rates, home range size, and displacement of global positioning system-collared individuals immediately after capture and for 20 days thereafter. Our results indicate that there is a minimal short-term effect of helicopter-based capture on bison movements. Significant differences from apparent pre-capture movement behavior were observed only within 24 hours after capture. We observed variation among individuals, however, with some animals taking up to 10 days to return to apparent pre-capture movement rates, whereas others had no measurable response to capture. Despite individual variation, &gt;80% of individuals had returned to apparent pre-capture movement behavior within the first 5 days after capture. Furthermore, sex-based effects were evident: females increased their daily movement rates, home range size, and displacement after capture, whereas males had either no effect or decreased movement rates. Our results suggest that movement rates are altered for only a short period after capture and, therefore, should not have severe negative effects on bison using our protocols. Accordingly, researchers should censor the first 10 days after capture from their analyses to avoid using biased information. Our study should also help inform public discourse regarding capturing and handling wildlife for research or management purposes.</abstract><cop>Bethesda</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><doi>10.1002/jwmg.21640</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2681-6852</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-541X
ispartof The Journal of wildlife management, 2019-05, Vol.83 (4), p.830-837
issn 0022-541X
1937-2817
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2232515754
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects animal welfare
Animals
bison
Bison bison
Buffalo
chemical immobilization
Demographics
Global positioning systems
GPS
GPS collar
Helicopters
Home range
Management and Conservation
Materials handling
movement rates
Organic chemistry
Wildlife
wildlife capture and handling
title Short-Term Effect of Helicopter-Based Capture on Movements of a Social Ungulate
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T07%3A51%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Short-Term%20Effect%20of%20Helicopter-Based%20Capture%20on%20Movements%20of%20a%20Social%20Ungulate&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20wildlife%20management&rft.au=JUNG,%20THOMAS%20S.&rft.date=2019-05-01&rft.volume=83&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=830&rft.epage=837&rft.pages=830-837&rft.issn=0022-541X&rft.eissn=1937-2817&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jwmg.21640&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26689584%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2232515754&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26689584&rfr_iscdi=true