Perpetuating Oppression: Does the Current Counseling Discourse Neutralize Social Action?
The counseling profession, by virtue of research, dialogue, and the evolution of professional ideology, continues to uphold the viewpoint that psychological distress and disorders emanate from innate or biologically based factors. Consequently, the social reality that counseling partially defines th...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal for social action in counseling and psychology 2012-04, Vol.4 (1), p.18-29 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 29 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 18 |
| container_title | Journal for social action in counseling and psychology |
| container_volume | 4 |
| creator | Greenleaf, Arie T. Bryant, Rhonda M. |
| description | The counseling profession, by virtue of research, dialogue, and the evolution of professional ideology, continues to uphold the viewpoint that psychological distress and disorders emanate from innate or biologically based factors. Consequently, the social reality that counseling partially defines through this discourse may inadvertently constrain the very movement that can most affect change through social action and engagement. Counseling professionals may unwittingly undercut attempts by oppressed individuals, groups, and their allies to create a more equitable and just society through civil disobedience and concerted social action. This article discusses how the current discourse on social justice may neutralize social action by reviewing discourse theory and presentation of a case study that offers strategies to operational discourse theory and support social action and engagement. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.33043/JSACP.4.1.18-29 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2222751585</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2222751585</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b1959-fd59acbce3f9641b883d8cd5fe94f2fea10281ec49a25702342f700fa057b8893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kL1PwzAQxS0EEhV0Z7TESoK_QmwWVKV8qqKVChKb5bhnSBWSYCcD_PW4LRIsvOVu-L13p4fQCSUp50Tw84flpFikIqUplQlTe2jEaKYSSQXb_7MfonEIaxLFlSAiH6GXBfgO-sH0VfOK513nIYSqbS7xtIWA-zfAxeA9ND0u2qEJUG-4aRVsO_gA-BGG3pu6-gK8bG1lajyxffRfHaMDZ-oA4595hJ5vrp-Ku2Q2v70vJrOkpCp-5VaZMra0wJ26ELSUkq-kXWUOlHDMgaGESQpWKMOynDAumMsJcYZkeYQVP0Knu9zOtx8DhF6v42dNPKlZVJ7RTGaRIjvK-jYED053vno3_lNTorcV6m2FWmiqqdRsE3y2s5Rh-M38F_8GRHRySQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2222751585</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Perpetuating Oppression: Does the Current Counseling Discourse Neutralize Social Action?</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Greenleaf, Arie T. ; Bryant, Rhonda M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Greenleaf, Arie T. ; Bryant, Rhonda M.</creatorcontrib><description>The counseling profession, by virtue of research, dialogue, and the evolution of professional ideology, continues to uphold the viewpoint that psychological distress and disorders emanate from innate or biologically based factors. Consequently, the social reality that counseling partially defines through this discourse may inadvertently constrain the very movement that can most affect change through social action and engagement. Counseling professionals may unwittingly undercut attempts by oppressed individuals, groups, and their allies to create a more equitable and just society through civil disobedience and concerted social action. This article discusses how the current discourse on social justice may neutralize social action by reviewing discourse theory and presentation of a case study that offers strategies to operational discourse theory and support social action and engagement.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2159-8142</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2159-8142</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.33043/JSACP.4.1.18-29</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Muncie: Ball State University</publisher><subject>Civil disobedience ; Counseling ; Discourse ; Morality ; Oppression ; Psychological distress ; Social action ; Social justice ; Social reality</subject><ispartof>Journal for social action in counseling and psychology, 2012-04, Vol.4 (1), p.18-29</ispartof><rights>2012. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b1959-fd59acbce3f9641b883d8cd5fe94f2fea10281ec49a25702342f700fa057b8893</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,12825,27901,27902,30976</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Greenleaf, Arie T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bryant, Rhonda M.</creatorcontrib><title>Perpetuating Oppression: Does the Current Counseling Discourse Neutralize Social Action?</title><title>Journal for social action in counseling and psychology</title><addtitle>jsacp</addtitle><description>The counseling profession, by virtue of research, dialogue, and the evolution of professional ideology, continues to uphold the viewpoint that psychological distress and disorders emanate from innate or biologically based factors. Consequently, the social reality that counseling partially defines through this discourse may inadvertently constrain the very movement that can most affect change through social action and engagement. Counseling professionals may unwittingly undercut attempts by oppressed individuals, groups, and their allies to create a more equitable and just society through civil disobedience and concerted social action. This article discusses how the current discourse on social justice may neutralize social action by reviewing discourse theory and presentation of a case study that offers strategies to operational discourse theory and support social action and engagement.</description><subject>Civil disobedience</subject><subject>Counseling</subject><subject>Discourse</subject><subject>Morality</subject><subject>Oppression</subject><subject>Psychological distress</subject><subject>Social action</subject><subject>Social justice</subject><subject>Social reality</subject><issn>2159-8142</issn><issn>2159-8142</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kL1PwzAQxS0EEhV0Z7TESoK_QmwWVKV8qqKVChKb5bhnSBWSYCcD_PW4LRIsvOVu-L13p4fQCSUp50Tw84flpFikIqUplQlTe2jEaKYSSQXb_7MfonEIaxLFlSAiH6GXBfgO-sH0VfOK513nIYSqbS7xtIWA-zfAxeA9ND0u2qEJUG-4aRVsO_gA-BGG3pu6-gK8bG1lajyxffRfHaMDZ-oA4595hJ5vrp-Ku2Q2v70vJrOkpCp-5VaZMra0wJ26ELSUkq-kXWUOlHDMgaGESQpWKMOynDAumMsJcYZkeYQVP0Knu9zOtx8DhF6v42dNPKlZVJ7RTGaRIjvK-jYED053vno3_lNTorcV6m2FWmiqqdRsE3y2s5Rh-M38F_8GRHRySQ</recordid><startdate>20120401</startdate><enddate>20120401</enddate><creator>Greenleaf, Arie T.</creator><creator>Bryant, Rhonda M.</creator><general>Ball State University</general><scope>AAXHK</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120401</creationdate><title>Perpetuating Oppression: Does the Current Counseling Discourse Neutralize Social Action?</title><author>Greenleaf, Arie T. ; Bryant, Rhonda M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b1959-fd59acbce3f9641b883d8cd5fe94f2fea10281ec49a25702342f700fa057b8893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Civil disobedience</topic><topic>Counseling</topic><topic>Discourse</topic><topic>Morality</topic><topic>Oppression</topic><topic>Psychological distress</topic><topic>Social action</topic><topic>Social justice</topic><topic>Social reality</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Greenleaf, Arie T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bryant, Rhonda M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Ball State Open Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal for social action in counseling and psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Greenleaf, Arie T.</au><au>Bryant, Rhonda M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Perpetuating Oppression: Does the Current Counseling Discourse Neutralize Social Action?</atitle><jtitle>Journal for social action in counseling and psychology</jtitle><stitle>jsacp</stitle><date>2012-04-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>18</spage><epage>29</epage><pages>18-29</pages><issn>2159-8142</issn><eissn>2159-8142</eissn><abstract>The counseling profession, by virtue of research, dialogue, and the evolution of professional ideology, continues to uphold the viewpoint that psychological distress and disorders emanate from innate or biologically based factors. Consequently, the social reality that counseling partially defines through this discourse may inadvertently constrain the very movement that can most affect change through social action and engagement. Counseling professionals may unwittingly undercut attempts by oppressed individuals, groups, and their allies to create a more equitable and just society through civil disobedience and concerted social action. This article discusses how the current discourse on social justice may neutralize social action by reviewing discourse theory and presentation of a case study that offers strategies to operational discourse theory and support social action and engagement.</abstract><cop>Muncie</cop><pub>Ball State University</pub><doi>10.33043/JSACP.4.1.18-29</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2159-8142 |
| ispartof | Journal for social action in counseling and psychology, 2012-04, Vol.4 (1), p.18-29 |
| issn | 2159-8142 2159-8142 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2222751585 |
| source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
| subjects | Civil disobedience Counseling Discourse Morality Oppression Psychological distress Social action Social justice Social reality |
| title | Perpetuating Oppression: Does the Current Counseling Discourse Neutralize Social Action? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T00%3A52%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Perpetuating%20Oppression:%20Does%20the%20Current%20Counseling%20Discourse%20Neutralize%20Social%20Action?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20for%20social%20action%20in%20counseling%20and%20psychology&rft.au=Greenleaf,%20Arie%20T.&rft.date=2012-04-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=18&rft.epage=29&rft.pages=18-29&rft.issn=2159-8142&rft.eissn=2159-8142&rft_id=info:doi/10.33043/JSACP.4.1.18-29&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2222751585%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2222751585&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |