Real resource utilization in banking, economies of scope, and the relationship between retail loans and deposits

Even though non-interest expenses on physical capital and labor comprise at least 40 percent of banks’ total costs, much of the banking literature entirely ignores real resource costs. This paper shows that whenever banks realize economies of scope in the use of resources, banks’ balance-sheet choic...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Economics letters 2019-04, Vol.177, p.39-42
Hauptverfasser: Dia, Enzo, VanHoose, David
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 42
container_issue
container_start_page 39
container_title Economics letters
container_volume 177
creator Dia, Enzo
VanHoose, David
description Even though non-interest expenses on physical capital and labor comprise at least 40 percent of banks’ total costs, much of the banking literature entirely ignores real resource costs. This paper shows that whenever banks realize economies of scope in the use of resources, banks’ balance-sheet choices are inextricably linked to their decisions regarding employment of capital and labor and demonstrates that the intensity of capital utilization must be systematically related to the loan-deposit ratio. Based on U.S. banking data, we provide empirical evidence supporting this prediction. •We model the role of resource costs in banking.•When loans and deposits require specialized resources, portfolio separation holds.•When resources are jointly used, capital intensity and loan-deposit ratio share a trend.•A panel data estimation supports the approach.•Aggregate time-series data support the approach as the series are cointegrated.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.econlet.2019.01.018
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2222921782</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0165176519300242</els_id><sourcerecordid>2222921782</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-afa562d3b2abdd558a49e44616b522c561f0dbac4cf0dd72efffe42b6062ddd93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkFtLAzEQhYMoWKs_QQj42l2T7GYvTyLFGxQE0eeQTWZt6jZZk1TRX296eXcYGBjON4c5CF1SklNCq-tVDsrZAWLOCG1zQlM3R2hCm7rI6qIuj9Ek6XhG64qforMQVoRQ1tZ8gsYXkAP2ENzGK8CbaAbzK6NxFhuLO2k_jH2f4a2BWxsI2PU4KDfCDEurcVxCgocdEJZmxB3EbwCbllGaAQ9O2rBTahhdMDGco5NeDgEuDnOK3u7vXueP2eL54Wl-u8hUSVjMZC95xXTRMdlpzXkjyxbKsqJVxxlTvKI90Z1UpUpT1wz6voeSdRVJlNZtMUVX-7ujd58bCFGs0os2WQqWqmW0blhS8b1KeReCh16M3qyl_xGUiG24YiUO4YptuILQ1E3ibvYcpBe-DHgRlAGrQBsPKgrtzD8X_gCHoIhD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2222921782</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Real resource utilization in banking, economies of scope, and the relationship between retail loans and deposits</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Dia, Enzo ; VanHoose, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Dia, Enzo ; VanHoose, David</creatorcontrib><description>Even though non-interest expenses on physical capital and labor comprise at least 40 percent of banks’ total costs, much of the banking literature entirely ignores real resource costs. This paper shows that whenever banks realize economies of scope in the use of resources, banks’ balance-sheet choices are inextricably linked to their decisions regarding employment of capital and labor and demonstrates that the intensity of capital utilization must be systematically related to the loan-deposit ratio. Based on U.S. banking data, we provide empirical evidence supporting this prediction. •We model the role of resource costs in banking.•When loans and deposits require specialized resources, portfolio separation holds.•When resources are jointly used, capital intensity and loan-deposit ratio share a trend.•A panel data estimation supports the approach.•Aggregate time-series data support the approach as the series are cointegrated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-1765</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7374</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2019.01.018</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Balance sheets ; Bank loan-deposit ratio ; Bank loans ; Bank physical capital intensity ; Banking ; Banking industry ; Capital structure ; Economies of scope ; Employment ; Labor ; Loans</subject><ispartof>Economics letters, 2019-04, Vol.177, p.39-42</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Apr 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-afa562d3b2abdd558a49e44616b522c561f0dbac4cf0dd72efffe42b6062ddd93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-afa562d3b2abdd558a49e44616b522c561f0dbac4cf0dd72efffe42b6062ddd93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165176519300242$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dia, Enzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VanHoose, David</creatorcontrib><title>Real resource utilization in banking, economies of scope, and the relationship between retail loans and deposits</title><title>Economics letters</title><description>Even though non-interest expenses on physical capital and labor comprise at least 40 percent of banks’ total costs, much of the banking literature entirely ignores real resource costs. This paper shows that whenever banks realize economies of scope in the use of resources, banks’ balance-sheet choices are inextricably linked to their decisions regarding employment of capital and labor and demonstrates that the intensity of capital utilization must be systematically related to the loan-deposit ratio. Based on U.S. banking data, we provide empirical evidence supporting this prediction. •We model the role of resource costs in banking.•When loans and deposits require specialized resources, portfolio separation holds.•When resources are jointly used, capital intensity and loan-deposit ratio share a trend.•A panel data estimation supports the approach.•Aggregate time-series data support the approach as the series are cointegrated.</description><subject>Balance sheets</subject><subject>Bank loan-deposit ratio</subject><subject>Bank loans</subject><subject>Bank physical capital intensity</subject><subject>Banking</subject><subject>Banking industry</subject><subject>Capital structure</subject><subject>Economies of scope</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Labor</subject><subject>Loans</subject><issn>0165-1765</issn><issn>1873-7374</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkFtLAzEQhYMoWKs_QQj42l2T7GYvTyLFGxQE0eeQTWZt6jZZk1TRX296eXcYGBjON4c5CF1SklNCq-tVDsrZAWLOCG1zQlM3R2hCm7rI6qIuj9Ek6XhG64qforMQVoRQ1tZ8gsYXkAP2ENzGK8CbaAbzK6NxFhuLO2k_jH2f4a2BWxsI2PU4KDfCDEurcVxCgocdEJZmxB3EbwCbllGaAQ9O2rBTahhdMDGco5NeDgEuDnOK3u7vXueP2eL54Wl-u8hUSVjMZC95xXTRMdlpzXkjyxbKsqJVxxlTvKI90Z1UpUpT1wz6voeSdRVJlNZtMUVX-7ujd58bCFGs0os2WQqWqmW0blhS8b1KeReCh16M3qyl_xGUiG24YiUO4YptuILQ1E3ibvYcpBe-DHgRlAGrQBsPKgrtzD8X_gCHoIhD</recordid><startdate>20190401</startdate><enddate>20190401</enddate><creator>Dia, Enzo</creator><creator>VanHoose, David</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190401</creationdate><title>Real resource utilization in banking, economies of scope, and the relationship between retail loans and deposits</title><author>Dia, Enzo ; VanHoose, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-afa562d3b2abdd558a49e44616b522c561f0dbac4cf0dd72efffe42b6062ddd93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Balance sheets</topic><topic>Bank loan-deposit ratio</topic><topic>Bank loans</topic><topic>Bank physical capital intensity</topic><topic>Banking</topic><topic>Banking industry</topic><topic>Capital structure</topic><topic>Economies of scope</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Labor</topic><topic>Loans</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dia, Enzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VanHoose, David</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Economics letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dia, Enzo</au><au>VanHoose, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Real resource utilization in banking, economies of scope, and the relationship between retail loans and deposits</atitle><jtitle>Economics letters</jtitle><date>2019-04-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>177</volume><spage>39</spage><epage>42</epage><pages>39-42</pages><issn>0165-1765</issn><eissn>1873-7374</eissn><abstract>Even though non-interest expenses on physical capital and labor comprise at least 40 percent of banks’ total costs, much of the banking literature entirely ignores real resource costs. This paper shows that whenever banks realize economies of scope in the use of resources, banks’ balance-sheet choices are inextricably linked to their decisions regarding employment of capital and labor and demonstrates that the intensity of capital utilization must be systematically related to the loan-deposit ratio. Based on U.S. banking data, we provide empirical evidence supporting this prediction. •We model the role of resource costs in banking.•When loans and deposits require specialized resources, portfolio separation holds.•When resources are jointly used, capital intensity and loan-deposit ratio share a trend.•A panel data estimation supports the approach.•Aggregate time-series data support the approach as the series are cointegrated.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.econlet.2019.01.018</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0165-1765
ispartof Economics letters, 2019-04, Vol.177, p.39-42
issn 0165-1765
1873-7374
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2222921782
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Balance sheets
Bank loan-deposit ratio
Bank loans
Bank physical capital intensity
Banking
Banking industry
Capital structure
Economies of scope
Employment
Labor
Loans
title Real resource utilization in banking, economies of scope, and the relationship between retail loans and deposits
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T17%3A28%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Real%20resource%20utilization%20in%20banking,%20economies%20of%20scope,%20and%20the%20relationship%20between%20retail%20loans%20and%20deposits&rft.jtitle=Economics%20letters&rft.au=Dia,%20Enzo&rft.date=2019-04-01&rft.volume=177&rft.spage=39&rft.epage=42&rft.pages=39-42&rft.issn=0165-1765&rft.eissn=1873-7374&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.econlet.2019.01.018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2222921782%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2222921782&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0165176519300242&rfr_iscdi=true