Municipal Financial Reporting on the World Wide Web: A Survey of Financial Data Displayed on the Official Websites of the 100 Largest U.S. Municipalities
This article documents the status of Internet financial reporting (budgets, CAFRs and popular reporting) by the 100 largest U.S. cities. This research is important to establish a baseline against which to compare the growth of Internet reporting in light of this new effort by the GFOA. The official...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The journal of government financial management 2004-07, Vol.53 (2), p.20 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 20 |
container_title | The journal of government financial management |
container_volume | 53 |
creator | Groff, James E Pitman, Marshall K |
description | This article documents the status of Internet financial reporting (budgets, CAFRs and popular reporting) by the 100 largest U.S. cities. This research is important to establish a baseline against which to compare the growth of Internet reporting in light of this new effort by the GFOA. The official website addresses of the 100 largest (based on population figures from the 2000 census) U.S. cities were obtained through a search of the World Wide Web. Eighty percent of the largest cities use the recommended domain name convention (www.ci. - city name. - state abbreviation.us). The largest cities were nearly twice as likely (68% to 38%) to present both budget and CAFR data while smaller cities were nearly twice as likely to present budget data alone (46% to 24%). This lack of enthusiasm for CAFR data may be due to a perception by officials of smaller cities that they have less need to provide external validation of their performance to their citizens. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_222375566</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>656512851</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_2223755663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjskKwjAURbNQcPyHh3slbajTThxwoQgOuJRoX_VJSWqSCn6Kf2sUFZeu7oVzD9wCKweREM1AdKMSq1h75jwIRY-X2X2eKzpQJlOYkJLqQL4tMdPGkTqCVuBOCFtt0hi2FPuK-z4MYJWbK95AJz_aSDoJI7JZKm8Yf9xFktALe9OSQ_uUniDgHGbSHNE62LRWLfheIUdoa6yYyNRi_Z1V1piM18NpMzP6kntpd9a5UR7twjAUnShqt8VfowcrcFY0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>222375566</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Municipal Financial Reporting on the World Wide Web: A Survey of Financial Data Displayed on the Official Websites of the 100 Largest U.S. Municipalities</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Groff, James E ; Pitman, Marshall K</creator><creatorcontrib>Groff, James E ; Pitman, Marshall K</creatorcontrib><description>This article documents the status of Internet financial reporting (budgets, CAFRs and popular reporting) by the 100 largest U.S. cities. This research is important to establish a baseline against which to compare the growth of Internet reporting in light of this new effort by the GFOA. The official website addresses of the 100 largest (based on population figures from the 2000 census) U.S. cities were obtained through a search of the World Wide Web. Eighty percent of the largest cities use the recommended domain name convention (www.ci. - city name. - state abbreviation.us). The largest cities were nearly twice as likely (68% to 38%) to present both budget and CAFR data while smaller cities were nearly twice as likely to present budget data alone (46% to 24%). This lack of enthusiasm for CAFR data may be due to a perception by officials of smaller cities that they have less need to provide external validation of their performance to their citizens.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1533-1385</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Alexandria: Association of Government Accountants</publisher><subject>Annual reports ; Audited financial statements ; Budgets ; Cities ; Financial disclosure ; Financial reporting ; Government ; Internet access ; Municipal government ; Nonprofit organizations ; Polls & surveys ; Population ; Stockholders ; Websites ; World Wide Web</subject><ispartof>The journal of government financial management, 2004-07, Vol.53 (2), p.20</ispartof><rights>Copyright Association of Government Accountants Summer 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Groff, James E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pitman, Marshall K</creatorcontrib><title>Municipal Financial Reporting on the World Wide Web: A Survey of Financial Data Displayed on the Official Websites of the 100 Largest U.S. Municipalities</title><title>The journal of government financial management</title><description>This article documents the status of Internet financial reporting (budgets, CAFRs and popular reporting) by the 100 largest U.S. cities. This research is important to establish a baseline against which to compare the growth of Internet reporting in light of this new effort by the GFOA. The official website addresses of the 100 largest (based on population figures from the 2000 census) U.S. cities were obtained through a search of the World Wide Web. Eighty percent of the largest cities use the recommended domain name convention (www.ci. - city name. - state abbreviation.us). The largest cities were nearly twice as likely (68% to 38%) to present both budget and CAFR data while smaller cities were nearly twice as likely to present budget data alone (46% to 24%). This lack of enthusiasm for CAFR data may be due to a perception by officials of smaller cities that they have less need to provide external validation of their performance to their citizens.</description><subject>Annual reports</subject><subject>Audited financial statements</subject><subject>Budgets</subject><subject>Cities</subject><subject>Financial disclosure</subject><subject>Financial reporting</subject><subject>Government</subject><subject>Internet access</subject><subject>Municipal government</subject><subject>Nonprofit organizations</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Stockholders</subject><subject>Websites</subject><subject>World Wide Web</subject><issn>1533-1385</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjskKwjAURbNQcPyHh3slbajTThxwoQgOuJRoX_VJSWqSCn6Kf2sUFZeu7oVzD9wCKweREM1AdKMSq1h75jwIRY-X2X2eKzpQJlOYkJLqQL4tMdPGkTqCVuBOCFtt0hi2FPuK-z4MYJWbK95AJz_aSDoJI7JZKm8Yf9xFktALe9OSQ_uUniDgHGbSHNE62LRWLfheIUdoa6yYyNRi_Z1V1piM18NpMzP6kntpd9a5UR7twjAUnShqt8VfowcrcFY0</recordid><startdate>20040701</startdate><enddate>20040701</enddate><creator>Groff, James E</creator><creator>Pitman, Marshall K</creator><general>Association of Government Accountants</general><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4S-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X1</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8A9</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRAZJ</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040701</creationdate><title>Municipal Financial Reporting on the World Wide Web: A Survey of Financial Data Displayed on the Official Websites of the 100 Largest U.S. Municipalities</title><author>Groff, James E ; Pitman, Marshall K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_2223755663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Annual reports</topic><topic>Audited financial statements</topic><topic>Budgets</topic><topic>Cities</topic><topic>Financial disclosure</topic><topic>Financial reporting</topic><topic>Government</topic><topic>Internet access</topic><topic>Municipal government</topic><topic>Nonprofit organizations</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Stockholders</topic><topic>Websites</topic><topic>World Wide Web</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Groff, James E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pitman, Marshall K</creatorcontrib><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>BPIR.com Limited</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Accounting & Tax Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Accounting & Tax Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>The journal of government financial management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Groff, James E</au><au>Pitman, Marshall K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Municipal Financial Reporting on the World Wide Web: A Survey of Financial Data Displayed on the Official Websites of the 100 Largest U.S. Municipalities</atitle><jtitle>The journal of government financial management</jtitle><date>2004-07-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>20</spage><pages>20-</pages><issn>1533-1385</issn><abstract>This article documents the status of Internet financial reporting (budgets, CAFRs and popular reporting) by the 100 largest U.S. cities. This research is important to establish a baseline against which to compare the growth of Internet reporting in light of this new effort by the GFOA. The official website addresses of the 100 largest (based on population figures from the 2000 census) U.S. cities were obtained through a search of the World Wide Web. Eighty percent of the largest cities use the recommended domain name convention (www.ci. - city name. - state abbreviation.us). The largest cities were nearly twice as likely (68% to 38%) to present both budget and CAFR data while smaller cities were nearly twice as likely to present budget data alone (46% to 24%). This lack of enthusiasm for CAFR data may be due to a perception by officials of smaller cities that they have less need to provide external validation of their performance to their citizens.</abstract><cop>Alexandria</cop><pub>Association of Government Accountants</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1533-1385 |
ispartof | The journal of government financial management, 2004-07, Vol.53 (2), p.20 |
issn | 1533-1385 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_222375566 |
source | EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
subjects | Annual reports Audited financial statements Budgets Cities Financial disclosure Financial reporting Government Internet access Municipal government Nonprofit organizations Polls & surveys Population Stockholders Websites World Wide Web |
title | Municipal Financial Reporting on the World Wide Web: A Survey of Financial Data Displayed on the Official Websites of the 100 Largest U.S. Municipalities |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T22%3A27%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Municipal%20Financial%20Reporting%20on%20the%20World%20Wide%20Web:%20A%20Survey%20of%20Financial%20Data%20Displayed%20on%20the%20Official%20Websites%20of%20the%20100%20Largest%20U.S.%20Municipalities&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20government%20financial%20management&rft.au=Groff,%20James%20E&rft.date=2004-07-01&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=20&rft.pages=20-&rft.issn=1533-1385&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E656512851%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=222375566&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |