Strategies for Planned Change. An Exchange of Views Between

In a comment on a critique of the organization development approach of Dunphy and Stace (1988), Dunford feels that there are critical factors not dealt with in the model in regard to the conceptualization of both the environment and management. The perspective of management seems at odds with a grow...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Organization studies 1990-01, Vol.11 (1), p.131
Hauptverfasser: Dunford, Richard, Dunphy, Dexter C, Stace, Doug A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 131
container_title Organization studies
container_volume 11
creator Dunford, Richard
Dunphy, Dexter C
Stace, Doug A
description In a comment on a critique of the organization development approach of Dunphy and Stace (1988), Dunford feels that there are critical factors not dealt with in the model in regard to the conceptualization of both the environment and management. The perspective of management seems at odds with a growing literature on organizations as political arenas within which management constitute one or more interest groups with interests not reducible to that of the neutral representatives of capital. In a reply, Dunphy and Stace agree that they see managers as fit-seeking individuals operating in the interest of organizational effectiveness and survival, but not as neutral conduits in doing so, as Dunford argued. One of the most powerful interventions an interest group can make in an organization is to initiate a reconceptualization and redefinition of the salient environment.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_222420158</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>705176</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_2224201583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNit0KgjAYQEcUZD_v8NG98W0uFboqMboMjG5l1KcpstU2sccvogfo6nA4Z8QCnkgeRijlmAXIEwxTifGUzZxrETHiPA7YtvBWeaobclAZC6dOaU03yO5K17SGnYb8df0KmAouDQ0O9uQHIr1gk0p1jpY_ztnqkJ-zY_iw5tmT82Vreqs_qRRCSIF8k0Z_TW_2dDbW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>222420158</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Strategies for Planned Change. An Exchange of Views Between</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Dunford, Richard ; Dunphy, Dexter C ; Stace, Doug A</creator><creatorcontrib>Dunford, Richard ; Dunphy, Dexter C ; Stace, Doug A</creatorcontrib><description>In a comment on a critique of the organization development approach of Dunphy and Stace (1988), Dunford feels that there are critical factors not dealt with in the model in regard to the conceptualization of both the environment and management. The perspective of management seems at odds with a growing literature on organizations as political arenas within which management constitute one or more interest groups with interests not reducible to that of the neutral representatives of capital. In a reply, Dunphy and Stace agree that they see managers as fit-seeking individuals operating in the interest of organizational effectiveness and survival, but not as neutral conduits in doing so, as Dunford argued. One of the most powerful interventions an interest group can make in an organization is to initiate a reconceptualization and redefinition of the salient environment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0170-8406</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1741-3044</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ORGSDM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: Sage Publications Ltd</publisher><subject>Organization development ; Organization theory ; Organizational change ; Strategic planning</subject><ispartof>Organization studies, 1990-01, Vol.11 (1), p.131</ispartof><rights>Copyright Walter De Gruyter &amp; Company 1990</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dunford, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunphy, Dexter C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stace, Doug A</creatorcontrib><title>Strategies for Planned Change. An Exchange of Views Between</title><title>Organization studies</title><description>In a comment on a critique of the organization development approach of Dunphy and Stace (1988), Dunford feels that there are critical factors not dealt with in the model in regard to the conceptualization of both the environment and management. The perspective of management seems at odds with a growing literature on organizations as political arenas within which management constitute one or more interest groups with interests not reducible to that of the neutral representatives of capital. In a reply, Dunphy and Stace agree that they see managers as fit-seeking individuals operating in the interest of organizational effectiveness and survival, but not as neutral conduits in doing so, as Dunford argued. One of the most powerful interventions an interest group can make in an organization is to initiate a reconceptualization and redefinition of the salient environment.</description><subject>Organization development</subject><subject>Organization theory</subject><subject>Organizational change</subject><subject>Strategic planning</subject><issn>0170-8406</issn><issn>1741-3044</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNit0KgjAYQEcUZD_v8NG98W0uFboqMboMjG5l1KcpstU2sccvogfo6nA4Z8QCnkgeRijlmAXIEwxTifGUzZxrETHiPA7YtvBWeaobclAZC6dOaU03yO5K17SGnYb8df0KmAouDQ0O9uQHIr1gk0p1jpY_ztnqkJ-zY_iw5tmT82Vreqs_qRRCSIF8k0Z_TW_2dDbW</recordid><startdate>19900101</startdate><enddate>19900101</enddate><creator>Dunford, Richard</creator><creator>Dunphy, Dexter C</creator><creator>Stace, Doug A</creator><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19900101</creationdate><title>Strategies for Planned Change. An Exchange of Views Between</title><author>Dunford, Richard ; Dunphy, Dexter C ; Stace, Doug A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_2224201583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Organization development</topic><topic>Organization theory</topic><topic>Organizational change</topic><topic>Strategic planning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dunford, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunphy, Dexter C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stace, Doug A</creatorcontrib><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Organization studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dunford, Richard</au><au>Dunphy, Dexter C</au><au>Stace, Doug A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Strategies for Planned Change. An Exchange of Views Between</atitle><jtitle>Organization studies</jtitle><date>1990-01-01</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>131</spage><pages>131-</pages><issn>0170-8406</issn><eissn>1741-3044</eissn><coden>ORGSDM</coden><abstract>In a comment on a critique of the organization development approach of Dunphy and Stace (1988), Dunford feels that there are critical factors not dealt with in the model in regard to the conceptualization of both the environment and management. The perspective of management seems at odds with a growing literature on organizations as political arenas within which management constitute one or more interest groups with interests not reducible to that of the neutral representatives of capital. In a reply, Dunphy and Stace agree that they see managers as fit-seeking individuals operating in the interest of organizational effectiveness and survival, but not as neutral conduits in doing so, as Dunford argued. One of the most powerful interventions an interest group can make in an organization is to initiate a reconceptualization and redefinition of the salient environment.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Sage Publications Ltd</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0170-8406
ispartof Organization studies, 1990-01, Vol.11 (1), p.131
issn 0170-8406
1741-3044
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_222420158
source SAGE Complete A-Z List
subjects Organization development
Organization theory
Organizational change
Strategic planning
title Strategies for Planned Change. An Exchange of Views Between
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T06%3A19%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Strategies%20for%20Planned%20Change.%20An%20Exchange%20of%20Views%20Between&rft.jtitle=Organization%20studies&rft.au=Dunford,%20Richard&rft.date=1990-01-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=131&rft.pages=131-&rft.issn=0170-8406&rft.eissn=1741-3044&rft.coden=ORGSDM&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E705176%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=222420158&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true