Explaining willingness to pay for pricing reforms that improve electricity service in India
Quality of electricity service remains poor in many developing countries. Here we examine factors that influence stated willingness to pay for better service (i.e., more hours of power per day) among rural and urban households in Uttar Pradesh, India. Besides suggesting that low willingness to pay i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Energy policy 2019-05, Vol.128, p.459-469 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 469 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 459 |
container_title | Energy policy |
container_volume | 128 |
creator | Blankenship, Brian Wong, Jason Chun Yu Urpelainen, Johannes |
description | Quality of electricity service remains poor in many developing countries. Here we examine factors that influence stated willingness to pay for better service (i.e., more hours of power per day) among rural and urban households in Uttar Pradesh, India. Besides suggesting that low willingness to pay is a major obstacle to pricing reform, we find that respondents with more social trust are willing to pay more. In a randomized survey experiment, we also find that delays in service improvements and a lack of community support for pricing reform reduce willingness to pay. These results confirm the importance of non-financial considerations in popular support for policies that impose higher prices in exchange for better service. However, we do not find evidence for sense of entitlement – the belief that government should offer basic goods and services for free – as a predictor of low willingness to pay. These results offer useful input for effective strategies to reform electricity pricing for better service and, ultimately, economic growth, particularly in areas where electricity is heavily underpriced and where governance is weak.
•Social trust increases willingness to pay for improved electricity service.•Feelings of entitlement have no discernible effect on willingness to pay.•People are more willing to pay if others in the community are.•Willingness to pay is overall quite low.•Building community trust offers a path to pricing reform. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.01.015 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2221225517</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S030142151930014X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2221225517</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-911bf2354d980a459f6419f48d2791914a34958183ecd8024be87c6b95e23d3a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UMtOwzAQtBBIlMIXcLHEOcXrRxIfOKCqQKVKXODEwXKdDThKk2Cnhf49LuWMtNJotTO7O0PINbAZMMhvmxl2Q9_OOAM9Y5BKnZAJlIXI8qIoTsmECQaZ5KDOyUWMDWNMllpOyNvie2it73z3Tr982ybsMEY69nSwe1r3gQ7Bu8M4YOo2afRhR-o3Q-h3SLFFNx4I455GDDvvkPqOLrvK20tyVts24tUfTsnrw-Jl_pStnh-X8_tV5oQuxkwDrGsulKx0yaxUus4l6FqWFS80aJBWSK1KKAW6qmRcrrEsXL7WCrmohBVTcnPcm1763GIcTdNvQ5dOGs45cK4UFIkljiwX-hiTGZOMbWzYG2DmkKJpzG-K5pCiYZBKJdXdUYXJwM5jMNF57BxWPiTnpur9v_ofljp8Ig</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2221225517</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Explaining willingness to pay for pricing reforms that improve electricity service in India</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Blankenship, Brian ; Wong, Jason Chun Yu ; Urpelainen, Johannes</creator><creatorcontrib>Blankenship, Brian ; Wong, Jason Chun Yu ; Urpelainen, Johannes</creatorcontrib><description>Quality of electricity service remains poor in many developing countries. Here we examine factors that influence stated willingness to pay for better service (i.e., more hours of power per day) among rural and urban households in Uttar Pradesh, India. Besides suggesting that low willingness to pay is a major obstacle to pricing reform, we find that respondents with more social trust are willing to pay more. In a randomized survey experiment, we also find that delays in service improvements and a lack of community support for pricing reform reduce willingness to pay. These results confirm the importance of non-financial considerations in popular support for policies that impose higher prices in exchange for better service. However, we do not find evidence for sense of entitlement – the belief that government should offer basic goods and services for free – as a predictor of low willingness to pay. These results offer useful input for effective strategies to reform electricity pricing for better service and, ultimately, economic growth, particularly in areas where electricity is heavily underpriced and where governance is weak.
•Social trust increases willingness to pay for improved electricity service.•Feelings of entitlement have no discernible effect on willingness to pay.•People are more willing to pay if others in the community are.•Willingness to pay is overall quite low.•Building community trust offers a path to pricing reform.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4215</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6777</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.01.015</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Community involvement ; Community support ; Developing countries ; Economic development ; Economic growth ; Electricity ; Electricity pricing ; Energy ; Energy policy ; Entitlement ; Financial support ; Governance ; Households ; India ; LDCs ; Power ; Prices ; Pricing policies ; Pricing reform ; Public opinion ; Public services ; Reforms ; Respondents ; Rural areas ; Rural communities ; Willingness to pay</subject><ispartof>Energy policy, 2019-05, Vol.128, p.459-469</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. May 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-911bf2354d980a459f6419f48d2791914a34958183ecd8024be87c6b95e23d3a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-911bf2354d980a459f6419f48d2791914a34958183ecd8024be87c6b95e23d3a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.01.015$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27847,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Blankenship, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Jason Chun Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urpelainen, Johannes</creatorcontrib><title>Explaining willingness to pay for pricing reforms that improve electricity service in India</title><title>Energy policy</title><description>Quality of electricity service remains poor in many developing countries. Here we examine factors that influence stated willingness to pay for better service (i.e., more hours of power per day) among rural and urban households in Uttar Pradesh, India. Besides suggesting that low willingness to pay is a major obstacle to pricing reform, we find that respondents with more social trust are willing to pay more. In a randomized survey experiment, we also find that delays in service improvements and a lack of community support for pricing reform reduce willingness to pay. These results confirm the importance of non-financial considerations in popular support for policies that impose higher prices in exchange for better service. However, we do not find evidence for sense of entitlement – the belief that government should offer basic goods and services for free – as a predictor of low willingness to pay. These results offer useful input for effective strategies to reform electricity pricing for better service and, ultimately, economic growth, particularly in areas where electricity is heavily underpriced and where governance is weak.
•Social trust increases willingness to pay for improved electricity service.•Feelings of entitlement have no discernible effect on willingness to pay.•People are more willing to pay if others in the community are.•Willingness to pay is overall quite low.•Building community trust offers a path to pricing reform.</description><subject>Community involvement</subject><subject>Community support</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Economic growth</subject><subject>Electricity</subject><subject>Electricity pricing</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy policy</subject><subject>Entitlement</subject><subject>Financial support</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>India</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Prices</subject><subject>Pricing policies</subject><subject>Pricing reform</subject><subject>Public opinion</subject><subject>Public services</subject><subject>Reforms</subject><subject>Respondents</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Rural communities</subject><subject>Willingness to pay</subject><issn>0301-4215</issn><issn>1873-6777</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UMtOwzAQtBBIlMIXcLHEOcXrRxIfOKCqQKVKXODEwXKdDThKk2Cnhf49LuWMtNJotTO7O0PINbAZMMhvmxl2Q9_OOAM9Y5BKnZAJlIXI8qIoTsmECQaZ5KDOyUWMDWNMllpOyNvie2it73z3Tr982ybsMEY69nSwe1r3gQ7Bu8M4YOo2afRhR-o3Q-h3SLFFNx4I455GDDvvkPqOLrvK20tyVts24tUfTsnrw-Jl_pStnh-X8_tV5oQuxkwDrGsulKx0yaxUus4l6FqWFS80aJBWSK1KKAW6qmRcrrEsXL7WCrmohBVTcnPcm1763GIcTdNvQ5dOGs45cK4UFIkljiwX-hiTGZOMbWzYG2DmkKJpzG-K5pCiYZBKJdXdUYXJwM5jMNF57BxWPiTnpur9v_ofljp8Ig</recordid><startdate>20190501</startdate><enddate>20190501</enddate><creator>Blankenship, Brian</creator><creator>Wong, Jason Chun Yu</creator><creator>Urpelainen, Johannes</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190501</creationdate><title>Explaining willingness to pay for pricing reforms that improve electricity service in India</title><author>Blankenship, Brian ; Wong, Jason Chun Yu ; Urpelainen, Johannes</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-911bf2354d980a459f6419f48d2791914a34958183ecd8024be87c6b95e23d3a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Community involvement</topic><topic>Community support</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Economic growth</topic><topic>Electricity</topic><topic>Electricity pricing</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy policy</topic><topic>Entitlement</topic><topic>Financial support</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>India</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Prices</topic><topic>Pricing policies</topic><topic>Pricing reform</topic><topic>Public opinion</topic><topic>Public services</topic><topic>Reforms</topic><topic>Respondents</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Rural communities</topic><topic>Willingness to pay</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Blankenship, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Jason Chun Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urpelainen, Johannes</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Blankenship, Brian</au><au>Wong, Jason Chun Yu</au><au>Urpelainen, Johannes</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Explaining willingness to pay for pricing reforms that improve electricity service in India</atitle><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle><date>2019-05-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>128</volume><spage>459</spage><epage>469</epage><pages>459-469</pages><issn>0301-4215</issn><eissn>1873-6777</eissn><abstract>Quality of electricity service remains poor in many developing countries. Here we examine factors that influence stated willingness to pay for better service (i.e., more hours of power per day) among rural and urban households in Uttar Pradesh, India. Besides suggesting that low willingness to pay is a major obstacle to pricing reform, we find that respondents with more social trust are willing to pay more. In a randomized survey experiment, we also find that delays in service improvements and a lack of community support for pricing reform reduce willingness to pay. These results confirm the importance of non-financial considerations in popular support for policies that impose higher prices in exchange for better service. However, we do not find evidence for sense of entitlement – the belief that government should offer basic goods and services for free – as a predictor of low willingness to pay. These results offer useful input for effective strategies to reform electricity pricing for better service and, ultimately, economic growth, particularly in areas where electricity is heavily underpriced and where governance is weak.
•Social trust increases willingness to pay for improved electricity service.•Feelings of entitlement have no discernible effect on willingness to pay.•People are more willing to pay if others in the community are.•Willingness to pay is overall quite low.•Building community trust offers a path to pricing reform.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.enpol.2019.01.015</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0301-4215 |
ispartof | Energy policy, 2019-05, Vol.128, p.459-469 |
issn | 0301-4215 1873-6777 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2221225517 |
source | PAIS Index; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Community involvement Community support Developing countries Economic development Economic growth Electricity Electricity pricing Energy Energy policy Entitlement Financial support Governance Households India LDCs Power Prices Pricing policies Pricing reform Public opinion Public services Reforms Respondents Rural areas Rural communities Willingness to pay |
title | Explaining willingness to pay for pricing reforms that improve electricity service in India |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T21%3A35%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Explaining%20willingness%20to%20pay%20for%20pricing%20reforms%20that%20improve%20electricity%20service%20in%20India&rft.jtitle=Energy%20policy&rft.au=Blankenship,%20Brian&rft.date=2019-05-01&rft.volume=128&rft.spage=459&rft.epage=469&rft.pages=459-469&rft.issn=0301-4215&rft.eissn=1873-6777&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.01.015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2221225517%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2221225517&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S030142151930014X&rfr_iscdi=true |