Optimization of power conversion efficiency of polyvinyl-alcohol/titanium dioxide compact layer using response surface methodology/central composite design

•PVA/TiO2 nanofibers compact layer has been optimized using response surface methodology with central composite design.•Synergistic effect between concentration of PVA and volume of TTIP was studied.•DSSC with TiO2 compact layer displayed almost twice PCE compared to the DSSC without TiO2 compact la...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Solar energy 2019-05, Vol.183, p.689-696
Hauptverfasser: Mustafa, Muhammad Norhaffis, Shafie, Suhaidi, Wahid, Mohd Haniff, Sulaiman, Yusran
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•PVA/TiO2 nanofibers compact layer has been optimized using response surface methodology with central composite design.•Synergistic effect between concentration of PVA and volume of TTIP was studied.•DSSC with TiO2 compact layer displayed almost twice PCE compared to the DSSC without TiO2 compact layer.•RSM can accurately obtain the coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.9958 with below 5% residual standard error. In this study, response surface methodology by central composite design (RSM/CCD) was used as an efficient approach for modeling and optimizing titanium dioxide (TiO2) as a compact layer via electrospinning for dye-sensitized solar cell (DSSC) performances. The concentration of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) and volume of titanium isopropoxide (TTIP) were investigated by RSM/CCD and the interaction between these factors was studied and modeled to identify the significant parameters toward DSSC performance. The statistical analysis showed that these two factors have significantly affected the power conversion efficiency (PCE). The model obtained was valid and capable to predict the response model accurately as the model was able to obtain the coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.9958 with below 5% residual standard error.
ISSN:0038-092X
1471-1257
DOI:10.1016/j.solener.2019.03.074