How robust are risk-taking associations in incubating birds? A test and a review
Flushing distance (FD, the horizontal distance between a parent bird when it leaves its nest and an approaching predator) is one measure of nest defense and of risk-taking; parents that stay too long risk being killed, whereas those that flush too early risk at the very least impairing development o...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Behavioral ecology and sociobiology 2019-06, Vol.73 (6), p.1-9, Article 79 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 9 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Behavioral ecology and sociobiology |
container_volume | 73 |
creator | Graham, Kylee F. Shutler, Dave |
description | Flushing distance (FD, the horizontal distance between a parent bird when it leaves its nest and an approaching predator) is one measure of nest defense and of risk-taking; parents that stay too long risk being killed, whereas those that flush too early risk at the very least impairing development of their young, and at the very worst leaving them unprotected against predators. Thus, FD should be under strong natural selection. A general prediction is that incubating birds will remain on a nest being approached by a predator until risks of staying reach a threshold that outweighs costs of fleeing. This threshold is predicted to vary depending on a brood’s value, parental characteristics, environmental conditions, and learning that repeated visits pose a limited or no threat. We evaluated FD in a nest box population of tree swallows (Tachycineta bicolor) relative to each of these. We obtained 246 FDs from 66 different nests over 2 years. We found some evidence that FD increased with clutch size (tendency), female age, and air temperature, and decreased with greater overhead vegetation density; six additional associations were not significant. Given the lackluster support for the predictions we tested, we did a review of the literature and similarly found limited support for most of the associations we tested despite the entrenched view that these relationships are commonplace. We submit that further insights are needed into understanding predictors of FD in incubating birds. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00265-019-2692-x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2229855348</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>48705608</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>48705608</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-a8d9eae47d4cf093a04e9af6aa275f755fc0c88e0f9f54e3c88bd7f3d33af6d73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wIMQ8Bydzccme5JS1AqCHvQcsrtJSaubmuza-u9NWdGbMDAzzPvMDC9C5wVcFQDyOgHQUhAoKkLLipLdAZoUnFECsqSHaAKMAxGcs2N0ktIKAMpCqQl6XoQtjqEeUo9NtDj6tCa9WftuiU1KofGm96FL2Hc5mqHObR7VPrbpBs9wb_dg12KDo_30dnuKjpx5S_bsJ0_R693ty3xBHp_uH-azR9IwpnpiVFtZY7lseeOgYga4rYwrjaFSOCmEa6BRyoKrnOCW5bpupWMtY1nVSjZFl-PeTQwfQ_5Cr8IQu3xSU0orJQTjKquKUdXEkFK0Tm-ifzfxSxeg98bp0TidjdN74_QuM3RkUtZ2Sxv_Nv8HXYzQKvUh_l7hSoIoQbFvc4J7Xg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2229855348</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How robust are risk-taking associations in incubating birds? A test and a review</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Graham, Kylee F. ; Shutler, Dave</creator><creatorcontrib>Graham, Kylee F. ; Shutler, Dave</creatorcontrib><description>Flushing distance (FD, the horizontal distance between a parent bird when it leaves its nest and an approaching predator) is one measure of nest defense and of risk-taking; parents that stay too long risk being killed, whereas those that flush too early risk at the very least impairing development of their young, and at the very worst leaving them unprotected against predators. Thus, FD should be under strong natural selection. A general prediction is that incubating birds will remain on a nest being approached by a predator until risks of staying reach a threshold that outweighs costs of fleeing. This threshold is predicted to vary depending on a brood’s value, parental characteristics, environmental conditions, and learning that repeated visits pose a limited or no threat. We evaluated FD in a nest box population of tree swallows (Tachycineta bicolor) relative to each of these. We obtained 246 FDs from 66 different nests over 2 years. We found some evidence that FD increased with clutch size (tendency), female age, and air temperature, and decreased with greater overhead vegetation density; six additional associations were not significant. Given the lackluster support for the predictions we tested, we did a review of the literature and similarly found limited support for most of the associations we tested despite the entrenched view that these relationships are commonplace. We submit that further insights are needed into understanding predictors of FD in incubating birds.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0340-5443</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0762</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00265-019-2692-x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Science + Business Media</publisher><subject>Air temperature ; Animal Ecology ; Aquatic birds ; Behavioral Sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Birds ; Clutch size ; Eggs ; Environmental conditions ; Life Sciences ; Literature reviews ; Natural selection ; Nests ; ORIGINAL ARTICLE ; Parents ; Predators ; Predictions ; Risk ; Risk taking ; Waterfowl ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology, 2019-06, Vol.73 (6), p.1-9, Article 79</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH, part of Springer Nature 2019</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019</rights><rights>Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-a8d9eae47d4cf093a04e9af6aa275f755fc0c88e0f9f54e3c88bd7f3d33af6d73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-a8d9eae47d4cf093a04e9af6aa275f755fc0c88e0f9f54e3c88bd7f3d33af6d73</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2032-8148</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48705608$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48705608$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Graham, Kylee F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shutler, Dave</creatorcontrib><title>How robust are risk-taking associations in incubating birds? A test and a review</title><title>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology</title><addtitle>Behav Ecol Sociobiol</addtitle><description>Flushing distance (FD, the horizontal distance between a parent bird when it leaves its nest and an approaching predator) is one measure of nest defense and of risk-taking; parents that stay too long risk being killed, whereas those that flush too early risk at the very least impairing development of their young, and at the very worst leaving them unprotected against predators. Thus, FD should be under strong natural selection. A general prediction is that incubating birds will remain on a nest being approached by a predator until risks of staying reach a threshold that outweighs costs of fleeing. This threshold is predicted to vary depending on a brood’s value, parental characteristics, environmental conditions, and learning that repeated visits pose a limited or no threat. We evaluated FD in a nest box population of tree swallows (Tachycineta bicolor) relative to each of these. We obtained 246 FDs from 66 different nests over 2 years. We found some evidence that FD increased with clutch size (tendency), female age, and air temperature, and decreased with greater overhead vegetation density; six additional associations were not significant. Given the lackluster support for the predictions we tested, we did a review of the literature and similarly found limited support for most of the associations we tested despite the entrenched view that these relationships are commonplace. We submit that further insights are needed into understanding predictors of FD in incubating birds.</description><subject>Air temperature</subject><subject>Animal Ecology</subject><subject>Aquatic birds</subject><subject>Behavioral Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Clutch size</subject><subject>Eggs</subject><subject>Environmental conditions</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Natural selection</subject><subject>Nests</subject><subject>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</subject><subject>Parents</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Predictions</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Risk taking</subject><subject>Waterfowl</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0340-5443</issn><issn>1432-0762</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wIMQ8Bydzccme5JS1AqCHvQcsrtJSaubmuza-u9NWdGbMDAzzPvMDC9C5wVcFQDyOgHQUhAoKkLLipLdAZoUnFECsqSHaAKMAxGcs2N0ktIKAMpCqQl6XoQtjqEeUo9NtDj6tCa9WftuiU1KofGm96FL2Hc5mqHObR7VPrbpBs9wb_dg12KDo_30dnuKjpx5S_bsJ0_R693ty3xBHp_uH-azR9IwpnpiVFtZY7lseeOgYga4rYwrjaFSOCmEa6BRyoKrnOCW5bpupWMtY1nVSjZFl-PeTQwfQ_5Cr8IQu3xSU0orJQTjKquKUdXEkFK0Tm-ifzfxSxeg98bp0TidjdN74_QuM3RkUtZ2Sxv_Nv8HXYzQKvUh_l7hSoIoQbFvc4J7Xg</recordid><startdate>20190601</startdate><enddate>20190601</enddate><creator>Graham, Kylee F.</creator><creator>Shutler, Dave</creator><general>Springer Science + Business Media</general><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2032-8148</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190601</creationdate><title>How robust are risk-taking associations in incubating birds? A test and a review</title><author>Graham, Kylee F. ; Shutler, Dave</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-a8d9eae47d4cf093a04e9af6aa275f755fc0c88e0f9f54e3c88bd7f3d33af6d73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Air temperature</topic><topic>Animal Ecology</topic><topic>Aquatic birds</topic><topic>Behavioral Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Clutch size</topic><topic>Eggs</topic><topic>Environmental conditions</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Natural selection</topic><topic>Nests</topic><topic>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</topic><topic>Parents</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Predictions</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Risk taking</topic><topic>Waterfowl</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Graham, Kylee F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shutler, Dave</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Graham, Kylee F.</au><au>Shutler, Dave</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How robust are risk-taking associations in incubating birds? A test and a review</atitle><jtitle>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology</jtitle><stitle>Behav Ecol Sociobiol</stitle><date>2019-06-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>73</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>9</epage><pages>1-9</pages><artnum>79</artnum><issn>0340-5443</issn><eissn>1432-0762</eissn><abstract>Flushing distance (FD, the horizontal distance between a parent bird when it leaves its nest and an approaching predator) is one measure of nest defense and of risk-taking; parents that stay too long risk being killed, whereas those that flush too early risk at the very least impairing development of their young, and at the very worst leaving them unprotected against predators. Thus, FD should be under strong natural selection. A general prediction is that incubating birds will remain on a nest being approached by a predator until risks of staying reach a threshold that outweighs costs of fleeing. This threshold is predicted to vary depending on a brood’s value, parental characteristics, environmental conditions, and learning that repeated visits pose a limited or no threat. We evaluated FD in a nest box population of tree swallows (Tachycineta bicolor) relative to each of these. We obtained 246 FDs from 66 different nests over 2 years. We found some evidence that FD increased with clutch size (tendency), female age, and air temperature, and decreased with greater overhead vegetation density; six additional associations were not significant. Given the lackluster support for the predictions we tested, we did a review of the literature and similarly found limited support for most of the associations we tested despite the entrenched view that these relationships are commonplace. We submit that further insights are needed into understanding predictors of FD in incubating birds.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Science + Business Media</pub><doi>10.1007/s00265-019-2692-x</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2032-8148</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0340-5443 |
ispartof | Behavioral ecology and sociobiology, 2019-06, Vol.73 (6), p.1-9, Article 79 |
issn | 0340-5443 1432-0762 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2229855348 |
source | JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Air temperature Animal Ecology Aquatic birds Behavioral Sciences Biomedical and Life Sciences Birds Clutch size Eggs Environmental conditions Life Sciences Literature reviews Natural selection Nests ORIGINAL ARTICLE Parents Predators Predictions Risk Risk taking Waterfowl Zoology |
title | How robust are risk-taking associations in incubating birds? A test and a review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T10%3A35%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20robust%20are%20risk-taking%20associations%20in%20incubating%20birds?%20A%20test%20and%20a%20review&rft.jtitle=Behavioral%20ecology%20and%20sociobiology&rft.au=Graham,%20Kylee%20F.&rft.date=2019-06-01&rft.volume=73&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=9&rft.pages=1-9&rft.artnum=79&rft.issn=0340-5443&rft.eissn=1432-0762&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00265-019-2692-x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E48705608%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2229855348&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=48705608&rfr_iscdi=true |