Rate of Magma Supply Beneath Mammoth Mountain, California, Based on Helium Isotopes and CO2 Emissions

Mammoth Mountain, California, has exhibited unrest over the past ~30 years, characterized by seismicity over a broad range of depths, elevated 3He/4He ratios in fumarolic gas, and large‐scale diffuse CO2 emissions. This activity has been attributed to magmatic intrusion, but minimal ground deformati...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Geophysical research letters 2019-05, Vol.46 (9), p.4636-4644
Hauptverfasser: Lewicki, Jennifer L., Evans, William C., Montgomery‐Brown, Emily K., Mangan, Margaret T., King, John C., Hunt, Andrew G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 4644
container_issue 9
container_start_page 4636
container_title Geophysical research letters
container_volume 46
creator Lewicki, Jennifer L.
Evans, William C.
Montgomery‐Brown, Emily K.
Mangan, Margaret T.
King, John C.
Hunt, Andrew G.
description Mammoth Mountain, California, has exhibited unrest over the past ~30 years, characterized by seismicity over a broad range of depths, elevated 3He/4He ratios in fumarolic gas, and large‐scale diffuse CO2 emissions. This activity has been attributed to magmatic intrusion, but minimal ground deformation and the presence of a shallow crustal gas reservoir beneath Mammoth Mountain pose a challenge for estimating magma supply rate. Here, we use the record of fumarolic 3He/4He ratios and CO2 emissions to estimate that of the ~5.2 Mt of CO2 released from Mammoth Mountain between 1989 and 2016, 1.6 Mt was associated with active intrusion and degassing of ~0.05–0.07 km3 of basaltic magma. Intrusion at an average rate of ~0.002–0.003 km3/year into a postulated zone of partial melt at ~15‐km depth could occur without detection by local Global Navigation Satellite System stations. Plain Language Summary Magma supply rate exerts a fundamental control on a volcano's eruptive and intrusive activity. Seismicity and large‐scale diffuse CO2 emissions at Mammoth Mountain, California, over the past ~30 years have been attributed to magmatic intrusion. Estimating magma supply rate beneath Mammoth Mountain is challenging, however, because (1) ground deformation, a useful indicator of magmatic intrusion, has been minor and (2) a gas reservoir in the shallow crust traps rising CO2 for unknown periods. In this study, we use fumarole helium isotopes to estimate CO2 emissions associated with active magmatic intrusion beneath Mammoth Mountain from 1989 to 2016, volume of basaltic magma degassed, and average intrusion rate. Based on ground deformation source modeling, we find that this rate of intrusion could potentially occur into a postulated zone of partial melt at ~15‐km depth without detection by geodetic monitoring, although other (e.g., deeper) sources are possible. Key Points Fumarole helium isotopes are used to quantify CO2 emissions associated with active magmatic intrusion beneath Mammoth Mountain From 1989 to 2016, ~1.6 Mt of CO2 emissions was associated with active intrusion and degassing of ~0.05‐0.07 km3 of basaltic magma An average intrusion rate of ~0.002‐0.003 km3/year into a zone of partial melt at ~15‐km depth might occur undetected by geodetic monitoring
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2019GL082487
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2229666771</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2229666771</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p2266-3a8a619a066390e34a7a94edaf506d4aa86fbdc8e47f09670fd73f1f02e178b73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkE1Lw0AYhBdRsFZv_oAFr42-u5vux9EGbQuRQtVzeGt2dUuSjdkE6b83pR48zTA8zMAQcsvgngE3DxyYWeagearVGZkwk6aJBlDnZAJgRs-VvCRXMe4BQIBgE2K32FsaHH3Bzxrp69C21YEubGOx_xrDug5HDUPTo29mNMPKu9A1Hmd0gdGWNDR0ZSs_1HQdQx9aGyk2Jc02nD7VPkYfmnhNLhxW0d786ZS8Pz-9Zask3yzX2WOetJxLmQjUKJlBkFIYsCJFhSa1Jbo5yDJF1NLtyg9tU-XASAWuVMIxB9wypXdKTMndqbftwvdgY1_sw9A142TBOTdSSqXYSPET9eMreyjaztfYHQoGxfHF4v-LxXKbz7UBKX4B-eJlLg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2229666771</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rate of Magma Supply Beneath Mammoth Mountain, California, Based on Helium Isotopes and CO2 Emissions</title><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Lewicki, Jennifer L. ; Evans, William C. ; Montgomery‐Brown, Emily K. ; Mangan, Margaret T. ; King, John C. ; Hunt, Andrew G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lewicki, Jennifer L. ; Evans, William C. ; Montgomery‐Brown, Emily K. ; Mangan, Margaret T. ; King, John C. ; Hunt, Andrew G.</creatorcontrib><description>Mammoth Mountain, California, has exhibited unrest over the past ~30 years, characterized by seismicity over a broad range of depths, elevated 3He/4He ratios in fumarolic gas, and large‐scale diffuse CO2 emissions. This activity has been attributed to magmatic intrusion, but minimal ground deformation and the presence of a shallow crustal gas reservoir beneath Mammoth Mountain pose a challenge for estimating magma supply rate. Here, we use the record of fumarolic 3He/4He ratios and CO2 emissions to estimate that of the ~5.2 Mt of CO2 released from Mammoth Mountain between 1989 and 2016, 1.6 Mt was associated with active intrusion and degassing of ~0.05–0.07 km3 of basaltic magma. Intrusion at an average rate of ~0.002–0.003 km3/year into a postulated zone of partial melt at ~15‐km depth could occur without detection by local Global Navigation Satellite System stations. Plain Language Summary Magma supply rate exerts a fundamental control on a volcano's eruptive and intrusive activity. Seismicity and large‐scale diffuse CO2 emissions at Mammoth Mountain, California, over the past ~30 years have been attributed to magmatic intrusion. Estimating magma supply rate beneath Mammoth Mountain is challenging, however, because (1) ground deformation, a useful indicator of magmatic intrusion, has been minor and (2) a gas reservoir in the shallow crust traps rising CO2 for unknown periods. In this study, we use fumarole helium isotopes to estimate CO2 emissions associated with active magmatic intrusion beneath Mammoth Mountain from 1989 to 2016, volume of basaltic magma degassed, and average intrusion rate. Based on ground deformation source modeling, we find that this rate of intrusion could potentially occur into a postulated zone of partial melt at ~15‐km depth without detection by geodetic monitoring, although other (e.g., deeper) sources are possible. Key Points Fumarole helium isotopes are used to quantify CO2 emissions associated with active magmatic intrusion beneath Mammoth Mountain From 1989 to 2016, ~1.6 Mt of CO2 emissions was associated with active intrusion and degassing of ~0.05‐0.07 km3 of basaltic magma An average intrusion rate of ~0.002‐0.003 km3/year into a zone of partial melt at ~15‐km depth might occur undetected by geodetic monitoring</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-8276</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-8007</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2019GL082487</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Carbon dioxide ; Carbon dioxide emissions ; Deformation ; Degassing ; Detection ; Estimation ; Global navigation satellite system ; Helium ; Helium isotopes ; Intrusion ; Isotopes ; Lava ; Magma ; Navigation ; Navigation satellites ; Navigation systems ; Navigational satellites ; Ratios ; Reservoirs ; Seismicity ; Volcanic activity ; Volcanic eruptions ; Volcanoes</subject><ispartof>Geophysical research letters, 2019-05, Vol.46 (9), p.4636-4644</ispartof><rights>2019. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0001-6787-2055 ; 0000-0003-1994-9104 ; 0000-0002-5273-8053</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2019GL082487$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2019GL082487$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,11493,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46443,46808,46867</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lewicki, Jennifer L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, William C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montgomery‐Brown, Emily K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mangan, Margaret T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, John C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunt, Andrew G.</creatorcontrib><title>Rate of Magma Supply Beneath Mammoth Mountain, California, Based on Helium Isotopes and CO2 Emissions</title><title>Geophysical research letters</title><description>Mammoth Mountain, California, has exhibited unrest over the past ~30 years, characterized by seismicity over a broad range of depths, elevated 3He/4He ratios in fumarolic gas, and large‐scale diffuse CO2 emissions. This activity has been attributed to magmatic intrusion, but minimal ground deformation and the presence of a shallow crustal gas reservoir beneath Mammoth Mountain pose a challenge for estimating magma supply rate. Here, we use the record of fumarolic 3He/4He ratios and CO2 emissions to estimate that of the ~5.2 Mt of CO2 released from Mammoth Mountain between 1989 and 2016, 1.6 Mt was associated with active intrusion and degassing of ~0.05–0.07 km3 of basaltic magma. Intrusion at an average rate of ~0.002–0.003 km3/year into a postulated zone of partial melt at ~15‐km depth could occur without detection by local Global Navigation Satellite System stations. Plain Language Summary Magma supply rate exerts a fundamental control on a volcano's eruptive and intrusive activity. Seismicity and large‐scale diffuse CO2 emissions at Mammoth Mountain, California, over the past ~30 years have been attributed to magmatic intrusion. Estimating magma supply rate beneath Mammoth Mountain is challenging, however, because (1) ground deformation, a useful indicator of magmatic intrusion, has been minor and (2) a gas reservoir in the shallow crust traps rising CO2 for unknown periods. In this study, we use fumarole helium isotopes to estimate CO2 emissions associated with active magmatic intrusion beneath Mammoth Mountain from 1989 to 2016, volume of basaltic magma degassed, and average intrusion rate. Based on ground deformation source modeling, we find that this rate of intrusion could potentially occur into a postulated zone of partial melt at ~15‐km depth without detection by geodetic monitoring, although other (e.g., deeper) sources are possible. Key Points Fumarole helium isotopes are used to quantify CO2 emissions associated with active magmatic intrusion beneath Mammoth Mountain From 1989 to 2016, ~1.6 Mt of CO2 emissions was associated with active intrusion and degassing of ~0.05‐0.07 km3 of basaltic magma An average intrusion rate of ~0.002‐0.003 km3/year into a zone of partial melt at ~15‐km depth might occur undetected by geodetic monitoring</description><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide emissions</subject><subject>Deformation</subject><subject>Degassing</subject><subject>Detection</subject><subject>Estimation</subject><subject>Global navigation satellite system</subject><subject>Helium</subject><subject>Helium isotopes</subject><subject>Intrusion</subject><subject>Isotopes</subject><subject>Lava</subject><subject>Magma</subject><subject>Navigation</subject><subject>Navigation satellites</subject><subject>Navigation systems</subject><subject>Navigational satellites</subject><subject>Ratios</subject><subject>Reservoirs</subject><subject>Seismicity</subject><subject>Volcanic activity</subject><subject>Volcanic eruptions</subject><subject>Volcanoes</subject><issn>0094-8276</issn><issn>1944-8007</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkE1Lw0AYhBdRsFZv_oAFr42-u5vux9EGbQuRQtVzeGt2dUuSjdkE6b83pR48zTA8zMAQcsvgngE3DxyYWeagearVGZkwk6aJBlDnZAJgRs-VvCRXMe4BQIBgE2K32FsaHH3Bzxrp69C21YEubGOx_xrDug5HDUPTo29mNMPKu9A1Hmd0gdGWNDR0ZSs_1HQdQx9aGyk2Jc02nD7VPkYfmnhNLhxW0d786ZS8Pz-9Zask3yzX2WOetJxLmQjUKJlBkFIYsCJFhSa1Jbo5yDJF1NLtyg9tU-XASAWuVMIxB9wypXdKTMndqbftwvdgY1_sw9A142TBOTdSSqXYSPET9eMreyjaztfYHQoGxfHF4v-LxXKbz7UBKX4B-eJlLg</recordid><startdate>20190516</startdate><enddate>20190516</enddate><creator>Lewicki, Jennifer L.</creator><creator>Evans, William C.</creator><creator>Montgomery‐Brown, Emily K.</creator><creator>Mangan, Margaret T.</creator><creator>King, John C.</creator><creator>Hunt, Andrew G.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6787-2055</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1994-9104</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5273-8053</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190516</creationdate><title>Rate of Magma Supply Beneath Mammoth Mountain, California, Based on Helium Isotopes and CO2 Emissions</title><author>Lewicki, Jennifer L. ; Evans, William C. ; Montgomery‐Brown, Emily K. ; Mangan, Margaret T. ; King, John C. ; Hunt, Andrew G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p2266-3a8a619a066390e34a7a94edaf506d4aa86fbdc8e47f09670fd73f1f02e178b73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide emissions</topic><topic>Deformation</topic><topic>Degassing</topic><topic>Detection</topic><topic>Estimation</topic><topic>Global navigation satellite system</topic><topic>Helium</topic><topic>Helium isotopes</topic><topic>Intrusion</topic><topic>Isotopes</topic><topic>Lava</topic><topic>Magma</topic><topic>Navigation</topic><topic>Navigation satellites</topic><topic>Navigation systems</topic><topic>Navigational satellites</topic><topic>Ratios</topic><topic>Reservoirs</topic><topic>Seismicity</topic><topic>Volcanic activity</topic><topic>Volcanic eruptions</topic><topic>Volcanoes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lewicki, Jennifer L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, William C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montgomery‐Brown, Emily K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mangan, Margaret T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, John C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunt, Andrew G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Geophysical research letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lewicki, Jennifer L.</au><au>Evans, William C.</au><au>Montgomery‐Brown, Emily K.</au><au>Mangan, Margaret T.</au><au>King, John C.</au><au>Hunt, Andrew G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rate of Magma Supply Beneath Mammoth Mountain, California, Based on Helium Isotopes and CO2 Emissions</atitle><jtitle>Geophysical research letters</jtitle><date>2019-05-16</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>4636</spage><epage>4644</epage><pages>4636-4644</pages><issn>0094-8276</issn><eissn>1944-8007</eissn><abstract>Mammoth Mountain, California, has exhibited unrest over the past ~30 years, characterized by seismicity over a broad range of depths, elevated 3He/4He ratios in fumarolic gas, and large‐scale diffuse CO2 emissions. This activity has been attributed to magmatic intrusion, but minimal ground deformation and the presence of a shallow crustal gas reservoir beneath Mammoth Mountain pose a challenge for estimating magma supply rate. Here, we use the record of fumarolic 3He/4He ratios and CO2 emissions to estimate that of the ~5.2 Mt of CO2 released from Mammoth Mountain between 1989 and 2016, 1.6 Mt was associated with active intrusion and degassing of ~0.05–0.07 km3 of basaltic magma. Intrusion at an average rate of ~0.002–0.003 km3/year into a postulated zone of partial melt at ~15‐km depth could occur without detection by local Global Navigation Satellite System stations. Plain Language Summary Magma supply rate exerts a fundamental control on a volcano's eruptive and intrusive activity. Seismicity and large‐scale diffuse CO2 emissions at Mammoth Mountain, California, over the past ~30 years have been attributed to magmatic intrusion. Estimating magma supply rate beneath Mammoth Mountain is challenging, however, because (1) ground deformation, a useful indicator of magmatic intrusion, has been minor and (2) a gas reservoir in the shallow crust traps rising CO2 for unknown periods. In this study, we use fumarole helium isotopes to estimate CO2 emissions associated with active magmatic intrusion beneath Mammoth Mountain from 1989 to 2016, volume of basaltic magma degassed, and average intrusion rate. Based on ground deformation source modeling, we find that this rate of intrusion could potentially occur into a postulated zone of partial melt at ~15‐km depth without detection by geodetic monitoring, although other (e.g., deeper) sources are possible. Key Points Fumarole helium isotopes are used to quantify CO2 emissions associated with active magmatic intrusion beneath Mammoth Mountain From 1989 to 2016, ~1.6 Mt of CO2 emissions was associated with active intrusion and degassing of ~0.05‐0.07 km3 of basaltic magma An average intrusion rate of ~0.002‐0.003 km3/year into a zone of partial melt at ~15‐km depth might occur undetected by geodetic monitoring</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1029/2019GL082487</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6787-2055</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1994-9104</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5273-8053</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-8276
ispartof Geophysical research letters, 2019-05, Vol.46 (9), p.4636-4644
issn 0094-8276
1944-8007
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2229666771
source Wiley Free Content; Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Carbon dioxide
Carbon dioxide emissions
Deformation
Degassing
Detection
Estimation
Global navigation satellite system
Helium
Helium isotopes
Intrusion
Isotopes
Lava
Magma
Navigation
Navigation satellites
Navigation systems
Navigational satellites
Ratios
Reservoirs
Seismicity
Volcanic activity
Volcanic eruptions
Volcanoes
title Rate of Magma Supply Beneath Mammoth Mountain, California, Based on Helium Isotopes and CO2 Emissions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T15%3A34%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rate%20of%20Magma%20Supply%20Beneath%20Mammoth%20Mountain,%20California,%20Based%20on%20Helium%20Isotopes%20and%20CO2%20Emissions&rft.jtitle=Geophysical%20research%20letters&rft.au=Lewicki,%20Jennifer%20L.&rft.date=2019-05-16&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=4636&rft.epage=4644&rft.pages=4636-4644&rft.issn=0094-8276&rft.eissn=1944-8007&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2019GL082487&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E2229666771%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2229666771&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true