Postindustrial technology policy
Even without the possibility that reassessment of the nation’s military posture might lead to declines in support for generation of new knowledge in the physical sciences and engineering, the growth of the service economy should suffice to occasion a fresh look at US technology policy. This paper re...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Research policy 2001-06, Vol.30 (6), p.873-889 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 889 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 873 |
| container_title | Research policy |
| container_volume | 30 |
| creator | Alic, John A. |
| description | Even without the possibility that reassessment of the nation’s military posture might lead to declines in support for generation of new knowledge in the physical sciences and engineering, the growth of the service economy should suffice to occasion a fresh look at US technology policy. This paper reviews the reasons, with particular attention to services such as health care. It then sketches needs for a postindustrial, post-Cold War US technology policy. Those needs lie heavily in the direction of diffusion and learning. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00162-1 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_223227442</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0048733300001621</els_id><sourcerecordid>74297705</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-452c1c426b84554f16953b3285df4e7026cc445949d4fdcc3bc797f73d5064873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUE1LAzEUDKJgrf4EoXjSw2q-s3sSKX5SUFDPYZt9a1O2mzXZFvbf-9qKVw-TB2Fm3rwh5JzRa0aZvnmnVOaZEUJcUnpF8Ytn7ICMWG5EZjRXh2T0RzkmJyktKbIkLUZk8hZS79tqnfroy2bSg1u0oQlfw6QLjXfDKTmqyybB2e8ck8-H-4_pUzZ7fXye3s0yJ7XoM6m4Y05yPc-lUrJmulBiLniuqlqCoVw7J6UqZFHJunJOzJ0pTG1EpaiWGHRMLva-XQzfa0i9XYZ1bHGl5VxwbqTkSFJ7koshpQi17aJflXGwjNptF3bXhd0eaim1uy4sQ93LXhehA_cnAoAICe-0GytKQfEZEBxlODxCIzoEBrR5XthFv0Kz270ZYB0bD9Em56F1UPkIrrdV8P_E-QHMC3zf</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>223227442</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Postindustrial technology policy</title><source>RePEc</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Alic, John A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Alic, John A.</creatorcontrib><description>Even without the possibility that reassessment of the nation’s military posture might lead to declines in support for generation of new knowledge in the physical sciences and engineering, the growth of the service economy should suffice to occasion a fresh look at US technology policy. This paper reviews the reasons, with particular attention to services such as health care. It then sketches needs for a postindustrial, post-Cold War US technology policy. Those needs lie heavily in the direction of diffusion and learning.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-7333</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7625</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00162-1</identifier><identifier>CODEN: REPYBP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Cold War ; Policy making ; Productivity ; R&D ; Research & development ; Services ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Research policy, 2001-06, Vol.30 (6), p.873-889</ispartof><rights>2001 Elsevier Science B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. Jun 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-452c1c426b84554f16953b3285df4e7026cc445949d4fdcc3bc797f73d5064873</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-452c1c426b84554f16953b3285df4e7026cc445949d4fdcc3bc797f73d5064873</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733300001621$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,3994,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeerespol/v_3a30_3ay_3a2001_3ai_3a6_3ap_3a873-889.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alic, John A.</creatorcontrib><title>Postindustrial technology policy</title><title>Research policy</title><description>Even without the possibility that reassessment of the nation’s military posture might lead to declines in support for generation of new knowledge in the physical sciences and engineering, the growth of the service economy should suffice to occasion a fresh look at US technology policy. This paper reviews the reasons, with particular attention to services such as health care. It then sketches needs for a postindustrial, post-Cold War US technology policy. Those needs lie heavily in the direction of diffusion and learning.</description><subject>Cold War</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>R&D</subject><subject>Research & development</subject><subject>Services</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0048-7333</issn><issn>1873-7625</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUE1LAzEUDKJgrf4EoXjSw2q-s3sSKX5SUFDPYZt9a1O2mzXZFvbf-9qKVw-TB2Fm3rwh5JzRa0aZvnmnVOaZEUJcUnpF8Ytn7ICMWG5EZjRXh2T0RzkmJyktKbIkLUZk8hZS79tqnfroy2bSg1u0oQlfw6QLjXfDKTmqyybB2e8ck8-H-4_pUzZ7fXye3s0yJ7XoM6m4Y05yPc-lUrJmulBiLniuqlqCoVw7J6UqZFHJunJOzJ0pTG1EpaiWGHRMLva-XQzfa0i9XYZ1bHGl5VxwbqTkSFJ7koshpQi17aJflXGwjNptF3bXhd0eaim1uy4sQ93LXhehA_cnAoAICe-0GytKQfEZEBxlODxCIzoEBrR5XthFv0Kz270ZYB0bD9Em56F1UPkIrrdV8P_E-QHMC3zf</recordid><startdate>20010601</startdate><enddate>20010601</enddate><creator>Alic, John A.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Sequoia S.A</general><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JQ2</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010601</creationdate><title>Postindustrial technology policy</title><author>Alic, John A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-452c1c426b84554f16953b3285df4e7026cc445949d4fdcc3bc797f73d5064873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Cold War</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>R&D</topic><topic>Research & development</topic><topic>Services</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alic, John A.</creatorcontrib><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Research policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alic, John A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Postindustrial technology policy</atitle><jtitle>Research policy</jtitle><date>2001-06-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>873</spage><epage>889</epage><pages>873-889</pages><issn>0048-7333</issn><eissn>1873-7625</eissn><coden>REPYBP</coden><abstract>Even without the possibility that reassessment of the nation’s military posture might lead to declines in support for generation of new knowledge in the physical sciences and engineering, the growth of the service economy should suffice to occasion a fresh look at US technology policy. This paper reviews the reasons, with particular attention to services such as health care. It then sketches needs for a postindustrial, post-Cold War US technology policy. Those needs lie heavily in the direction of diffusion and learning.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00162-1</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0048-7333 |
| ispartof | Research policy, 2001-06, Vol.30 (6), p.873-889 |
| issn | 0048-7333 1873-7625 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_223227442 |
| source | RePEc; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
| subjects | Cold War Policy making Productivity R&D Research & development Services Studies |
| title | Postindustrial technology policy |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T19%3A04%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Postindustrial%20technology%20policy&rft.jtitle=Research%20policy&rft.au=Alic,%20John%20A.&rft.date=2001-06-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=873&rft.epage=889&rft.pages=873-889&rft.issn=0048-7333&rft.eissn=1873-7625&rft.coden=REPYBP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00162-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E74297705%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=223227442&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0048733300001621&rfr_iscdi=true |