Rate of Magma Supply Beneath Mammoth Mountain, California, Based on Helium Isotopes and CO2 Emissions
Mammoth Mountain, California, has exhibited unrest over the past ~30 years, characterized by seismicity over a broad range of depths, elevated 3He/4He ratios in fumarolic gas, and large‐scale diffuse CO2 emissions. This activity has been attributed to magmatic intrusion, but minimal ground deformati...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Geophysical research letters 2019-05, Vol.46 (9), p.4636-4644 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 4644 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 4636 |
container_title | Geophysical research letters |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Lewicki, Jennifer L. Evans, William C. Montgomery‐Brown, Emily K. Mangan, Margaret T. King, John C. Hunt, Andrew G. |
description | Mammoth Mountain, California, has exhibited unrest over the past ~30 years, characterized by seismicity over a broad range of depths, elevated 3He/4He ratios in fumarolic gas, and large‐scale diffuse CO2 emissions. This activity has been attributed to magmatic intrusion, but minimal ground deformation and the presence of a shallow crustal gas reservoir beneath Mammoth Mountain pose a challenge for estimating magma supply rate. Here, we use the record of fumarolic 3He/4He ratios and CO2 emissions to estimate that of the ~5.2 Mt of CO2 released from Mammoth Mountain between 1989 and 2016, 1.6 Mt was associated with active intrusion and degassing of ~0.05–0.07 km3 of basaltic magma. Intrusion at an average rate of ~0.002–0.003 km3/year into a postulated zone of partial melt at ~15‐km depth could occur without detection by local Global Navigation Satellite System stations.
Plain Language Summary
Magma supply rate exerts a fundamental control on a volcano's eruptive and intrusive activity. Seismicity and large‐scale diffuse CO2 emissions at Mammoth Mountain, California, over the past ~30 years have been attributed to magmatic intrusion. Estimating magma supply rate beneath Mammoth Mountain is challenging, however, because (1) ground deformation, a useful indicator of magmatic intrusion, has been minor and (2) a gas reservoir in the shallow crust traps rising CO2 for unknown periods. In this study, we use fumarole helium isotopes to estimate CO2 emissions associated with active magmatic intrusion beneath Mammoth Mountain from 1989 to 2016, volume of basaltic magma degassed, and average intrusion rate. Based on ground deformation source modeling, we find that this rate of intrusion could potentially occur into a postulated zone of partial melt at ~15‐km depth without detection by geodetic monitoring, although other (e.g., deeper) sources are possible.
Key Points
Fumarole helium isotopes are used to quantify CO2 emissions associated with active magmatic intrusion beneath Mammoth Mountain
From 1989 to 2016, ~1.6 Mt of CO2 emissions was associated with active intrusion and degassing of ~0.05‐0.07 km3 of basaltic magma
An average intrusion rate of ~0.002‐0.003 km3/year into a zone of partial melt at ~15‐km depth might occur undetected by geodetic monitoring |
doi_str_mv | 10.1029/2019GL082487 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2229666771</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2229666771</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p2266-3a8a619a066390e34a7a94edaf506d4aa86fbdc8e47f09670fd73f1f02e178b73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkE1Lw0AYhBdRsFZv_oAFr42-u5vux9EGbQuRQtVzeGt2dUuSjdkE6b83pR48zTA8zMAQcsvgngE3DxyYWeagearVGZkwk6aJBlDnZAJgRs-VvCRXMe4BQIBgE2K32FsaHH3Bzxrp69C21YEubGOx_xrDug5HDUPTo29mNMPKu9A1Hmd0gdGWNDR0ZSs_1HQdQx9aGyk2Jc02nD7VPkYfmnhNLhxW0d786ZS8Pz-9Zask3yzX2WOetJxLmQjUKJlBkFIYsCJFhSa1Jbo5yDJF1NLtyg9tU-XASAWuVMIxB9wypXdKTMndqbftwvdgY1_sw9A142TBOTdSSqXYSPET9eMreyjaztfYHQoGxfHF4v-LxXKbz7UBKX4B-eJlLg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2229666771</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rate of Magma Supply Beneath Mammoth Mountain, California, Based on Helium Isotopes and CO2 Emissions</title><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Lewicki, Jennifer L. ; Evans, William C. ; Montgomery‐Brown, Emily K. ; Mangan, Margaret T. ; King, John C. ; Hunt, Andrew G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lewicki, Jennifer L. ; Evans, William C. ; Montgomery‐Brown, Emily K. ; Mangan, Margaret T. ; King, John C. ; Hunt, Andrew G.</creatorcontrib><description>Mammoth Mountain, California, has exhibited unrest over the past ~30 years, characterized by seismicity over a broad range of depths, elevated 3He/4He ratios in fumarolic gas, and large‐scale diffuse CO2 emissions. This activity has been attributed to magmatic intrusion, but minimal ground deformation and the presence of a shallow crustal gas reservoir beneath Mammoth Mountain pose a challenge for estimating magma supply rate. Here, we use the record of fumarolic 3He/4He ratios and CO2 emissions to estimate that of the ~5.2 Mt of CO2 released from Mammoth Mountain between 1989 and 2016, 1.6 Mt was associated with active intrusion and degassing of ~0.05–0.07 km3 of basaltic magma. Intrusion at an average rate of ~0.002–0.003 km3/year into a postulated zone of partial melt at ~15‐km depth could occur without detection by local Global Navigation Satellite System stations.
Plain Language Summary
Magma supply rate exerts a fundamental control on a volcano's eruptive and intrusive activity. Seismicity and large‐scale diffuse CO2 emissions at Mammoth Mountain, California, over the past ~30 years have been attributed to magmatic intrusion. Estimating magma supply rate beneath Mammoth Mountain is challenging, however, because (1) ground deformation, a useful indicator of magmatic intrusion, has been minor and (2) a gas reservoir in the shallow crust traps rising CO2 for unknown periods. In this study, we use fumarole helium isotopes to estimate CO2 emissions associated with active magmatic intrusion beneath Mammoth Mountain from 1989 to 2016, volume of basaltic magma degassed, and average intrusion rate. Based on ground deformation source modeling, we find that this rate of intrusion could potentially occur into a postulated zone of partial melt at ~15‐km depth without detection by geodetic monitoring, although other (e.g., deeper) sources are possible.
Key Points
Fumarole helium isotopes are used to quantify CO2 emissions associated with active magmatic intrusion beneath Mammoth Mountain
From 1989 to 2016, ~1.6 Mt of CO2 emissions was associated with active intrusion and degassing of ~0.05‐0.07 km3 of basaltic magma
An average intrusion rate of ~0.002‐0.003 km3/year into a zone of partial melt at ~15‐km depth might occur undetected by geodetic monitoring</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-8276</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-8007</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2019GL082487</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Carbon dioxide ; Carbon dioxide emissions ; Deformation ; Degassing ; Detection ; Estimation ; Global navigation satellite system ; Helium ; Helium isotopes ; Intrusion ; Isotopes ; Lava ; Magma ; Navigation ; Navigation satellites ; Navigation systems ; Navigational satellites ; Ratios ; Reservoirs ; Seismicity ; Volcanic activity ; Volcanic eruptions ; Volcanoes</subject><ispartof>Geophysical research letters, 2019-05, Vol.46 (9), p.4636-4644</ispartof><rights>2019. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0001-6787-2055 ; 0000-0003-1994-9104 ; 0000-0002-5273-8053</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2019GL082487$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2019GL082487$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,11493,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46443,46808,46867</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lewicki, Jennifer L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, William C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montgomery‐Brown, Emily K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mangan, Margaret T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, John C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunt, Andrew G.</creatorcontrib><title>Rate of Magma Supply Beneath Mammoth Mountain, California, Based on Helium Isotopes and CO2 Emissions</title><title>Geophysical research letters</title><description>Mammoth Mountain, California, has exhibited unrest over the past ~30 years, characterized by seismicity over a broad range of depths, elevated 3He/4He ratios in fumarolic gas, and large‐scale diffuse CO2 emissions. This activity has been attributed to magmatic intrusion, but minimal ground deformation and the presence of a shallow crustal gas reservoir beneath Mammoth Mountain pose a challenge for estimating magma supply rate. Here, we use the record of fumarolic 3He/4He ratios and CO2 emissions to estimate that of the ~5.2 Mt of CO2 released from Mammoth Mountain between 1989 and 2016, 1.6 Mt was associated with active intrusion and degassing of ~0.05–0.07 km3 of basaltic magma. Intrusion at an average rate of ~0.002–0.003 km3/year into a postulated zone of partial melt at ~15‐km depth could occur without detection by local Global Navigation Satellite System stations.
Plain Language Summary
Magma supply rate exerts a fundamental control on a volcano's eruptive and intrusive activity. Seismicity and large‐scale diffuse CO2 emissions at Mammoth Mountain, California, over the past ~30 years have been attributed to magmatic intrusion. Estimating magma supply rate beneath Mammoth Mountain is challenging, however, because (1) ground deformation, a useful indicator of magmatic intrusion, has been minor and (2) a gas reservoir in the shallow crust traps rising CO2 for unknown periods. In this study, we use fumarole helium isotopes to estimate CO2 emissions associated with active magmatic intrusion beneath Mammoth Mountain from 1989 to 2016, volume of basaltic magma degassed, and average intrusion rate. Based on ground deformation source modeling, we find that this rate of intrusion could potentially occur into a postulated zone of partial melt at ~15‐km depth without detection by geodetic monitoring, although other (e.g., deeper) sources are possible.
Key Points
Fumarole helium isotopes are used to quantify CO2 emissions associated with active magmatic intrusion beneath Mammoth Mountain
From 1989 to 2016, ~1.6 Mt of CO2 emissions was associated with active intrusion and degassing of ~0.05‐0.07 km3 of basaltic magma
An average intrusion rate of ~0.002‐0.003 km3/year into a zone of partial melt at ~15‐km depth might occur undetected by geodetic monitoring</description><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide emissions</subject><subject>Deformation</subject><subject>Degassing</subject><subject>Detection</subject><subject>Estimation</subject><subject>Global navigation satellite system</subject><subject>Helium</subject><subject>Helium isotopes</subject><subject>Intrusion</subject><subject>Isotopes</subject><subject>Lava</subject><subject>Magma</subject><subject>Navigation</subject><subject>Navigation satellites</subject><subject>Navigation systems</subject><subject>Navigational satellites</subject><subject>Ratios</subject><subject>Reservoirs</subject><subject>Seismicity</subject><subject>Volcanic activity</subject><subject>Volcanic eruptions</subject><subject>Volcanoes</subject><issn>0094-8276</issn><issn>1944-8007</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkE1Lw0AYhBdRsFZv_oAFr42-u5vux9EGbQuRQtVzeGt2dUuSjdkE6b83pR48zTA8zMAQcsvgngE3DxyYWeagearVGZkwk6aJBlDnZAJgRs-VvCRXMe4BQIBgE2K32FsaHH3Bzxrp69C21YEubGOx_xrDug5HDUPTo29mNMPKu9A1Hmd0gdGWNDR0ZSs_1HQdQx9aGyk2Jc02nD7VPkYfmnhNLhxW0d786ZS8Pz-9Zask3yzX2WOetJxLmQjUKJlBkFIYsCJFhSa1Jbo5yDJF1NLtyg9tU-XASAWuVMIxB9wypXdKTMndqbftwvdgY1_sw9A142TBOTdSSqXYSPET9eMreyjaztfYHQoGxfHF4v-LxXKbz7UBKX4B-eJlLg</recordid><startdate>20190516</startdate><enddate>20190516</enddate><creator>Lewicki, Jennifer L.</creator><creator>Evans, William C.</creator><creator>Montgomery‐Brown, Emily K.</creator><creator>Mangan, Margaret T.</creator><creator>King, John C.</creator><creator>Hunt, Andrew G.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6787-2055</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1994-9104</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5273-8053</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190516</creationdate><title>Rate of Magma Supply Beneath Mammoth Mountain, California, Based on Helium Isotopes and CO2 Emissions</title><author>Lewicki, Jennifer L. ; Evans, William C. ; Montgomery‐Brown, Emily K. ; Mangan, Margaret T. ; King, John C. ; Hunt, Andrew G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p2266-3a8a619a066390e34a7a94edaf506d4aa86fbdc8e47f09670fd73f1f02e178b73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide emissions</topic><topic>Deformation</topic><topic>Degassing</topic><topic>Detection</topic><topic>Estimation</topic><topic>Global navigation satellite system</topic><topic>Helium</topic><topic>Helium isotopes</topic><topic>Intrusion</topic><topic>Isotopes</topic><topic>Lava</topic><topic>Magma</topic><topic>Navigation</topic><topic>Navigation satellites</topic><topic>Navigation systems</topic><topic>Navigational satellites</topic><topic>Ratios</topic><topic>Reservoirs</topic><topic>Seismicity</topic><topic>Volcanic activity</topic><topic>Volcanic eruptions</topic><topic>Volcanoes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lewicki, Jennifer L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, William C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montgomery‐Brown, Emily K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mangan, Margaret T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, John C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunt, Andrew G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Geophysical research letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lewicki, Jennifer L.</au><au>Evans, William C.</au><au>Montgomery‐Brown, Emily K.</au><au>Mangan, Margaret T.</au><au>King, John C.</au><au>Hunt, Andrew G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rate of Magma Supply Beneath Mammoth Mountain, California, Based on Helium Isotopes and CO2 Emissions</atitle><jtitle>Geophysical research letters</jtitle><date>2019-05-16</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>4636</spage><epage>4644</epage><pages>4636-4644</pages><issn>0094-8276</issn><eissn>1944-8007</eissn><abstract>Mammoth Mountain, California, has exhibited unrest over the past ~30 years, characterized by seismicity over a broad range of depths, elevated 3He/4He ratios in fumarolic gas, and large‐scale diffuse CO2 emissions. This activity has been attributed to magmatic intrusion, but minimal ground deformation and the presence of a shallow crustal gas reservoir beneath Mammoth Mountain pose a challenge for estimating magma supply rate. Here, we use the record of fumarolic 3He/4He ratios and CO2 emissions to estimate that of the ~5.2 Mt of CO2 released from Mammoth Mountain between 1989 and 2016, 1.6 Mt was associated with active intrusion and degassing of ~0.05–0.07 km3 of basaltic magma. Intrusion at an average rate of ~0.002–0.003 km3/year into a postulated zone of partial melt at ~15‐km depth could occur without detection by local Global Navigation Satellite System stations.
Plain Language Summary
Magma supply rate exerts a fundamental control on a volcano's eruptive and intrusive activity. Seismicity and large‐scale diffuse CO2 emissions at Mammoth Mountain, California, over the past ~30 years have been attributed to magmatic intrusion. Estimating magma supply rate beneath Mammoth Mountain is challenging, however, because (1) ground deformation, a useful indicator of magmatic intrusion, has been minor and (2) a gas reservoir in the shallow crust traps rising CO2 for unknown periods. In this study, we use fumarole helium isotopes to estimate CO2 emissions associated with active magmatic intrusion beneath Mammoth Mountain from 1989 to 2016, volume of basaltic magma degassed, and average intrusion rate. Based on ground deformation source modeling, we find that this rate of intrusion could potentially occur into a postulated zone of partial melt at ~15‐km depth without detection by geodetic monitoring, although other (e.g., deeper) sources are possible.
Key Points
Fumarole helium isotopes are used to quantify CO2 emissions associated with active magmatic intrusion beneath Mammoth Mountain
From 1989 to 2016, ~1.6 Mt of CO2 emissions was associated with active intrusion and degassing of ~0.05‐0.07 km3 of basaltic magma
An average intrusion rate of ~0.002‐0.003 km3/year into a zone of partial melt at ~15‐km depth might occur undetected by geodetic monitoring</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1029/2019GL082487</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6787-2055</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1994-9104</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5273-8053</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0094-8276 |
ispartof | Geophysical research letters, 2019-05, Vol.46 (9), p.4636-4644 |
issn | 0094-8276 1944-8007 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2229666771 |
source | Wiley Free Content; Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Carbon dioxide Carbon dioxide emissions Deformation Degassing Detection Estimation Global navigation satellite system Helium Helium isotopes Intrusion Isotopes Lava Magma Navigation Navigation satellites Navigation systems Navigational satellites Ratios Reservoirs Seismicity Volcanic activity Volcanic eruptions Volcanoes |
title | Rate of Magma Supply Beneath Mammoth Mountain, California, Based on Helium Isotopes and CO2 Emissions |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T15%3A34%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rate%20of%20Magma%20Supply%20Beneath%20Mammoth%20Mountain,%20California,%20Based%20on%20Helium%20Isotopes%20and%20CO2%20Emissions&rft.jtitle=Geophysical%20research%20letters&rft.au=Lewicki,%20Jennifer%20L.&rft.date=2019-05-16&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=4636&rft.epage=4644&rft.pages=4636-4644&rft.issn=0094-8276&rft.eissn=1944-8007&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2019GL082487&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E2229666771%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2229666771&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |