Real resource utilization in banking, economies of scope, and the relationship between retail loans and deposits
Even though non-interest expenses on physical capital and labor comprise at least 40 percent of banks’ total costs, much of the banking literature entirely ignores real resource costs. This paper shows that whenever banks realize economies of scope in the use of resources, banks’ balance-sheet choic...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Economics letters 2019-04, Vol.177, p.39-42 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 42 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 39 |
container_title | Economics letters |
container_volume | 177 |
creator | Dia, Enzo VanHoose, David |
description | Even though non-interest expenses on physical capital and labor comprise at least 40 percent of banks’ total costs, much of the banking literature entirely ignores real resource costs. This paper shows that whenever banks realize economies of scope in the use of resources, banks’ balance-sheet choices are inextricably linked to their decisions regarding employment of capital and labor and demonstrates that the intensity of capital utilization must be systematically related to the loan-deposit ratio. Based on U.S. banking data, we provide empirical evidence supporting this prediction.
•We model the role of resource costs in banking.•When loans and deposits require specialized resources, portfolio separation holds.•When resources are jointly used, capital intensity and loan-deposit ratio share a trend.•A panel data estimation supports the approach.•Aggregate time-series data support the approach as the series are cointegrated. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.econlet.2019.01.018 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2222921782</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0165176519300242</els_id><sourcerecordid>2222921782</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-afa562d3b2abdd558a49e44616b522c561f0dbac4cf0dd72efffe42b6062ddd93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkFtLAzEQhYMoWKs_QQj42l2T7GYvTyLFGxQE0eeQTWZt6jZZk1TRX296eXcYGBjON4c5CF1SklNCq-tVDsrZAWLOCG1zQlM3R2hCm7rI6qIuj9Ek6XhG64qforMQVoRQ1tZ8gsYXkAP2ENzGK8CbaAbzK6NxFhuLO2k_jH2f4a2BWxsI2PU4KDfCDEurcVxCgocdEJZmxB3EbwCbllGaAQ9O2rBTahhdMDGco5NeDgEuDnOK3u7vXueP2eL54Wl-u8hUSVjMZC95xXTRMdlpzXkjyxbKsqJVxxlTvKI90Z1UpUpT1wz6voeSdRVJlNZtMUVX-7ujd58bCFGs0os2WQqWqmW0blhS8b1KeReCh16M3qyl_xGUiG24YiUO4YptuILQ1E3ibvYcpBe-DHgRlAGrQBsPKgrtzD8X_gCHoIhD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2222921782</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Real resource utilization in banking, economies of scope, and the relationship between retail loans and deposits</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Dia, Enzo ; VanHoose, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Dia, Enzo ; VanHoose, David</creatorcontrib><description>Even though non-interest expenses on physical capital and labor comprise at least 40 percent of banks’ total costs, much of the banking literature entirely ignores real resource costs. This paper shows that whenever banks realize economies of scope in the use of resources, banks’ balance-sheet choices are inextricably linked to their decisions regarding employment of capital and labor and demonstrates that the intensity of capital utilization must be systematically related to the loan-deposit ratio. Based on U.S. banking data, we provide empirical evidence supporting this prediction.
•We model the role of resource costs in banking.•When loans and deposits require specialized resources, portfolio separation holds.•When resources are jointly used, capital intensity and loan-deposit ratio share a trend.•A panel data estimation supports the approach.•Aggregate time-series data support the approach as the series are cointegrated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-1765</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7374</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2019.01.018</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Balance sheets ; Bank loan-deposit ratio ; Bank loans ; Bank physical capital intensity ; Banking ; Banking industry ; Capital structure ; Economies of scope ; Employment ; Labor ; Loans</subject><ispartof>Economics letters, 2019-04, Vol.177, p.39-42</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Apr 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-afa562d3b2abdd558a49e44616b522c561f0dbac4cf0dd72efffe42b6062ddd93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-afa562d3b2abdd558a49e44616b522c561f0dbac4cf0dd72efffe42b6062ddd93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165176519300242$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dia, Enzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VanHoose, David</creatorcontrib><title>Real resource utilization in banking, economies of scope, and the relationship between retail loans and deposits</title><title>Economics letters</title><description>Even though non-interest expenses on physical capital and labor comprise at least 40 percent of banks’ total costs, much of the banking literature entirely ignores real resource costs. This paper shows that whenever banks realize economies of scope in the use of resources, banks’ balance-sheet choices are inextricably linked to their decisions regarding employment of capital and labor and demonstrates that the intensity of capital utilization must be systematically related to the loan-deposit ratio. Based on U.S. banking data, we provide empirical evidence supporting this prediction.
•We model the role of resource costs in banking.•When loans and deposits require specialized resources, portfolio separation holds.•When resources are jointly used, capital intensity and loan-deposit ratio share a trend.•A panel data estimation supports the approach.•Aggregate time-series data support the approach as the series are cointegrated.</description><subject>Balance sheets</subject><subject>Bank loan-deposit ratio</subject><subject>Bank loans</subject><subject>Bank physical capital intensity</subject><subject>Banking</subject><subject>Banking industry</subject><subject>Capital structure</subject><subject>Economies of scope</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Labor</subject><subject>Loans</subject><issn>0165-1765</issn><issn>1873-7374</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkFtLAzEQhYMoWKs_QQj42l2T7GYvTyLFGxQE0eeQTWZt6jZZk1TRX296eXcYGBjON4c5CF1SklNCq-tVDsrZAWLOCG1zQlM3R2hCm7rI6qIuj9Ek6XhG64qforMQVoRQ1tZ8gsYXkAP2ENzGK8CbaAbzK6NxFhuLO2k_jH2f4a2BWxsI2PU4KDfCDEurcVxCgocdEJZmxB3EbwCbllGaAQ9O2rBTahhdMDGco5NeDgEuDnOK3u7vXueP2eL54Wl-u8hUSVjMZC95xXTRMdlpzXkjyxbKsqJVxxlTvKI90Z1UpUpT1wz6voeSdRVJlNZtMUVX-7ujd58bCFGs0os2WQqWqmW0blhS8b1KeReCh16M3qyl_xGUiG24YiUO4YptuILQ1E3ibvYcpBe-DHgRlAGrQBsPKgrtzD8X_gCHoIhD</recordid><startdate>20190401</startdate><enddate>20190401</enddate><creator>Dia, Enzo</creator><creator>VanHoose, David</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190401</creationdate><title>Real resource utilization in banking, economies of scope, and the relationship between retail loans and deposits</title><author>Dia, Enzo ; VanHoose, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-afa562d3b2abdd558a49e44616b522c561f0dbac4cf0dd72efffe42b6062ddd93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Balance sheets</topic><topic>Bank loan-deposit ratio</topic><topic>Bank loans</topic><topic>Bank physical capital intensity</topic><topic>Banking</topic><topic>Banking industry</topic><topic>Capital structure</topic><topic>Economies of scope</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Labor</topic><topic>Loans</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dia, Enzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VanHoose, David</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Economics letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dia, Enzo</au><au>VanHoose, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Real resource utilization in banking, economies of scope, and the relationship between retail loans and deposits</atitle><jtitle>Economics letters</jtitle><date>2019-04-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>177</volume><spage>39</spage><epage>42</epage><pages>39-42</pages><issn>0165-1765</issn><eissn>1873-7374</eissn><abstract>Even though non-interest expenses on physical capital and labor comprise at least 40 percent of banks’ total costs, much of the banking literature entirely ignores real resource costs. This paper shows that whenever banks realize economies of scope in the use of resources, banks’ balance-sheet choices are inextricably linked to their decisions regarding employment of capital and labor and demonstrates that the intensity of capital utilization must be systematically related to the loan-deposit ratio. Based on U.S. banking data, we provide empirical evidence supporting this prediction.
•We model the role of resource costs in banking.•When loans and deposits require specialized resources, portfolio separation holds.•When resources are jointly used, capital intensity and loan-deposit ratio share a trend.•A panel data estimation supports the approach.•Aggregate time-series data support the approach as the series are cointegrated.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.econlet.2019.01.018</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0165-1765 |
ispartof | Economics letters, 2019-04, Vol.177, p.39-42 |
issn | 0165-1765 1873-7374 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2222921782 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Balance sheets Bank loan-deposit ratio Bank loans Bank physical capital intensity Banking Banking industry Capital structure Economies of scope Employment Labor Loans |
title | Real resource utilization in banking, economies of scope, and the relationship between retail loans and deposits |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T17%3A28%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Real%20resource%20utilization%20in%20banking,%20economies%20of%20scope,%20and%20the%20relationship%20between%20retail%20loans%20and%20deposits&rft.jtitle=Economics%20letters&rft.au=Dia,%20Enzo&rft.date=2019-04-01&rft.volume=177&rft.spage=39&rft.epage=42&rft.pages=39-42&rft.issn=0165-1765&rft.eissn=1873-7374&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.econlet.2019.01.018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2222921782%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2222921782&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0165176519300242&rfr_iscdi=true |