THE TREE AND THE ROD: JURISDICTION IN LATE MEDIEVAL ENGLAND
Through an exploration of jurisdictional disputes at Dunwich that stretched from the 1380s to the 1460s, this article sets out to provide a more compelling explanation of late-medieval jurisdiction. At Dunwich, conflict was precipitated by massive environmental change, as the town’s harbour silted u...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Past & present 2017-11, Vol.237 (237), p.13-51 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 51 |
---|---|
container_issue | 237 |
container_start_page | 13 |
container_title | Past & present |
container_volume | 237 |
creator | Johnson, Tom |
description | Through an exploration of jurisdictional disputes at Dunwich that stretched from the 1380s to the 1460s, this article sets out to provide a more compelling explanation of late-medieval jurisdiction. At Dunwich, conflict was precipitated by massive environmental change, as the town’s harbour silted up, ‘moved’ northwards into another jurisdiction, and then later overflowed. This began a process in which jurisdiction - constituted in the relationship between authority, community, and the physical landsacpe - unravelled, flaring into a long dispute.
Through a detailed examination of the vernacular documentation produced during the disputes at Dunwich, a new model of jurisdiction is proposed. Rather than seeing late-medieval jurisdictions as static entities formed around particular communities or territories, this article argues that jurisdiction was an ongoing process of interpreting and communicating authority. It was an interpretative act insofar as accumulated legal privileges had to be textually reconciled with one another; it was communicative insofar as these projections of authority had to be imparted to a wide audience.
As more rights were accumulated by different institutions, so it became more difficult to satisfactorily reconcle them; and moreover, the expanding political public of the fifteenth century had more opportunities to intervene, and disrupt the successful communication of jurisdictional authority. The model of jurisdiction as a process of interpretation and communication can thus help to explain the more general proliferation of jurisdictional disputes in later medieval England, as well as the complex and often contested ways in which institutions attempted to exercise their authority. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/pastj/gtx051 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2225204353</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26801976</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26801976</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c253t-abe56a6ae267251989f52ec564d2ddaa5603d2ead04af3263b47be25185b87be3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9z01Lw0AQBuBFFIzVW69CwKtpZ2e_kmNpoxWKhRLB27JJNmJQE3dTsP_erZHOZWbgYYaXkCmFGYWMzXvjh3b-NvyAoGckolyphEv-ek4iAEYTVFxekivvWwglgEVkWqzzuNjlebx4XsXHZbddXZOLxnx4e_PfJ-TlIS-W62SzfXxaLjZJhYINiSmtkEYai1KhoFmaNQJtJSSvsa6NERJYjdbUwE3DULKSq9IGmYoyDRObkLvxbu-67731g267vfsKLzUiCgTOBAvqflSV67x3ttG9e_807qAp6GNu_Zdbj7kDvx1564fOnSzKFGimJPsF_ARSYw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2225204353</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>THE TREE AND THE ROD: JURISDICTION IN LATE MEDIEVAL ENGLAND</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Johnson, Tom</creator><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Tom</creatorcontrib><description>Through an exploration of jurisdictional disputes at Dunwich that stretched from the 1380s to the 1460s, this article sets out to provide a more compelling explanation of late-medieval jurisdiction. At Dunwich, conflict was precipitated by massive environmental change, as the town’s harbour silted up, ‘moved’ northwards into another jurisdiction, and then later overflowed. This began a process in which jurisdiction - constituted in the relationship between authority, community, and the physical landsacpe - unravelled, flaring into a long dispute.
Through a detailed examination of the vernacular documentation produced during the disputes at Dunwich, a new model of jurisdiction is proposed. Rather than seeing late-medieval jurisdictions as static entities formed around particular communities or territories, this article argues that jurisdiction was an ongoing process of interpreting and communicating authority. It was an interpretative act insofar as accumulated legal privileges had to be textually reconciled with one another; it was communicative insofar as these projections of authority had to be imparted to a wide audience.
As more rights were accumulated by different institutions, so it became more difficult to satisfactorily reconcle them; and moreover, the expanding political public of the fifteenth century had more opportunities to intervene, and disrupt the successful communication of jurisdictional authority. The model of jurisdiction as a process of interpretation and communication can thus help to explain the more general proliferation of jurisdictional disputes in later medieval England, as well as the complex and often contested ways in which institutions attempted to exercise their authority.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-2746</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-464X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/pastj/gtx051</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>15th century ; Authority ; Communication ; Disputes ; Human rights ; Judicial process ; Jurisdiction ; Medieval history ; Projections</subject><ispartof>Past & present, 2017-11, Vol.237 (237), p.13-51</ispartof><rights>The Past and Present Society, Oxford, 2017</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford Publishing Limited(England) Nov 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c253t-abe56a6ae267251989f52ec564d2ddaa5603d2ead04af3263b47be25185b87be3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26801976$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26801976$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,27905,27906,57998,58231</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Tom</creatorcontrib><title>THE TREE AND THE ROD: JURISDICTION IN LATE MEDIEVAL ENGLAND</title><title>Past & present</title><description>Through an exploration of jurisdictional disputes at Dunwich that stretched from the 1380s to the 1460s, this article sets out to provide a more compelling explanation of late-medieval jurisdiction. At Dunwich, conflict was precipitated by massive environmental change, as the town’s harbour silted up, ‘moved’ northwards into another jurisdiction, and then later overflowed. This began a process in which jurisdiction - constituted in the relationship between authority, community, and the physical landsacpe - unravelled, flaring into a long dispute.
Through a detailed examination of the vernacular documentation produced during the disputes at Dunwich, a new model of jurisdiction is proposed. Rather than seeing late-medieval jurisdictions as static entities formed around particular communities or territories, this article argues that jurisdiction was an ongoing process of interpreting and communicating authority. It was an interpretative act insofar as accumulated legal privileges had to be textually reconciled with one another; it was communicative insofar as these projections of authority had to be imparted to a wide audience.
As more rights were accumulated by different institutions, so it became more difficult to satisfactorily reconcle them; and moreover, the expanding political public of the fifteenth century had more opportunities to intervene, and disrupt the successful communication of jurisdictional authority. The model of jurisdiction as a process of interpretation and communication can thus help to explain the more general proliferation of jurisdictional disputes in later medieval England, as well as the complex and often contested ways in which institutions attempted to exercise their authority.</description><subject>15th century</subject><subject>Authority</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Disputes</subject><subject>Human rights</subject><subject>Judicial process</subject><subject>Jurisdiction</subject><subject>Medieval history</subject><subject>Projections</subject><issn>0031-2746</issn><issn>1477-464X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9z01Lw0AQBuBFFIzVW69CwKtpZ2e_kmNpoxWKhRLB27JJNmJQE3dTsP_erZHOZWbgYYaXkCmFGYWMzXvjh3b-NvyAoGckolyphEv-ek4iAEYTVFxekivvWwglgEVkWqzzuNjlebx4XsXHZbddXZOLxnx4e_PfJ-TlIS-W62SzfXxaLjZJhYINiSmtkEYai1KhoFmaNQJtJSSvsa6NERJYjdbUwE3DULKSq9IGmYoyDRObkLvxbu-67731g267vfsKLzUiCgTOBAvqflSV67x3ttG9e_807qAp6GNu_Zdbj7kDvx1564fOnSzKFGimJPsF_ARSYw</recordid><startdate>20171101</startdate><enddate>20171101</enddate><creator>Johnson, Tom</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C18</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171101</creationdate><title>THE TREE AND THE ROD</title><author>Johnson, Tom</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c253t-abe56a6ae267251989f52ec564d2ddaa5603d2ead04af3263b47be25185b87be3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>15th century</topic><topic>Authority</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Disputes</topic><topic>Human rights</topic><topic>Judicial process</topic><topic>Jurisdiction</topic><topic>Medieval history</topic><topic>Projections</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Tom</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Past & present</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Johnson, Tom</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>THE TREE AND THE ROD: JURISDICTION IN LATE MEDIEVAL ENGLAND</atitle><jtitle>Past & present</jtitle><date>2017-11-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>237</volume><issue>237</issue><spage>13</spage><epage>51</epage><pages>13-51</pages><issn>0031-2746</issn><eissn>1477-464X</eissn><abstract>Through an exploration of jurisdictional disputes at Dunwich that stretched from the 1380s to the 1460s, this article sets out to provide a more compelling explanation of late-medieval jurisdiction. At Dunwich, conflict was precipitated by massive environmental change, as the town’s harbour silted up, ‘moved’ northwards into another jurisdiction, and then later overflowed. This began a process in which jurisdiction - constituted in the relationship between authority, community, and the physical landsacpe - unravelled, flaring into a long dispute.
Through a detailed examination of the vernacular documentation produced during the disputes at Dunwich, a new model of jurisdiction is proposed. Rather than seeing late-medieval jurisdictions as static entities formed around particular communities or territories, this article argues that jurisdiction was an ongoing process of interpreting and communicating authority. It was an interpretative act insofar as accumulated legal privileges had to be textually reconciled with one another; it was communicative insofar as these projections of authority had to be imparted to a wide audience.
As more rights were accumulated by different institutions, so it became more difficult to satisfactorily reconcle them; and moreover, the expanding political public of the fifteenth century had more opportunities to intervene, and disrupt the successful communication of jurisdictional authority. The model of jurisdiction as a process of interpretation and communication can thus help to explain the more general proliferation of jurisdictional disputes in later medieval England, as well as the complex and often contested ways in which institutions attempted to exercise their authority.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/pastj/gtx051</doi><tpages>39</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0031-2746 |
ispartof | Past & present, 2017-11, Vol.237 (237), p.13-51 |
issn | 0031-2746 1477-464X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2225204353 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
subjects | 15th century Authority Communication Disputes Human rights Judicial process Jurisdiction Medieval history Projections |
title | THE TREE AND THE ROD: JURISDICTION IN LATE MEDIEVAL ENGLAND |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T23%3A45%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=THE%20TREE%20AND%20THE%20ROD:%20JURISDICTION%20IN%20LATE%20MEDIEVAL%20ENGLAND&rft.jtitle=Past%20&%20present&rft.au=Johnson,%20Tom&rft.date=2017-11-01&rft.volume=237&rft.issue=237&rft.spage=13&rft.epage=51&rft.pages=13-51&rft.issn=0031-2746&rft.eissn=1477-464X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/pastj/gtx051&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26801976%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2225204353&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26801976&rfr_iscdi=true |