Misperceptions of feedback in dynamic decision making

In recent years laboratory experiments have shed significant light on the behavior of economic agents in a variety of microeconomic and decision-theoretic contexts such as auction markets, portfolio choice, and preference elicitation. Despite the success of experimental techniques in the micro domai...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Organizational behavior and human decision processes 1989-06, Vol.43 (3), p.301-335
1. Verfasser: Sterman, John D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 335
container_issue 3
container_start_page 301
container_title Organizational behavior and human decision processes
container_volume 43
creator Sterman, John D
description In recent years laboratory experiments have shed significant light on the behavior of economic agents in a variety of microeconomic and decision-theoretic contexts such as auction markets, portfolio choice, and preference elicitation. Despite the success of experimental techniques in the micro domain, there has been relatively little work linking the behavior of decision makers to the dynamics of larger organizations such as corporations, industries, or the macroeconomy. This paper presents a laboratory experiment in which subjects manage a simulated economy. Subjects must invest sufficient capital plant and equipment to satisfy demand. Subjects were given complete and perfect information regarding the structure of the simulated economy, the values of all variables, and the past history of the system. Nevertheless, the overwhelming majority of the subjects generate significant and costly oscillations. A simple decision rule based on the anchoring and adjustment heuristic is shown to simulate the subjects' decisions quite well. Several distinct sources of the subjects' poor performance are identified and termed “misperceptions of feedback.” The decision rule is related to various models of economic fluctuations; implications for experimental investigation of dynamic decision making in aggregate systems are explored.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0749-5978(89)90041-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_223182419</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0749597889900411</els_id><sourcerecordid>1252812</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-f4186f7bddb6211d869d5a9f85282a75d96d65c0a4eaf7364b5dca983df40dc13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1r3DAQhkVJoJtN_0EPpvSQHpxorA9Ll0JZ0nyQ0Et7FrI0arQftis5gf33lbNhjzmMBsTzvjPzEvIZ6CVQkFe05boWulUXSn_TlHKo4QNZANWi1rqhJ2RxRD6Ss5zXlAJIShdEPMY8YnI4TnHoczWEKiD6zrpNFfvK73u7i67y6GIuQLWzm9j_PSenwW4zfnrrS_Ln5_Xv1W398OvmbvXjoXa8FVMdOCgZ2s77TjYAXknthdVBiUY1thVeSy-Fo5ajDS2TvBPeWa2YD5x6B2xJvhx8xzT8e8Y8mfXwnPoy0jQNA9Vw0AXiB8ilIeeEwYwp7mzaG6BmzsfMx5v5eKO0ec3HzN73B1nCEd1Rg4jroXvyo3kxzHJWnn0p0EXKbCw1f41zp2AYE-Zp2hWzr2-L2uzsNiTbl8COplK1TLS8YN8PGJbQXiImk13E3qGPCd1k_BDfX_o_N1iRXw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>223182419</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Misperceptions of feedback in dynamic decision making</title><source>RePEc</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Sterman, John D</creator><creatorcontrib>Sterman, John D</creatorcontrib><description>In recent years laboratory experiments have shed significant light on the behavior of economic agents in a variety of microeconomic and decision-theoretic contexts such as auction markets, portfolio choice, and preference elicitation. Despite the success of experimental techniques in the micro domain, there has been relatively little work linking the behavior of decision makers to the dynamics of larger organizations such as corporations, industries, or the macroeconomy. This paper presents a laboratory experiment in which subjects manage a simulated economy. Subjects must invest sufficient capital plant and equipment to satisfy demand. Subjects were given complete and perfect information regarding the structure of the simulated economy, the values of all variables, and the past history of the system. Nevertheless, the overwhelming majority of the subjects generate significant and costly oscillations. A simple decision rule based on the anchoring and adjustment heuristic is shown to simulate the subjects' decisions quite well. Several distinct sources of the subjects' poor performance are identified and termed “misperceptions of feedback.” The decision rule is related to various models of economic fluctuations; implications for experimental investigation of dynamic decision making in aggregate systems are explored.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0749-5978</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9920</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0749-5978(89)90041-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Decision making ; Estimates ; Feedback ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Laboratories ; Miscellaneous ; Organizational behavior ; Perceptions ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Social psychology ; Statistical analysis ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 1989-06, Vol.43 (3), p.301-335</ispartof><rights>1989</rights><rights>1990 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Inc. Jun 1989</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-f4186f7bddb6211d869d5a9f85282a75d96d65c0a4eaf7364b5dca983df40dc13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-f4186f7bddb6211d869d5a9f85282a75d96d65c0a4eaf7364b5dca983df40dc13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(89)90041-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,4008,27924,27925,30999,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=6873574$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeejobhdp/v_3a43_3ay_3a1989_3ai_3a3_3ap_3a301-335.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sterman, John D</creatorcontrib><title>Misperceptions of feedback in dynamic decision making</title><title>Organizational behavior and human decision processes</title><description>In recent years laboratory experiments have shed significant light on the behavior of economic agents in a variety of microeconomic and decision-theoretic contexts such as auction markets, portfolio choice, and preference elicitation. Despite the success of experimental techniques in the micro domain, there has been relatively little work linking the behavior of decision makers to the dynamics of larger organizations such as corporations, industries, or the macroeconomy. This paper presents a laboratory experiment in which subjects manage a simulated economy. Subjects must invest sufficient capital plant and equipment to satisfy demand. Subjects were given complete and perfect information regarding the structure of the simulated economy, the values of all variables, and the past history of the system. Nevertheless, the overwhelming majority of the subjects generate significant and costly oscillations. A simple decision rule based on the anchoring and adjustment heuristic is shown to simulate the subjects' decisions quite well. Several distinct sources of the subjects' poor performance are identified and termed “misperceptions of feedback.” The decision rule is related to various models of economic fluctuations; implications for experimental investigation of dynamic decision making in aggregate systems are explored.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Organizational behavior</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0749-5978</issn><issn>1095-9920</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1989</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1r3DAQhkVJoJtN_0EPpvSQHpxorA9Ll0JZ0nyQ0Et7FrI0arQftis5gf33lbNhjzmMBsTzvjPzEvIZ6CVQkFe05boWulUXSn_TlHKo4QNZANWi1rqhJ2RxRD6Ss5zXlAJIShdEPMY8YnI4TnHoczWEKiD6zrpNFfvK73u7i67y6GIuQLWzm9j_PSenwW4zfnrrS_Ln5_Xv1W398OvmbvXjoXa8FVMdOCgZ2s77TjYAXknthdVBiUY1thVeSy-Fo5ajDS2TvBPeWa2YD5x6B2xJvhx8xzT8e8Y8mfXwnPoy0jQNA9Vw0AXiB8ilIeeEwYwp7mzaG6BmzsfMx5v5eKO0ec3HzN73B1nCEd1Rg4jroXvyo3kxzHJWnn0p0EXKbCw1f41zp2AYE-Zp2hWzr2-L2uzsNiTbl8COplK1TLS8YN8PGJbQXiImk13E3qGPCd1k_BDfX_o_N1iRXw</recordid><startdate>19890601</startdate><enddate>19890601</enddate><creator>Sterman, John D</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Inc</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19890601</creationdate><title>Misperceptions of feedback in dynamic decision making</title><author>Sterman, John D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-f4186f7bddb6211d869d5a9f85282a75d96d65c0a4eaf7364b5dca983df40dc13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1989</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Organizational behavior</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sterman, John D</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Organizational behavior and human decision processes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sterman, John D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Misperceptions of feedback in dynamic decision making</atitle><jtitle>Organizational behavior and human decision processes</jtitle><date>1989-06-01</date><risdate>1989</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>301</spage><epage>335</epage><pages>301-335</pages><issn>0749-5978</issn><eissn>1095-9920</eissn><abstract>In recent years laboratory experiments have shed significant light on the behavior of economic agents in a variety of microeconomic and decision-theoretic contexts such as auction markets, portfolio choice, and preference elicitation. Despite the success of experimental techniques in the micro domain, there has been relatively little work linking the behavior of decision makers to the dynamics of larger organizations such as corporations, industries, or the macroeconomy. This paper presents a laboratory experiment in which subjects manage a simulated economy. Subjects must invest sufficient capital plant and equipment to satisfy demand. Subjects were given complete and perfect information regarding the structure of the simulated economy, the values of all variables, and the past history of the system. Nevertheless, the overwhelming majority of the subjects generate significant and costly oscillations. A simple decision rule based on the anchoring and adjustment heuristic is shown to simulate the subjects' decisions quite well. Several distinct sources of the subjects' poor performance are identified and termed “misperceptions of feedback.” The decision rule is related to various models of economic fluctuations; implications for experimental investigation of dynamic decision making in aggregate systems are explored.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/0749-5978(89)90041-1</doi><tpages>35</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0749-5978
ispartof Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 1989-06, Vol.43 (3), p.301-335
issn 0749-5978
1095-9920
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_223182419
source RePEc; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Decision making
Estimates
Feedback
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Laboratories
Miscellaneous
Organizational behavior
Perceptions
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Social psychology
Statistical analysis
Studies
title Misperceptions of feedback in dynamic decision making
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T20%3A26%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Misperceptions%20of%20feedback%20in%20dynamic%20decision%20making&rft.jtitle=Organizational%20behavior%20and%20human%20decision%20processes&rft.au=Sterman,%20John%20D&rft.date=1989-06-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=301&rft.epage=335&rft.pages=301-335&rft.issn=0749-5978&rft.eissn=1095-9920&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0749-5978(89)90041-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1252812%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=223182419&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=0749597889900411&rfr_iscdi=true