Multiple Group IRT Measurement Invariance Analysis of the Forms of Self-Criticising/Attacking and Self-Reassuring Scale in Thirteen International Samples
The purpose of this study was to examine the measurement invariance of the Forms of Self-Criticising/Attacking & Self-Reassuring Scale (FSCRS) in terms of Item Response Theory differential test functioning in thirteen distinct samples ( N = 7714) from twelve different countries. We assessed dif...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of rational-emotive and cognitive-behavior therapy 2019-12, Vol.37 (4), p.411-444 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 444 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 411 |
container_title | Journal of rational-emotive and cognitive-behavior therapy |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Halamová, Júlia Kanovský, Martin Gilbert, Paul Troop, Nicholas A. Zuroff, David C. Petrocchi, Nicola Hermanto, Nicola Krieger, Tobias Kirby, James N. Asano, Kenichi Matos, Marcela Yu, FuYa Sommers-Spijkerman, Marion Shahar, Ben Basran, Jaskaran Kupeli, Nuriye |
description | The purpose of this study was to examine the measurement invariance of the Forms of Self-Criticising/Attacking & Self-Reassuring Scale (FSCRS) in terms of Item Response Theory differential test functioning in thirteen distinct samples (
N
= 7714) from twelve different countries. We assessed differential test functioning for the three FSCRS subscales, Inadequate-Self, Hated-Self and Reassured-Self separately. 32 of the 78 pairwise comparisons between samples for Inadequate-Self, 42 of the 78 pairwise comparisons for Reassured-Self and 54 of the 78 pairwise comparisons for Hated-Self demonstrated no differential test functioning, i.e. measurement invariance. Hated-Self was the most invariant of the three subscales, suggesting that self-hatred is similarly perceived across different cultures. Nonetheless, all three subscales of FSCRS are sensitive to cross-cultural differences. Considering the possible cultural and linguistic differences in the expression of self-criticism and self-reassurance, future analyses of the meanings and connotations of these constructs across the world are necessary in order to develop or tailor a scale which allows cross-cultural comparisons of various treatment outcomes related to self-criticism. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10942-019-00319-1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2216583633</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2216583633</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-34c2483da63c6a7d09659dddee6035ea1774b68fadf913e1e28a75fd8d8e21003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UV1PwyAUJUYT58cf8InE5zoohdLHZdG5ZMbEzWeC5VbRjlagJvsp_lvZauKbL8D9OOdc7kHoipIbSkg5DZRURZ4RWmWEsHTSIzShvGSZ4IIdowmRVZFVRPJTdBbCOyEk55JP0PfD0Ebbt4AXvht6vHza4AfQYfCwBRfx0n1pb7WrAc-cbnfBBtw1OL4Bvuv89hCsoW2yubfR1jZY9zqdxajrj_TC2pmx_JQ4E-k-t651krMOb96sjwAuiUTwTkfbJQm81ts0T7hAJ41uA1z-3ufo-e52M7_PVo-L5Xy2ymomWMxYUeeFZEYLVgtdGlIJXhljAARhHDQty-JFyEabpqIMKORSl7wx0kjI0-7YOboeeXvffQ4QonrvhjRNG1SeU8FlkmGpKx-7at-F4KFRvbdb7XeKErW3QI0WqGSBOligaAKxERT6_c_B_1H_g_oB7EyLww</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2216583633</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multiple Group IRT Measurement Invariance Analysis of the Forms of Self-Criticising/Attacking and Self-Reassuring Scale in Thirteen International Samples</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Halamová, Júlia ; Kanovský, Martin ; Gilbert, Paul ; Troop, Nicholas A. ; Zuroff, David C. ; Petrocchi, Nicola ; Hermanto, Nicola ; Krieger, Tobias ; Kirby, James N. ; Asano, Kenichi ; Matos, Marcela ; Yu, FuYa ; Sommers-Spijkerman, Marion ; Shahar, Ben ; Basran, Jaskaran ; Kupeli, Nuriye</creator><creatorcontrib>Halamová, Júlia ; Kanovský, Martin ; Gilbert, Paul ; Troop, Nicholas A. ; Zuroff, David C. ; Petrocchi, Nicola ; Hermanto, Nicola ; Krieger, Tobias ; Kirby, James N. ; Asano, Kenichi ; Matos, Marcela ; Yu, FuYa ; Sommers-Spijkerman, Marion ; Shahar, Ben ; Basran, Jaskaran ; Kupeli, Nuriye</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study was to examine the measurement invariance of the Forms of Self-Criticising/Attacking & Self-Reassuring Scale (FSCRS) in terms of Item Response Theory differential test functioning in thirteen distinct samples (
N
= 7714) from twelve different countries. We assessed differential test functioning for the three FSCRS subscales, Inadequate-Self, Hated-Self and Reassured-Self separately. 32 of the 78 pairwise comparisons between samples for Inadequate-Self, 42 of the 78 pairwise comparisons for Reassured-Self and 54 of the 78 pairwise comparisons for Hated-Self demonstrated no differential test functioning, i.e. measurement invariance. Hated-Self was the most invariant of the three subscales, suggesting that self-hatred is similarly perceived across different cultures. Nonetheless, all three subscales of FSCRS are sensitive to cross-cultural differences. Considering the possible cultural and linguistic differences in the expression of self-criticism and self-reassurance, future analyses of the meanings and connotations of these constructs across the world are necessary in order to develop or tailor a scale which allows cross-cultural comparisons of various treatment outcomes related to self-criticism.