Difficulty of Reaching Respondents and Nonresponse Bias: Evidence from Large Government Surveys
How high is unemployment? How low is labor force participation? Is obesity more prevalent among men? How large are household expenditures? We study the sources of the relevant official statistics—the Current Population Survey, the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, and the Consumer Expendit...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The review of economics and statistics 2019-03, Vol.101 (1), p.176-191 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 191 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 176 |
container_title | The review of economics and statistics |
container_volume | 101 |
creator | Heffetz, Ori Reeves, Daniel B |
description | How high is unemployment? How low is labor force participation? Is obesity more prevalent among men? How large are household expenditures? We study the sources of the relevant official statistics—the Current Population Survey, the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, and the Consumer Expenditure Survey—and find that the answers depend on whether we look at easy- or at difficult-to-reach respondents, measured by the number of call and visit attempts made by interviewers. A challenge to the (conditionally-)random-nonresponse assumption, these findings empirically substantiate the theoretical warning against making population-wide estimates from surveys with low response rates. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1162/rest_a_00748 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2220303480</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2220303480</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-43e8c81ceb18dce45b713e220e4f5cdb1b52f1fd883730c7f8e281d8b3ee44a53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkE1PAjEQhhujiYje_AFNvHhwdabtQvGmiGhCNPHj3Ox2p1gCu9gCCf56i3gwhlMn7TPPdF7GThEuETviKlBcmMIAdJXeYy3MJWQ9VGKftQCkyjq5zA_ZUYwTAMAuyhYzd945b5fTxZo3jr9QYT98PU5FnDd1RfUi8qKu-FNTh5-rSPzWF_GaD1Y-PVviLjQzPirCmPiwWVGoZ6mLvy7DitbxmB24Yhrp5Pdss_f7wVv_IRs9Dx_7N6PMKuwtMiVJW42WStSVJZWX6XckBJByua1KLHPh0FVay64E23WahMZKl5JIqSKXbXa29c5D87nc5DBplqFOI41IGpnW15Coiy1lQxNjIGfmwc-KsDYIZhOh-Rthwm-2-Mz_8W2QFQJ6NBKUAGUECEztBnrmy8__O853OHaO-wZvZYjZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2220303480</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Difficulty of Reaching Respondents and Nonresponse Bias: Evidence from Large Government Surveys</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>MIT Press Journals</source><creator>Heffetz, Ori ; Reeves, Daniel B</creator><creatorcontrib>Heffetz, Ori ; Reeves, Daniel B</creatorcontrib><description>How high is unemployment? How low is labor force participation? Is obesity more prevalent among men? How large are household expenditures? We study the sources of the relevant official statistics—the Current Population Survey, the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, and the Consumer Expenditure Survey—and find that the answers depend on whether we look at easy- or at difficult-to-reach respondents, measured by the number of call and visit attempts made by interviewers. A challenge to the (conditionally-)random-nonresponse assumption, these findings empirically substantiate the theoretical warning against making population-wide estimates from surveys with low response rates.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0034-6535</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-9142</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1162/rest_a_00748</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>One Rogers Street, Cambridge, MA 02142-1209, USA: MIT Press</publisher><subject>Labor force participation ; Men ; Obesity ; Polls & surveys ; Response bias ; Risk behavior ; Surveillance systems ; Unemployment</subject><ispartof>The review of economics and statistics, 2019-03, Vol.101 (1), p.176-191</ispartof><rights>Copyright MIT Press Journals, The Mar 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-43e8c81ceb18dce45b713e220e4f5cdb1b52f1fd883730c7f8e281d8b3ee44a53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-43e8c81ceb18dce45b713e220e4f5cdb1b52f1fd883730c7f8e281d8b3ee44a53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://direct.mit.edu/rest/article/doi/10.1162/rest_a_00748$$EHTML$$P50$$Gmit$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,54009,54010</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Heffetz, Ori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reeves, Daniel B</creatorcontrib><title>Difficulty of Reaching Respondents and Nonresponse Bias: Evidence from Large Government Surveys</title><title>The review of economics and statistics</title><description>How high is unemployment? How low is labor force participation? Is obesity more prevalent among men? How large are household expenditures? We study the sources of the relevant official statistics—the Current Population Survey, the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, and the Consumer Expenditure Survey—and find that the answers depend on whether we look at easy- or at difficult-to-reach respondents, measured by the number of call and visit attempts made by interviewers. A challenge to the (conditionally-)random-nonresponse assumption, these findings empirically substantiate the theoretical warning against making population-wide estimates from surveys with low response rates.</description><subject>Labor force participation</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Response bias</subject><subject>Risk behavior</subject><subject>Surveillance systems</subject><subject>Unemployment</subject><issn>0034-6535</issn><issn>1530-9142</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkE1PAjEQhhujiYje_AFNvHhwdabtQvGmiGhCNPHj3Ox2p1gCu9gCCf56i3gwhlMn7TPPdF7GThEuETviKlBcmMIAdJXeYy3MJWQ9VGKftQCkyjq5zA_ZUYwTAMAuyhYzd945b5fTxZo3jr9QYT98PU5FnDd1RfUi8qKu-FNTh5-rSPzWF_GaD1Y-PVviLjQzPirCmPiwWVGoZ6mLvy7DitbxmB24Yhrp5Pdss_f7wVv_IRs9Dx_7N6PMKuwtMiVJW42WStSVJZWX6XckBJByua1KLHPh0FVay64E23WahMZKl5JIqSKXbXa29c5D87nc5DBplqFOI41IGpnW15Coiy1lQxNjIGfmwc-KsDYIZhOh-Rthwm-2-Mz_8W2QFQJ6NBKUAGUECEztBnrmy8__O853OHaO-wZvZYjZ</recordid><startdate>20190301</startdate><enddate>20190301</enddate><creator>Heffetz, Ori</creator><creator>Reeves, Daniel B</creator><general>MIT Press</general><general>MIT Press Journals, The</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190301</creationdate><title>Difficulty of Reaching Respondents and Nonresponse Bias: Evidence from Large Government Surveys</title><author>Heffetz, Ori ; Reeves, Daniel B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-43e8c81ceb18dce45b713e220e4f5cdb1b52f1fd883730c7f8e281d8b3ee44a53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Labor force participation</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Response bias</topic><topic>Risk behavior</topic><topic>Surveillance systems</topic><topic>Unemployment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Heffetz, Ori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reeves, Daniel B</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>The review of economics and statistics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Heffetz, Ori</au><au>Reeves, Daniel B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Difficulty of Reaching Respondents and Nonresponse Bias: Evidence from Large Government Surveys</atitle><jtitle>The review of economics and statistics</jtitle><date>2019-03-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>101</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>176</spage><epage>191</epage><pages>176-191</pages><issn>0034-6535</issn><eissn>1530-9142</eissn><abstract>How high is unemployment? How low is labor force participation? Is obesity more prevalent among men? How large are household expenditures? We study the sources of the relevant official statistics—the Current Population Survey, the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, and the Consumer Expenditure Survey—and find that the answers depend on whether we look at easy- or at difficult-to-reach respondents, measured by the number of call and visit attempts made by interviewers. A challenge to the (conditionally-)random-nonresponse assumption, these findings empirically substantiate the theoretical warning against making population-wide estimates from surveys with low response rates.</abstract><cop>One Rogers Street, Cambridge, MA 02142-1209, USA</cop><pub>MIT Press</pub><doi>10.1162/rest_a_00748</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0034-6535 |
ispartof | The review of economics and statistics, 2019-03, Vol.101 (1), p.176-191 |
issn | 0034-6535 1530-9142 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2220303480 |
source | EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; MIT Press Journals |
subjects | Labor force participation Men Obesity Polls & surveys Response bias Risk behavior Surveillance systems Unemployment |
title | Difficulty of Reaching Respondents and Nonresponse Bias: Evidence from Large Government Surveys |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T15%3A45%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Difficulty%20of%20Reaching%20Respondents%20and%20Nonresponse%20Bias:%20Evidence%20from%20Large%20Government%20Surveys&rft.jtitle=The%20review%20of%20economics%20and%20statistics&rft.au=Heffetz,%20Ori&rft.date=2019-03-01&rft.volume=101&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=176&rft.epage=191&rft.pages=176-191&rft.issn=0034-6535&rft.eissn=1530-9142&rft_id=info:doi/10.1162/rest_a_00748&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2220303480%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2220303480&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |