Influence of Different Modifications on Bending Strength of Wood

Despite intensive research in wood protection, no simple wood treatment method is available for satisfactory wood protection that could ensure appropriate strength and bio-resistance of wood products during their service life. The present study is a part of a project that is aimed to improve wood se...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Key engineering materials 2019-04, Vol.800, p.240-245
Hauptverfasser: Andersone, Ingeborga, Kuka, Edgars, Cīrule, Dace, Verovkins, Anrijs, Antons, Andis
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 245
container_issue
container_start_page 240
container_title Key engineering materials
container_volume 800
creator Andersone, Ingeborga
Kuka, Edgars
Cīrule, Dace
Verovkins, Anrijs
Antons, Andis
description Despite intensive research in wood protection, no simple wood treatment method is available for satisfactory wood protection that could ensure appropriate strength and bio-resistance of wood products during their service life. The present study is a part of a project that is aimed to improve wood service properties by combining wood thermal treatment and impregnation with copper containing preservatives. The objective of the present study was to investigate the effect of conventional modifications (thermal modification at relatively mild temperature range (150 - 180°C) and impregnation) and double-treatments (impregnation after thermal treatment and vice versa) on the bending properties of birch (Betula spp.) and pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) wood. Bending strength considerably decreased after thermal modification of wood, however MOE values generally did not significantly change. Moreover, impregnation had no effect on the bending properties for both unmodified and thermally modified wood specimens. For double-treatment in which impregnation was carried out before thermal modification no changes in bending strength were observed comparing to thermally modified wood. However, MOE values of these specimens were 10 % for birch and 19 % for pine smaller comparing to just thermally modified wood. The results of double-treatment tests imply that, regarding wood bending properties, wood impregnation after thermal modification is more appropriate.
doi_str_mv 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.800.240
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2230867145</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2230867145</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2100-ded9f13a076873f35ba65a3ee3a36c45f0f6d646976ec10d046efcbb90748ffe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMFKAzEQhoMoWKvvsCB42-1ks5vdvUi1Vi22eFDxGNLspN1Sk5qkFN_elAq9epqB-fn-4SPkhkJWQF4Pdrtd5lWHJnS6U5nBMHgZz7IaIMsLOCE9ynmeNlVTnsYdKEubOufn5ML7FQCjNS17ZDgxer1FozCxOnnotEYXicnMtnuqDJ01PrEmuUfTdmaRvIV4X4TlPv5pbXtJzrRce7z6m33y8Th-Hz2n09enyehumqqcAqQtto2mTELF64ppVs4lLyVDZJJxVZQaNG95wZuKo6LQQsFRq_m8gaqo41OsT64P3I2z31v0Qazs1plYKfKcQc0rWpQxdXtIKWe9d6jFxnVf0v0ICmJvTURr4mhNRGsiWhPRmojWImB4AAQnjQ-olseefyJ-ATiXfhQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2230867145</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of Different Modifications on Bending Strength of Wood</title><source>Scientific.net Journals</source><creator>Andersone, Ingeborga ; Kuka, Edgars ; Cīrule, Dace ; Verovkins, Anrijs ; Antons, Andis</creator><creatorcontrib>Andersone, Ingeborga ; Kuka, Edgars ; Cīrule, Dace ; Verovkins, Anrijs ; Antons, Andis</creatorcontrib><description>Despite intensive research in wood protection, no simple wood treatment method is available for satisfactory wood protection that could ensure appropriate strength and bio-resistance of wood products during their service life. The present study is a part of a project that is aimed to improve wood service properties by combining wood thermal treatment and impregnation with copper containing preservatives. The objective of the present study was to investigate the effect of conventional modifications (thermal modification at relatively mild temperature range (150 - 180°C) and impregnation) and double-treatments (impregnation after thermal treatment and vice versa) on the bending properties of birch (Betula spp.) and pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) wood. Bending strength considerably decreased after thermal modification of wood, however MOE values generally did not significantly change. Moreover, impregnation had no effect on the bending properties for both unmodified and thermally modified wood specimens. For double-treatment in which impregnation was carried out before thermal modification no changes in bending strength were observed comparing to thermally modified wood. However, MOE values of these specimens were 10 % for birch and 19 % for pine smaller comparing to just thermally modified wood. The results of double-treatment tests imply that, regarding wood bending properties, wood impregnation after thermal modification is more appropriate.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1013-9826</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1662-9795</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1662-9795</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.800.240</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Zurich: Trans Tech Publications Ltd</publisher><subject>Bend strength ; Heat treatment ; Impregnation ; Preservatives ; Properties (attributes) ; Service life ; Wood ; Wood products</subject><ispartof>Key engineering materials, 2019-04, Vol.800, p.240-245</ispartof><rights>2019 Trans Tech Publications Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Trans Tech Publications Ltd. Apr 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2100-ded9f13a076873f35ba65a3ee3a36c45f0f6d646976ec10d046efcbb90748ffe3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://www.scientific.net/Image/TitleCover/4758?width=600</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Andersone, Ingeborga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuka, Edgars</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cīrule, Dace</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verovkins, Anrijs</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antons, Andis</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of Different Modifications on Bending Strength of Wood</title><title>Key engineering materials</title><description>Despite intensive research in wood protection, no simple wood treatment method is available for satisfactory wood protection that could ensure appropriate strength and bio-resistance