Effects of caprock sealing capacities on coalbed methane preservation: Experimental investigation and case study

Caprocks play an important role in the trapping of coalbed methane (CBM) reservoirs. To study the sealing capacities of caprocks, five samples with different lithologies of Neogene clayrock, Paleogene redbeds, Permian sandstone, Permian mudstone and Permian siltstone were collected and tested using...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Central South University 2019-04, Vol.26 (4), p.925-937
Hauptverfasser: Tian, Fu-chao, Liang, Yun-tao, Wang, De-ming, Jin, Kan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 937
container_issue 4
container_start_page 925
container_title Journal of Central South University
container_volume 26
creator Tian, Fu-chao
Liang, Yun-tao
Wang, De-ming
Jin, Kan
description Caprocks play an important role in the trapping of coalbed methane (CBM) reservoirs. To study the sealing capacities of caprocks, five samples with different lithologies of Neogene clayrock, Paleogene redbeds, Permian sandstone, Permian mudstone and Permian siltstone were collected and tested using experimental methods of microstructure observation, pore structure measurement and diffusion properties determination. Results indicate that with denser structures, lower porosities, much more developed micropores/transition pores and higher pore/throat ratios, mudstone and siltstone have the more ideal sealing capacities for CBM preservation when comparing to other kinds of caprocks; the methane diffusion coefficients of mudstone/siltstone are about 6 times higher than sandstone and almost 90 times higher than clayrock/redbeds. To further estimate the CBM escape through caprocks, a one-dimensional CBM diffusion model is derived. Modeling calculation result demonstrates that under the same thickness, the CBM sealing abilities of mudstone/siltstone are almost 100 times higher than those of clayrock/redbeds, and nearly 17 times higher than sandstone, which indicates that the coal seam below caprocks like clayrock, redbeds or sandstone may suffer stronger CBM diffusion effect than that below mudstone or siltstone. Such conclusion is verified by the case study from III3 District, Xutuan Colliery, where the coal seam capped by Paleogene redbeds has a much lower CBM content than that capped by the Permian strata like mudstone, siltstone and sandstone.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11771-019-4061-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2219971102</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2219971102</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-bd98014fb36b78984cb0e7cada8d67c12f7254157e9d5ed239b9b40f5447a13e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UEtPwzAMjhBITGM_gFskzoU4aZuGG5rGQ5rEBc5Rmrqj0KUlySb278koEidOtvU9bH-EXAK7BsbkTQCQEjIGKstZCZk4ITPOucwKzsVp6pkqMl4pdU4WIXQ1E8BLUapyRsZV26KNgQ4ttWb0g_2gAU3fuc1xNraLHSbUUTuYvsaGbjG-GYd09BjQ703sBndLV18j-m6LLpqedm6PIXabH4wa1ySrgDTEXXO4IGet6QMufuucvN6vXpaP2fr54Wl5t86sgDJmdaMqBnlbi7KWlapyWzOU1jSmakppgbeSFzkUElVTYMOFqlWds7bIc2lAoJiTq8k3_fS5S-fo92HnXVqpOQelJADjiQUTy_ohBI-tHtMXxh80MH3MVk_Z6pStPmarRdLwSRMS123Q_zn_L_oGgx19vw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2219971102</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of caprock sealing capacities on coalbed methane preservation: Experimental investigation and case study</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Tian, Fu-chao ; Liang, Yun-tao ; Wang, De-ming ; Jin, Kan</creator><creatorcontrib>Tian, Fu-chao ; Liang, Yun-tao ; Wang, De-ming ; Jin, Kan</creatorcontrib><description>Caprocks play an important role in the trapping of coalbed methane (CBM) reservoirs. To study the sealing capacities of caprocks, five samples with different lithologies of Neogene clayrock, Paleogene redbeds, Permian sandstone, Permian mudstone and Permian siltstone were collected and tested using experimental methods of microstructure observation, pore structure measurement and diffusion properties determination. Results indicate that with denser structures, lower porosities, much more developed micropores/transition pores and higher pore/throat ratios, mudstone and siltstone have the more ideal sealing capacities for CBM preservation when comparing to other kinds of caprocks; the methane diffusion coefficients of mudstone/siltstone are about 6 times higher than sandstone and almost 90 times higher than clayrock/redbeds. To further estimate the CBM escape through caprocks, a one-dimensional CBM diffusion model is derived. Modeling calculation result demonstrates that under the same thickness, the CBM sealing abilities of mudstone/siltstone are almost 100 times higher than those of clayrock/redbeds, and nearly 17 times higher than sandstone, which indicates that the coal seam below caprocks like clayrock, redbeds or sandstone may suffer stronger CBM diffusion effect than that below mudstone or siltstone. Such conclusion is verified by the case study from III3 District, Xutuan Colliery, where the coal seam capped by Paleogene redbeds has a much lower CBM content than that capped by the Permian strata like mudstone, siltstone and sandstone.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2095-2899</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2227-5223</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11771-019-4061-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Changsha: Central South University</publisher><subject>Coalbed methane ; Diffusion effects ; Engineering ; Metallic Materials ; Methane ; Mudstone ; Porosity ; Preservation ; Sandstone ; Sealing ; Siltstone</subject><ispartof>Journal of Central South University, 2019-04, Vol.26 (4), p.925-937</ispartof><rights>Central South University Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Nature B.V. 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-bd98014fb36b78984cb0e7cada8d67c12f7254157e9d5ed239b9b40f5447a13e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-bd98014fb36b78984cb0e7cada8d67c12f7254157e9d5ed239b9b40f5447a13e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9253-5373 ; 0000-0002-7343-1448</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11771-019-4061-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11771-019-4061-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tian, Fu-chao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Yun-tao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, De-ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jin, Kan</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of caprock sealing capacities on coalbed methane preservation: Experimental investigation and case study</title><title>Journal of Central South University</title><addtitle>J. Cent. South Univ</addtitle><description>Caprocks play an important role in the trapping of coalbed methane (CBM) reservoirs. To study the sealing capacities of caprocks, five samples with different lithologies of Neogene clayrock, Paleogene redbeds, Permian sandstone, Permian mudstone and Permian siltstone were collected and tested using experimental methods of microstructure observation, pore structure measurement and diffusion properties determination. Results indicate that with denser structures, lower porosities, much more developed micropores/transition pores and higher pore/throat ratios, mudstone and siltstone have the more ideal sealing capacities for CBM preservation when comparing to other kinds of caprocks; the methane diffusion coefficients of mudstone/siltstone are about 6 times higher than sandstone and almost 90 times higher than clayrock/redbeds. To further estimate the CBM escape through caprocks, a one-dimensional CBM diffusion model is derived. Modeling calculation result demonstrates that under the same thickness, the CBM sealing abilities of mudstone/siltstone are almost 100 times higher than those of clayrock/redbeds, and nearly 17 times higher than sandstone, which indicates that the coal seam below caprocks like clayrock, redbeds or sandstone may suffer stronger CBM diffusion effect than that below mudstone or siltstone. Such conclusion is verified by the case study from III3 District, Xutuan Colliery, where the coal seam capped by Paleogene redbeds has a much lower CBM content than that capped by the Permian strata like mudstone, siltstone and sandstone.</description><subject>Coalbed methane</subject><subject>Diffusion effects</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Metallic Materials</subject><subject>Methane</subject><subject>Mudstone</subject><subject>Porosity</subject><subject>Preservation</subject><subject>Sandstone</subject><subject>Sealing</subject><subject>Siltstone</subject><issn>2095-2899</issn><issn>2227-5223</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1UEtPwzAMjhBITGM_gFskzoU4aZuGG5rGQ5rEBc5Rmrqj0KUlySb278koEidOtvU9bH-EXAK7BsbkTQCQEjIGKstZCZk4ITPOucwKzsVp6pkqMl4pdU4WIXQ1E8BLUapyRsZV26KNgQ4ttWb0g_2gAU3fuc1xNraLHSbUUTuYvsaGbjG-GYd09BjQ703sBndLV18j-m6LLpqedm6PIXabH4wa1ySrgDTEXXO4IGet6QMufuucvN6vXpaP2fr54Wl5t86sgDJmdaMqBnlbi7KWlapyWzOU1jSmakppgbeSFzkUElVTYMOFqlWds7bIc2lAoJiTq8k3_fS5S-fo92HnXVqpOQelJADjiQUTy_ohBI-tHtMXxh80MH3MVk_Z6pStPmarRdLwSRMS123Q_zn_L_oGgx19vw</recordid><startdate>20190401</startdate><enddate>20190401</enddate><creator>Tian, Fu-chao</creator><creator>Liang, Yun-tao</creator><creator>Wang, De-ming</creator><creator>Jin, Kan</creator><general>Central South