Multiple Group IRT Measurement Invariance Analysis of the Forms of Self-Criticising/Attacking and Self-Reassuring Scale in Thirteen International Samples

The purpose of this study was to examine the measurement invariance of the Forms of Self-Criticising/Attacking & Self-Reassuring Scale (FSCRS) in terms of Item Response Theory differential test functioning in thirteen distinct samples ( N  = 7714) from twelve different countries. We assessed dif...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of rational-emotive and cognitive-behavior therapy 2019-12, Vol.37 (4), p.411-444
Hauptverfasser: Halamová, Júlia, Kanovský, Martin, Gilbert, Paul, Troop, Nicholas A., Zuroff, David C., Petrocchi, Nicola, Hermanto, Nicola, Krieger, Tobias, Kirby, James N., Asano, Kenichi, Matos, Marcela, Yu, FuYa, Sommers-Spijkerman, Marion, Shahar, Ben, Basran, Jaskaran, Kupeli, Nuriye
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 444
container_issue 4
container_start_page 411
container_title Journal of rational-emotive and cognitive-behavior therapy
container_volume 37
creator Halamová, Júlia
Kanovský, Martin
Gilbert, Paul
Troop, Nicholas A.
Zuroff, David C.
Petrocchi, Nicola
Hermanto, Nicola
Krieger, Tobias
Kirby, James N.
Asano, Kenichi
Matos, Marcela
Yu, FuYa
Sommers-Spijkerman, Marion
Shahar, Ben
Basran, Jaskaran
Kupeli, Nuriye
description The purpose of this study was to examine the measurement invariance of the Forms of Self-Criticising/Attacking & Self-Reassuring Scale (FSCRS) in terms of Item Response Theory differential test functioning in thirteen distinct samples ( N  = 7714) from twelve different countries. We assessed differential test functioning for the three FSCRS subscales, Inadequate-Self, Hated-Self and Reassured-Self separately. 32 of the 78 pairwise comparisons between samples for Inadequate-Self, 42 of the 78 pairwise comparisons for Reassured-Self and 54 of the 78 pairwise comparisons for Hated-Self demonstrated no differential test functioning, i.e. measurement invariance. Hated-Self was the most invariant of the three subscales, suggesting that self-hatred is similarly perceived across different cultures. Nonetheless, all three subscales of FSCRS are sensitive to cross-cultural differences. Considering the possible cultural and linguistic differences in the expression of self-criticism and self-reassurance, future analyses of the meanings and connotations of these constructs across the world are necessary in order to develop or tailor a scale which allows cross-cultural comparisons of various treatment outcomes related to self-criticism.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10942-019-00319-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2216583633</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2216583633</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-34c2483da63c6a7d09659dddee6035ea1774b68fadf913e1e28a75fd8d8e21003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UV1PwyAUJUYT58cf8InE5zoohdLHZdG5ZMbEzWeC5VbRjlagJvsp_lvZauKbL8D9OOdc7kHoipIbSkg5DZRURZ4RWmWEsHTSIzShvGSZ4IIdowmRVZFVRPJTdBbCOyEk55JP0PfD0Ebbt4AXvht6vHza4AfQYfCwBRfx0n1pb7WrAc-cbnfBBtw1OL4Bvuv89hCsoW2yubfR1jZY9zqdxajrj_TC2pmx_JQ4E-k-t651krMOb96sjwAuiUTwTkfbJQm81ts0T7hAJ41uA1z-3ufo-e52M7_PVo-L5Xy2ymomWMxYUeeFZEYLVgtdGlIJXhljAARhHDQty-JFyEabpqIMKORSl7wx0kjI0-7YOboeeXvffQ4QonrvhjRNG1SeU8FlkmGpKx-7at-F4KFRvbdb7XeKErW3QI0WqGSBOligaAKxERT6_c_B_1H_g_oB7EyLww</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2216583633</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multiple Group IRT Measurement Invariance Analysis of the Forms of Self-Criticising/Attacking and Self-Reassuring Scale in Thirteen International Samples</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Halamová, Júlia ; Kanovský, Martin ; Gilbert, Paul ; Troop, Nicholas A. ; Zuroff, David C. ; Petrocchi, Nicola ; Hermanto, Nicola ; Krieger, Tobias ; Kirby, James N. ; Asano, Kenichi ; Matos, Marcela ; Yu, FuYa ; Sommers-Spijkerman, Marion ; Shahar, Ben ; Basran, Jaskaran ; Kupeli, Nuriye</creator><creatorcontrib>Halamová, Júlia ; Kanovský, Martin ; Gilbert, Paul ; Troop, Nicholas A. ; Zuroff, David C. ; Petrocchi, Nicola ; Hermanto, Nicola ; Krieger, Tobias ; Kirby, James N. ; Asano, Kenichi ; Matos, Marcela ; Yu, FuYa ; Sommers-Spijkerman, Marion ; Shahar, Ben ; Basran, Jaskaran ; Kupeli, Nuriye</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study was to examine the measurement invariance of the Forms of Self-Criticising/Attacking &amp; Self-Reassuring Scale (FSCRS) in terms of Item Response Theory differential test functioning in thirteen distinct samples ( N  = 7714) from twelve different countries. We assessed differential test functioning for the three FSCRS subscales, Inadequate-Self, Hated-Self and Reassured-Self separately. 32 of the 78 pairwise comparisons between samples for Inadequate-Self, 42 of the 78 pairwise comparisons for Reassured-Self and 54 of the 78 pairwise comparisons for Hated-Self demonstrated no differential test functioning, i.e. measurement invariance. Hated-Self was the most invariant of the three subscales, suggesting that self-hatred is similarly perceived across different cultures. Nonetheless, all three subscales of FSCRS are sensitive to cross-cultural differences. Considering the possible cultural and linguistic differences in the expression of self-criticism and self-reassurance, future analyses of the meanings and connotations of these constructs across the world are necessary in order to develop or tailor a scale which allows cross-cultural comparisons of various treatment outcomes related to self-criticism.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0894-9085</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-6563</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10942-019-00319-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Clinical outcomes ; Clinical Psychology ; Community and Environmental Psychology ; Cross cultural studies ; Cultural differences ; Education ; Hate ; Item response theory ; Meaning ; Measurement ; Psychiatry ; Psychology ; Public Health ; Reassurance ; Selfcriticism</subject><ispartof>Journal of rational-emotive and cognitive-behavior therapy, 2019-12, Vol.37 (4), p.411-444</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><rights>Journal of Rational-Emotive &amp; Cognitive-Behavior Therapy is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved. © 2019. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-34c2483da63c6a7d09659dddee6035ea1774b68fadf913e1e28a75fd8d8e21003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-34c2483da63c6a7d09659dddee6035ea1774b68fadf913e1e28a75fd8d8e21003</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2655-2327</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10942-019-00319-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10942-019-00319-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,12850,27928,27929,31003,41492,42561,51323</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Halamová, Júlia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanovský, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilbert, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Troop, Nicholas A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zuroff, David C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrocchi, Nicola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hermanto, Nicola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krieger, Tobias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirby, James N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asano, Kenichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matos, Marcela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, FuYa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sommers-Spijkerman, Marion</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shahar, Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basran, Jaskaran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kupeli, Nuriye</creatorcontrib><title>Multiple Group IRT Measurement Invariance Analysis of the Forms of Self-Criticising/Attacking and Self-Reassuring Scale in Thirteen International Samples</title><title>Journal of rational-emotive and cognitive-behavior therapy</title><addtitle>J Rat-Emo Cognitive-Behav Ther</addtitle><description>The purpose of this study was to examine the measurement invariance of the Forms of Self-Criticising/Attacking &amp; Self-Reassuring Scale (FSCRS) in terms of Item Response Theory differential test functioning in thirteen distinct samples ( N  = 7714) from twelve different countries. We assessed differential test functioning for the three FSCRS subscales, Inadequate-Self, Hated-Self and Reassured-Self separately. 32 of the 78 pairwise comparisons between samples for Inadequate-Self, 42 of the 78 pairwise comparisons for Reassured-Self and 54 of the 78 pairwise comparisons for Hated-Self demonstrated no differential test functioning, i.e. measurement invariance. Hated-Self was the most invariant of the three subscales, suggesting that self-hatred is similarly perceived across different cultures. Nonetheless, all three subscales of FSCRS are sensitive to cross-cultural differences. Considering the possible cultural and linguistic differences in the expression of self-criticism and self-reassurance, future analyses of the meanings and connotations of these constructs across the world are necessary in order to develop or tailor a scale which allows cross-cultural comparisons of various treatment outcomes related to self-criticism.</description><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Clinical Psychology</subject><subject>Community and Environmental Psychology</subject><subject>Cross cultural studies</subject><subject>Cultural differences</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Hate</subject><subject>Item response theory</subject><subject>Meaning</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Reassurance</subject><subject>Selfcriticism</subject><issn>0894-9085</issn><issn>1573-6563</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UV1PwyAUJUYT58cf8InE5zoohdLHZdG5ZMbEzWeC5VbRjlagJvsp_lvZauKbL8D9OOdc7kHoipIbSkg5DZRURZ4RWmWEsHTSIzShvGSZ4IIdowmRVZFVRPJTdBbCOyEk55JP0PfD0Ebbt4AXvht6vHza4AfQYfCwBRfx0n1pb7WrAc-cbnfBBtw1OL4Bvuv89hCsoW2yubfR1jZY9zqdxajrj_TC2pmx_JQ4E-k-t651krMOb96sjwAuiUTwTkfbJQm81ts0T7hAJ41uA1z-3ufo-e52M7_PVo-L5Xy2ymomWMxYUeeFZEYLVgtdGlIJXhljAARhHDQty-JFyEabpqIMKORSl7wx0kjI0-7YOboeeXvffQ4QonrvhjRNG1SeU8FlkmGpKx-7at-F4KFRvbdb7XeKErW3QI0WqGSBOligaAKxERT6_c_B_1H_g_oB7EyLww</recordid><startdate>20191201</startdate><enddate>20191201</enddate><creator>Halamová, Júlia</creator><creator>Kanovský, Martin</creator><creator>Gilbert, Paul</creator><creator>Troop, Nicholas A.</creator><creator>Zuroff, David C.</creator><creator>Petrocchi, Nicola</creator><creator>Hermanto, Nicola</creator><creator>Krieger, Tobias</creator><creator>Kirby, James N.</creator><creator>Asano, Kenichi</creator><creator>Matos, Marcela</creator><creator>Yu, FuYa</creator><creator>Sommers-Spijkerman, Marion</creator><creator>Shahar, Ben</creator><creator>Basran, Jaskaran</creator><creator>Kupeli, Nuriye</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2655-2327</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191201</creationdate><title>Multiple Group IRT Measurement Invariance Analysis of the Forms of Self-Criticising/Attacking and Self-Reassuring Scale in Thirteen International Samples</title><author>Halamová, Júlia ; Kanovský, Martin ; Gilbert, Paul ; Troop, Nicholas A. ; Zuroff, David C. ; Petrocchi, Nicola ; Hermanto, Nicola ; Krieger, Tobias ; Kirby, James N. ; Asano, Kenichi ; Matos, Marcela ; Yu, FuYa ; Sommers-Spijkerman, Marion ; Shahar, Ben ; Basran, Jaskaran ; Kupeli, Nuriye</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-34c2483da63c6a7d09659dddee6035ea1774b68fadf913e1e28a75fd8d8e21003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Clinical Psychology</topic><topic>Community and Environmental Psychology</topic><topic>Cross cultural studies</topic><topic>Cultural differences</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Hate</topic><topic>Item response theory</topic><topic>Meaning</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Reassurance</topic><topic>Selfcriticism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Halamová, Júlia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanovský, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilbert, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Troop, Nicholas A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zuroff, David C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrocchi, Nicola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hermanto, Nicola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krieger, Tobias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirby, James N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asano, Kenichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matos, Marcela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, FuYa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sommers-Spijkerman, Marion</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shahar, Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basran, Jaskaran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kupeli, Nuriye</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of rational-emotive and cognitive-behavior therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Halamová, Júlia</au><au>Kanovský, Martin</au><au>Gilbert, Paul</au><au>Troop, Nicholas A.</au><au>Zuroff, David C.</au><au>Petrocchi, Nicola</au><au>Hermanto, Nicola</au><au>Krieger, Tobias</au><au>Kirby, James N.</au><au>Asano, Kenichi</au><au>Matos, Marcela</au><au>Yu, FuYa</au><au>Sommers-Spijkerman, Marion</au><au>Shahar, Ben</au><au>Basran, Jaskaran</au><au>Kupeli, Nuriye</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multiple Group IRT Measurement Invariance Analysis of the Forms of Self-Criticising/Attacking and Self-Reassuring Scale in Thirteen International Samples</atitle><jtitle>Journal of rational-emotive and cognitive-behavior therapy</jtitle><stitle>J Rat-Emo Cognitive-Behav Ther</stitle><date>2019-12-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>411</spage><epage>444</epage><pages>411-444</pages><issn>0894-9085</issn><eissn>1573-6563</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this study was to examine the measurement invariance of the Forms of Self-Criticising/Attacking &amp; Self-Reassuring Scale (FSCRS) in terms of Item Response Theory differential test functioning in thirteen distinct samples ( N  = 7714) from twelve different countries. We assessed differential test functioning for the three FSCRS subscales, Inadequate-Self, Hated-Self and Reassured-Self separately. 32 of the 78 pairwise comparisons between samples for Inadequate-Self, 42 of the 78 pairwise comparisons for Reassured-Self and 54 of the 78 pairwise comparisons for Hated-Self demonstrated no differential test functioning, i.e. measurement invariance. Hated-Self was the most invariant of the three subscales, suggesting that self-hatred is similarly perceived across different cultures. Nonetheless, all three subscales of FSCRS are sensitive to cross-cultural differences. Considering the possible cultural and linguistic differences in the expression of self-criticism and self-reassurance, future analyses of the meanings and connotations of these constructs across the world are necessary in order to develop or tailor a scale which allows cross-cultural comparisons of various treatment outcomes related to self-criticism.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s10942-019-00319-1</doi><tpages>34</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2655-2327</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0894-9085
ispartof Journal of rational-emotive and cognitive-behavior therapy, 2019-12, Vol.37 (4), p.411-444
issn 0894-9085
1573-6563
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2216583633
source SpringerNature Journals; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
subjects Behavioral Science and Psychology
Clinical outcomes
Clinical Psychology
Community and Environmental Psychology
Cross cultural studies
Cultural differences
Education
Hate
Item response theory
Meaning
Measurement
Psychiatry
Psychology
Public Health
Reassurance
Selfcriticism
title Multiple Group IRT Measurement Invariance Analysis of the Forms of Self-Criticising/Attacking and Self-Reassuring Scale in Thirteen International Samples
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T08%3A37%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multiple%20Group%20IRT%20Measurement%20Invariance%20Analysis%20of%20the%20Forms%20of%20Self-Criticising/Attacking%20and%20Self-Reassuring%20Scale%20in%20Thirteen%20International%20Samples&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20rational-emotive%20and%20cognitive-behavior%20therapy&rft.au=Halamov%C3%A1,%20J%C3%BAlia&rft.date=2019-12-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=411&rft.epage=444&rft.pages=411-444&rft.issn=0894-9085&rft.eissn=1573-6563&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10942-019-00319-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2216583633%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2216583633&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true