Difficulty of Reaching Respondents and Nonresponse Bias: Evidence from Large Government Surveys

How high is unemployment? How low is labor force participation? Is obesity more prevalent among men? How large are household expenditures? We study the sources of the relevant official statistics—the Current Population Survey, the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, and the Consumer Expendit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The review of economics and statistics 2019-03, Vol.101 (1), p.176-191
Hauptverfasser: Heffetz, Ori, Reeves, Daniel B
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 191
container_issue 1
container_start_page 176
container_title The review of economics and statistics
container_volume 101
creator Heffetz, Ori
Reeves, Daniel B
description How high is unemployment? How low is labor force participation? Is obesity more prevalent among men? How large are household expenditures? We study the sources of the relevant official statistics—the Current Population Survey, the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, and the Consumer Expenditure Survey—and find that the answers depend on whether we look at easy- or at difficult-to-reach respondents, measured by the number of call and visit attempts made by interviewers. A challenge to the (conditionally-)random-nonresponse assumption, these findings empirically substantiate the theoretical warning against making population-wide estimates from surveys with low response rates.
doi_str_mv 10.1162/rest_a_00748
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2220303480</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2220303480</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-43e8c81ceb18dce45b713e220e4f5cdb1b52f1fd883730c7f8e281d8b3ee44a53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkE1PAjEQhhujiYje_AFNvHhwdabtQvGmiGhCNPHj3Ox2p1gCu9gCCf56i3gwhlMn7TPPdF7GThEuETviKlBcmMIAdJXeYy3MJWQ9VGKftQCkyjq5zA_ZUYwTAMAuyhYzd945b5fTxZo3jr9QYT98PU5FnDd1RfUi8qKu-FNTh5-rSPzWF_GaD1Y-PVviLjQzPirCmPiwWVGoZ6mLvy7DitbxmB24Yhrp5Pdss_f7wVv_IRs9Dx_7N6PMKuwtMiVJW42WStSVJZWX6XckBJByua1KLHPh0FVay64E23WahMZKl5JIqSKXbXa29c5D87nc5DBplqFOI41IGpnW15Coiy1lQxNjIGfmwc-KsDYIZhOh-Rthwm-2-Mz_8W2QFQJ6NBKUAGUECEztBnrmy8__O853OHaO-wZvZYjZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2220303480</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Difficulty of Reaching Respondents and Nonresponse Bias: Evidence from Large Government Surveys</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>MIT Press Journals</source><creator>Heffetz, Ori ; Reeves, Daniel B</creator><creatorcontrib>Heffetz, Ori ; Reeves, Daniel B</creatorcontrib><description>How high is unemployment? How low is labor force participation? Is obesity more prevalent among men? How large are household expenditures? We study the sources of the relevant official statistics—the Current Population Survey, the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, and the Consumer Expenditure Survey—and find that the answers depend on whether we look at easy- or at difficult-to-reach respondents, measured by the number of call and visit attempts made by interviewers. A challenge to the (conditionally-)random-nonresponse assumption, these findings empirically substantiate the theoretical warning against making population-wide estimates from surveys with low response rates.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0034-6535</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-9142</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1162/rest_a_00748</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>One Rogers Street, Cambridge, MA 02142-1209, USA: MIT Press</publisher><subject>Labor force participation ; Men ; Obesity ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Response bias ; Risk behavior ; Surveillance systems ; Unemployment</subject><ispartof>The review of economics and statistics, 2019-03, Vol.101 (1), p.176-191</ispartof><rights>Copyright MIT Press Journals, The Mar 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-43e8c81ceb18dce45b713e220e4f5cdb1b52f1fd883730c7f8e281d8b3ee44a53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-43e8c81ceb18dce45b713e220e4f5cdb1b52f1fd883730c7f8e281d8b3ee44a53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://direct.mit.edu/rest/article/doi/10.1162/rest_a_00748$$EHTML$$P50$$Gmit$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,54009,54010</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Heffetz, Ori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reeves, Daniel B</creatorcontrib><title>Difficulty of Reaching Respondents and Nonresponse Bias: Evidence from Large Government Surveys</title><title>The review of economics and statistics</title><description>How high is unemployment? How low is labor force participation? Is obesity more prevalent among men? How large are household expenditures? We study the sources of the relevant official statistics—the Current Population Survey, the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, and the Consumer Expenditure Survey—and find that the answers depend on whether we look at easy- or at difficult-to-reach respondents, measured by the number of call and visit attempts made by interviewers. A challenge to the (conditionally-)random-nonresponse assumption, these findings empirically substantiate the theoretical warning against making population-wide estimates from surveys with low response rates.</description><subject>Labor force participation</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Response bias</subject><subject>Risk behavior</subject><subject>Surveillance systems</subject><subject>Unemployment</subject><issn>0034-6535</issn><issn>1530-9142</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkE1PAjEQhhujiYje_AFNvHhwdabtQvGmiGhCNPHj3Ox2p1gCu9gCCf56i3gwhlMn7TPPdF7GThEuETviKlBcmMIAdJXeYy3MJWQ9VGKftQCkyjq5zA_ZUYwTAMAuyhYzd945b5fTxZo3jr9QYT98PU5FnDd1RfUi8qKu-FNTh5-rSPzWF_GaD1Y-PVviLjQzPirCmPiwWVGoZ6mLvy7DitbxmB24Yhrp5Pdss_f7wVv_IRs9Dx_7N6PMKuwtMiVJW42WStSVJZWX6XckBJByua1KLHPh0FVay64E23WahMZKl5JIqSKXbXa29c5D87nc5DBplqFOI41IGpnW15Coiy1lQxNjIGfmwc-KsDYIZhOh-Rthwm-2-Mz_8W2QFQJ6NBKUAGUECEztBnrmy8__O853OHaO-wZvZYjZ</recordid><startdate>20190301</startdate><enddate>20190301</enddate><creator>Heffetz, Ori</creator><creator>Reeves, Daniel B</creator><general>MIT Press</general><general>MIT Press Journals, The</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190301</creationdate><title>Difficulty of Reaching Respondents and Nonresponse Bias: Evidence from Large Government Surveys</title><author>Heffetz, Ori ; Reeves, Daniel B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-43e8c81ceb18dce45b713e220e4f5cdb1b52f1fd883730c7f8e281d8b3ee44a53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Labor force participation</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Response bias</topic><topic>Risk behavior</topic><topic>Surveillance systems</topic><topic>Unemployment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Heffetz, Ori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reeves, Daniel B</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>The review of economics and statistics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Heffetz, Ori</au><au>Reeves, Daniel B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Difficulty of Reaching Respondents and Nonresponse Bias: Evidence from Large Government Surveys</atitle><jtitle>The review of economics and statistics</jtitle><date>2019-03-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>101</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>176</spage><epage>191</epage><pages>176-191</pages><issn>0034-6535</issn><eissn>1530-9142</eissn><abstract>How high is unemployment? How low is labor force participation? Is obesity more prevalent among men? How large are household expenditures? We study the sources of the relevant official statistics—the Current Population Survey, the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, and the Consumer Expenditure Survey—and find that the answers depend on whether we look at easy- or at difficult-to-reach respondents, measured by the number of call and visit attempts made by interviewers. A challenge to the (conditionally-)random-nonresponse assumption, these findings empirically substantiate the theoretical warning against making population-wide estimates from surveys with low response rates.</abstract><cop>One Rogers Street, Cambridge, MA 02142-1209, USA</cop><pub>MIT Press</pub><doi>10.1162/rest_a_00748</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0034-6535
ispartof The review of economics and statistics, 2019-03, Vol.101 (1), p.176-191
issn 0034-6535
1530-9142
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2220303480
source EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; MIT Press Journals
subjects Labor force participation
Men
Obesity
Polls & surveys
Response bias
Risk behavior
Surveillance systems
Unemployment
title Difficulty of Reaching Respondents and Nonresponse Bias: Evidence from Large Government Surveys
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T15%3A45%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Difficulty%20of%20Reaching%20Respondents%20and%20Nonresponse%20Bias:%20Evidence%20from%20Large%20Government%20Surveys&rft.jtitle=The%20review%20of%20economics%20and%20statistics&rft.au=Heffetz,%20Ori&rft.date=2019-03-01&rft.volume=101&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=176&rft.epage=191&rft.pages=176-191&rft.issn=0034-6535&rft.eissn=1530-9142&rft_id=info:doi/10.1162/rest_a_00748&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2220303480%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2220303480&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true