Slashing Phragmites (Phragmites australis) prior to planting does not promote native vegetation establishment
Summary Phragmites or Common Reed (Phragmites australis) is a tall rhizomatous cosmopolitan grass. While native to Australia, it can be invasive in wetlands, forming dense monocultures and reducing their ecological integrity. We assessed the potential for the cutting of Phragmites reeds prior to pla...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ecological management & restoration 2019-05, Vol.20 (2), p.162-165 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 165 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 162 |
container_title | Ecological management & restoration |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Greet, Joe King, Elise |
description | Summary
Phragmites or Common Reed (Phragmites australis) is a tall rhizomatous cosmopolitan grass. While native to Australia, it can be invasive in wetlands, forming dense monocultures and reducing their ecological integrity. We assessed the potential for the cutting of Phragmites reeds prior to planting to promote the establishment of indigenous shrubs that might ultimately outcompete Phragmites. We established ten 5 m × 5 m quadrats in an area dominated by Phragmites, brush‐cut the reeds to ground level in five of them and left five uncut as controls. Within each quadrat, we planted 20 plants (~40 cm tall) of each of five indigenous shrub species, unguarded (4 plants/m2). We surveyed the plants one month after planting and annually for the following four years for survival, height and browsing damage. Browsing damage to plants was common (>50%) and unaffected by cutting. After four years, overall plant survival rates were ~25% and mean plant heights for the five shrub species ranged between 120 and 174 cm. Cutting of Phragmites had no positive effect on plant survival or height. In fact, two Melaleuca species grew taller in the uncut quadrats. Cutting of Phragmites reed beds prior to planting is unlikely to promote the establishment of woody plantings. However, planting within established Phragmites with or without prior brush‐cutting is worthy of further trialling as a potential tool for reinstating native diversity at Phragmites‐dominated sites. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/emr.12354 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2228525104</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2228525104</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2924-5e6141a4da6cf17a8175255d7aaadfb6d8fb9a3c978d469afaf16d18a35956bd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtOwzAQRS0EEqWw4A8ssaGLtLHjPLxEVXlIRSAea2sSO22qxC62U9S_xyVdsGE2cyWfOzO-CF2TeEpCzVRnp4QmKTtBI8IYjQoeJ6dHnccxOUcXzm2CyJOMj1D33oJbN3qFX9cWVl3jlcO3fzT0zltoGzfBW9sYi73B2xa0P3ikCYQ2PjyZzniFNfhmp_BOrZQP0misnIcy2Ned0v4SndXQOnV17GP0eb_4mD9Gy5eHp_ndMqoopyxKVUYYASYhq2qSQ0HylKapzAFA1mUmi7rkkFQ8LyTLONRQk0ySApKUp1kpkzG6GeaGu776cILYmN7qsFJQSoswjMQsUJOBqqxxzqpahB92YPeCxOKQpghpit80Azsb2O-mVfv_QbF4fhscP_PyeNk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2228525104</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Slashing Phragmites (Phragmites australis) prior to planting does not promote native vegetation establishment</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Greet, Joe ; King, Elise</creator><creatorcontrib>Greet, Joe ; King, Elise</creatorcontrib><description>Summary
Phragmites or Common Reed (Phragmites australis) is a tall rhizomatous cosmopolitan grass. While native to Australia, it can be invasive in wetlands, forming dense monocultures and reducing their ecological integrity. We assessed the potential for the cutting of Phragmites reeds prior to planting to promote the establishment of indigenous shrubs that might ultimately outcompete Phragmites. We established ten 5 m × 5 m quadrats in an area dominated by Phragmites, brush‐cut the reeds to ground level in five of them and left five uncut as controls. Within each quadrat, we planted 20 plants (~40 cm tall) of each of five indigenous shrub species, unguarded (4 plants/m2). We surveyed the plants one month after planting and annually for the following four years for survival, height and browsing damage. Browsing damage to plants was common (>50%) and unaffected by cutting. After four years, overall plant survival rates were ~25% and mean plant heights for the five shrub species ranged between 120 and 174 cm. Cutting of Phragmites had no positive effect on plant survival or height. In fact, two Melaleuca species grew taller in the uncut quadrats. Cutting of Phragmites reed beds prior to planting is unlikely to promote the establishment of woody plantings. However, planting within established Phragmites with or without prior brush‐cutting is worthy of further trialling as a potential tool for reinstating native diversity at Phragmites‐dominated sites.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1442-7001</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1442-8903</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/emr.12354</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Canberra: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Browsing ; competition ; Ecological monitoring ; Ground level ; Invasive species ; Monoculture ; Phragmites ; Phragmites australis ; plant invasions ; Planting ; Reed beds ; reed slashing ; Reeds ; Shrubs ; Species ; Survival ; Vegetation establishment ; wetland forest restoration ; woody plant establishment</subject><ispartof>Ecological management & restoration, 2019-05, Vol.20 (2), p.162-165</ispartof><rights>2019 Ecological Society of Australia and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Ecological Society of Australia and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2924-5e6141a4da6cf17a8175255d7aaadfb6d8fb9a3c978d469afaf16d18a35956bd3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2434-4735 ; 0000-0002-2543-1486</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Femr.12354$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Femr.12354$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Greet, Joe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, Elise</creatorcontrib><title>Slashing Phragmites (Phragmites australis) prior to planting does not promote native vegetation establishment</title><title>Ecological management & restoration</title><description>Summary
Phragmites or Common Reed (Phragmites australis) is a tall rhizomatous cosmopolitan grass. While native to Australia, it can be invasive in wetlands, forming dense monocultures and reducing their ecological integrity. We assessed the potential for the cutting of Phragmites reeds prior to planting to promote the establishment of indigenous shrubs that might ultimately outcompete Phragmites. We established ten 5 m × 5 m quadrats in an area dominated by Phragmites, brush‐cut the reeds to ground level in five of them and left five uncut as controls. Within each quadrat, we planted 20 plants (~40 cm tall) of each of five indigenous shrub species, unguarded (4 plants/m2). We surveyed the plants one month after planting and annually for the following four years for survival, height and browsing damage. Browsing damage to plants was common (>50%) and unaffected by cutting. After four years, overall plant survival rates were ~25% and mean plant heights for the five shrub species ranged between 120 and 174 cm. Cutting of Phragmites had no positive effect on plant survival or height. In fact, two Melaleuca species grew taller in the uncut quadrats. Cutting of Phragmites reed beds prior to planting is unlikely to promote the establishment of woody plantings. However, planting within established Phragmites with or without prior brush‐cutting is worthy of further trialling as a potential tool for reinstating native diversity at Phragmites‐dominated sites.</description><subject>Browsing</subject><subject>competition</subject><subject>Ecological monitoring</subject><subject>Ground level</subject><subject>Invasive species</subject><subject>Monoculture</subject><subject>Phragmites</subject><subject>Phragmites australis</subject><subject>plant invasions</subject><subject>Planting</subject><subject>Reed beds</subject><subject>reed slashing</subject><subject>Reeds</subject><subject>Shrubs</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Vegetation establishment</subject><subject>wetland forest restoration</subject><subject>woody plant establishment</subject><issn>1442-7001</issn><issn>1442-8903</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMtOwzAQRS0EEqWw4A8ssaGLtLHjPLxEVXlIRSAea2sSO22qxC62U9S_xyVdsGE2cyWfOzO-CF2TeEpCzVRnp4QmKTtBI8IYjQoeJ6dHnccxOUcXzm2CyJOMj1D33oJbN3qFX9cWVl3jlcO3fzT0zltoGzfBW9sYi73B2xa0P3ikCYQ2PjyZzniFNfhmp_BOrZQP0misnIcy2Ned0v4SndXQOnV17GP0eb_4mD9Gy5eHp_ndMqoopyxKVUYYASYhq2qSQ0HylKapzAFA1mUmi7rkkFQ8LyTLONRQk0ySApKUp1kpkzG6GeaGu776cILYmN7qsFJQSoswjMQsUJOBqqxxzqpahB92YPeCxOKQpghpit80Azsb2O-mVfv_QbF4fhscP_PyeNk</recordid><startdate>201905</startdate><enddate>201905</enddate><creator>Greet, Joe</creator><creator>King, Elise</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2434-4735</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2543-1486</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201905</creationdate><title>Slashing Phragmites (Phragmites australis) prior to planting does not promote native vegetation establishment</title><author>Greet, Joe ; King, Elise</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2924-5e6141a4da6cf17a8175255d7aaadfb6d8fb9a3c978d469afaf16d18a35956bd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Browsing</topic><topic>competition</topic><topic>Ecological monitoring</topic><topic>Ground level</topic><topic>Invasive species</topic><topic>Monoculture</topic><topic>Phragmites</topic><topic>Phragmites australis</topic><topic>plant invasions</topic><topic>Planting</topic><topic>Reed beds</topic><topic>reed slashing</topic><topic>Reeds</topic><topic>Shrubs</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Vegetation establishment</topic><topic>wetland forest restoration</topic><topic>woody plant establishment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Greet, Joe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, Elise</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Ecological management & restoration</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Greet, Joe</au><au>King, Elise</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Slashing Phragmites (Phragmites australis) prior to planting does not promote native vegetation establishment</atitle><jtitle>Ecological management & restoration</jtitle><date>2019-05</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>162</spage><epage>165</epage><pages>162-165</pages><issn>1442-7001</issn><eissn>1442-8903</eissn><abstract>Summary
Phragmites or Common Reed (Phragmites australis) is a tall rhizomatous cosmopolitan grass. While native to Australia, it can be invasive in wetlands, forming dense monocultures and reducing their ecological integrity. We assessed the potential for the cutting of Phragmites reeds prior to planting to promote the establishment of indigenous shrubs that might ultimately outcompete Phragmites. We established ten 5 m × 5 m quadrats in an area dominated by Phragmites, brush‐cut the reeds to ground level in five of them and left five uncut as controls. Within each quadrat, we planted 20 plants (~40 cm tall) of each of five indigenous shrub species, unguarded (4 plants/m2). We surveyed the plants one month after planting and annually for the following four years for survival, height and browsing damage. Browsing damage to plants was common (>50%) and unaffected by cutting. After four years, overall plant survival rates were ~25% and mean plant heights for the five shrub species ranged between 120 and 174 cm. Cutting of Phragmites had no positive effect on plant survival or height. In fact, two Melaleuca species grew taller in the uncut quadrats. Cutting of Phragmites reed beds prior to planting is unlikely to promote the establishment of woody plantings. However, planting within established Phragmites with or without prior brush‐cutting is worthy of further trialling as a potential tool for reinstating native diversity at Phragmites‐dominated sites.</abstract><cop>Canberra</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/emr.12354</doi><tpages>4</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2434-4735</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2543-1486</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1442-7001 |
ispartof | Ecological management & restoration, 2019-05, Vol.20 (2), p.162-165 |
issn | 1442-7001 1442-8903 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2228525104 |
source | Wiley Journals |
subjects | Browsing competition Ecological monitoring Ground level Invasive species Monoculture Phragmites Phragmites australis plant invasions Planting Reed beds reed slashing Reeds Shrubs Species Survival Vegetation establishment wetland forest restoration woody plant establishment |
title | Slashing Phragmites (Phragmites australis) prior to planting does not promote native vegetation establishment |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T03%3A50%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Slashing%20Phragmites%20(Phragmites%20australis)%20prior%20to%20planting%20does%20not%20promote%20native%20vegetation%20establishment&rft.jtitle=Ecological%20management%20&%20restoration&rft.au=Greet,%20Joe&rft.date=2019-05&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=162&rft.epage=165&rft.pages=162-165&rft.issn=1442-7001&rft.eissn=1442-8903&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/emr.12354&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2228525104%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2228525104&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |