‘Can you talk me through your argument’? Features of dialogic interaction in academic writing tutorials

Academic writing tutorials are regarded as beneficial when they are conducted in an egalitarian and dialogic mode of interaction, enabling students to negotiate and explore ideas. However, previous research has revealed a tendency towards tutor dominance and prescriptive, monologic teaching behaviou...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of English for academic purposes 2019-03, Vol.38, p.25-35
1. Verfasser: Wingate, Ursula
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 35
container_issue
container_start_page 25
container_title Journal of English for academic purposes
container_volume 38
creator Wingate, Ursula
description Academic writing tutorials are regarded as beneficial when they are conducted in an egalitarian and dialogic mode of interaction, enabling students to negotiate and explore ideas. However, previous research has revealed a tendency towards tutor dominance and prescriptive, monologic teaching behaviour. The research presented in this article explored the nature of interaction and instructional talk in tutorials delivered by peer tutors. The peer-tutoring model is often chosen to facilitate discipline-specific advice; however, peer tutors may not always be sufficiently experienced and trained to deliver dialogic teaching. This study examined ten peer-led tutorials with the aim to make evidence-based recommendations for tutor training. The initial quantitative analysis led to the identification of the two most dialogic and the two most monologic tutorials, which were subsequently subjected to a detailed discourse analysis. The findings show an overall high degree of tutor-dominated interaction. In the few dialogic tutorials, however, the tutors' skilful use of initiating and follow-up moves and frequent use of scaffolding techniques helped the students to engage more deeply with their topic and solve problems independently . The findings suggest that tutor training should focus more explicitly on the benefits, features and strategies of a dialogic tutoring approach.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jeap.2019.01.001
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2216273756</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1475158518305010</els_id><sourcerecordid>2216273756</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-501802077e57ecb68d9bab65c04530a3d85cfe33720d2a5bffa74970bb981213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFOwzAQRS0EEqVwAVaWWCfYTh0nEhJCFQWkSmy6txxnkjpt4uI4oO56DLheT4KjsmY1o9H7M38-QreUxJTQ9L6JG1C7mBGax4TGhNAzNKGZyCI6y8V56GeCR5Rn_BJd9X0TgCxL-QRtjofvuerw3g7Yq-0Gt4D92tmhXo8zh5WrhxY6fzz8POIFKD846LGtcGnU1tZGY9N5cEp7Y7vQY6VVCW2YfznjTVdjP3jrAtxfo4sqFLj5q1O0Wjyv5q_R8v3lbf60jHQimI948EYYEQK4AF2kWZkXqki5JjOeEJWUGdcVJIElJVO8qColwpOkKPKMMppM0d1p7c7ZjwF6L5vwSBcuSsZoykQieBoodqK0s33voJI7Z1rl9pISOWYqGzlmKsdMJaEyRBZEDycRBPufBpzstYFOQ2kcaC9La_6T_wLNboJ1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2216273756</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>‘Can you talk me through your argument’? Features of dialogic interaction in academic writing tutorials</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Wingate, Ursula</creator><creatorcontrib>Wingate, Ursula</creatorcontrib><description>Academic writing tutorials are regarded as beneficial when they are conducted in an egalitarian and dialogic mode of interaction, enabling students to negotiate and explore ideas. However, previous research has revealed a tendency towards tutor dominance and prescriptive, monologic teaching behaviour. The research presented in this article explored the nature of interaction and instructional talk in tutorials delivered by peer tutors. The peer-tutoring model is often chosen to facilitate discipline-specific advice; however, peer tutors may not always be sufficiently experienced and trained to deliver dialogic teaching. This study examined ten peer-led tutorials with the aim to make evidence-based recommendations for tutor training. The initial quantitative analysis led to the identification of the two most dialogic and the two most monologic tutorials, which were subsequently subjected to a detailed discourse analysis. The findings show an overall high degree of tutor-dominated interaction. In the few dialogic tutorials, however, the tutors' skilful use of initiating and follow-up moves and frequent use of scaffolding techniques helped the students to engage more deeply with their topic and solve problems independently . The findings suggest that tutor training should focus more explicitly on the benefits, features and strategies of a dialogic tutoring approach.