Process mining for self-regulated learning assessment in e-learning

Content assessment has broadly improved in e-learning scenarios in recent decades. However, the e-Learning process can give rise to a spatial and temporal gap that poses interesting challenges for assessment of not only content, but also students’ acquisition of core skills such as self-regulated le...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of computing in higher education 2020-04, Vol.32 (1), p.74-88
Hauptverfasser: Cerezo, Rebeca, Bogarín, Alejandro, Esteban, María, Romero, Cristóbal
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 88
container_issue 1
container_start_page 74
container_title Journal of computing in higher education
container_volume 32
creator Cerezo, Rebeca
Bogarín, Alejandro
Esteban, María
Romero, Cristóbal
description Content assessment has broadly improved in e-learning scenarios in recent decades. However, the e-Learning process can give rise to a spatial and temporal gap that poses interesting challenges for assessment of not only content, but also students’ acquisition of core skills such as self-regulated learning. Our objective was to discover students’ self-regulated learning processes during an e-Learning course by using Process Mining Techniques. We applied a new algorithm in the educational domain called Inductive Miner over the interaction traces from 101 university students in a course given over one semester on the Moodle 2.0 platform. Data was extracted from the platform’s event logs with 21,629 traces in order to discover students’ self-regulation models that contribute to improving the instructional process. The Inductive Miner algorithm discovered optimal models in terms of fitness for both Pass and Fail students in this dataset, as well as models at a certain level of granularity that can be interpreted in educational terms, which are the most important achievement in model discovery. We can conclude that although students who passed did not follow the instructors’ suggestions exactly, they did follow the logic of a successful self-regulated learning process as opposed to their failing classmates. The Process Mining models also allow us to examine which specific actions the students performed, and it was particularly interesting to see a high presence of actions related to forum-supported collaborative learning in the Pass group and an absence of those in the Fail group.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s12528-019-09225-y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2222865773</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1246053</ericid><sourcerecordid>2222865773</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-20b304f5fa67b13869cd5537cbf5de90c98076f82d1604903eba781dfa54e0c33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1LAzEQxYMoWKv_gCAseI5Oks3HHqXUqhT0oOeQzU7Klu1uTbaH_vduu37cnMsM_N57A4-QawZ3DEDfJ8YlNxRYQaHgXNL9CZkwozRlXIjT4YacU6a5OicXKa0BBBhRTMjsLXYeU8o2dVu3qyx0MUvYBBpxtWtcj1XWoItH5lIalBts-6xuM6Q_4JKcBdckvPreU_LxOH-fPdHl6-J59rCkXuSspxxKAXmQwSldMmFU4SsphfZlkBUW4AsDWgXDK6YgL0Bg6bRhVXAyR_BCTMntmLuN3ecOU2_X3S62w0vLhzFKan1Q8VHlY5dSxGC3sd64uLcM7KEsO5Zlh7LssSy7H0w3owlj7X8N8xfGcwXyECpGngbWrjD-vf4n9QsBE3ZA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2222865773</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Process mining for self-regulated learning assessment in e-learning</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Cerezo, Rebeca ; Bogarín, Alejandro ; Esteban, María ; Romero, Cristóbal</creator><creatorcontrib>Cerezo, Rebeca ; Bogarín, Alejandro ; Esteban, María ; Romero, Cristóbal</creatorcontrib><description>Content assessment has broadly improved in e-learning scenarios in recent decades. However, the e-Learning process can give rise to a spatial and temporal gap that poses interesting challenges for assessment of not only content, but also students’ acquisition of core skills such as self-regulated learning. Our objective was to discover students’ self-regulated learning processes during an e-Learning course by using Process Mining Techniques. We applied a new algorithm in the educational domain called Inductive Miner over the interaction traces from 101 university students in a course given over one semester on the Moodle 2.0 platform. Data was extracted from the platform’s event logs with 21,629 traces in order to discover students’ self-regulation models that contribute to improving the instructional process. The Inductive Miner algorithm discovered optimal models in terms of fitness for both Pass and Fail students in this dataset, as well as models at a certain level of granularity that can be interpreted in educational terms, which are the most important achievement in model discovery. We can conclude that although students who passed did not follow the instructors’ suggestions exactly, they did follow the logic of a successful self-regulated learning process as opposed to their failing classmates. The Process Mining models also allow us to examine which specific actions the students performed, and it was particularly interesting to see a high presence of actions related to forum-supported collaborative learning in the Pass group and an absence of those in the Fail group.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1042-1726</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1867-1233</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12528-019-09225-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; College Students ; Colleges &amp; universities ; Computer Mediated Communication ; Cooperative Learning ; Data Analysis ; Distance learning ; Education ; Educational Technology ; Electronic Learning ; Evaluation Methods ; Fitness ; Higher Education ; Integrated Learning Systems ; Learning ; Learning and Instruction ; Learning Processes ; Machine learning ; Mathematics ; Online instruction ; Pass Fail Grading ; Self Management ; Student Behavior ; Students ; Teachers</subject><ispartof>Journal of computing in higher education, 2020-04, Vol.32 (1), p.74-88</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019</rights><rights>Journal of Computing in Higher Education is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-20b304f5fa67b13869cd5537cbf5de90c98076f82d1604903eba781dfa54e0c33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-20b304f5fa67b13869cd5537cbf5de90c98076f82d1604903eba781dfa54e0c33</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2253-106X ; 0000-0002-1100-335X ; 0000-0003-4180-4948</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12528-019-09225-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12528-019-09225-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1246053$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cerezo, Rebeca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bogarín, Alejandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esteban, María</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romero, Cristóbal</creatorcontrib><title>Process mining for self-regulated learning assessment in e-learning</title><title>Journal of computing in higher education</title><addtitle>J Comput High Educ</addtitle><description>Content assessment has broadly improved in e-learning scenarios in recent decades. However, the e-Learning process can give rise to a spatial and temporal gap that poses interesting challenges for assessment of not only content, but also students’ acquisition of core skills such as self-regulated learning. Our objective was to discover students’ self-regulated learning processes during an e-Learning course by using Process Mining Techniques. We applied a new algorithm in the educational domain called Inductive Miner over the interaction traces from 101 university students in a course given over one semester on the Moodle 2.0 platform. Data was extracted from the platform’s event logs with 21,629 traces in order to discover students’ self-regulation models that contribute to improving the instructional process. The Inductive Miner algorithm discovered optimal models in terms of fitness for both Pass and Fail students in this dataset, as well as models at a certain level of granularity that can be interpreted in educational terms, which are the most important achievement in model discovery. We can conclude that although students who passed did not follow the instructors’ suggestions exactly, they did follow the logic of a successful self-regulated learning process as opposed to their failing classmates. The Process Mining models also allow us to examine which specific actions the students performed, and it was particularly interesting to see a high presence of actions related to forum-supported collaborative learning in the Pass group and an absence of those in the Fail group.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Colleges &amp; universities</subject><subject>Computer Mediated Communication</subject><subject>Cooperative Learning</subject><subject>Data Analysis</subject><subject>Distance learning</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Technology</subject><subject>Electronic Learning</subject><subject>Evaluation Methods</subject><subject>Fitness</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Integrated Learning Systems</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning and Instruction</subject><subject>Learning Processes</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Mathematics</subject><subject>Online instruction</subject><subject>Pass Fail Grading</subject><subject>Self Management</subject><subject>Student Behavior</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><issn>1042-1726</issn><issn>1867-1233</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1LAzEQxYMoWKv_gCAseI5Oks3HHqXUqhT0oOeQzU7Klu1uTbaH_vduu37cnMsM_N57A4-QawZ3DEDfJ8YlNxRYQaHgXNL9CZkwozRlXIjT4YacU6a5OicXKa0BBBhRTMjsLXYeU8o2dVu3qyx0MUvYBBpxtWtcj1XWoItH5lIalBts-6xuM6Q_4JKcBdckvPreU_LxOH-fPdHl6-J59rCkXuSspxxKAXmQwSldMmFU4SsphfZlkBUW4AsDWgXDK6YgL0Bg6bRhVXAyR_BCTMntmLuN3ecOU2_X3S62w0vLhzFKan1Q8VHlY5dSxGC3sd64uLcM7KEsO5Zlh7LssSy7H0w3owlj7X8N8xfGcwXyECpGngbWrjD-vf4n9QsBE3ZA</recordid><startdate>20200401</startdate><enddate>20200401</enddate><creator>Cerezo, Rebeca</creator><creator>Bogarín, Alejandro</creator><creator>Esteban, María</creator><creator>Romero, Cristóbal</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2253-106X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1100-335X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4180-4948</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200401</creationdate><title>Process mining for self-regulated learning assessment in e-learning</title><author>Cerezo, Rebeca ; Bogarín, Alejandro ; Esteban, María ; Romero, Cristóbal</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-20b304f5fa67b13869cd5537cbf5de90c98076f82d1604903eba781dfa54e0c33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Colleges &amp; universities</topic><topic>Computer Mediated Communication</topic><topic>Cooperative Learning</topic><topic>Data Analysis</topic><topic>Distance learning</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Technology</topic><topic>Electronic Learning</topic><topic>Evaluation Methods</topic><topic>Fitness</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Integrated Learning Systems</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning and Instruction</topic><topic>Learning Processes</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Mathematics</topic><topic>Online instruction</topic><topic>Pass Fail Grading</topic><topic>Self Management</topic><topic>Student Behavior</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cerezo, Rebeca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bogarín, Alejandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esteban, María</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romero, Cristóbal</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of computing in higher education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cerezo, Rebeca</au><au>Bogarín, Alejandro</au><au>Esteban, María</au><au>Romero, Cristóbal</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1246053</ericid><atitle>Process mining for self-regulated learning assessment in e-learning</atitle><jtitle>Journal of computing in higher education</jtitle><stitle>J Comput High Educ</stitle><date>2020-04-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>74</spage><epage>88</epage><pages>74-88</pages><issn>1042-1726</issn><eissn>1867-1233</eissn><abstract>Content assessment has broadly improved in e-learning scenarios in recent decades. However, the e-Learning process can give rise to a spatial and temporal gap that poses interesting challenges for assessment of not only content, but also students’ acquisition of core skills such as self-regulated learning. Our objective was to discover students’ self-regulated learning processes during an e-Learning course by using Process Mining Techniques. We applied a new algorithm in the educational domain called Inductive Miner over the interaction traces from 101 university students in a course given over one semester on the Moodle 2.0 platform. Data was extracted from the platform’s event logs with 21,629 traces in order to discover students’ self-regulation models that contribute to improving the instructional process. The Inductive Miner algorithm discovered optimal models in terms of fitness for both Pass and Fail students in this dataset, as well as models at a certain level of granularity that can be interpreted in educational terms, which are the most important achievement in model discovery. We can conclude that although students who passed did not follow the instructors’ suggestions exactly, they did follow the logic of a successful self-regulated learning process as opposed to their failing classmates. The Process Mining models also allow us to examine which specific actions the students performed, and it was particularly interesting to see a high presence of actions related to forum-supported collaborative learning in the Pass group and an absence of those in the Fail group.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s12528-019-09225-y</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2253-106X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1100-335X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4180-4948</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1042-1726
ispartof Journal of computing in higher education, 2020-04, Vol.32 (1), p.74-88
issn 1042-1726
1867-1233
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2222865773
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Algorithms
College Students
Colleges & universities
Computer Mediated Communication
Cooperative Learning
Data Analysis
Distance learning
Education
Educational Technology
Electronic Learning
Evaluation Methods
Fitness
Higher Education
Integrated Learning Systems
Learning
Learning and Instruction
Learning Processes
Machine learning
Mathematics
Online instruction
Pass Fail Grading
Self Management
Student Behavior
Students
Teachers
title Process mining for self-regulated learning assessment in e-learning
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T23%3A08%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Process%20mining%20for%20self-regulated%20learning%20assessment%20in%20e-learning&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20computing%20in%20higher%20education&rft.au=Cerezo,%20Rebeca&rft.date=2020-04-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=74&rft.epage=88&rft.pages=74-88&rft.issn=1042-1726&rft.eissn=1867-1233&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12528-019-09225-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2222865773%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2222865773&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1246053&rfr_iscdi=true