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0894-9085</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-6563</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10942-019-00319-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Clinical outcomes ; Clinical Psychology ; Community and Environmental Psychology ; Cross cultural studies ; Cultural differences ; Education ; Hate ; Item response theory ; Meaning ; Measurement ; Psychiatry ; Psychology ; Public Health ; Reassurance ; Selfcriticism</subject><ispartof>Journal of rational-emotive and cognitive-behavior therapy, 2019-12, Vol.37 (4), p.411-444</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><rights>Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved. © 2019. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-34c2483da63c6a7d09659dddee6035ea1774b68fadf913e1e28a75fd8d8e21003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-34c2483da63c6a7d09659dddee6035ea1774b68fadf913e1e28a75fd8d8e21003</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2655-2327</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10942-019-00319-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10942-019-00319-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,12850,27928,27929,31003,41492,42561,51323</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Halamová, Júlia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanovský, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilbert, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Troop, Nicholas A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zuroff, David C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrocchi, Nicola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hermanto, Nicola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krieger, Tobias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirby, James N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asano, Kenichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matos, Marcela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, FuYa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sommers-Spijkerman, Marion</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shahar, Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basran, Jaskaran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kupeli, Nuriye</creatorcontrib><title>Multiple Group IRT Measurement Invariance Analysis of the Forms of Self-Criticising/Attacking and Self-Reassuring Scale in Thirteen International Samples</title><title>Journal of rational-emotive and cognitive-behavior therapy</title><addtitle>J Rat-Emo Cognitive-Behav Ther</addtitle><description>The purpose of this study was to examine the measurement invariance of the Forms of Self-Criticising/Attacking & Self-Reassuring Scale (FSCRS) in terms of Item Response Theory differential test functioning in thirteen distinct samples (
N
= 7714) from twelve different countries. We assessed differential test functioning for the three FSCRS subscales, Inadequate-Self, Hated-Self and Reassured-Self separately. 32 of the 78 pairwise comparisons between samples for Inadequate-Self, 42 of the 78 pairwise comparisons for Reassured-Self and 54 of the 78 pairwise comparisons for Hated-Self demonstrated no differential test functioning, i.e. measurement invariance. Hated-Self was the most invariant of the three subscales, suggesting that self-hatred is similarly perceived across different cultures. Nonetheless, all three subscales of FSCRS are sensitive to cross-cultural differences. Considering the possible cultural and linguistic differences in the expression of self-criticism and self-reassurance, future analyses of the meanings and connotations of these constructs across the world are necessary in order to develop or tailor a scale which allows cross-cultural comparisons of various treatment outcomes related to self-criticism.</description><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Clinical Psychology</subject><subject>Community and Environmental Psychology</subject><subject>Cross cultural studies</subject><subject>Cultural differences</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Hate</subject><subject>Item response theory</subject><subject>Meaning</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Reassurance</subject><subject>Selfcriticism</subject><issn>0894-9085</issn><issn>1573-6563</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UV1PwyAUJUYT58cf8InE5zoohdLHZdG5ZMbEzWeC5VbRjlagJvsp_lvZauKbL8D9OOdc7kHoipIbSkg5DZRURZ4RWmWEsHTSIzShvGSZ4IIdowmRVZFVRPJTdBbCOyEk55JP0PfD0Ebbt4AXvht6vHza4AfQYfCwBRfx0n1pb7WrAc-cbnfBBtw1OL4Bvuv89hCsoW2yubfR1jZY9zqdxajrj_TC2pmx_JQ4E-k-t651krMOb96sjwAuiUTwTkfbJQm81ts0T7hAJ41uA1z-3ufo-e52M7_PVo-L5Xy2ymomWMxYUeeFZEYLVgtdGlIJXhljAARhHDQty-JFyEabpqIMKORSl7wx0kjI0-7YOboeeXvffQ4QonrvhjRNG1SeU8FlkmGpKx-7at-F4KFRvbdb7XeKErW3QI0WqGSBOligaAKxERT6_c_B_1H_g_oB7EyLww</recordid><startdate>20191201</startdate><enddate>20191201</enddate><creator>Halamová, Júlia</creator><creator>Kanovský, Martin</creator><creator>Gilbert, Paul</creator><creator>Troop, Nicholas A.</creator><creator>Zuroff, David C.</creator><creator>Petrocchi, Nicola</creator><creator>Hermanto, Nicola</creator><creator>Krieger, Tobias</creator><creator>Kirby, James N.</creator><creator>Asano, Kenichi</creator><creator>Matos, Marcela</creator><creator>Yu, FuYa</creator><creator>Sommers-Spijkerman, Marion</creator><creator>Shahar, Ben</creator><creator>Basran, Jaskaran</creator><creator>Kupeli, Nuriye</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2655-2327</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191201</creationdate><title>Multiple Group IRT Measurement Invariance Analysis of the Forms of Self-Criticising/Attacking and Self-Reassuring Scale in Thirteen International Samples</title><author>Halamová, Júlia ; Kanovský, Martin ; Gilbert, Paul ; Troop, Nicholas A. ; Zuroff, David C. ; Petrocchi, Nicola ; Hermanto, Nicola ; Krieger, Tobias ; Kirby, James N. ; Asano, Kenichi ; Matos, Marcela ; Yu, FuYa ; Sommers-Spijkerman, Marion ; Shahar, Ben ; Basran, Jaskaran ; Kupeli, Nuriye</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-34c2483da63c6a7d09659dddee6035ea1774b68fadf913e1e28a75fd8d8e21003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Clinical Psychology</topic><topic>Community and Environmental Psychology</topic><topic>Cross cultural studies</topic><topic>Cultural differences</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Hate</topic><topic>Item response theory</topic><topic>Meaning</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Reassurance</topic><topic>Selfcriticism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Halamová, Júlia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanovský, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilbert, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Troop, Nicholas A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zuroff, David C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrocchi, Nicola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hermanto, Nicola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krieger, Tobias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirby, James N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asano, Kenichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matos, Marcela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, FuYa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sommers-Spijkerman, Marion</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shahar, Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basran, Jaskaran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kupeli, Nuriye</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of rational-emotive and cognitive-behavior therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Halamová, Júlia</au><au>Kanovský, Martin</au><au>Gilbert, Paul</au><au>Troop, Nicholas A.</au><au>Zuroff, David C.</au><au>Petrocchi, Nicola</au><au>Hermanto, Nicola</au><au>Krieger, Tobias</au><au>Kirby, James N.</au><au>Asano, Kenichi</au><au>Matos, Marcela</au><au>Yu, FuYa</au><au>Sommers-Spijkerman, Marion</au><au>Shahar, Ben</au><au>Basran, Jaskaran</au><au>Kupeli, Nuriye</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multiple Group IRT Measurement Invariance Analysis of the Forms of Self-Criticising/Attacking and Self-Reassuring Scale in Thirteen International Samples</atitle><jtitle>Journal of rational-emotive and cognitive-behavior therapy</jtitle><stitle>J Rat-Emo Cognitive-Behav Ther</stitle><date>2019-12-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>411</spage><epage>444</epage><pages>411-444</pages><issn>0894-9085</issn><eissn>1573-6563</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this study was to examine the measurement invariance of the Forms of Self-Criticising/Attacking & Self-Reassuring Scale (FSCRS) in terms of Item Response Theory differential test functioning in thirteen distinct samples (
N
= 7714) from twelve different countries. We assessed differential test functioning for the three FSCRS subscales, Inadequate-Self, Hated-Self and Reassured-Self separately. 32 of the 78 pairwise comparisons between samples for Inadequate-Self, 42 of the 78 pairwise comparisons for Reassured-Self and 54 of the 78 pairwise comparisons for Hated-Self demonstrated no differential test functioning, i.e. measurement invariance. Hated-Self was the most invariant of the three subscales, suggesting that self-hatred is similarly perceived across different cultures. Nonetheless, all three subscales of FSCRS are sensitive to cross-cultural differences. Considering the possible cultural and linguistic differences in the expression of self-criticism and self-reassurance, future analyses of the meanings and connotations of these constructs across the world are necessary in order to develop or tailor a scale which allows cross-cultural comparisons of various treatment outcomes related to self-criticism.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s10942-019-00319-1</doi><tpages>34</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2655-2327</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0894-9085 |
ispartof | Journal of rational-emotive and cognitive-behavior therapy, 2019-12, Vol.37 (4), p.411-444 |
issn | 0894-9085 1573-6563 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2216583633 |
source | SpringerNature Journals; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
subjects | Behavioral Science and Psychology Clinical outcomes Clinical Psychology Community and Environmental Psychology Cross cultural studies Cultural differences Education Hate Item response theory Meaning Measurement Psychiatry Psychology Public Health Reassurance Selfcriticism |
title | Multiple Group IRT Measurement Invariance Analysis of the Forms of Self-Criticising/Attacking and Self-Reassuring Scale in Thirteen International Samples |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T08%3A37%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multiple%20Group%20IRT%20Measurement%20Invariance%20Analysis%20of%20the%20Forms%20of%20Self-Criticising/Attacking%20and%20Self-Reassuring%20Scale%20in%20Thirteen%20International%20Samples&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20rational-emotive%20and%20cognitive-behavior%20therapy&rft.au=Halamov%C3%A1,%20J%C3%BAlia&rft.date=2019-12-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=411&rft.epage=444&rft.pages=411-444&rft.issn=0894-9085&rft.eissn=1573-6563&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10942-019-00319-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2216583633%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2216583633&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |