Die Annexion von Bosnien-Herzegowina und István Burián

The Habsburg Empire was approved of temporary occupy Bosnia-Herzegovina on the Berliner Conference.Accordingly to the Article 25 of the Berliner Treaty and the agreement between Vienna andIstanbul on April 1879, Bosnia-Herzegovina was still under sovereignty of the Ottoman Empire. TheHabsburgs execu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Prague papers on the history of international relations 2017-01 (1), p.67
1. Verfasser: Murakami, Ryo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng ; fre ; ger
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 67
container_title Prague papers on the history of international relations
container_volume
creator Murakami, Ryo
description The Habsburg Empire was approved of temporary occupy Bosnia-Herzegovina on the Berliner Conference.Accordingly to the Article 25 of the Berliner Treaty and the agreement between Vienna andIstanbul on April 1879, Bosnia-Herzegovina was still under sovereignty of the Ottoman Empire. TheHabsburgs executives maintained this provisional status in both provinces until 1908. Furthermore,Bosnia-Herzegovina was a common administrative district (in German, Reichsland) between Austriaand Hungary. The Habsburg Empire finally declared the annexation of Bosnia-Herzegovina on6 October 1908. Alois Lexa Aehrenthal, Common Foreign Minister of the Habsburg Empire, becomethe focus of researcher for this theme. But I point out that it was István Burián, the Common FinanceMinister of the Habsburg Empire (1903–1912), who proposed the annexation of Bosnia-Herzegovinafor the first time. Burián presented memoranda proposing the annexation to Emperor Franz Josephin May 1907 and April 1908. But the revolution of the Young Turks was a decisive opportunityto annexation. Therefore we should not overestimate Burián’s role in the annexation attempt. Buthis memoranda not only stimulated leading circles of the Habsburg Empire to consider annexationbut also helped matters develop more smoothly in Vienna after the revolution of the Young Turks.As Burián himself later wrote, we should regard him as the true proponent of annexation. Howeverthe analysis about an annexation law, that was founded on the Habsburg’s succession law (in German,Pragmatische Sanktion), proves that the decision-making process for imperial affairs throughthe common cabinet and the minister conference was very complicated and lacked a coordinatingfunction. A full account of annexation reveals the pluralistic and inefficient policymaking of theHabsburg Empire under dual system.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2224513924</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2224513924</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_22245139243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNiksKwjAUAIMoWLR3CLgO5NO0cemXundfCj4lRV40aap4G8_ixczCA7gYZjEzIplUqmSV4HpMMmG4YpXS5ZTkIXScc2G0kKbKiNlaoCtEeFqHdEisXUALyGrwL7i4h8WWRjzRQ-iHzzv16G3ynEzO7TVA_vOMLPa746ZmN-_uEULfdC56TKmRUhZaqKUs1H_XF_SIOOY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2224513924</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Die Annexion von Bosnien-Herzegowina und István Burián</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Murakami, Ryo</creator><creatorcontrib>Murakami, Ryo</creatorcontrib><description>The Habsburg Empire was approved of temporary occupy Bosnia-Herzegovina on the Berliner Conference.Accordingly to the Article 25 of the Berliner Treaty and the agreement between Vienna andIstanbul on April 1879, Bosnia-Herzegovina was still under sovereignty of the Ottoman Empire. TheHabsburgs executives maintained this provisional status in both provinces until 1908. Furthermore,Bosnia-Herzegovina was a common administrative district (in German, Reichsland) between Austriaand Hungary. The Habsburg Empire finally declared the annexation of Bosnia-Herzegovina on6 October 1908. Alois Lexa Aehrenthal, Common Foreign Minister of the Habsburg Empire, becomethe focus of researcher for this theme. But I point out that it was István Burián, the Common FinanceMinister of the Habsburg Empire (1903–1912), who proposed the annexation of Bosnia-Herzegovinafor the first time. Burián presented memoranda proposing the annexation to Emperor Franz Josephin May 1907 and April 1908. But the revolution of the Young Turks was a decisive opportunityto annexation. Therefore we should not overestimate Burián’s role in the annexation attempt. Buthis memoranda not only stimulated leading circles of the Habsburg Empire to consider annexationbut also helped matters develop more smoothly in Vienna after the revolution of the Young Turks.As Burián himself later wrote, we should regard him as the true proponent of annexation. Howeverthe analysis about an annexation law, that was founded on the Habsburg’s succession law (in German,Pragmatische Sanktion), proves that the decision-making process for imperial affairs throughthe common cabinet and the minister conference was very complicated and lacked a coordinatingfunction. A full account of annexation reveals the pluralistic and inefficient policymaking of theHabsburg Empire under dual system.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1803-7356</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2336-7105</identifier><language>eng ; fre ; ger</language><publisher>Prague: Charles University, Faculty of Arts</publisher><ispartof>Prague papers on the history of international relations, 2017-01 (1), p.67</ispartof><rights>2017. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Murakami, Ryo</creatorcontrib><title>Die Annexion von Bosnien-Herzegowina und István Burián</title><title>Prague papers on the history of international relations</title><description>The Habsburg Empire was approved of temporary occupy Bosnia-Herzegovina on the Berliner Conference.Accordingly to the Article 25 of the Berliner Treaty and the agreement between Vienna andIstanbul on April 1879, Bosnia-Herzegovina was still under sovereignty of the Ottoman Empire. TheHabsburgs executives maintained this provisional status in both provinces until 1908. Furthermore,Bosnia-Herzegovina was a common administrative district (in German, Reichsland) between Austriaand Hungary. The Habsburg Empire finally declared the annexation of Bosnia-Herzegovina on6 October 1908. Alois Lexa Aehrenthal, Common Foreign Minister of the Habsburg Empire, becomethe focus of researcher for this theme. But I point out that it was István Burián, the Common FinanceMinister of the Habsburg Empire (1903–1912), who proposed the annexation of Bosnia-Herzegovinafor the first time. Burián presented memoranda proposing the annexation to Emperor Franz Josephin May 1907 and April 1908. But the revolution of the Young Turks was a decisive opportunityto annexation. Therefore we should not overestimate Burián’s role in the annexation attempt. Buthis memoranda not only stimulated leading circles of the Habsburg Empire to consider annexationbut also helped matters develop more smoothly in Vienna after the revolution of the Young Turks.As Burián himself later wrote, we should regard him as the true proponent of annexation. Howeverthe analysis about an annexation law, that was founded on the Habsburg’s succession law (in German,Pragmatische Sanktion), proves that the decision-making process for imperial affairs throughthe common cabinet and the minister conference was very complicated and lacked a coordinatingfunction. A full account of annexation reveals the pluralistic and inefficient policymaking of theHabsburg Empire under dual system.</description><issn>1803-7356</issn><issn>2336-7105</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNiksKwjAUAIMoWLR3CLgO5NO0cemXundfCj4lRV40aap4G8_ixczCA7gYZjEzIplUqmSV4HpMMmG4YpXS5ZTkIXScc2G0kKbKiNlaoCtEeFqHdEisXUALyGrwL7i4h8WWRjzRQ-iHzzv16G3ynEzO7TVA_vOMLPa746ZmN-_uEULfdC56TKmRUhZaqKUs1H_XF_SIOOY</recordid><startdate>20170101</startdate><enddate>20170101</enddate><creator>Murakami, Ryo</creator><general>Charles University, Faculty of Arts</general><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BYOGL</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170101</creationdate><title>Die Annexion von Bosnien-Herzegowina und István Burián</title><author>Murakami, Ryo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_22245139243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng ; fre ; ger</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Murakami, Ryo</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>East Europe, Central Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Prague papers on the history of international relations</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Murakami, Ryo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Die Annexion von Bosnien-Herzegowina und István Burián</atitle><jtitle>Prague papers on the history of international relations</jtitle><date>2017-01-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><issue>1</issue><spage>67</spage><pages>67-</pages><issn>1803-7356</issn><eissn>2336-7105</eissn><abstract>The Habsburg Empire was approved of temporary occupy Bosnia-Herzegovina on the Berliner Conference.Accordingly to the Article 25 of the Berliner Treaty and the agreement between Vienna andIstanbul on April 1879, Bosnia-Herzegovina was still under sovereignty of the Ottoman Empire. TheHabsburgs executives maintained this provisional status in both provinces until 1908. Furthermore,Bosnia-Herzegovina was a common administrative district (in German, Reichsland) between Austriaand Hungary. The Habsburg Empire finally declared the annexation of Bosnia-Herzegovina on6 October 1908. Alois Lexa Aehrenthal, Common Foreign Minister of the Habsburg Empire, becomethe focus of researcher for this theme. But I point out that it was István Burián, the Common FinanceMinister of the Habsburg Empire (1903–1912), who proposed the annexation of Bosnia-Herzegovinafor the first time. Burián presented memoranda proposing the annexation to Emperor Franz Josephin May 1907 and April 1908. But the revolution of the Young Turks was a decisive opportunityto annexation. Therefore we should not overestimate Burián’s role in the annexation attempt. Buthis memoranda not only stimulated leading circles of the Habsburg Empire to consider annexationbut also helped matters develop more smoothly in Vienna after the revolution of the Young Turks.As Burián himself later wrote, we should regard him as the true proponent of annexation. Howeverthe analysis about an annexation law, that was founded on the Habsburg’s succession law (in German,Pragmatische Sanktion), proves that the decision-making process for imperial affairs throughthe common cabinet and the minister conference was very complicated and lacked a coordinatingfunction. A full account of annexation reveals the pluralistic and inefficient policymaking of theHabsburg Empire under dual system.</abstract><cop>Prague</cop><pub>Charles University, Faculty of Arts</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1803-7356
ispartof Prague papers on the history of international relations, 2017-01 (1), p.67
issn 1803-7356
2336-7105
language eng ; fre ; ger
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2224513924
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
title Die Annexion von Bosnien-Herzegowina und István Burián
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T05%3A05%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Die%20Annexion%20von%20Bosnien-Herzegowina%20und%20Istv%C3%A1n%20Buri%C3%A1n&rft.jtitle=Prague%20papers%20on%20the%20history%20of%20international%20relations&rft.au=Murakami,%20Ryo&rft.date=2017-01-01&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=67&rft.pages=67-&rft.issn=1803-7356&rft.eissn=2336-7105&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2224513924%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2224513924&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true