Assessment for Monitoring of Education Systems: International Comparisons
Over the last two decades, with the increase in both numbers of participating jurisdictions and media attention, international large-scale assessments (ILSAs) have come to play a more salient role in global education policies than they once did. This has led to calls for greater transparency with re...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 2019-05, Vol.683 (1), p.75-92 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 92 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 75 |
container_title | The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science |
container_volume | 683 |
creator | BRAUN, HENRY I. SINGER, JUDITH D. |
description | Over the last two decades, with the increase in both numbers of participating jurisdictions and media attention, international large-scale assessments (ILSAs) have come to play a more salient role in global education policies than they once did. This has led to calls for greater transparency with regard to instrument development and closer scrutiny of the use of instruments in education policy. We begin with a brief review of the history of ILSAs and describe the requirements and constraints that shape ILSA design, implementation, and analysis. We then evaluate the rationales of employing ILSA results for different purposes, ranging from those we argue are most appropriate (comparative description) to least appropriate (causal inference). We cite examples of ILSA usage from different countries, with particular attention to the widespread misinterpretations and misuses of country rankings based on average scores on an assessment (e.g., literacy or numeracy). Looking forward, we offer suggestions on how to enhance the constructive roles that ILSAs play in informing education policy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0002716219843804 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2229892288</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26732340</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_0002716219843804</sage_id><sourcerecordid>26732340</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-5ed7bd585ac6be7221f01272347eca5e9ad10e8ff24c99c6d41cc98adf2714d23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kL1PwzAQxS0EEqGwsyBFYk6xz05sj1VVPqQiBmCOXH9UqUhcfOnQ_55EQSAxcMsN93vv9B4h14zOGZPyjlIKklXAtBJcUXFCMlaWUHAu9CnJxnMx3s_JBeKOjsN0RuYLRI_Y-q7PQ0z5c-yaPqam2-Yx5Ct3sKZvYpe_HrH3LV6Ss2A-0F997xl5v1-9LR-L9cvD03KxLiyvRF-U3smNK1VpbLXxEoAFykACF9JbU3ptHKNehQDCam0rJ5i1WhkXhgzCAZ-R28l3n-LnwWNf7-IhdcPLGgC00gBKDRSdKJsiYvKh3qemNelYM1qPrdR_WxkkxSRBs_W_pv_wNxO_w6GWH3-oJB_SUP4F-UNp2Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2229892288</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment for Monitoring of Education Systems: International Comparisons</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>BRAUN, HENRY I. ; SINGER, JUDITH D.</creator><creatorcontrib>BRAUN, HENRY I. ; SINGER, JUDITH D.</creatorcontrib><description>Over the last two decades, with the increase in both numbers of participating jurisdictions and media attention, international large-scale assessments (ILSAs) have come to play a more salient role in global education policies than they once did. This has led to calls for greater transparency with regard to instrument development and closer scrutiny of the use of instruments in education policy. We begin with a brief review of the history of ILSAs and describe the requirements and constraints that shape ILSA design, implementation, and analysis. We then evaluate the rationales of employing ILSA results for different purposes, ranging from those we argue are most appropriate (comparative description) to least appropriate (causal inference). We cite examples of ILSA usage from different countries, with particular attention to the widespread misinterpretations and misuses of country rankings based on average scores on an assessment (e.g., literacy or numeracy). Looking forward, we offer suggestions on how to enhance the constructive roles that ILSAs play in informing education policy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-7162</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3349</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0002716219843804</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications, Inc</publisher><subject>Assessments for System Monitoring ; Attention ; Cross cultural studies ; Education ; Education policy ; Educational systems ; Evaluation ; Inference ; International comparisons ; Mass media ; Numeracy ; Scrutiny ; Transparency</subject><ispartof>The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 2019-05, Vol.683 (1), p.75-92</ispartof><rights>2019 by The American Academy of Political and Social Science</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-5ed7bd585ac6be7221f01272347eca5e9ad10e8ff24c99c6d41cc98adf2714d23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-5ed7bd585ac6be7221f01272347eca5e9ad10e8ff24c99c6d41cc98adf2714d23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0002716219843804$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0002716219843804$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27866,27924,27925,33774,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>BRAUN, HENRY I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SINGER, JUDITH D.</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment for Monitoring of Education Systems: International Comparisons</title><title>The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science</title><description>Over the last two decades, with the increase in both numbers of participating jurisdictions and media attention, international large-scale assessments (ILSAs) have come to play a more salient role in global education policies than they once did. This has led to calls for greater transparency with regard to instrument development and closer scrutiny of the use of instruments in education policy. We begin with a brief review of the history of ILSAs and describe the requirements and constraints that shape ILSA design, implementation, and analysis. We then evaluate the rationales of employing ILSA results for different purposes, ranging from those we argue are most appropriate (comparative description) to least appropriate (causal inference). We cite examples of ILSA usage from different countries, with particular attention to the widespread misinterpretations and misuses of country rankings based on average scores on an assessment (e.g., literacy or numeracy). Looking forward, we offer suggestions on how to enhance the constructive roles that ILSAs play in informing education policy.</description><subject>Assessments for System Monitoring</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Cross cultural studies</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Education policy</subject><subject>Educational systems</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Inference</subject><subject>International comparisons</subject><subject>Mass media</subject><subject>Numeracy</subject><subject>Scrutiny</subject><subject>Transparency</subject><issn>0002-7162</issn><issn>1552-3349</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kL1PwzAQxS0EEqGwsyBFYk6xz05sj1VVPqQiBmCOXH9UqUhcfOnQ_55EQSAxcMsN93vv9B4h14zOGZPyjlIKklXAtBJcUXFCMlaWUHAu9CnJxnMx3s_JBeKOjsN0RuYLRI_Y-q7PQ0z5c-yaPqam2-Yx5Ct3sKZvYpe_HrH3LV6Ss2A-0F997xl5v1-9LR-L9cvD03KxLiyvRF-U3smNK1VpbLXxEoAFykACF9JbU3ptHKNehQDCam0rJ5i1WhkXhgzCAZ-R28l3n-LnwWNf7-IhdcPLGgC00gBKDRSdKJsiYvKh3qemNelYM1qPrdR_WxkkxSRBs_W_pv_wNxO_w6GWH3-oJB_SUP4F-UNp2Q</recordid><startdate>20190501</startdate><enddate>20190501</enddate><creator>BRAUN, HENRY I.</creator><creator>SINGER, JUDITH D.</creator><general>Sage Publications, Inc</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190501</creationdate><title>Assessment for Monitoring of Education Systems</title><author>BRAUN, HENRY I. ; SINGER, JUDITH D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-5ed7bd585ac6be7221f01272347eca5e9ad10e8ff24c99c6d41cc98adf2714d23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Assessments for System Monitoring</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Cross cultural studies</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Education policy</topic><topic>Educational systems</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Inference</topic><topic>International comparisons</topic><topic>Mass media</topic><topic>Numeracy</topic><topic>Scrutiny</topic><topic>Transparency</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BRAUN, HENRY I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SINGER, JUDITH D.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BRAUN, HENRY I.</au><au>SINGER, JUDITH D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment for Monitoring of Education Systems: International Comparisons</atitle><jtitle>The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science</jtitle><date>2019-05-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>683</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>75</spage><epage>92</epage><pages>75-92</pages><issn>0002-7162</issn><eissn>1552-3349</eissn><abstract>Over the last two decades, with the increase in both numbers of participating jurisdictions and media attention, international large-scale assessments (ILSAs) have come to play a more salient role in global education policies than they once did. This has led to calls for greater transparency with regard to instrument development and closer scrutiny of the use of instruments in education policy. We begin with a brief review of the history of ILSAs and describe the requirements and constraints that shape ILSA design, implementation, and analysis. We then evaluate the rationales of employing ILSA results for different purposes, ranging from those we argue are most appropriate (comparative description) to least appropriate (causal inference). We cite examples of ILSA usage from different countries, with particular attention to the widespread misinterpretations and misuses of country rankings based on average scores on an assessment (e.g., literacy or numeracy). Looking forward, we offer suggestions on how to enhance the constructive roles that ILSAs play in informing education policy.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>Sage Publications, Inc</pub><doi>10.1177/0002716219843804</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-7162 |
ispartof | The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 2019-05, Vol.683 (1), p.75-92 |
issn | 0002-7162 1552-3349 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2229892288 |
source | Access via SAGE; PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Assessments for System Monitoring Attention Cross cultural studies Education Education policy Educational systems Evaluation Inference International comparisons Mass media Numeracy Scrutiny Transparency |
title | Assessment for Monitoring of Education Systems: International Comparisons |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T22%3A56%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20for%20Monitoring%20of%20Education%20Systems:%20International%20Comparisons&rft.jtitle=The%20Annals%20of%20the%20American%20Academy%20of%20Political%20and%20Social%20Science&rft.au=BRAUN,%20HENRY%20I.&rft.date=2019-05-01&rft.volume=683&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=75&rft.epage=92&rft.pages=75-92&rft.issn=0002-7162&rft.eissn=1552-3349&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0002716219843804&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26732340%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2229892288&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26732340&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0002716219843804&rfr_iscdi=true |