of wood products during their service life. The present study is a part of a project that is aimed to improve wood service properties by combining wood thermal treatment and impregnation with copper containing preservatives. The objective of the present study was to investigate the effect of conventional modifications (thermal modification at relatively mild temperature range (150 - 180°C) and impregnation) and double-treatments (impregnation after thermal treatment and vice versa) on the bending properties of birch (Betula spp.) and pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) wood. Bending strength considerably decreased after thermal modification of wood, however MOE values generally did not significantly change. Moreover, impregnation had no effect on the bending properties for both unmodified and thermally modified wood specimens. For double-treatment in which impregnation was carried out before thermal modification no changes in bending strength were observed comparing to thermally modified wood. However, MOE values of these specimens were 10 % for birch and 19 % for pine smaller comparing to just thermally modified wood. The results of double-treatment tests imply that, regarding wood bending properties, wood impregnation after thermal modification is more appropriate.</description><subject>Bend strength</subject><subject>Heat treatment</subject><subject>Impregnation</subject><subject>Preservatives</subject><subject>Properties (attributes)</subject><subject>Service life</subject><subject>Wood</subject><subject>Wood products</subject><issn>1013-9826</issn><issn>1662-9795</issn><issn>1662-9795</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkMFKAzEQhoMoWKvvsCB42-1ks5vdvUi1Vi22eFDxGNLspN1Sk5qkFN_elAq9epqB-fn-4SPkhkJWQF4Pdrtd5lWHJnS6U5nBMHgZz7IaIMsLOCE9ynmeNlVTnsYdKEubOufn5ML7FQCjNS17ZDgxer1FozCxOnnotEYXicnMtnuqDJ01PrEmuUfTdmaRvIV4X4TlPv5pbXtJzrRce7z6m33y8Th-Hz2n09enyehumqqcAqQtto2mTELF64ppVs4lLyVDZJJxVZQaNG95wZuKo6LQQsFRq_m8gaqo41OsT64P3I2z31v0Qazs1plYKfKcQc0rWpQxdXtIKWe9d6jFxnVf0v0ICmJvTURr4mhNRGsiWhPRmojWImB4AAQnjQ-olseefyJ-ATiXfhQ</recordid><startdate>20190401</startdate><enddate>20190401</enddate><creator>Andersone, Ingeborga</creator><creator>Kuka, Edgars</creator><creator>Cīrule, Dace</creator><creator>Verovkins, Anrijs</creator><creator>Antons, Andis</creator><general>Trans Tech Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190401</creationdate><title>Influence of Different Modifications on Bending Strength of Wood</title><author>Andersone, Ingeborga ; Kuka, Edgars ; Cīrule, Dace ; Verovkins, Anrijs ; Antons, Andis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2100-ded9f13a076873f35ba65a3ee3a36c45f0f6d646976ec10d046efcbb90748ffe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Bend strength</topic><topic>Heat treatment</topic><topic>Impregnation</topic><topic>Preservatives</topic><topic>Properties (attributes)</topic><topic>Service life</topic><topic>Wood</topic><topic>Wood products</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Andersone, Ingeborga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuka, Edgars</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cīrule, Dace</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verovkins, Anrijs</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antons, Andis</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><jtitle>Key engineering materials</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Andersone, Ingeborga</au><au>Kuka, Edgars</au><au>Cīrule, Dace</au><au>Verovkins, Anrijs</au><au>Antons, Andis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of Different Modifications on Bending Strength of Wood</atitle><jtitle>Key engineering materials</jtitle><date>2019-04-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>800</volume><spage>240</spage><epage>245</epage><pages>240-245</pages><issn>1013-9826</issn><issn>1662-9795</issn><eissn>1662-9795</eissn><abstract>Despite intensive research in wood protection, no simple wood treatment method is available for satisfactory wood protection that could ensure appropriate strength and bio-resistance of wood products during their service life. The present study is a part of a project that is aimed to improve wood service properties by combining wood thermal treatment and impregnation with copper containing preservatives. The objective of the present study was to investigate the effect of conventional modifications (thermal modification at relatively mild temperature range (150 - 180°C) and impregnation) and double-treatments (impregnation after thermal treatment and vice versa) on the bending properties of birch (Betula spp.) and pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) wood. Bending strength considerably decreased after thermal modification of wood, however MOE values generally did not significantly change. Moreover, impregnation had no effect on the bending properties for both unmodified and thermally modified wood specimens. For double-treatment in which impregnation was carried out before thermal modification no changes in bending strength were observed comparing to thermally modified wood. However, MOE values of these specimens were 10 % for birch and 19 % for pine smaller comparing to just thermally modified wood. The results of double-treatment tests imply that, regarding wood bending properties, wood impregnation after thermal modification is more appropriate.</abstract><cop>Zurich</cop><pub>Trans Tech Publications Ltd</pub><doi>10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.800.240</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1013-9826
ispartof Key engineering materials, 2019-04, Vol.800, p.240-245
issn 1013-9826
1662-9795
1662-9795
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2230867145
source Scientific.net Journals
subjects Bend strength
Heat treatment
Impregnation
Preservatives
Properties (attributes)
Service life
Wood
Wood products
title Influence of Different Modifications on Bending Strength of Wood
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T08%3A44%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20Different%20Modifications%20on%20Bending%20Strength%20of%20Wood&rft.jtitle=Key%20engineering%20materials&rft.au=Andersone,%20Ingeborga&rft.date=2019-04-01&rft.volume=800&rft.spage=240&rft.epage=245&rft.pages=240-245&rft.issn=1013-9826&rft.eissn=1662-9795&rft_id=info:doi/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.800.240&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2230867145%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2230867145&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true