“The Battle is on”: Lakatos, Feyerabend, and the student protests
This paper shows how late 1960’s student protests influenced the thought of Imre Lakatos and Paul Feyerabend. I argue that student movements shaped their work from this period, specifically Lakatos’s “Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes” and Feyerabend’s Against Metho...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal for philosophy of science 2019-05, Vol.9 (2), Article 28 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | European journal for philosophy of science |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Martin, Eric C. |
description | This paper shows how late 1960’s student protests influenced the thought of Imre Lakatos and Paul Feyerabend. I argue that student movements shaped their work from this period, specifically Lakatos’s “Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes” and Feyerabend’s
Against Method
. Archival evidence shows that their political environments at London and Berkeley inflected their writing on scientific method, entrenching Lakatos’s search for a rationalist account of scientific development, and encouraging Feyerabend’s ‘anarchistic’ theory of knowledge. I document this influence and draw two broader lessons: one lesson about the role of biography in philosophy and the other about the historiography of student protests. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s13194-019-0251-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2223206977</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2223206977</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-567d8673efdf0e29d5bc267e0c5e97a396302074b8b96dc0698ba56b66654f953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kLFOwzAQhi0EElXpA7BZYm3gbMd2zAZVC0iVWMpsObEDLSUptjtk64PQl-uT4CoIJqa74fvuP_0IXRK4JgDyJhBGVJ4BURlQTrLuBA1IIVWWKwqnvzuh52gUwgoAKFAqQQzQ9LD7Wrw5fG9iXDu8DLhtDrv9LZ6bdxPbMMYz1zlvStfYMTaNxTHRIW6tayLe-Da6EMMFOqvNOrjRzxyil9l0MXnM5s8PT5O7eVYxImLGhbSFkMzVtgZHleVlRYV0UHGnpGFKsPSZzMuiVMJWIFRRGi5KIQTPa8XZEF31d1Pw5zYl61W79U2K1JRSRpMhZaJIT1W-DcG7Wm_88sP4ThPQx8J0X5hOheljYbpLDu2dkNjm1fm_y_9L3zNYbfE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2223206977</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>“The Battle is on”: Lakatos, Feyerabend, and the student protests</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Martin, Eric C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Martin, Eric C.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper shows how late 1960’s student protests influenced the thought of Imre Lakatos and Paul Feyerabend. I argue that student movements shaped their work from this period, specifically Lakatos’s “Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes” and Feyerabend’s
Against Method
. Archival evidence shows that their political environments at London and Berkeley inflected their writing on scientific method, entrenching Lakatos’s search for a rationalist account of scientific development, and encouraging Feyerabend’s ‘anarchistic’ theory of knowledge. I document this influence and draw two broader lessons: one lesson about the role of biography in philosophy and the other about the historiography of student protests.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1879-4912</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-4920</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s13194-019-0251-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Biographies ; Education ; Paper in History and Philosophy of Science ; Philosophy ; Philosophy of Science ; Students</subject><ispartof>European journal for philosophy of science, 2019-05, Vol.9 (2), Article 28</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2019</rights><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2019.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-567d8673efdf0e29d5bc267e0c5e97a396302074b8b96dc0698ba56b66654f953</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-567d8673efdf0e29d5bc267e0c5e97a396302074b8b96dc0698ba56b66654f953</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7171-548X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13194-019-0251-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13194-019-0251-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Martin, Eric C.</creatorcontrib><title>“The Battle is on”: Lakatos, Feyerabend, and the student protests</title><title>European journal for philosophy of science</title><addtitle>Euro Jnl Phil Sci</addtitle><description>This paper shows how late 1960’s student protests influenced the thought of Imre Lakatos and Paul Feyerabend. I argue that student movements shaped their work from this period, specifically Lakatos’s “Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes” and Feyerabend’s
Against Method
. Archival evidence shows that their political environments at London and Berkeley inflected their writing on scientific method, entrenching Lakatos’s search for a rationalist account of scientific development, and encouraging Feyerabend’s ‘anarchistic’ theory of knowledge. I document this influence and draw two broader lessons: one lesson about the role of biography in philosophy and the other about the historiography of student protests.</description><subject>Biographies</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Paper in History and Philosophy of Science</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Philosophy of Science</subject><subject>Students</subject><issn>1879-4912</issn><issn>1879-4920</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kLFOwzAQhi0EElXpA7BZYm3gbMd2zAZVC0iVWMpsObEDLSUptjtk64PQl-uT4CoIJqa74fvuP_0IXRK4JgDyJhBGVJ4BURlQTrLuBA1IIVWWKwqnvzuh52gUwgoAKFAqQQzQ9LD7Wrw5fG9iXDu8DLhtDrv9LZ6bdxPbMMYz1zlvStfYMTaNxTHRIW6tayLe-Da6EMMFOqvNOrjRzxyil9l0MXnM5s8PT5O7eVYxImLGhbSFkMzVtgZHleVlRYV0UHGnpGFKsPSZzMuiVMJWIFRRGi5KIQTPa8XZEF31d1Pw5zYl61W79U2K1JRSRpMhZaJIT1W-DcG7Wm_88sP4ThPQx8J0X5hOheljYbpLDu2dkNjm1fm_y_9L3zNYbfE</recordid><startdate>20190501</startdate><enddate>20190501</enddate><creator>Martin, Eric C.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7171-548X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190501</creationdate><title>“The Battle is on”: Lakatos, Feyerabend, and the student protests</title><author>Martin, Eric C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-567d8673efdf0e29d5bc267e0c5e97a396302074b8b96dc0698ba56b66654f953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Biographies</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Paper in History and Philosophy of Science</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Philosophy of Science</topic><topic>Students</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Martin, Eric C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>European journal for philosophy of science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Martin, Eric C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>“The Battle is on”: Lakatos, Feyerabend, and the student protests</atitle><jtitle>European journal for philosophy of science</jtitle><stitle>Euro Jnl Phil Sci</stitle><date>2019-05-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>2</issue><artnum>28</artnum><issn>1879-4912</issn><eissn>1879-4920</eissn><abstract>This paper shows how late 1960’s student protests influenced the thought of Imre Lakatos and Paul Feyerabend. I argue that student movements shaped their work from this period, specifically Lakatos’s “Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes” and Feyerabend’s
Against Method
. Archival evidence shows that their political environments at London and Berkeley inflected their writing on scientific method, entrenching Lakatos’s search for a rationalist account of scientific development, and encouraging Feyerabend’s ‘anarchistic’ theory of knowledge. I document this influence and draw two broader lessons: one lesson about the role of biography in philosophy and the other about the historiography of student protests.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s13194-019-0251-y</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7171-548X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1879-4912 |
ispartof | European journal for philosophy of science, 2019-05, Vol.9 (2), Article 28 |
issn | 1879-4912 1879-4920 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2223206977 |
source | SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Biographies Education Paper in History and Philosophy of Science Philosophy Philosophy of Science Students |
title | “The Battle is on”: Lakatos, Feyerabend, and the student protests |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T01%3A58%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E2%80%9CThe%20Battle%20is%20on%E2%80%9D:%20Lakatos,%20Feyerabend,%20and%20the%20student%20protests&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20for%20philosophy%20of%20science&rft.au=Martin,%20Eric%20C.&rft.date=2019-05-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=2&rft.artnum=28&rft.issn=1879-4912&rft.eissn=1879-4920&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s13194-019-0251-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2223206977%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2223206977&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |