Elevations in ostensibly anabolic hormones with resistance exercise enhance neither training-induced muscle hypertrophy nor strength of the elbow flexors

1 Exercise Metabolism Research Group, Department of Kinesiology; and ; 2 Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada Submitted 7 October 2009 ; accepted in final form 6 November 2009 The aim of our study was to determine whether resistance exercise-induced elevations in en...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of applied physiology (1985) 2010-01, Vol.108 (1), p.60-67
Hauptverfasser: West, Daniel W. D, Burd, Nicholas A, Tang, Jason E, Moore, Daniel R, Staples, Aaron W, Holwerda, Andrew M, Baker, Steven K, Phillips, Stuart M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:1 Exercise Metabolism Research Group, Department of Kinesiology; and ; 2 Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada Submitted 7 October 2009 ; accepted in final form 6 November 2009 The aim of our study was to determine whether resistance exercise-induced elevations in endogenous hormones enhance muscle strength and hypertrophy with training. Twelve healthy young men (21.8 ± 1.2 yr, body mass index = 23.1 ± 0.6 kg/m 2 ) trained their elbow flexors independently for 15 wk on separate days and under different hormonal milieu. In one training condition, participants performed isolated arm curl exercise designed to maintain basal hormone concentrations (low hormone, LH); in the other training condition, participants performed identical arm exercise to the LH condition followed immediately by a high volume of leg resistance exercise to elicit a large increase in endogenous hormones (high hormone, HH). There was no elevation in serum growth hormone (GH), insulin-like growth factor (IGF-1), or testosterone after the LH protocol but significant ( P < 0.001) elevations in these hormones immediately and 15 and 30 min after the HH protocol. The hormone responses elicited by each respective exercise protocol late in the training period were similar to the response elicited early in the training period, indicating that a divergent postexercise hormone response was maintained over the training period. Muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) increased by 12% in LH and 10% in HH ( P < 0.001) with no difference between conditions (condition x training interaction, P = 0.25). Similarly, type I ( P < 0.01) and type II ( P < 0.001) muscle fiber CSA increased with training with no effect of hormone elevation in the HH condition. Strength increased in both arms, but the increase was not different between the LH and HH conditions. We conclude that exposure of loaded muscle to acute exercise-induced elevations in endogenous anabolic hormones enhances neither muscle hypertrophy nor strength with resistance training in young men. testosterone; growth hormone; insulin-like growth factor-1; anabolism Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: S. M. Phillips, Exercise Metabolism Research Group, Dept. of Kinesiology McMaster Univ. 1280 Main St. West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1 Canada (e-mail: phillis{at}mcmaster.ca ).
ISSN:8750-7587
1522-1601
DOI:10.1152/japplphysiol.01147.2009