Institutional persistence, income inequality, and individual attitudes

Aspects of institutional quality vary substantially across countries, but are quite persistent over time. Further, institutional quality is correlated with income inequality, even among democracies. To account for these regularities, we offer a model where individual attitudes, toward inequality or...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of economic inequality 2019-09, Vol.17 (3), p.401-413
Hauptverfasser: Chong, Alberto, Gradstein, Mark
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 413
container_issue 3
container_start_page 401
container_title Journal of economic inequality
container_volume 17
creator Chong, Alberto
Gradstein, Mark
description Aspects of institutional quality vary substantially across countries, but are quite persistent over time. Further, institutional quality is correlated with income inequality, even among democracies. To account for these regularities, we offer a model where individual attitudes, toward inequality or trust in government, feature in voters’ preferences. The model displays path dependence, whereby inequality and institutional quality feed each other. It is suggested that this may explain the long shadow of historical legacies of postcolonial experiences. Simple correlations of reported attitudes using data from the World Values Surveys are consistent with the model.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10888-019-09414-w
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2228415121</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A727502763</galeid><sourcerecordid>A727502763</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c533t-a0d3131137783b21012e2846bcb5463292df4592473f4ca5b6c9fafc076736e33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF9LwzAUxYMoOKdfwKeCr8vMTZqmfRzD6WDgiz6HNE1HRpduSebYtze1gm9yH-4fzu9wOQg9ApkDIeI5ACnLEhOoMKlyyPH5Ck2AC4ZLQeB6mIsKg6Bwi-5C2BFCeUlgglZrF6KNp2h7p7rsYHywIRqnzSyzTvd7k5o5nlRn42WWKdekvbFftkmnTMWBbUy4Rzet6oJ5-O1T9Ll6-Vi-4c3763q52GDNGYtYkYYBA2BClKymQIAaWuZFrWueF4xWtGlzXtFcsDbXiteFrlrVaiIKwQrD2BQ9jb4H3x9PJkS5608-fR4kpckJOFBIqvmo2qrOSOvaPnqlUzVmb3XvTGvTfSGo4ISKYrClI6B9H4I3rTx4u1f-IoHIIWA5BixTwPInYHlOEBuhkMRua_zfL_9Q36FAfbw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2228415121</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Institutional persistence, income inequality, and individual attitudes</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>SpringerLink Journals (MCLS)</source><creator>Chong, Alberto ; Gradstein, Mark</creator><creatorcontrib>Chong, Alberto ; Gradstein, Mark</creatorcontrib><description>Aspects of institutional quality vary substantially across countries, but are quite persistent over time. Further, institutional quality is correlated with income inequality, even among democracies. To account for these regularities, we offer a model where individual attitudes, toward inequality or trust in government, feature in voters’ preferences. The model displays path dependence, whereby inequality and institutional quality feed each other. It is suggested that this may explain the long shadow of historical legacies of postcolonial experiences. Simple correlations of reported attitudes using data from the World Values Surveys are consistent with the model.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1569-1721</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-8701</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10888-019-09414-w</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Democracy ; Development Economics ; Economic Growth ; Economics ; Economics and Finance ; Income distribution ; Income inequality ; International Economics ; Personal income ; Political Science ; Public Finance</subject><ispartof>Journal of economic inequality, 2019-09, Vol.17 (3), p.401-413</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 Springer</rights><rights>The Journal of Economic Inequality is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c533t-a0d3131137783b21012e2846bcb5463292df4592473f4ca5b6c9fafc076736e33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c533t-a0d3131137783b21012e2846bcb5463292df4592473f4ca5b6c9fafc076736e33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10888-019-09414-w$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10888-019-09414-w$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chong, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gradstein, Mark</creatorcontrib><title>Institutional persistence, income inequality, and individual attitudes</title><title>Journal of economic inequality</title><addtitle>J Econ Inequal</addtitle><description>Aspects of institutional quality vary substantially across countries, but are quite persistent over time. Further, institutional quality is correlated with income inequality, even among democracies. To account for these regularities, we offer a model where individual attitudes, toward inequality or trust in government, feature in voters’ preferences. The model displays path dependence, whereby inequality and institutional quality feed each other. It is suggested that this may explain the long shadow of historical legacies of postcolonial experiences. Simple correlations of reported attitudes using data from the World Values Surveys are consistent with the model.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Development Economics</subject><subject>Economic Growth</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>Income distribution</subject><subject>Income inequality</subject><subject>International Economics</subject><subject>Personal income</subject><subject>Political Science</subject><subject>Public Finance</subject><issn>1569-1721</issn><issn>1573-8701</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kF9LwzAUxYMoOKdfwKeCr8vMTZqmfRzD6WDgiz6HNE1HRpduSebYtze1gm9yH-4fzu9wOQg9ApkDIeI5ACnLEhOoMKlyyPH5Ck2AC4ZLQeB6mIsKg6Bwi-5C2BFCeUlgglZrF6KNp2h7p7rsYHywIRqnzSyzTvd7k5o5nlRn42WWKdekvbFftkmnTMWBbUy4Rzet6oJ5-O1T9Ll6-Vi-4c3763q52GDNGYtYkYYBA2BClKymQIAaWuZFrWueF4xWtGlzXtFcsDbXiteFrlrVaiIKwQrD2BQ9jb4H3x9PJkS5608-fR4kpckJOFBIqvmo2qrOSOvaPnqlUzVmb3XvTGvTfSGo4ISKYrClI6B9H4I3rTx4u1f-IoHIIWA5BixTwPInYHlOEBuhkMRua_zfL_9Q36FAfbw</recordid><startdate>20190901</startdate><enddate>20190901</enddate><creator>Chong, Alberto</creator><creator>Gradstein, Mark</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190901</creationdate><title>Institutional persistence, income inequality, and individual attitudes</title><author>Chong, Alberto ; Gradstein, Mark</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c533t-a0d3131137783b21012e2846bcb5463292df4592473f4ca5b6c9fafc076736e33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Development Economics</topic><topic>Economic Growth</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>Income distribution</topic><topic>Income inequality</topic><topic>International Economics</topic><topic>Personal income</topic><topic>Political Science</topic><topic>Public Finance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chong, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gradstein, Mark</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of economic inequality</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chong, Alberto</au><au>Gradstein, Mark</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Institutional persistence, income inequality, and individual attitudes</atitle><jtitle>Journal of economic inequality</jtitle><stitle>J Econ Inequal</stitle><date>2019-09-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>401</spage><epage>413</epage><pages>401-413</pages><issn>1569-1721</issn><eissn>1573-8701</eissn><abstract>Aspects of institutional quality vary substantially across countries, but are quite persistent over time. Further, institutional quality is correlated with income inequality, even among democracies. To account for these regularities, we offer a model where individual attitudes, toward inequality or trust in government, feature in voters’ preferences. The model displays path dependence, whereby inequality and institutional quality feed each other. It is suggested that this may explain the long shadow of historical legacies of postcolonial experiences. Simple correlations of reported attitudes using data from the World Values Surveys are consistent with the model.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s10888-019-09414-w</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1569-1721
ispartof Journal of economic inequality, 2019-09, Vol.17 (3), p.401-413
issn 1569-1721
1573-8701
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2228415121
source Business Source Complete; SpringerLink Journals (MCLS)
subjects Analysis
Democracy
Development Economics
Economic Growth
Economics
Economics and Finance
Income distribution
Income inequality
International Economics
Personal income
Political Science
Public Finance
title Institutional persistence, income inequality, and individual attitudes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T17%3A50%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Institutional%20persistence,%20income%20inequality,%20and%20individual%20attitudes&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20economic%20inequality&rft.au=Chong,%20Alberto&rft.date=2019-09-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=401&rft.epage=413&rft.pages=401-413&rft.issn=1569-1721&rft.eissn=1573-8701&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10888-019-09414-w&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA727502763%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2228415121&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A727502763&rfr_iscdi=true