Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus
Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus The Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus* the American Diabetes Association, Alexandria, Virginia. Originally approved 1997. Modified in 1999 based on the Proceedings of the F...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Diabetes care 2002-01, Vol.25 (suppl 1), p.s5-s20 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | s20 |
---|---|
container_issue | suppl 1 |
container_start_page | s5 |
container_title | Diabetes care |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | The Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus |
description | Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus
The Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus*
the American Diabetes Association, Alexandria, Virginia. Originally approved 1997. Modified in 1999 based on the Proceedings
of the Fourth International Workshop-Conference on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus ( Diabetes Care 21 [Suppl. 2]:B1–B167, 1998).
The current classification and diagnosis of diabetes used in the U.S. was developed by the National Diabetes Data Group (NDDG)
and published in 1979 (1). The impetus for the classification and diagnosis scheme proposed then holds true today. That is,
the growth of knowledge regarding the etiology and pathogenesis of diabetes has led many individuals and groups in the diabetes
community to express the need for a revision of the nomenclature, diagnostic criteria, and classification of diabetes. As
a consequence, it was deemed essential to develop an appropriate, uniform terminology and a functional, working classification
of diabetes that reflects the current knowledge about the disease. (1)
It is now considered to be particularly important to move away from a system that appears to base the classification of the
disease, in large part, on the type of pharmacological treatment used in its management toward a system based on disease etiology
where possible.
An international Expert Committee, working under the sponsorship of the American Diabetes Association, was established in
May 1995 to review the scientific literature since 1979 and to decide if changes to the classification and diagnosis of diabetes
were warranted. The Committee met on multiple occasions and widely circulated a draft report of their findings and preliminary
recommendations to the international diabetes community. Based on the numerous comments and suggestions received, including
the opportunity to review unpublished data in detail, the Committee discussed and revised numerous drafts of a manuscript
that culminated in this published document.
This report is divided into four sections: definition and description of diabetes, classification of the disease, diagnostic
criteria, and testing for diabetes. The aim of this document is to define and describe diabetes as we know it today, present
a classification scheme that reflects its etiology and/or pathogenesis, provide guidelines for the diagnosis …
[Full Text of this Article] |
doi_str_mv | 10.2337/diacare.25.2007.S5 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_223067337</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>99961369</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3365-c34f4dff88c9565bf216618720640dd155c6f62de68413ca2338d28dca0f80a13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUMtOwzAQtBBIlMIPcIq4J_gd54jCUypCoiCOlutH6yqNQ-wK-Htc2gOXXe3OzK5mALhEsMKE1NfGK61GW2FWYQjras6OwAQ1hJWMUXEMJhDRpmRNg0_BWYxrCCGlQkzAx6sdwpiK4Iq0ssXd92Dz1IbNxqdkbRH6v_2tV8s-RB8L1Zui7VSM3nmtks-ErM34wiYbi2fbdT5t4zk4caqL9uLQp-D9_u6tfSxnLw9P7c2s1IRwlit11DgnhG4YZwuHEedI1BhyCo1BjGnuODaWC4qIVtmsMFgYraATUCEyBVf7u8MYPrc2JrkO27HPLyXGBPI6p5NJeE_SY4hxtE4Oo9-o8UciKHf5yUN-EjO5y0_OWRZVe9HKL1dfPoPmYPI_O26HoZNIRkZ-AYs9dgk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>223067337</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>The Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus</creator><creatorcontrib>The Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus</creatorcontrib><description>Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus
The Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus*
the American Diabetes Association, Alexandria, Virginia. Originally approved 1997. Modified in 1999 based on the Proceedings
of the Fourth International Workshop-Conference on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus ( Diabetes Care 21 [Suppl. 2]:B1–B167, 1998).
The current classification and diagnosis of diabetes used in the U.S. was developed by the National Diabetes Data Group (NDDG)
and published in 1979 (1). The impetus for the classification and diagnosis scheme proposed then holds true today. That is,
the growth of knowledge regarding the etiology and pathogenesis of diabetes has led many individuals and groups in the diabetes
community to express the need for a revision of the nomenclature, diagnostic criteria, and classification of diabetes. As
a consequence, it was deemed essential to develop an appropriate, uniform terminology and a functional, working classification
of diabetes that reflects the current knowledge about the disease. (1)
It is now considered to be particularly important to move away from a system that appears to base the classification of the
disease, in large part, on the type of pharmacological treatment used in its management toward a system based on disease etiology
where possible.
An international Expert Committee, working under the sponsorship of the American Diabetes Association, was established in
May 1995 to review the scientific literature since 1979 and to decide if changes to the classification and diagnosis of diabetes
were warranted. The Committee met on multiple occasions and widely circulated a draft report of their findings and preliminary
recommendations to the international diabetes community. Based on the numerous comments and suggestions received, including
the opportunity to review unpublished data in detail, the Committee discussed and revised numerous drafts of a manuscript
that culminated in this published document.
This report is divided into four sections: definition and description of diabetes, classification of the disease, diagnostic
criteria, and testing for diabetes. The aim of this document is to define and describe diabetes as we know it today, present
a classification scheme that reflects its etiology and/or pathogenesis, provide guidelines for the diagnosis …
[Full Text of this Article]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0149-5992</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1935-5548</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2337/diacare.25.2007.S5</identifier><identifier>CODEN: DICAD2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Alexandria: American Diabetes Association</publisher><subject>Classification ; Diabetes ; Medical diagnosis ; Medical screening</subject><ispartof>Diabetes care, 2002-01, Vol.25 (suppl 1), p.s5-s20</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Diabetes Association Jan 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3365-c34f4dff88c9565bf216618720640dd155c6f62de68413ca2338d28dca0f80a13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3365-c34f4dff88c9565bf216618720640dd155c6f62de68413ca2338d28dca0f80a13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>The Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus</creatorcontrib><title>Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus</title><title>Diabetes care</title><description>Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus
The Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus*
the American Diabetes Association, Alexandria, Virginia. Originally approved 1997. Modified in 1999 based on the Proceedings
of the Fourth International Workshop-Conference on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus ( Diabetes Care 21 [Suppl. 2]:B1–B167, 1998).
The current classification and diagnosis of diabetes used in the U.S. was developed by the National Diabetes Data Group (NDDG)
and published in 1979 (1). The impetus for the classification and diagnosis scheme proposed then holds true today. That is,
the growth of knowledge regarding the etiology and pathogenesis of diabetes has led many individuals and groups in the diabetes
community to express the need for a revision of the nomenclature, diagnostic criteria, and classification of diabetes. As
a consequence, it was deemed essential to develop an appropriate, uniform terminology and a functional, working classification
of diabetes that reflects the current knowledge about the disease. (1)
It is now considered to be particularly important to move away from a system that appears to base the classification of the
disease, in large part, on the type of pharmacological treatment used in its management toward a system based on disease etiology
where possible.
An international Expert Committee, working under the sponsorship of the American Diabetes Association, was established in
May 1995 to review the scientific literature since 1979 and to decide if changes to the classification and diagnosis of diabetes
were warranted. The Committee met on multiple occasions and widely circulated a draft report of their findings and preliminary
recommendations to the international diabetes community. Based on the numerous comments and suggestions received, including
the opportunity to review unpublished data in detail, the Committee discussed and revised numerous drafts of a manuscript
that culminated in this published document.
This report is divided into four sections: definition and description of diabetes, classification of the disease, diagnostic
criteria, and testing for diabetes. The aim of this document is to define and describe diabetes as we know it today, present
a classification scheme that reflects its etiology and/or pathogenesis, provide guidelines for the diagnosis …
[Full Text of this Article]</description><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><issn>0149-5992</issn><issn>1935-5548</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUMtOwzAQtBBIlMIPcIq4J_gd54jCUypCoiCOlutH6yqNQ-wK-Htc2gOXXe3OzK5mALhEsMKE1NfGK61GW2FWYQjras6OwAQ1hJWMUXEMJhDRpmRNg0_BWYxrCCGlQkzAx6sdwpiK4Iq0ssXd92Dz1IbNxqdkbRH6v_2tV8s-RB8L1Zui7VSM3nmtks-ErM34wiYbi2fbdT5t4zk4caqL9uLQp-D9_u6tfSxnLw9P7c2s1IRwlit11DgnhG4YZwuHEedI1BhyCo1BjGnuODaWC4qIVtmsMFgYraATUCEyBVf7u8MYPrc2JrkO27HPLyXGBPI6p5NJeE_SY4hxtE4Oo9-o8UciKHf5yUN-EjO5y0_OWRZVe9HKL1dfPoPmYPI_O26HoZNIRkZ-AYs9dgk</recordid><startdate>20020101</startdate><enddate>20020101</enddate><creator>The Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus</creator><general>American Diabetes Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020101</creationdate><title>Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus</title></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3365-c34f4dff88c9565bf216618720640dd155c6f62de68413ca2338d28dca0f80a13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>The Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Diabetes care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><aucorp>The Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus</atitle><jtitle>Diabetes care</jtitle><date>2002-01-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>suppl 1</issue><spage>s5</spage><epage>s20</epage><pages>s5-s20</pages><issn>0149-5992</issn><eissn>1935-5548</eissn><coden>DICAD2</coden><abstract>Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus
The Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus*
the American Diabetes Association, Alexandria, Virginia. Originally approved 1997. Modified in 1999 based on the Proceedings
of the Fourth International Workshop-Conference on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus ( Diabetes Care 21 [Suppl. 2]:B1–B167, 1998).
The current classification and diagnosis of diabetes used in the U.S. was developed by the National Diabetes Data Group (NDDG)
and published in 1979 (1). The impetus for the classification and diagnosis scheme proposed then holds true today. That is,
the growth of knowledge regarding the etiology and pathogenesis of diabetes has led many individuals and groups in the diabetes
community to express the need for a revision of the nomenclature, diagnostic criteria, and classification of diabetes. As
a consequence, it was deemed essential to develop an appropriate, uniform terminology and a functional, working classification
of diabetes that reflects the current knowledge about the disease. (1)
It is now considered to be particularly important to move away from a system that appears to base the classification of the
disease, in large part, on the type of pharmacological treatment used in its management toward a system based on disease etiology
where possible.
An international Expert Committee, working under the sponsorship of the American Diabetes Association, was established in
May 1995 to review the scientific literature since 1979 and to decide if changes to the classification and diagnosis of diabetes
were warranted. The Committee met on multiple occasions and widely circulated a draft report of their findings and preliminary
recommendations to the international diabetes community. Based on the numerous comments and suggestions received, including
the opportunity to review unpublished data in detail, the Committee discussed and revised numerous drafts of a manuscript
that culminated in this published document.
This report is divided into four sections: definition and description of diabetes, classification of the disease, diagnostic
criteria, and testing for diabetes. The aim of this document is to define and describe diabetes as we know it today, present
a classification scheme that reflects its etiology and/or pathogenesis, provide guidelines for the diagnosis …
[Full Text of this Article]</abstract><cop>Alexandria</cop><pub>American Diabetes Association</pub><doi>10.2337/diacare.25.2007.S5</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0149-5992 |
ispartof | Diabetes care, 2002-01, Vol.25 (suppl 1), p.s5-s20 |
issn | 0149-5992 1935-5548 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_223067337 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Classification Diabetes Medical diagnosis Medical screening |
title | Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T07%3A59%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Report%20of%20the%20Expert%20Committee%20on%20the%20Diagnosis%20and%20Classification%20of%20Diabetes%20Mellitus&rft.jtitle=Diabetes%20care&rft.aucorp=The%20Expert%20Committee%20on%20the%20Diagnosis%20and%20Classification%20of%20Diabetes%20Mellitus&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=suppl%201&rft.spage=s5&rft.epage=s20&rft.pages=s5-s20&rft.issn=0149-5992&rft.eissn=1935-5548&rft.coden=DICAD2&rft_id=info:doi/10.2337/diacare.25.2007.S5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E99961369%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=223067337&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |