Does Granular Activated Carbon with Chlorination Produce Safer Drinking Water? From Disinfection Byproducts and Total Organic Halogen to Calculated Toxicity
Granular activated carbon (GAC) adsorption is well-established for controlling regulated disinfection byproducts (DBPs), but its effectiveness for unregulated DBPs and DBP-associated toxicity is unclear. In this study, GAC treatment was evaluated at three full-scale chlorination drinking water treat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental science & technology 2019-05, Vol.53 (10), p.5987-5999 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 5999 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 5987 |
container_title | Environmental science & technology |
container_volume | 53 |
creator | Cuthbertson, Amy A Kimura, Susana Y Liberatore, Hannah K Summers, R. Scott Knappe, Detlef R. U Stanford, Benjamin D Maness, J. Clark Mulhern, Riley E Selbes, Meric Richardson, Susan D |
description | Granular activated carbon (GAC) adsorption is well-established for controlling regulated disinfection byproducts (DBPs), but its effectiveness for unregulated DBPs and DBP-associated toxicity is unclear. In this study, GAC treatment was evaluated at three full-scale chlorination drinking water treatment plants over different GAC service lives for controlling 61 unregulated DBPs, 9 regulated DBPs, and speciated total organic halogen (total organic chlorine, bromine, and iodine). The plants represented a range of impacts, including algal, agricultural, and industrial wastewater. This study represents the most extensive full-scale study of its kind and seeks to address the question of whether GAC can make drinking water safer from a DBP perspective. Overall, GAC was effective for removing DBP precursors and reducing DBP formation and total organic halogen, even after >22 000 bed volumes of treated water. GAC also effectively removed preformed DBPs at plants using prechlorination, including highly toxic iodoacetic acids and haloacetonitriles. However, 7 DBPs (mostly brominated and nitrogenous) increased in formation after GAC treatment. In one plant, an increase in tribromonitromethane had significant impacts on calculated cytotoxicity, which only had 7–17% reduction following GAC. While these DBPs are highly toxic, the total calculated cytotoxicity and genotoxicity for the GAC treated waters for the other two plants was reduced 32–83% (across young–middle–old GAC). Overall, calculated toxicity was reduced post-GAC, with preoxidation allowing further reductions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1021/acs.est.9b00023 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2231980241</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2231980241</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a375t-aeb91538044c020803c4e3f96bc591b4b9c6a1bea083a027e4b53645573158723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU9LAzEQxYMoWP-cvQY8ytZJsml3T6KtbQVBwYreltk0W6Nrokmq9rv4YU1b8eZpYOb95g3zCDli0GXA2Smq0NUhdssaALjYIh0mOWSykGybdACYyErRe9wleyE8ryVQdMj30OlAxx7tokVPz1U0Hxj1jA7Q187STxOf6OCpdd5YjCZ1br2bLZSmd9hoT4ep_2LsnD4kyp_RkXevdGiCsY1Wa_3F8m1NxEDRzujURWzpjZ-jNYpOsHVzbWl0ybBV6YaV99R9GWXi8oDsNNgGffhb98n96HI6mGTXN-Orwfl1hqIvY4a6LpkUBeS5Ag4FCJVr0ZS9WsmS1Xldqh6yWiMUAoH3dV5L0cul7Asmiz4X--R4szdd-r5IT6ye3cLbZFlxLlhZAM9ZUp1uVMq7ELxuqjdvXtEvKwbVKoIqRVCt6N8IEnGyIVaDv5X_qX8Aj4-LBA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2231980241</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does Granular Activated Carbon with Chlorination Produce Safer Drinking Water? From Disinfection Byproducts and Total Organic Halogen to Calculated Toxicity</title><source>ACS Publications</source><creator>Cuthbertson, Amy A ; Kimura, Susana Y ; Liberatore, Hannah K ; Summers, R. Scott ; Knappe, Detlef R. U ; Stanford, Benjamin D ; Maness, J. Clark ; Mulhern, Riley E ; Selbes, Meric ; Richardson, Susan D</creator><creatorcontrib>Cuthbertson, Amy A ; Kimura, Susana Y ; Liberatore, Hannah K ; Summers, R. Scott ; Knappe, Detlef R. U ; Stanford, Benjamin D ; Maness, J. Clark ; Mulhern, Riley E ; Selbes, Meric ; Richardson, Susan D</creatorcontrib><description>Granular activated carbon (GAC) adsorption is well-established for controlling regulated disinfection byproducts (DBPs), but its effectiveness for unregulated DBPs and DBP-associated toxicity is unclear. In this study, GAC treatment was evaluated at three full-scale chlorination drinking water treatment plants over different GAC service lives for controlling 61 unregulated DBPs, 9 regulated DBPs, and speciated total organic halogen (total organic chlorine, bromine, and iodine). The plants represented a range of impacts, including algal, agricultural, and industrial wastewater. This study represents the most extensive full-scale study of its kind and seeks to address the question of whether GAC can make drinking water safer from a DBP perspective. Overall, GAC was effective for removing DBP precursors and reducing DBP formation and total organic halogen, even after >22 000 bed volumes of treated water. GAC also effectively removed preformed DBPs at plants using prechlorination, including highly toxic iodoacetic acids and haloacetonitriles. However, 7 DBPs (mostly brominated and nitrogenous) increased in formation after GAC treatment. In one plant, an increase in tribromonitromethane had significant impacts on calculated cytotoxicity, which only had 7–17% reduction following GAC. While these DBPs are highly toxic, the total calculated cytotoxicity and genotoxicity for the GAC treated waters for the other two plants was reduced 32–83% (across young–middle–old GAC). Overall, calculated toxicity was reduced post-GAC, with preoxidation allowing further reductions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-936X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-5851</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.9b00023</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Easton: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Activated carbon ; Agricultural wastes ; Algae ; Bromination ; Bromine ; By products ; Byproducts ; Chlorination ; Chlorine ; Cytotoxicity ; Disinfection ; Drinking water ; Genotoxicity ; Industrial plants ; Industrial wastes ; Industrial wastewater ; Iodine ; Mathematical analysis ; Toxicity ; Treated water ; Wastewater ; Water treatment ; Water treatment plants</subject><ispartof>Environmental science & technology, 2019-05, Vol.53 (10), p.5987-5999</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Chemical Society May 21, 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a375t-aeb91538044c020803c4e3f96bc591b4b9c6a1bea083a027e4b53645573158723</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a375t-aeb91538044c020803c4e3f96bc591b4b9c6a1bea083a027e4b53645573158723</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6207-4513 ; 0000-0001-6293-3672 ; 0000-0001-7423-3251 ; 0000-0002-7634-3734</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.est.9b00023$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.9b00023$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2752,27053,27901,27902,56713,56763</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cuthbertson, Amy A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kimura, Susana Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liberatore, Hannah K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Summers, R. Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knappe, Detlef R. U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanford, Benjamin D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maness, J. Clark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mulhern, Riley E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Selbes, Meric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richardson, Susan D</creatorcontrib><title>Does Granular Activated Carbon with Chlorination Produce Safer Drinking Water? From Disinfection Byproducts and Total Organic Halogen to Calculated Toxicity</title><title>Environmental science & technology</title><addtitle>Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><description>Granular activated carbon (GAC) adsorption is well-established for controlling regulated disinfection byproducts (DBPs), but its effectiveness for unregulated DBPs and DBP-associated toxicity is unclear. In this study, GAC treatment was evaluated at three full-scale chlorination drinking water treatment plants over different GAC service lives for controlling 61 unregulated DBPs, 9 regulated DBPs, and speciated total organic halogen (total organic chlorine, bromine, and iodine). The plants represented a range of impacts, including algal, agricultural, and industrial wastewater. This study represents the most extensive full-scale study of its kind and seeks to address the question of whether GAC can make drinking water safer from a DBP perspective. Overall, GAC was effective for removing DBP precursors and reducing DBP formation and total organic halogen, even after >22 000 bed volumes of treated water. GAC also effectively removed preformed DBPs at plants using prechlorination, including highly toxic iodoacetic acids and haloacetonitriles. However, 7 DBPs (mostly brominated and nitrogenous) increased in formation after GAC treatment. In one plant, an increase in tribromonitromethane had significant impacts on calculated cytotoxicity, which only had 7–17% reduction following GAC. While these DBPs are highly toxic, the total calculated cytotoxicity and genotoxicity for the GAC treated waters for the other two plants was reduced 32–83% (across young–middle–old GAC). Overall, calculated toxicity was reduced post-GAC, with preoxidation allowing further reductions.</description><subject>Activated carbon</subject><subject>Agricultural wastes</subject><subject>Algae</subject><subject>Bromination</subject><subject>Bromine</subject><subject>By products</subject><subject>Byproducts</subject><subject>Chlorination</subject><subject>Chlorine</subject><subject>Cytotoxicity</subject><subject>Disinfection</subject><subject>Drinking water</subject><subject>Genotoxicity</subject><subject>Industrial plants</subject><subject>Industrial wastes</subject><subject>Industrial wastewater</subject><subject>Iodine</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><subject>Treated water</subject><subject>Wastewater</subject><subject>Water treatment</subject><subject>Water treatment plants</subject><issn>0013-936X</issn><issn>1520-5851</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kU9LAzEQxYMoWP-cvQY8ytZJsml3T6KtbQVBwYreltk0W6Nrokmq9rv4YU1b8eZpYOb95g3zCDli0GXA2Smq0NUhdssaALjYIh0mOWSykGybdACYyErRe9wleyE8ryVQdMj30OlAxx7tokVPz1U0Hxj1jA7Q187STxOf6OCpdd5YjCZ1br2bLZSmd9hoT4ep_2LsnD4kyp_RkXevdGiCsY1Wa_3F8m1NxEDRzujURWzpjZ-jNYpOsHVzbWl0ybBV6YaV99R9GWXi8oDsNNgGffhb98n96HI6mGTXN-Orwfl1hqIvY4a6LpkUBeS5Ag4FCJVr0ZS9WsmS1Xldqh6yWiMUAoH3dV5L0cul7Asmiz4X--R4szdd-r5IT6ye3cLbZFlxLlhZAM9ZUp1uVMq7ELxuqjdvXtEvKwbVKoIqRVCt6N8IEnGyIVaDv5X_qX8Aj4-LBA</recordid><startdate>20190521</startdate><enddate>20190521</enddate><creator>Cuthbertson, Amy A</creator><creator>Kimura, Susana Y</creator><creator>Liberatore, Hannah K</creator><creator>Summers, R. Scott</creator><creator>Knappe, Detlef R. U</creator><creator>Stanford, Benjamin D</creator><creator>Maness, J. Clark</creator><creator>Mulhern, Riley E</creator><creator>Selbes, Meric</creator><creator>Richardson, Susan D</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6207-4513</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6293-3672</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7423-3251</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7634-3734</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190521</creationdate><title>Does Granular Activated Carbon with Chlorination Produce Safer Drinking Water? From Disinfection Byproducts and Total Organic Halogen to Calculated Toxicity</title><author>Cuthbertson, Amy A ; Kimura, Susana Y ; Liberatore, Hannah K ; Summers, R. Scott ; Knappe, Detlef R. U ; Stanford, Benjamin D ; Maness, J. Clark ; Mulhern, Riley E ; Selbes, Meric ; Richardson, Susan D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a375t-aeb91538044c020803c4e3f96bc591b4b9c6a1bea083a027e4b53645573158723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Activated carbon</topic><topic>Agricultural wastes</topic><topic>Algae</topic><topic>Bromination</topic><topic>Bromine</topic><topic>By products</topic><topic>Byproducts</topic><topic>Chlorination</topic><topic>Chlorine</topic><topic>Cytotoxicity</topic><topic>Disinfection</topic><topic>Drinking water</topic><topic>Genotoxicity</topic><topic>Industrial plants</topic><topic>Industrial wastes</topic><topic>Industrial wastewater</topic><topic>Iodine</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><topic>Treated water</topic><topic>Wastewater</topic><topic>Water treatment</topic><topic>Water treatment plants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cuthbertson, Amy A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kimura, Susana Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liberatore, Hannah K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Summers, R. Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knappe, Detlef R. U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanford, Benjamin D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maness, J. Clark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mulhern, Riley E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Selbes, Meric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richardson, Susan D</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental science & technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cuthbertson, Amy A</au><au>Kimura, Susana Y</au><au>Liberatore, Hannah K</au><au>Summers, R. Scott</au><au>Knappe, Detlef R. U</au><au>Stanford, Benjamin D</au><au>Maness, J. Clark</au><au>Mulhern, Riley E</au><au>Selbes, Meric</au><au>Richardson, Susan D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does Granular Activated Carbon with Chlorination Produce Safer Drinking Water? From Disinfection Byproducts and Total Organic Halogen to Calculated Toxicity</atitle><jtitle>Environmental science & technology</jtitle><addtitle>Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><date>2019-05-21</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>5987</spage><epage>5999</epage><pages>5987-5999</pages><issn>0013-936X</issn><eissn>1520-5851</eissn><abstract>Granular activated carbon (GAC) adsorption is well-established for controlling regulated disinfection byproducts (DBPs), but its effectiveness for unregulated DBPs and DBP-associated toxicity is unclear. In this study, GAC treatment was evaluated at three full-scale chlorination drinking water treatment plants over different GAC service lives for controlling 61 unregulated DBPs, 9 regulated DBPs, and speciated total organic halogen (total organic chlorine, bromine, and iodine). The plants represented a range of impacts, including algal, agricultural, and industrial wastewater. This study represents the most extensive full-scale study of its kind and seeks to address the question of whether GAC can make drinking water safer from a DBP perspective. Overall, GAC was effective for removing DBP precursors and reducing DBP formation and total organic halogen, even after >22 000 bed volumes of treated water. GAC also effectively removed preformed DBPs at plants using prechlorination, including highly toxic iodoacetic acids and haloacetonitriles. However, 7 DBPs (mostly brominated and nitrogenous) increased in formation after GAC treatment. In one plant, an increase in tribromonitromethane had significant impacts on calculated cytotoxicity, which only had 7–17% reduction following GAC. While these DBPs are highly toxic, the total calculated cytotoxicity and genotoxicity for the GAC treated waters for the other two plants was reduced 32–83% (across young–middle–old GAC). Overall, calculated toxicity was reduced post-GAC, with preoxidation allowing further reductions.</abstract><cop>Easton</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><doi>10.1021/acs.est.9b00023</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6207-4513</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6293-3672</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7423-3251</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7634-3734</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0013-936X |
ispartof | Environmental science & technology, 2019-05, Vol.53 (10), p.5987-5999 |
issn | 0013-936X 1520-5851 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2231980241 |
source | ACS Publications |
subjects | Activated carbon Agricultural wastes Algae Bromination Bromine By products Byproducts Chlorination Chlorine Cytotoxicity Disinfection Drinking water Genotoxicity Industrial plants Industrial wastes Industrial wastewater Iodine Mathematical analysis Toxicity Treated water Wastewater Water treatment Water treatment plants |
title | Does Granular Activated Carbon with Chlorination Produce Safer Drinking Water? From Disinfection Byproducts and Total Organic Halogen to Calculated Toxicity |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T13%3A30%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20Granular%20Activated%20Carbon%20with%20Chlorination%20Produce%20Safer%20Drinking%20Water?%20From%20Disinfection%20Byproducts%20and%20Total%20Organic%20Halogen%20to%20Calculated%20Toxicity&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20science%20&%20technology&rft.au=Cuthbertson,%20Amy%20A&rft.date=2019-05-21&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=5987&rft.epage=5999&rft.pages=5987-5999&rft.issn=0013-936X&rft.eissn=1520-5851&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/acs.est.9b00023&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2231980241%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2231980241&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |