Misperceptions of feedback in dynamic decision making
In recent years laboratory experiments have shed significant light on the behavior of economic agents in a variety of microeconomic and decision-theoretic contexts such as auction markets, portfolio choice, and preference elicitation. Despite the success of experimental techniques in the micro domai...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Organizational behavior and human decision processes 1989-06, Vol.43 (3), p.301-335 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 335 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 301 |
container_title | Organizational behavior and human decision processes |
container_volume | 43 |
creator | Sterman, John D |
description | In recent years laboratory experiments have shed significant light on the behavior of economic agents in a variety of microeconomic and decision-theoretic contexts such as auction markets, portfolio choice, and preference elicitation. Despite the success of experimental techniques in the micro domain, there has been relatively little work linking the behavior of decision makers to the dynamics of larger organizations such as corporations, industries, or the macroeconomy. This paper presents a laboratory experiment in which subjects manage a simulated economy. Subjects must invest sufficient capital plant and equipment to satisfy demand. Subjects were given complete and perfect information regarding the structure of the simulated economy, the values of all variables, and the past history of the system. Nevertheless, the overwhelming majority of the subjects generate significant and costly oscillations. A simple decision rule based on the anchoring and adjustment heuristic is shown to simulate the subjects' decisions quite well. Several distinct sources of the subjects' poor performance are identified and termed “misperceptions of feedback.” The decision rule is related to various models of economic fluctuations; implications for experimental investigation of dynamic decision making in aggregate systems are explored. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0749-5978(89)90041-1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_223182419</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0749597889900411</els_id><sourcerecordid>1252812</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-f4186f7bddb6211d869d5a9f85282a75d96d65c0a4eaf7364b5dca983df40dc13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1r3DAQhkVJoJtN_0EPpvSQHpxorA9Ll0JZ0nyQ0Et7FrI0arQftis5gf33lbNhjzmMBsTzvjPzEvIZ6CVQkFe05boWulUXSn_TlHKo4QNZANWi1rqhJ2RxRD6Ss5zXlAJIShdEPMY8YnI4TnHoczWEKiD6zrpNFfvK73u7i67y6GIuQLWzm9j_PSenwW4zfnrrS_Ln5_Xv1W398OvmbvXjoXa8FVMdOCgZ2s77TjYAXknthdVBiUY1thVeSy-Fo5ajDS2TvBPeWa2YD5x6B2xJvhx8xzT8e8Y8mfXwnPoy0jQNA9Vw0AXiB8ilIeeEwYwp7mzaG6BmzsfMx5v5eKO0ec3HzN73B1nCEd1Rg4jroXvyo3kxzHJWnn0p0EXKbCw1f41zp2AYE-Zp2hWzr2-L2uzsNiTbl8COplK1TLS8YN8PGJbQXiImk13E3qGPCd1k_BDfX_o_N1iRXw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>223182419</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Misperceptions of feedback in dynamic decision making</title><source>RePEc</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Sterman, John D</creator><creatorcontrib>Sterman, John D</creatorcontrib><description>In recent years laboratory experiments have shed significant light on the behavior of economic agents in a variety of microeconomic and decision-theoretic contexts such as auction markets, portfolio choice, and preference elicitation. Despite the success of experimental techniques in the micro domain, there has been relatively little work linking the behavior of decision makers to the dynamics of larger organizations such as corporations, industries, or the macroeconomy. This paper presents a laboratory experiment in which subjects manage a simulated economy. Subjects must invest sufficient capital plant and equipment to satisfy demand. Subjects were given complete and perfect information regarding the structure of the simulated economy, the values of all variables, and the past history of the system. Nevertheless, the overwhelming majority of the subjects generate significant and costly oscillations. A simple decision rule based on the anchoring and adjustment heuristic is shown to simulate the subjects' decisions quite well. Several distinct sources of the subjects' poor performance are identified and termed “misperceptions of feedback.” The decision rule is related to various models of economic fluctuations; implications for experimental investigation of dynamic decision making in aggregate systems are explored.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0749-5978</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9920</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0749-5978(89)90041-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Decision making ; Estimates ; Feedback ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Laboratories ; Miscellaneous ; Organizational behavior ; Perceptions ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Social psychology ; Statistical analysis ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 1989-06, Vol.43 (3), p.301-335</ispartof><rights>1989</rights><rights>1990 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Inc. Jun 1989</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-f4186f7bddb6211d869d5a9f85282a75d96d65c0a4eaf7364b5dca983df40dc13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-f4186f7bddb6211d869d5a9f85282a75d96d65c0a4eaf7364b5dca983df40dc13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(89)90041-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,4008,27924,27925,30999,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=6873574$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeejobhdp/v_3a43_3ay_3a1989_3ai_3a3_3ap_3a301-335.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sterman, John D</creatorcontrib><title>Misperceptions of feedback in dynamic decision making</title><title>Organizational behavior and human decision processes</title><description>In recent years laboratory experiments have shed significant light on the behavior of economic agents in a variety of microeconomic and decision-theoretic contexts such as auction markets, portfolio choice, and preference elicitation. Despite the success of experimental techniques in the micro domain, there has been relatively little work linking the behavior of decision makers to the dynamics of larger organizations such as corporations, industries, or the macroeconomy. This paper presents a laboratory experiment in which subjects manage a simulated economy. Subjects must invest sufficient capital plant and equipment to satisfy demand. Subjects were given complete and perfect information regarding the structure of the simulated economy, the values of all variables, and the past history of the system. Nevertheless, the overwhelming majority of the subjects generate significant and costly oscillations. A simple decision rule based on the anchoring and adjustment heuristic is shown to simulate the subjects' decisions quite well. Several distinct sources of the subjects' poor performance are identified and termed “misperceptions of feedback.” The decision rule is related to various models of economic fluctuations; implications for experimental investigation of dynamic decision making in aggregate systems are explored.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Organizational behavior</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0749-5978</issn><issn>1095-9920</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1989</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1r3DAQhkVJoJtN_0EPpvSQHpxorA9Ll0JZ0nyQ0Et7FrI0arQftis5gf33lbNhjzmMBsTzvjPzEvIZ6CVQkFe05boWulUXSn_TlHKo4QNZANWi1rqhJ2RxRD6Ss5zXlAJIShdEPMY8YnI4TnHoczWEKiD6zrpNFfvK73u7i67y6GIuQLWzm9j_PSenwW4zfnrrS_Ln5_Xv1W398OvmbvXjoXa8FVMdOCgZ2s77TjYAXknthdVBiUY1thVeSy-Fo5ajDS2TvBPeWa2YD5x6B2xJvhx8xzT8e8Y8mfXwnPoy0jQNA9Vw0AXiB8ilIeeEwYwp7mzaG6BmzsfMx5v5eKO0ec3HzN73B1nCEd1Rg4jroXvyo3kxzHJWnn0p0EXKbCw1f41zp2AYE-Zp2hWzr2-L2uzsNiTbl8COplK1TLS8YN8PGJbQXiImk13E3qGPCd1k_BDfX_o_N1iRXw</recordid><startdate>19890601</startdate><enddate>19890601</enddate><creator>Sterman, John D</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Inc</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19890601</creationdate><title>Misperceptions of feedback in dynamic decision making</title><author>Sterman, John D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-f4186f7bddb6211d869d5a9f85282a75d96d65c0a4eaf7364b5dca983df40dc13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1989</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Organizational behavior</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sterman, John D</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Organizational behavior and human decision processes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sterman, John D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Misperceptions of feedback in dynamic decision making</atitle><jtitle>Organizational behavior and human decision processes</jtitle><date>1989-06-01</date><risdate>1989</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>301</spage><epage>335</epage><pages>301-335</pages><issn>0749-5978</issn><eissn>1095-9920</eissn><abstract>In recent years laboratory experiments have shed significant light on the behavior of economic agents in a variety of microeconomic and decision-theoretic contexts such as auction markets, portfolio choice, and preference elicitation. Despite the success of experimental techniques in the micro domain, there has been relatively little work linking the behavior of decision makers to the dynamics of larger organizations such as corporations, industries, or the macroeconomy. This paper presents a laboratory experiment in which subjects manage a simulated economy. Subjects must invest sufficient capital plant and equipment to satisfy demand. Subjects were given complete and perfect information regarding the structure of the simulated economy, the values of all variables, and the past history of the system. Nevertheless, the overwhelming majority of the subjects generate significant and costly oscillations. A simple decision rule based on the anchoring and adjustment heuristic is shown to simulate the subjects' decisions quite well. Several distinct sources of the subjects' poor performance are identified and termed “misperceptions of feedback.” The decision rule is related to various models of economic fluctuations; implications for experimental investigation of dynamic decision making in aggregate systems are explored.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/0749-5978(89)90041-1</doi><tpages>35</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0749-5978 |
ispartof | Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 1989-06, Vol.43 (3), p.301-335 |
issn | 0749-5978 1095-9920 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_223182419 |
source | RePEc; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Decision making Estimates Feedback Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Laboratories Miscellaneous Organizational behavior Perceptions Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Social psychology Statistical analysis Studies |
title | Misperceptions of feedback in dynamic decision making |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T20%3A26%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Misperceptions%20of%20feedback%20in%20dynamic%20decision%20making&rft.jtitle=Organizational%20behavior%20and%20human%20decision%20processes&rft.au=Sterman,%20John%20D&rft.date=1989-06-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=301&rft.epage=335&rft.pages=301-335&rft.issn=0749-5978&rft.eissn=1095-9920&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0749-5978(89)90041-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1252812%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=223182419&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=0749597889900411&rfr_iscdi=true |