University</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9253-5373</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7343-1448</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190401</creationdate><title>Effects of caprock sealing capacities on coalbed methane preservation: Experimental investigation and case study</title><author>Tian, Fu-chao ; Liang, Yun-tao ; Wang, De-ming ; Jin, Kan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-bd98014fb36b78984cb0e7cada8d67c12f7254157e9d5ed239b9b40f5447a13e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Coalbed methane</topic><topic>Diffusion effects</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Metallic Materials</topic><topic>Methane</topic><topic>Mudstone</topic><topic>Porosity</topic><topic>Preservation</topic><topic>Sandstone</topic><topic>Sealing</topic><topic>Siltstone</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tian, Fu-chao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Yun-tao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, De-ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jin, Kan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of Central South University</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tian, Fu-chao</au><au>Liang, Yun-tao</au><au>Wang, De-ming</au><au>Jin, Kan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of caprock sealing capacities on coalbed methane preservation: Experimental investigation and case study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Central South University</jtitle><stitle>J. Cent. South Univ</stitle><date>2019-04-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>925</spage><epage>937</epage><pages>925-937</pages><issn>2095-2899</issn><eissn>2227-5223</eissn><abstract>Caprocks play an important role in the trapping of coalbed methane (CBM) reservoirs. To study the sealing capacities of caprocks, five samples with different lithologies of Neogene clayrock, Paleogene redbeds, Permian sandstone, Permian mudstone and Permian siltstone were collected and tested using experimental methods of microstructure observation, pore structure measurement and diffusion properties determination. Results indicate that with denser structures, lower porosities, much more developed micropores/transition pores and higher pore/throat ratios, mudstone and siltstone have the more ideal sealing capacities for CBM preservation when comparing to other kinds of caprocks; the methane diffusion coefficients of mudstone/siltstone are about 6 times higher than sandstone and almost 90 times higher than clayrock/redbeds. To further estimate the CBM escape through caprocks, a one-dimensional CBM diffusion model is derived. Modeling calculation result demonstrates that under the same thickness, the CBM sealing abilities of mudstone/siltstone are almost 100 times higher than those of clayrock/redbeds, and nearly 17 times higher than sandstone, which indicates that the coal seam below caprocks like clayrock, redbeds or sandstone may suffer stronger CBM diffusion effect than that below mudstone or siltstone. Such conclusion is verified by the case study from III3 District, Xutuan Colliery, where the coal seam capped by Paleogene redbeds has a much lower CBM content than that capped by the Permian strata like mudstone, siltstone and sandstone.</abstract><cop>Changsha</cop><pub>Central South University</pub><doi>10.1007/s11771-019-4061-3</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9253-5373</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7343-1448</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2095-2899
ispartof Journal of Central South University, 2019-04, Vol.26 (4), p.925-937
issn 2095-2899
2227-5223
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2219971102
source SpringerLink Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Coalbed methane
Diffusion effects
Engineering
Metallic Materials
Methane
Mudstone
Porosity
Preservation
Sandstone
Sealing
Siltstone
title Effects of caprock sealing capacities on coalbed methane preservation: Experimental investigation and case study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T02%3A38%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20caprock%20sealing%20capacities%20on%20coalbed%20methane%20preservation:%20Experimental%20investigation%20and%20case%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Central%20South%20University&rft.au=Tian,%20Fu-chao&rft.date=2019-04-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=925&rft.epage=937&rft.pages=925-937&rft.issn=2095-2899&rft.eissn=2227-5223&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11771-019-4061-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2219971102%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2219971102&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true