THE TREE AND THE ROD: JURISDICTION IN LATE MEDIEVAL ENGLAND

Through an exploration of jurisdictional disputes at Dunwich that stretched from the 1380s to the 1460s, this article sets out to provide a more compelling explanation of late-medieval jurisdiction. At Dunwich, conflict was precipitated by massive environmental change, as the town’s harbour silted u...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Past & present 2017-11, Vol.237 (237), p.13-51
1. Verfasser: Johnson, Tom
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 51
container_issue 237
container_start_page 13
container_title Past & present
container_volume 237
creator Johnson, Tom
description Through an exploration of jurisdictional disputes at Dunwich that stretched from the 1380s to the 1460s, this article sets out to provide a more compelling explanation of late-medieval jurisdiction. At Dunwich, conflict was precipitated by massive environmental change, as the town’s harbour silted up, ‘moved’ northwards into another jurisdiction, and then later overflowed. This began a process in which jurisdiction - constituted in the relationship between authority, community, and the physical landsacpe - unravelled, flaring into a long dispute. Through a detailed examination of the vernacular documentation produced during the disputes at Dunwich, a new model of jurisdiction is proposed. Rather than seeing late-medieval jurisdictions as static entities formed around particular communities or territories, this article argues that jurisdiction was an ongoing process of interpreting and communicating authority. It was an interpretative act insofar as accumulated legal privileges had to be textually reconciled with one another; it was communicative insofar as these projections of authority had to be imparted to a wide audience. As more rights were accumulated by different institutions, so it became more difficult to satisfactorily reconcle them; and moreover, the expanding political public of the fifteenth century had more opportunities to intervene, and disrupt the successful communication of jurisdictional authority. The model of jurisdiction as a process of interpretation and communication can thus help to explain the more general proliferation of jurisdictional disputes in later medieval England, as well as the complex and often contested ways in which institutions attempted to exercise their authority.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/pastj/gtx051
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2225204353</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26801976</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26801976</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c253t-abe56a6ae267251989f52ec564d2ddaa5603d2ead04af3263b47be25185b87be3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9z01Lw0AQBuBFFIzVW69CwKtpZ2e_kmNpoxWKhRLB27JJNmJQE3dTsP_erZHOZWbgYYaXkCmFGYWMzXvjh3b-NvyAoGckolyphEv-ek4iAEYTVFxekivvWwglgEVkWqzzuNjlebx4XsXHZbddXZOLxnx4e_PfJ-TlIS-W62SzfXxaLjZJhYINiSmtkEYai1KhoFmaNQJtJSSvsa6NERJYjdbUwE3DULKSq9IGmYoyDRObkLvxbu-67731g267vfsKLzUiCgTOBAvqflSV67x3ttG9e_807qAp6GNu_Zdbj7kDvx1564fOnSzKFGimJPsF_ARSYw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2225204353</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>THE TREE AND THE ROD: JURISDICTION IN LATE MEDIEVAL ENGLAND</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Johnson, Tom</creator><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Tom</creatorcontrib><description>Through an exploration of jurisdictional disputes at Dunwich that stretched from the 1380s to the 1460s, this article sets out to provide a more compelling explanation of late-medieval jurisdiction. At Dunwich, conflict was precipitated by massive environmental change, as the town’s harbour silted up, ‘moved’ northwards into another jurisdiction, and then later overflowed. This began a process in which jurisdiction - constituted in the relationship between authority, community, and the physical landsacpe - unravelled, flaring into a long dispute. Through a detailed examination of the vernacular documentation produced during the disputes at Dunwich, a new model of jurisdiction is proposed. Rather than seeing late-medieval jurisdictions as static entities formed around particular communities or territories, this article argues that jurisdiction was an ongoing process of interpreting and communicating authority. It was an interpretative act insofar as accumulated legal privileges had to be textually reconciled with one another; it was communicative insofar as these projections of authority had to be imparted to a wide audience. As more rights were accumulated by different institutions, so it became more difficult to satisfactorily reconcle them; and moreover, the expanding political public of the fifteenth century had more opportunities to intervene, and disrupt the successful communication of jurisdictional authority. The model of jurisdiction as a process of interpretation and communication can thus help to explain the more general proliferation of jurisdictional disputes in later medieval England, as well as the complex and often contested ways in which institutions attempted to exercise their authority.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-2746</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-464X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/pastj/gtx051</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>15th century ; Authority ; Communication ; Disputes ; Human rights ; Judicial process ; Jurisdiction ; Medieval history ; Projections</subject><ispartof>Past &amp; present, 2017-11, Vol.237 (237), p.13-51</ispartof><rights>The Past and Present Society, Oxford, 2017</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford Publishing Limited(England) Nov 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c253t-abe56a6ae267251989f52ec564d2ddaa5603d2ead04af3263b47be25185b87be3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26801976$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26801976$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,27905,27906,57998,58231</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Tom</creatorcontrib><title>THE TREE AND THE ROD: JURISDICTION IN LATE MEDIEVAL ENGLAND</title><title>Past &amp; present</title><description>Through an exploration of jurisdictional disputes at Dunwich that stretched from the 1380s to the 1460s, this article sets out to provide a more compelling explanation of late-medieval jurisdiction. At Dunwich, conflict was precipitated by massive environmental change, as the town’s harbour silted up, ‘moved’ northwards into another jurisdiction, and then later overflowed. This began a process in which jurisdiction - constituted in the relationship between authority, community, and the physical landsacpe - unravelled, flaring into a long dispute. Through a detailed examination of the vernacular documentation produced during the disputes at Dunwich, a new model of jurisdiction is proposed. Rather than seeing late-medieval jurisdictions as static entities formed around particular communities or territories, this article argues that jurisdiction was an ongoing process of interpreting and communicating authority. It was an interpretative act insofar as accumulated legal privileges had to be textually reconciled with one another; it was communicative insofar as these projections of authority had to be imparted to a wide audience. As more rights were accumulated by different institutions, so it became more difficult to satisfactorily reconcle them; and moreover, the expanding political public of the fifteenth century had more opportunities to intervene, and disrupt the successful communication of jurisdictional authority. The model of jurisdiction as a process of interpretation and communication can thus help to explain the more general proliferation of jurisdictional disputes in later medieval England, as well as the complex and often contested ways in which institutions attempted to exercise their authority.</description><subject>15th century</subject><subject>Authority</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Disputes</subject><subject>Human rights</subject><subject>Judicial process</subject><subject>Jurisdiction</subject><subject>Medieval history</subject><subject>Projections</subject><issn>0031-2746</issn><issn>1477-464X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9z01Lw0AQBuBFFIzVW69CwKtpZ2e_kmNpoxWKhRLB27JJNmJQE3dTsP_erZHOZWbgYYaXkCmFGYWMzXvjh3b-NvyAoGckolyphEv-ek4iAEYTVFxekivvWwglgEVkWqzzuNjlebx4XsXHZbddXZOLxnx4e_PfJ-TlIS-W62SzfXxaLjZJhYINiSmtkEYai1KhoFmaNQJtJSSvsa6NERJYjdbUwE3DULKSq9IGmYoyDRObkLvxbu-67731g267vfsKLzUiCgTOBAvqflSV67x3ttG9e_807qAp6GNu_Zdbj7kDvx1564fOnSzKFGimJPsF_ARSYw</recordid><startdate>20171101</startdate><enddate>20171101</enddate><creator>Johnson, Tom</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C18</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171101</creationdate><title>THE TREE AND THE ROD</title><author>Johnson, Tom</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c253t-abe56a6ae267251989f52ec564d2ddaa5603d2ead04af3263b47be25185b87be3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>15th century</topic><topic>Authority</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Disputes</topic><topic>Human rights</topic><topic>Judicial process</topic><topic>Jurisdiction</topic><topic>Medieval history</topic><topic>Projections</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Tom</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Past &amp; present</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Johnson, Tom</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>THE TREE AND THE ROD: JURISDICTION IN LATE MEDIEVAL ENGLAND</atitle><jtitle>Past &amp; present</jtitle><date>2017-11-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>237</volume><issue>237</issue><spage>13</spage><epage>51</epage><pages>13-51</pages><issn>0031-2746</issn><eissn>1477-464X</eissn><abstract>Through an exploration of jurisdictional disputes at Dunwich that stretched from the 1380s to the 1460s, this article sets out to provide a more compelling explanation of late-medieval jurisdiction. At Dunwich, conflict was precipitated by massive environmental change, as the town’s harbour silted up, ‘moved’ northwards into another jurisdiction, and then later overflowed. This began a process in which jurisdiction - constituted in the relationship between authority, community, and the physical landsacpe - unravelled, flaring into a long dispute. Through a detailed examination of the vernacular documentation produced during the disputes at Dunwich, a new model of jurisdiction is proposed. Rather than seeing late-medieval jurisdictions as static entities formed around particular communities or territories, this article argues that jurisdiction was an ongoing process of interpreting and communicating authority. It was an interpretative act insofar as accumulated legal privileges had to be textually reconciled with one another; it was communicative insofar as these projections of authority had to be imparted to a wide audience. As more rights were accumulated by different institutions, so it became more difficult to satisfactorily reconcle them; and moreover, the expanding political public of the fifteenth century had more opportunities to intervene, and disrupt the successful communication of jurisdictional authority. The model of jurisdiction as a process of interpretation and communication can thus help to explain the more general proliferation of jurisdictional disputes in later medieval England, as well as the complex and often contested ways in which institutions attempted to exercise their authority.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/pastj/gtx051</doi><tpages>39</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-2746
ispartof Past & present, 2017-11, Vol.237 (237), p.13-51
issn 0031-2746
1477-464X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2225204353
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects 15th century
Authority
Communication
Disputes
Human rights
Judicial process
Jurisdiction
Medieval history
Projections
title THE TREE AND THE ROD: JURISDICTION IN LATE MEDIEVAL ENGLAND
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T23%3A45%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=THE%20TREE%20AND%20THE%20ROD:%20JURISDICTION%20IN%20LATE%20MEDIEVAL%20ENGLAND&rft.jtitle=Past%20&%20present&rft.au=Johnson,%20Tom&rft.date=2017-11-01&rft.volume=237&rft.issue=237&rft.spage=13&rft.epage=51&rft.pages=13-51&rft.issn=0031-2746&rft.eissn=1477-464X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/pastj/gtx051&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26801976%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2225204353&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26801976&rfr_iscdi=true