Ambu AuraOnce versus i-gel laryngeal mask airway in infants and children undergoing surgical procedures
Objectives: To compare the efficacy and performance of the pediatric Ambu AuraOnce (Ambu AO) mask (Ambu, Copenhagen, Denmark) and i-gel mask (Intersurgical Ltd., Wokingham, United Kingdom). Methods: From May 2015 to September 2016, 112 patients, 0-14 years old, underwent elective surgery at a tertia...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Saudi medical journal 2017-05, Vol.38 (5), p.482-490 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 490 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 482 |
| container_title | Saudi medical journal |
| container_volume | 38 |
| creator | Alzahem, Abdulrahman M Aqil Mansoor Alzahrani, Tariq A Aljazaeri, Ayman H |
| description | Objectives: To compare the efficacy and performance of the pediatric Ambu AuraOnce (Ambu AO) mask (Ambu, Copenhagen, Denmark) and i-gel mask (Intersurgical Ltd., Wokingham, United Kingdom). Methods: From May 2015 to September 2016, 112 patients, 0-14 years old, underwent elective surgery at a tertiary university hospital (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia). They were randomly assigned to the Ambu AO or i-gel group. Three groups underwent a subgroup analysis: ≤5 kg (group 1), 5.1–10.0 kg (group 2), and >10 kg (group 3). Results: The oropharyngeal leak pressure was significantly higher for the i-gel (25.4±4.1 cm H2O) than for the Ambu AO (22.5±3.9 cm H2O, p |
| doi_str_mv | 10.15537/smj.2017.5.17960 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2229281189</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2229281189</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c769-6aa223eab4409aa7be3eb781a33c320cc3fabe6fec4c4f6f47076e51bb77fe9a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjc1KAzEYRYMoWKsP4C7gesb8TJLJcij-QaGb7suXzJdx6jTVpFH69g4oHLircw8h95zVXClpHvNhXwvGTa1qbqxmF2TBtWoryY26JAsmja2UaJtrcpPznjGpNdMLMnQHV2hXEmyiR_qNKZdMx2rAiU6QznFAmOgB8geFMf3AmY5xJkA8ZQqxp_59nPqEkZbYYxqOYxxoLmkY_ex9pqPHviTMt-QqwJTx7n-XZPv8tF29VuvNy9uqW1feaFtpACEkgmsaZgGMQ4nOtByk9FIw72UAhzqgb3wTdGgMMxoVd86YgBbkkjz83c7lr4L5tNsfS4pzcSeEsKLlvLXyF3ulW48</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2229281189</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ambu AuraOnce versus i-gel laryngeal mask airway in infants and children undergoing surgical procedures</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Alzahem, Abdulrahman M ; Aqil Mansoor ; Alzahrani, Tariq A ; Aljazaeri, Ayman H</creator><creatorcontrib>Alzahem, Abdulrahman M ; Aqil Mansoor ; Alzahrani, Tariq A ; Aljazaeri, Ayman H</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives: To compare the efficacy and performance of the pediatric Ambu AuraOnce (Ambu AO) mask (Ambu, Copenhagen, Denmark) and i-gel mask (Intersurgical Ltd., Wokingham, United Kingdom). Methods: From May 2015 to September 2016, 112 patients, 0-14 years old, underwent elective surgery at a tertiary university hospital (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia). They were randomly assigned to the Ambu AO or i-gel group. Three groups underwent a subgroup analysis: ≤5 kg (group 1), 5.1–10.0 kg (group 2), and >10 kg (group 3). Results: The oropharyngeal leak pressure was significantly higher for the i-gel (25.4±4.1 cm H2O) than for the Ambu AO (22.5±3.9 cm H2O, p<0.001). The Ambu AO had a slightly higher ease of insertion compared to the i-gel (100% versus 94%, p=0.08) and required less manipulation (2% versus 11%, p=0.07).The Ambu AO and i-gel showed non-significant differences in performance between weight groups. There were statistically significant differences for higher leak pressure in group 2 (p=0.01) and group 3 (p=0.002) in favor of the i-gel, and for less manipulation in the Ambu AO in group 1 (p=0.04). Fiberoptic viewing was superior in group 2 for the i-gel (p=0.03) and in group 3 for the Ambu AO (p=0.02). Conclusion: Both devices demonstrated equally good performance with low morbidity. The Ambu AO had a statistical tendency towards easier insertion and less manipulation. Confirming this finding will require large scale trials.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0379-5284</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1658-3175</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.15537/smj.2017.5.17960</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Riyadh: Prince Sultan Military Medical City (PSMMC)</publisher><subject>Airway management ; Anesthesia ; Babies ; Intubation ; Patients ; Pediatrics ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>Saudi medical journal, 2017-05, Vol.38 (5), p.482-490</ispartof><rights>Saudi Medical Journal 2017. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial – Share Alike License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c769-6aa223eab4409aa7be3eb781a33c320cc3fabe6fec4c4f6f47076e51bb77fe9a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alzahem, Abdulrahman M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aqil Mansoor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alzahrani, Tariq A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aljazaeri, Ayman H</creatorcontrib><title>Ambu AuraOnce versus i-gel laryngeal mask airway in infants and children undergoing surgical procedures</title><title>Saudi medical journal</title><description>Objectives: To compare the efficacy and performance of the pediatric Ambu AuraOnce (Ambu AO) mask (Ambu, Copenhagen, Denmark) and i-gel mask (Intersurgical Ltd., Wokingham, United Kingdom). Methods: From May 2015 to September 2016, 112 patients, 0-14 years old, underwent elective surgery at a tertiary university hospital (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia). They were randomly assigned to the Ambu AO or i-gel group. Three groups underwent a subgroup analysis: ≤5 kg (group 1), 5.1–10.0 kg (group 2), and >10 kg (group 3). Results: The oropharyngeal leak pressure was significantly higher for the i-gel (25.4±4.1 cm H2O) than for the Ambu AO (22.5±3.9 cm H2O, p<0.001). The Ambu AO had a slightly higher ease of insertion compared to the i-gel (100% versus 94%, p=0.08) and required less manipulation (2% versus 11%, p=0.07).The Ambu AO and i-gel showed non-significant differences in performance between weight groups. There were statistically significant differences for higher leak pressure in group 2 (p=0.01) and group 3 (p=0.002) in favor of the i-gel, and for less manipulation in the Ambu AO in group 1 (p=0.04). Fiberoptic viewing was superior in group 2 for the i-gel (p=0.03) and in group 3 for the Ambu AO (p=0.02). Conclusion: Both devices demonstrated equally good performance with low morbidity. The Ambu AO had a statistical tendency towards easier insertion and less manipulation. Confirming this finding will require large scale trials.</description><subject>Airway management</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Babies</subject><subject>Intubation</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>0379-5284</issn><issn>1658-3175</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNotjc1KAzEYRYMoWKsP4C7gesb8TJLJcij-QaGb7suXzJdx6jTVpFH69g4oHLircw8h95zVXClpHvNhXwvGTa1qbqxmF2TBtWoryY26JAsmja2UaJtrcpPznjGpNdMLMnQHV2hXEmyiR_qNKZdMx2rAiU6QznFAmOgB8geFMf3AmY5xJkA8ZQqxp_59nPqEkZbYYxqOYxxoLmkY_ex9pqPHviTMt-QqwJTx7n-XZPv8tF29VuvNy9uqW1feaFtpACEkgmsaZgGMQ4nOtByk9FIw72UAhzqgb3wTdGgMMxoVd86YgBbkkjz83c7lr4L5tNsfS4pzcSeEsKLlvLXyF3ulW48</recordid><startdate>20170501</startdate><enddate>20170501</enddate><creator>Alzahem, Abdulrahman M</creator><creator>Aqil Mansoor</creator><creator>Alzahrani, Tariq A</creator><creator>Aljazaeri, Ayman H</creator><general>Prince Sultan Military Medical City (PSMMC)</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170501</creationdate><title>Ambu AuraOnce versus i-gel laryngeal mask airway in infants and children undergoing surgical procedures</title><author>Alzahem, Abdulrahman M ; Aqil Mansoor ; Alzahrani, Tariq A ; Aljazaeri, Ayman H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c769-6aa223eab4409aa7be3eb781a33c320cc3fabe6fec4c4f6f47076e51bb77fe9a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Airway management</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Babies</topic><topic>Intubation</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alzahem, Abdulrahman M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aqil Mansoor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alzahrani, Tariq A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aljazaeri, Ayman H</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Saudi medical journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alzahem, Abdulrahman M</au><au>Aqil Mansoor</au><au>Alzahrani, Tariq A</au><au>Aljazaeri, Ayman H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ambu AuraOnce versus i-gel laryngeal mask airway in infants and children undergoing surgical procedures</atitle><jtitle>Saudi medical journal</jtitle><date>2017-05-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>482</spage><epage>490</epage><pages>482-490</pages><issn>0379-5284</issn><eissn>1658-3175</eissn><abstract>Objectives: To compare the efficacy and performance of the pediatric Ambu AuraOnce (Ambu AO) mask (Ambu, Copenhagen, Denmark) and i-gel mask (Intersurgical Ltd., Wokingham, United Kingdom). Methods: From May 2015 to September 2016, 112 patients, 0-14 years old, underwent elective surgery at a tertiary university hospital (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia). They were randomly assigned to the Ambu AO or i-gel group. Three groups underwent a subgroup analysis: ≤5 kg (group 1), 5.1–10.0 kg (group 2), and >10 kg (group 3). Results: The oropharyngeal leak pressure was significantly higher for the i-gel (25.4±4.1 cm H2O) than for the Ambu AO (22.5±3.9 cm H2O, p<0.001). The Ambu AO had a slightly higher ease of insertion compared to the i-gel (100% versus 94%, p=0.08) and required less manipulation (2% versus 11%, p=0.07).The Ambu AO and i-gel showed non-significant differences in performance between weight groups. There were statistically significant differences for higher leak pressure in group 2 (p=0.01) and group 3 (p=0.002) in favor of the i-gel, and for less manipulation in the Ambu AO in group 1 (p=0.04). Fiberoptic viewing was superior in group 2 for the i-gel (p=0.03) and in group 3 for the Ambu AO (p=0.02). Conclusion: Both devices demonstrated equally good performance with low morbidity. The Ambu AO had a statistical tendency towards easier insertion and less manipulation. Confirming this finding will require large scale trials.</abstract><cop>Riyadh</cop><pub>Prince Sultan Military Medical City (PSMMC)</pub><doi>10.15537/smj.2017.5.17960</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0379-5284 |
| ispartof | Saudi medical journal, 2017-05, Vol.38 (5), p.482-490 |
| issn | 0379-5284 1658-3175 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2229281189 |
| source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; PubMed Central |
| subjects | Airway management Anesthesia Babies Intubation Patients Pediatrics Surgery |
| title | Ambu AuraOnce versus i-gel laryngeal mask airway in infants and children undergoing surgical procedures |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T07%3A06%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ambu%20AuraOnce%20versus%20i-gel%20laryngeal%20mask%20airway%20in%20infants%20and%20children%20undergoing%20surgical%20procedures&rft.jtitle=Saudi%20medical%20journal&rft.au=Alzahem,%20Abdulrahman%20M&rft.date=2017-05-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=482&rft.epage=490&rft.pages=482-490&rft.issn=0379-5284&rft.eissn=1658-3175&rft_id=info:doi/10.15537/smj.2017.5.17960&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2229281189%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2229281189&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |