8 An analysis of extra cardiac findings generated by the expansion of ct coronary angiography at a district general hospital
IntroductionThe updated 2016 NICE guidelines for stable chest pain recommend CT coronary angiography (CTCA) as the first line investigation for all patients presenting with stable chest pain. The implementation of these guidelines has led to the expansion of CTCA services. The CT scanning field of v...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Heart (British Cardiac Society) 2019-05, Vol.105 (Suppl 6), p.A8 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | Suppl 6 |
container_start_page | A8 |
container_title | Heart (British Cardiac Society) |
container_volume | 105 |
creator | Hudson, Jonathan Fyyaz, Saad David, Sarojini Olabintan, Olaolu Katsigris, Athanasios Alfakih, Khaled |
description | IntroductionThe updated 2016 NICE guidelines for stable chest pain recommend CT coronary angiography (CTCA) as the first line investigation for all patients presenting with stable chest pain. The implementation of these guidelines has led to the expansion of CTCA services. The CT scanning field of view extends beyond the heart resulting in extra-cardiac findings, which can require further investigation. Our aim was to assess the impact of the expansion of CTCA on the volume of extra cardiac findings, and to quantify the frequency and cost of the downstream tests generated.MethodsWe undertook a retrospective audit of all CTCAs performed between January 2017 and June 2018 at a district general hospital. Extra-cardiac findings in the CTCA report were classified according to whether they were clinically significant or insignificant. We analysed which scans required downstream investigation and follow up, and the financial implications using standardized NHS England tariffs.ResultsA total of 652 scans were performed with a total of 202 (26.2%) individual incidental extra-cardiac findings, 106 (16.3%) were deemed to be clinically significant requiring further investigation or referral to a specialist clinic. The extra-cardiac findings were abdominal (45), thoracic (42), cardiac (14), and involving breast tissue (5). The most common specific extra-cardiac findings were liver cysts (36) and pulmonary nodules (22). Two lung malignancies was identified.There were a total of 122 further investigations or referrals generated by extra-cardiac findings. The most common downstream investigations required were abdominal ultrasound (40), CT thorax (21), and echocardiogram (12). Referral to a specialist clinic for further assessment was required in 31 patients including 5 to a triple assessment breast clinic.The total additional cost of imaging investigations or onwards referral to a specialist clinic was £12,464. Broken down by category, thoracic findings required £7,828, abdominal findings £1,710, cardiac findings £2,226, and breast findings £700. The added cost on average per patient for investigating and referring on extra-cardiac findings was £19.ConclusionOur data suggests that CTCA generates a significant number of clinically relevant extra-cardiac findings that require further investigation. These have additional costs and generate significant workload for the rapid access chest pain clinic. Importantly, we identified significant delays in the downstream investigati |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/heartjnl-2019-BCS.8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_bmj_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2230236388</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2230236388</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b1128-dc41f23cc5a58514e08a4a60affb5f234aa635ac9a3ec972e9b618e30a75be993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kM1KxDAUhYMoOI4-gZuA645J02bS5Tj4BwMuVHAXbtO0TemkNcmAsxE3vqhPYsro6h7u_e6BcxC6pGRBKePXrQYXOtsnKaFFcrN-XogjNKMZF9Pm7ThqlucJJ2x5is687wghWSH4DH2Kn6_vlcVgod974_FQY_0RHGAFrjKgcG1sZWzjcaOtdhB0hcs9Dq2O3AjWm8FOTypgNbjBgttHs8YMjYOxjTpgwJXxwZmIHDx63A5-NAH6c3RSQ-_1xd-co9e725f1Q7J5un9crzZJSWkqkkpltE6ZUjnkIqeZJgIy4ATquszjIQPgLAdVANOqWKa6KDkVmhFY5qUuCjZHVwff0Q3vO-2D7Iadi5m9TFNGUsaZEJFaHKhy28nRmW0MIymRU8fyv2M5dSxjx1KwXzMFdRA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2230236388</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>8 An analysis of extra cardiac findings generated by the expansion of ct coronary angiography at a district general hospital</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Hudson, Jonathan ; Fyyaz, Saad ; David, Sarojini ; Olabintan, Olaolu ; Katsigris, Athanasios ; Alfakih, Khaled</creator><creatorcontrib>Hudson, Jonathan ; Fyyaz, Saad ; David, Sarojini ; Olabintan, Olaolu ; Katsigris, Athanasios ; Alfakih, Khaled</creatorcontrib><description>IntroductionThe updated 2016 NICE guidelines for stable chest pain recommend CT coronary angiography (CTCA) as the first line investigation for all patients presenting with stable chest pain. The implementation of these guidelines has led to the expansion of CTCA services. The CT scanning field of view extends beyond the heart resulting in extra-cardiac findings, which can require further investigation. Our aim was to assess the impact of the expansion of CTCA on the volume of extra cardiac findings, and to quantify the frequency and cost of the downstream tests generated.MethodsWe undertook a retrospective audit of all CTCAs performed between January 2017 and June 2018 at a district general hospital. Extra-cardiac findings in the CTCA report were classified according to whether they were clinically significant or insignificant. We analysed which scans required downstream investigation and follow up, and the financial implications using standardized NHS England tariffs.ResultsA total of 652 scans were performed with a total of 202 (26.2%) individual incidental extra-cardiac findings, 106 (16.3%) were deemed to be clinically significant requiring further investigation or referral to a specialist clinic. The extra-cardiac findings were abdominal (45), thoracic (42), cardiac (14), and involving breast tissue (5). The most common specific extra-cardiac findings were liver cysts (36) and pulmonary nodules (22). Two lung malignancies was identified.There were a total of 122 further investigations or referrals generated by extra-cardiac findings. The most common downstream investigations required were abdominal ultrasound (40), CT thorax (21), and echocardiogram (12). Referral to a specialist clinic for further assessment was required in 31 patients including 5 to a triple assessment breast clinic.The total additional cost of imaging investigations or onwards referral to a specialist clinic was £12,464. Broken down by category, thoracic findings required £7,828, abdominal findings £1,710, cardiac findings £2,226, and breast findings £700. The added cost on average per patient for investigating and referring on extra-cardiac findings was £19.ConclusionOur data suggests that CTCA generates a significant number of clinically relevant extra-cardiac findings that require further investigation. These have additional costs and generate significant workload for the rapid access chest pain clinic. Importantly, we identified significant delays in the downstream investigations in the absence of robust referral pathways. The expansion of CTCA to even older patients will increase the extra-cardiac findings and will require hospitals to develop referral pathways and to clearly delineate responsibility for further investigation, follow up and onwards referral of important findings. Although somewhat controversial due to ethical considerations of missing potentially pre-malignant and malignant conditions, limiting the scanning field of view to scan just the heart, may reduce the number of incidental findings and limit radiation exposure1.ReferenceRobertson J, Nicholls S, Bardin P, et al. Incidental Pulmonary Nodules Are Common on CT Coronary Angiogram and Have a Significant Cost Impact. Heart Lung Circ 2017.Conflict of InterestNone</description><identifier>ISSN: 1355-6037</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-201X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2019-BCS.8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><subject>Abdomen ; Medical imaging ; Pain</subject><ispartof>Heart (British Cardiac Society), 2019-05, Vol.105 (Suppl 6), p.A8</ispartof><rights>2019, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><rights>2019 2019, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hudson, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fyyaz, Saad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>David, Sarojini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olabintan, Olaolu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katsigris, Athanasios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alfakih, Khaled</creatorcontrib><title>8 An analysis of extra cardiac findings generated by the expansion of ct coronary angiography at a district general hospital</title><title>Heart (British Cardiac Society)</title><description>IntroductionThe updated 2016 NICE guidelines for stable chest pain recommend CT coronary angiography (CTCA) as the first line investigation for all patients presenting with stable chest pain. The implementation of these guidelines has led to the expansion of CTCA services. The CT scanning field of view extends beyond the heart resulting in extra-cardiac findings, which can require further investigation. Our aim was to assess the impact of the expansion of CTCA on the volume of extra cardiac findings, and to quantify the frequency and cost of the downstream tests generated.MethodsWe undertook a retrospective audit of all CTCAs performed between January 2017 and June 2018 at a district general hospital. Extra-cardiac findings in the CTCA report were classified according to whether they were clinically significant or insignificant. We analysed which scans required downstream investigation and follow up, and the financial implications using standardized NHS England tariffs.ResultsA total of 652 scans were performed with a total of 202 (26.2%) individual incidental extra-cardiac findings, 106 (16.3%) were deemed to be clinically significant requiring further investigation or referral to a specialist clinic. The extra-cardiac findings were abdominal (45), thoracic (42), cardiac (14), and involving breast tissue (5). The most common specific extra-cardiac findings were liver cysts (36) and pulmonary nodules (22). Two lung malignancies was identified.There were a total of 122 further investigations or referrals generated by extra-cardiac findings. The most common downstream investigations required were abdominal ultrasound (40), CT thorax (21), and echocardiogram (12). Referral to a specialist clinic for further assessment was required in 31 patients including 5 to a triple assessment breast clinic.The total additional cost of imaging investigations or onwards referral to a specialist clinic was £12,464. Broken down by category, thoracic findings required £7,828, abdominal findings £1,710, cardiac findings £2,226, and breast findings £700. The added cost on average per patient for investigating and referring on extra-cardiac findings was £19.ConclusionOur data suggests that CTCA generates a significant number of clinically relevant extra-cardiac findings that require further investigation. These have additional costs and generate significant workload for the rapid access chest pain clinic. Importantly, we identified significant delays in the downstream investigations in the absence of robust referral pathways. The expansion of CTCA to even older patients will increase the extra-cardiac findings and will require hospitals to develop referral pathways and to clearly delineate responsibility for further investigation, follow up and onwards referral of important findings. Although somewhat controversial due to ethical considerations of missing potentially pre-malignant and malignant conditions, limiting the scanning field of view to scan just the heart, may reduce the number of incidental findings and limit radiation exposure1.ReferenceRobertson J, Nicholls S, Bardin P, et al. Incidental Pulmonary Nodules Are Common on CT Coronary Angiogram and Have a Significant Cost Impact. Heart Lung Circ 2017.Conflict of InterestNone</description><subject>Abdomen</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Pain</subject><issn>1355-6037</issn><issn>1468-201X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kM1KxDAUhYMoOI4-gZuA645J02bS5Tj4BwMuVHAXbtO0TemkNcmAsxE3vqhPYsro6h7u_e6BcxC6pGRBKePXrQYXOtsnKaFFcrN-XogjNKMZF9Pm7ThqlucJJ2x5is687wghWSH4DH2Kn6_vlcVgod974_FQY_0RHGAFrjKgcG1sZWzjcaOtdhB0hcs9Dq2O3AjWm8FOTypgNbjBgttHs8YMjYOxjTpgwJXxwZmIHDx63A5-NAH6c3RSQ-_1xd-co9e725f1Q7J5un9crzZJSWkqkkpltE6ZUjnkIqeZJgIy4ATquszjIQPgLAdVANOqWKa6KDkVmhFY5qUuCjZHVwff0Q3vO-2D7Iadi5m9TFNGUsaZEJFaHKhy28nRmW0MIymRU8fyv2M5dSxjx1KwXzMFdRA</recordid><startdate>201905</startdate><enddate>201905</enddate><creator>Hudson, Jonathan</creator><creator>Fyyaz, Saad</creator><creator>David, Sarojini</creator><creator>Olabintan, Olaolu</creator><creator>Katsigris, Athanasios</creator><creator>Alfakih, Khaled</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201905</creationdate><title>8 An analysis of extra cardiac findings generated by the expansion of ct coronary angiography at a district general hospital</title><author>Hudson, Jonathan ; Fyyaz, Saad ; David, Sarojini ; Olabintan, Olaolu ; Katsigris, Athanasios ; Alfakih, Khaled</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b1128-dc41f23cc5a58514e08a4a60affb5f234aa635ac9a3ec972e9b618e30a75be993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Abdomen</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Pain</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hudson, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fyyaz, Saad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>David, Sarojini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olabintan, Olaolu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katsigris, Athanasios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alfakih, Khaled</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Heart (British Cardiac Society)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hudson, Jonathan</au><au>Fyyaz, Saad</au><au>David, Sarojini</au><au>Olabintan, Olaolu</au><au>Katsigris, Athanasios</au><au>Alfakih, Khaled</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>8 An analysis of extra cardiac findings generated by the expansion of ct coronary angiography at a district general hospital</atitle><jtitle>Heart (British Cardiac Society)</jtitle><date>2019-05</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>105</volume><issue>Suppl 6</issue><spage>A8</spage><pages>A8-</pages><issn>1355-6037</issn><eissn>1468-201X</eissn><abstract>IntroductionThe updated 2016 NICE guidelines for stable chest pain recommend CT coronary angiography (CTCA) as the first line investigation for all patients presenting with stable chest pain. The implementation of these guidelines has led to the expansion of CTCA services. The CT scanning field of view extends beyond the heart resulting in extra-cardiac findings, which can require further investigation. Our aim was to assess the impact of the expansion of CTCA on the volume of extra cardiac findings, and to quantify the frequency and cost of the downstream tests generated.MethodsWe undertook a retrospective audit of all CTCAs performed between January 2017 and June 2018 at a district general hospital. Extra-cardiac findings in the CTCA report were classified according to whether they were clinically significant or insignificant. We analysed which scans required downstream investigation and follow up, and the financial implications using standardized NHS England tariffs.ResultsA total of 652 scans were performed with a total of 202 (26.2%) individual incidental extra-cardiac findings, 106 (16.3%) were deemed to be clinically significant requiring further investigation or referral to a specialist clinic. The extra-cardiac findings were abdominal (45), thoracic (42), cardiac (14), and involving breast tissue (5). The most common specific extra-cardiac findings were liver cysts (36) and pulmonary nodules (22). Two lung malignancies was identified.There were a total of 122 further investigations or referrals generated by extra-cardiac findings. The most common downstream investigations required were abdominal ultrasound (40), CT thorax (21), and echocardiogram (12). Referral to a specialist clinic for further assessment was required in 31 patients including 5 to a triple assessment breast clinic.The total additional cost of imaging investigations or onwards referral to a specialist clinic was £12,464. Broken down by category, thoracic findings required £7,828, abdominal findings £1,710, cardiac findings £2,226, and breast findings £700. The added cost on average per patient for investigating and referring on extra-cardiac findings was £19.ConclusionOur data suggests that CTCA generates a significant number of clinically relevant extra-cardiac findings that require further investigation. These have additional costs and generate significant workload for the rapid access chest pain clinic. Importantly, we identified significant delays in the downstream investigations in the absence of robust referral pathways. The expansion of CTCA to even older patients will increase the extra-cardiac findings and will require hospitals to develop referral pathways and to clearly delineate responsibility for further investigation, follow up and onwards referral of important findings. Although somewhat controversial due to ethical considerations of missing potentially pre-malignant and malignant conditions, limiting the scanning field of view to scan just the heart, may reduce the number of incidental findings and limit radiation exposure1.ReferenceRobertson J, Nicholls S, Bardin P, et al. Incidental Pulmonary Nodules Are Common on CT Coronary Angiogram and Have a Significant Cost Impact. Heart Lung Circ 2017.Conflict of InterestNone</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><doi>10.1136/heartjnl-2019-BCS.8</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1355-6037 |
ispartof | Heart (British Cardiac Society), 2019-05, Vol.105 (Suppl 6), p.A8 |
issn | 1355-6037 1468-201X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2230236388 |
source | PubMed Central |
subjects | Abdomen Medical imaging Pain |
title | 8 An analysis of extra cardiac findings generated by the expansion of ct coronary angiography at a district general hospital |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T16%3A26%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_bmj_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=8%E2%80%85An%20analysis%20of%20extra%20cardiac%20findings%20generated%20by%20the%20expansion%20of%20ct%20coronary%20angiography%20at%20a%20district%20general%20hospital&rft.jtitle=Heart%20(British%20Cardiac%20Society)&rft.au=Hudson,%20Jonathan&rft.date=2019-05&rft.volume=105&rft.issue=Suppl%206&rft.spage=A8&rft.pages=A8-&rft.issn=1355-6037&rft.eissn=1468-201X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/heartjnl-2019-BCS.8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_bmj_p%3E2230236388%3C/proquest_bmj_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2230236388&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |