Explaining willingness to pay for pricing reforms that improve electricity service in India

Quality of electricity service remains poor in many developing countries. Here we examine factors that influence stated willingness to pay for better service (i.e., more hours of power per day) among rural and urban households in Uttar Pradesh, India. Besides suggesting that low willingness to pay i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Energy policy 2019-05, Vol.128, p.459-469
Hauptverfasser: Blankenship, Brian, Wong, Jason Chun Yu, Urpelainen, Johannes
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 469
container_issue
container_start_page 459
container_title Energy policy
container_volume 128
creator Blankenship, Brian
Wong, Jason Chun Yu
Urpelainen, Johannes
description Quality of electricity service remains poor in many developing countries. Here we examine factors that influence stated willingness to pay for better service (i.e., more hours of power per day) among rural and urban households in Uttar Pradesh, India. Besides suggesting that low willingness to pay is a major obstacle to pricing reform, we find that respondents with more social trust are willing to pay more. In a randomized survey experiment, we also find that delays in service improvements and a lack of community support for pricing reform reduce willingness to pay. These results confirm the importance of non-financial considerations in popular support for policies that impose higher prices in exchange for better service. However, we do not find evidence for sense of entitlement – the belief that government should offer basic goods and services for free – as a predictor of low willingness to pay. These results offer useful input for effective strategies to reform electricity pricing for better service and, ultimately, economic growth, particularly in areas where electricity is heavily underpriced and where governance is weak. •Social trust increases willingness to pay for improved electricity service.•Feelings of entitlement have no discernible effect on willingness to pay.•People are more willing to pay if others in the community are.•Willingness to pay is overall quite low.•Building community trust offers a path to pricing reform.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.01.015
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2221225517</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S030142151930014X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2221225517</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-911bf2354d980a459f6419f48d2791914a34958183ecd8024be87c6b95e23d3a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UMtOwzAQtBBIlMIXcLHEOcXrRxIfOKCqQKVKXODEwXKdDThKk2Cnhf49LuWMtNJotTO7O0PINbAZMMhvmxl2Q9_OOAM9Y5BKnZAJlIXI8qIoTsmECQaZ5KDOyUWMDWNMllpOyNvie2it73z3Tr982ybsMEY69nSwe1r3gQ7Bu8M4YOo2afRhR-o3Q-h3SLFFNx4I455GDDvvkPqOLrvK20tyVts24tUfTsnrw-Jl_pStnh-X8_tV5oQuxkwDrGsulKx0yaxUus4l6FqWFS80aJBWSK1KKAW6qmRcrrEsXL7WCrmohBVTcnPcm1763GIcTdNvQ5dOGs45cK4UFIkljiwX-hiTGZOMbWzYG2DmkKJpzG-K5pCiYZBKJdXdUYXJwM5jMNF57BxWPiTnpur9v_ofljp8Ig</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2221225517</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Explaining willingness to pay for pricing reforms that improve electricity service in India</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Blankenship, Brian ; Wong, Jason Chun Yu ; Urpelainen, Johannes</creator><creatorcontrib>Blankenship, Brian ; Wong, Jason Chun Yu ; Urpelainen, Johannes</creatorcontrib><description>Quality of electricity service remains poor in many developing countries. Here we examine factors that influence stated willingness to pay for better service (i.e., more hours of power per day) among rural and urban households in Uttar Pradesh, India. Besides suggesting that low willingness to pay is a major obstacle to pricing reform, we find that respondents with more social trust are willing to pay more. In a randomized survey experiment, we also find that delays in service improvements and a lack of community support for pricing reform reduce willingness to pay. These results confirm the importance of non-financial considerations in popular support for policies that impose higher prices in exchange for better service. However, we do not find evidence for sense of entitlement – the belief that government should offer basic goods and services for free – as a predictor of low willingness to pay. These results offer useful input for effective strategies to reform electricity pricing for better service and, ultimately, economic growth, particularly in areas where electricity is heavily underpriced and where governance is weak. •Social trust increases willingness to pay for improved electricity service.•Feelings of entitlement have no discernible effect on willingness to pay.•People are more willing to pay if others in the community are.•Willingness to pay is overall quite low.•Building community trust offers a path to pricing reform.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4215</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6777</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.01.015</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Community involvement ; Community support ; Developing countries ; Economic development ; Economic growth ; Electricity ; Electricity pricing ; Energy ; Energy policy ; Entitlement ; Financial support ; Governance ; Households ; India ; LDCs ; Power ; Prices ; Pricing policies ; Pricing reform ; Public opinion ; Public services ; Reforms ; Respondents ; Rural areas ; Rural communities ; Willingness to pay</subject><ispartof>Energy policy, 2019-05, Vol.128, p.459-469</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. May 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-911bf2354d980a459f6419f48d2791914a34958183ecd8024be87c6b95e23d3a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-911bf2354d980a459f6419f48d2791914a34958183ecd8024be87c6b95e23d3a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.01.015$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27847,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Blankenship, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Jason Chun Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urpelainen, Johannes</creatorcontrib><title>Explaining willingness to pay for pricing reforms that improve electricity service in India</title><title>Energy policy</title><description>Quality of electricity service remains poor in many developing countries. Here we examine factors that influence stated willingness to pay for better service (i.e., more hours of power per day) among rural and urban households in Uttar Pradesh, India. Besides suggesting that low willingness to pay is a major obstacle to pricing reform, we find that respondents with more social trust are willing to pay more. In a randomized survey experiment, we also find that delays in service improvements and a lack of community support for pricing reform reduce willingness to pay. These results confirm the importance of non-financial considerations in popular support for policies that impose higher prices in exchange for better service. However, we do not find evidence for sense of entitlement – the belief that government should offer basic goods and services for free – as a predictor of low willingness to pay. These results offer useful input for effective strategies to reform electricity pricing for better service and, ultimately, economic growth, particularly in areas where electricity is heavily underpriced and where governance is weak. •Social trust increases willingness to pay for improved electricity service.•Feelings of entitlement have no discernible effect on willingness to pay.•People are more willing to pay if others in the community are.•Willingness to pay is overall quite low.•Building community trust offers a path to pricing reform.</description><subject>Community involvement</subject><subject>Community support</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Economic growth</subject><subject>Electricity</subject><subject>Electricity pricing</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy policy</subject><subject>Entitlement</subject><subject>Financial support</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>India</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Prices</subject><subject>Pricing policies</subject><subject>Pricing reform</subject><subject>Public opinion</subject><subject>Public services</subject><subject>Reforms</subject><subject>Respondents</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Rural communities</subject><subject>Willingness to pay</subject><issn>0301-4215</issn><issn>1873-6777</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UMtOwzAQtBBIlMIXcLHEOcXrRxIfOKCqQKVKXODEwXKdDThKk2Cnhf49LuWMtNJotTO7O0PINbAZMMhvmxl2Q9_OOAM9Y5BKnZAJlIXI8qIoTsmECQaZ5KDOyUWMDWNMllpOyNvie2it73z3Tr982ybsMEY69nSwe1r3gQ7Bu8M4YOo2afRhR-o3Q-h3SLFFNx4I455GDDvvkPqOLrvK20tyVts24tUfTsnrw-Jl_pStnh-X8_tV5oQuxkwDrGsulKx0yaxUus4l6FqWFS80aJBWSK1KKAW6qmRcrrEsXL7WCrmohBVTcnPcm1763GIcTdNvQ5dOGs45cK4UFIkljiwX-hiTGZOMbWzYG2DmkKJpzG-K5pCiYZBKJdXdUYXJwM5jMNF57BxWPiTnpur9v_ofljp8Ig</recordid><startdate>20190501</startdate><enddate>20190501</enddate><creator>Blankenship, Brian</creator><creator>Wong, Jason Chun Yu</creator><creator>Urpelainen, Johannes</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190501</creationdate><title>Explaining willingness to pay for pricing reforms that improve electricity service in India</title><author>Blankenship, Brian ; Wong, Jason Chun Yu ; Urpelainen, Johannes</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-911bf2354d980a459f6419f48d2791914a34958183ecd8024be87c6b95e23d3a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Community involvement</topic><topic>Community support</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Economic growth</topic><topic>Electricity</topic><topic>Electricity pricing</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy policy</topic><topic>Entitlement</topic><topic>Financial support</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>India</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Prices</topic><topic>Pricing policies</topic><topic>Pricing reform</topic><topic>Public opinion</topic><topic>Public services</topic><topic>Reforms</topic><topic>Respondents</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Rural communities</topic><topic>Willingness to pay</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Blankenship, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Jason Chun Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urpelainen, Johannes</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Blankenship, Brian</au><au>Wong, Jason Chun Yu</au><au>Urpelainen, Johannes</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Explaining willingness to pay for pricing reforms that improve electricity service in India</atitle><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle><date>2019-05-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>128</volume><spage>459</spage><epage>469</epage><pages>459-469</pages><issn>0301-4215</issn><eissn>1873-6777</eissn><abstract>Quality of electricity service remains poor in many developing countries. Here we examine factors that influence stated willingness to pay for better service (i.e., more hours of power per day) among rural and urban households in Uttar Pradesh, India. Besides suggesting that low willingness to pay is a major obstacle to pricing reform, we find that respondents with more social trust are willing to pay more. In a randomized survey experiment, we also find that delays in service improvements and a lack of community support for pricing reform reduce willingness to pay. These results confirm the importance of non-financial considerations in popular support for policies that impose higher prices in exchange for better service. However, we do not find evidence for sense of entitlement – the belief that government should offer basic goods and services for free – as a predictor of low willingness to pay. These results offer useful input for effective strategies to reform electricity pricing for better service and, ultimately, economic growth, particularly in areas where electricity is heavily underpriced and where governance is weak. •Social trust increases willingness to pay for improved electricity service.•Feelings of entitlement have no discernible effect on willingness to pay.•People are more willing to pay if others in the community are.•Willingness to pay is overall quite low.•Building community trust offers a path to pricing reform.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.enpol.2019.01.015</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-4215
ispartof Energy policy, 2019-05, Vol.128, p.459-469
issn 0301-4215
1873-6777
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2221225517
source PAIS Index; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Community involvement
Community support
Developing countries
Economic development
Economic growth
Electricity
Electricity pricing
Energy
Energy policy
Entitlement
Financial support
Governance
Households
India
LDCs
Power
Prices
Pricing policies
Pricing reform
Public opinion
Public services
Reforms
Respondents
Rural areas
Rural communities
Willingness to pay
title Explaining willingness to pay for pricing reforms that improve electricity service in India
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T21%3A35%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Explaining%20willingness%20to%20pay%20for%20pricing%20reforms%20that%20improve%20electricity%20service%20in%20India&rft.jtitle=Energy%20policy&rft.au=Blankenship,%20Brian&rft.date=2019-05-01&rft.volume=128&rft.spage=459&rft.epage=469&rft.pages=459-469&rft.issn=0301-4215&rft.eissn=1873-6777&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.01.015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2221225517%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2221225517&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S030142151930014X&rfr_iscdi=true