The economic vote at the party level: Electoral behaviour during the Great Recession
The Great Recession is a non-trivial test bed for the theory of economic voting, especially if its predictions are decomposed at the party level, as done in this article by analysing the electoral performances of parties competing in 89 national elections held in the 28 member states of the EU betwe...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Party politics 2019-05, Vol.25 (3), p.461-473 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 473 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 461 |
container_title | Party politics |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Giuliani, Marco Massari, Sergio Alberto |
description | The Great Recession is a non-trivial test bed for the theory of economic voting, especially if its predictions are decomposed at the party level, as done in this article by analysing the electoral performances of parties competing in 89 national elections held in the 28 member states of the EU between 2003 and 2015. We acknowledge counterintuitively that prime ministers’ parties are able to exploit the relatively good state of the economy, while sharing the blame with their allies in times of crisis, counting on the lack of clarity in the attribution of responsibilities and deploying their heresthetic capacities. We further recognize that new parties, more than opposition ones, proportionally profited from the recession. Tough times magnify the alternation between left- and right-wing victories, without necessarily favouring the most radical parties, whereas the EU’s supposed responsibility in prolonging the crisis fuelled the success of Eurosceptic parties. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1354068817728214 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2217425579</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1354068817728214</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2217425579</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-5bf769cd29167fa65e4f37eef822432adc1f1a117b105cd0212d71fe72ebedd23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UM1LwzAUD6LgnN49BjxX85Km6bzJmFMYCDLPJU1eto6umUlX2H9v5gRB8PR-vN_H-yDkFtg9gFIPIGTOirJMmJcc8jMygrxgmShKcZ5worMjf0muYtwwBpJBOSLL5RopGt_5bWPo4Hukuqd9au506A-0xQHbRzpr0fQ-6JbWuNZD4_eB2n1outW3dh4wud7RYIyN767JhdNtxJufOiYfz7Pl9CVbvM1fp0-LzAgJfSZrp4qJsXwChXK6kJg7oRBdyXkuuLYGHOh0XQ1MGss4cKvAoeJYo7VcjMndKXcX_OceY19t0mJdGllxDirnUqpJUrGTygQfY0BX7UKz1eFQAauOv6v-_i5ZspMl6hX-hv6r_wJy524K</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2217425579</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The economic vote at the party level: Electoral behaviour during the Great Recession</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Giuliani, Marco ; Massari, Sergio Alberto</creator><creatorcontrib>Giuliani, Marco ; Massari, Sergio Alberto</creatorcontrib><description>The Great Recession is a non-trivial test bed for the theory of economic voting, especially if its predictions are decomposed at the party level, as done in this article by analysing the electoral performances of parties competing in 89 national elections held in the 28 member states of the EU between 2003 and 2015. We acknowledge counterintuitively that prime ministers’ parties are able to exploit the relatively good state of the economy, while sharing the blame with their allies in times of crisis, counting on the lack of clarity in the attribution of responsibilities and deploying their heresthetic capacities. We further recognize that new parties, more than opposition ones, proportionally profited from the recession. Tough times magnify the alternation between left- and right-wing victories, without necessarily favouring the most radical parties, whereas the EU’s supposed responsibility in prolonging the crisis fuelled the success of Eurosceptic parties.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1354-0688</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-3683</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1354068817728214</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Attribution ; Blame ; Counting ; Crises ; Economic theory ; Euroscepticism ; National elections ; Political parties ; Prime ministers ; Radicalism ; Recessions ; Voter behavior ; Voting</subject><ispartof>Party politics, 2019-05, Vol.25 (3), p.461-473</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-5bf769cd29167fa65e4f37eef822432adc1f1a117b105cd0212d71fe72ebedd23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-5bf769cd29167fa65e4f37eef822432adc1f1a117b105cd0212d71fe72ebedd23</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6927-7177</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1354068817728214$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1354068817728214$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21799,27903,27904,43600,43601</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Giuliani, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Massari, Sergio Alberto</creatorcontrib><title>The economic vote at the party level: Electoral behaviour during the Great Recession</title><title>Party politics</title><description>The Great Recession is a non-trivial test bed for the theory of economic voting, especially if its predictions are decomposed at the party level, as done in this article by analysing the electoral performances of parties competing in 89 national elections held in the 28 member states of the EU between 2003 and 2015. We acknowledge counterintuitively that prime ministers’ parties are able to exploit the relatively good state of the economy, while sharing the blame with their allies in times of crisis, counting on the lack of clarity in the attribution of responsibilities and deploying their heresthetic capacities. We further recognize that new parties, more than opposition ones, proportionally profited from the recession. Tough times magnify the alternation between left- and right-wing victories, without necessarily favouring the most radical parties, whereas the EU’s supposed responsibility in prolonging the crisis fuelled the success of Eurosceptic parties.</description><subject>Attribution</subject><subject>Blame</subject><subject>Counting</subject><subject>Crises</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Euroscepticism</subject><subject>National elections</subject><subject>Political parties</subject><subject>Prime ministers</subject><subject>Radicalism</subject><subject>Recessions</subject><subject>Voter behavior</subject><subject>Voting</subject><issn>1354-0688</issn><issn>1460-3683</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UM1LwzAUD6LgnN49BjxX85Km6bzJmFMYCDLPJU1eto6umUlX2H9v5gRB8PR-vN_H-yDkFtg9gFIPIGTOirJMmJcc8jMygrxgmShKcZ5worMjf0muYtwwBpJBOSLL5RopGt_5bWPo4Hukuqd9au506A-0xQHbRzpr0fQ-6JbWuNZD4_eB2n1outW3dh4wud7RYIyN767JhdNtxJufOiYfz7Pl9CVbvM1fp0-LzAgJfSZrp4qJsXwChXK6kJg7oRBdyXkuuLYGHOh0XQ1MGss4cKvAoeJYo7VcjMndKXcX_OceY19t0mJdGllxDirnUqpJUrGTygQfY0BX7UKz1eFQAauOv6v-_i5ZspMl6hX-hv6r_wJy524K</recordid><startdate>201905</startdate><enddate>201905</enddate><creator>Giuliani, Marco</creator><creator>Massari, Sergio Alberto</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6927-7177</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201905</creationdate><title>The economic vote at the party level: Electoral behaviour during the Great Recession</title><author>Giuliani, Marco ; Massari, Sergio Alberto</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-5bf769cd29167fa65e4f37eef822432adc1f1a117b105cd0212d71fe72ebedd23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Attribution</topic><topic>Blame</topic><topic>Counting</topic><topic>Crises</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Euroscepticism</topic><topic>National elections</topic><topic>Political parties</topic><topic>Prime ministers</topic><topic>Radicalism</topic><topic>Recessions</topic><topic>Voter behavior</topic><topic>Voting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Giuliani, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Massari, Sergio Alberto</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Party politics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Giuliani, Marco</au><au>Massari, Sergio Alberto</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The economic vote at the party level: Electoral behaviour during the Great Recession</atitle><jtitle>Party politics</jtitle><date>2019-05</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>461</spage><epage>473</epage><pages>461-473</pages><issn>1354-0688</issn><eissn>1460-3683</eissn><abstract>The Great Recession is a non-trivial test bed for the theory of economic voting, especially if its predictions are decomposed at the party level, as done in this article by analysing the electoral performances of parties competing in 89 national elections held in the 28 member states of the EU between 2003 and 2015. We acknowledge counterintuitively that prime ministers’ parties are able to exploit the relatively good state of the economy, while sharing the blame with their allies in times of crisis, counting on the lack of clarity in the attribution of responsibilities and deploying their heresthetic capacities. We further recognize that new parties, more than opposition ones, proportionally profited from the recession. Tough times magnify the alternation between left- and right-wing victories, without necessarily favouring the most radical parties, whereas the EU’s supposed responsibility in prolonging the crisis fuelled the success of Eurosceptic parties.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1354068817728214</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6927-7177</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1354-0688 |
ispartof | Party politics, 2019-05, Vol.25 (3), p.461-473 |
issn | 1354-0688 1460-3683 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2217425579 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; SAGE Complete A-Z List |
subjects | Attribution Blame Counting Crises Economic theory Euroscepticism National elections Political parties Prime ministers Radicalism Recessions Voter behavior Voting |
title | The economic vote at the party level: Electoral behaviour during the Great Recession |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T16%3A07%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20economic%20vote%20at%20the%20party%20level:%20Electoral%20behaviour%20during%20the%20Great%20Recession&rft.jtitle=Party%20politics&rft.au=Giuliani,%20Marco&rft.date=2019-05&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=461&rft.epage=473&rft.pages=461-473&rft.issn=1354-0688&rft.eissn=1460-3683&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1354068817728214&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2217425579%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2217425579&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1354068817728214&rfr_iscdi=true |