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1475-1585</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-1497</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jeap.2019.01.001</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Academic writing ; Discourse analysis ; Negotiation ; Peer tutoring ; Quantitative analysis ; Scaffolding ; Students ; Tutoring</subject><ispartof>Journal of English for academic purposes, 2019-03, Vol.38, p.25-35</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Mar 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-501802077e57ecb68d9bab65c04530a3d85cfe33720d2a5bffa74970bb981213</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-501802077e57ecb68d9bab65c04530a3d85cfe33720d2a5bffa74970bb981213</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1475158518305010$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wingate, Ursula</creatorcontrib><title>‘Can you talk me through your argument’? Features of dialogic interaction in academic writing tutorials</title><title>Journal of English for academic purposes</title><description>Academic writing tutorials are regarded as beneficial when they are conducted in an egalitarian and dialogic mode of interaction, enabling students to negotiate and explore ideas. However, previous research has revealed a tendency towards tutor dominance and prescriptive, monologic teaching behaviour. The research presented in this article explored the nature of interaction and instructional talk in tutorials delivered by peer tutors. The peer-tutoring model is often chosen to facilitate discipline-specific advice; however, peer tutors may not always be sufficiently experienced and trained to deliver dialogic teaching. This study examined ten peer-led tutorials with the aim to make evidence-based recommendations for tutor training. The initial quantitative analysis led to the identification of the two most dialogic and the two most monologic tutorials, which were subsequently subjected to a detailed discourse analysis. The findings show an overall high degree of tutor-dominated interaction. In the few dialogic tutorials, however, the tutors' skilful use of initiating and follow-up moves and frequent use of scaffolding techniques helped the students to engage more deeply with their topic and solve problems independently . The findings suggest that tutor training should focus more explicitly on the benefits, features and strategies of a dialogic tutoring approach.</description><subject>Academic writing</subject><subject>Discourse analysis</subject><subject>Negotiation</subject><subject>Peer tutoring</subject><subject>Quantitative analysis</subject><subject>Scaffolding</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Tutoring</subject><issn>1475-1585</issn><issn>1878-1497</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEFOwzAQRS0EEqVwAVaWWCfYTh0nEhJCFQWkSmy6txxnkjpt4uI4oO56DLheT4KjsmY1o9H7M38-QreUxJTQ9L6JG1C7mBGax4TGhNAzNKGZyCI6y8V56GeCR5Rn_BJd9X0TgCxL-QRtjofvuerw3g7Yq-0Gt4D92tmhXo8zh5WrhxY6fzz8POIFKD846LGtcGnU1tZGY9N5cEp7Y7vQY6VVCW2YfznjTVdjP3jrAtxfo4sqFLj5q1O0Wjyv5q_R8v3lbf60jHQimI948EYYEQK4AF2kWZkXqki5JjOeEJWUGdcVJIElJVO8qColwpOkKPKMMppM0d1p7c7ZjwF6L5vwSBcuSsZoykQieBoodqK0s33voJI7Z1rl9pISOWYqGzlmKsdMJaEyRBZEDycRBPufBpzstYFOQ2kcaC9La_6T_wLNboJ1</recordid><startdate>201903</startdate><enddate>201903</enddate><creator>Wingate, Ursula</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201903</creationdate><title>‘Can you talk me through your argument’? Features of dialogic interaction in academic writing tutorials</title><author>Wingate, Ursula</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-501802077e57ecb68d9bab65c04530a3d85cfe33720d2a5bffa74970bb981213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Academic writing</topic><topic>Discourse analysis</topic><topic>Negotiation</topic><topic>Peer tutoring</topic><topic>Quantitative analysis</topic><topic>Scaffolding</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Tutoring</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wingate, Ursula</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Journal of English for academic purposes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wingate, Ursula</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>‘Can you talk me through your argument’? Features of dialogic interaction in academic writing tutorials</atitle><jtitle>Journal of English for academic purposes</jtitle><date>2019-03</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>38</volume><spage>25</spage><epage>35</epage><pages>25-35</pages><issn>1475-1585</issn><eissn>1878-1497</eissn><abstract>Academic writing tutorials are regarded as beneficial when they are conducted in an egalitarian and dialogic mode of interaction, enabling students to negotiate and explore ideas. However, previous research has revealed a tendency towards tutor dominance and prescriptive, monologic teaching behaviour. The research presented in this article explored the nature of interaction and instructional talk in tutorials delivered by peer tutors. The peer-tutoring model is often chosen to facilitate discipline-specific advice; however, peer tutors may not always be sufficiently experienced and trained to deliver dialogic teaching. This study examined ten peer-led tutorials with the aim to make evidence-based recommendations for tutor training. The initial quantitative analysis led to the identification of the two most dialogic and the two most monologic tutorials, which were subsequently subjected to a detailed discourse analysis. The findings show an overall high degree of tutor-dominated interaction. In the few dialogic tutorials, however, the tutors' skilful use of initiating and follow-up moves and frequent use of scaffolding techniques helped the students to engage more deeply with their topic and solve problems independently . The findings suggest that tutor training should focus more explicitly on the benefits, features and strategies of a dialogic tutoring approach.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jeap.2019.01.001</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1475-1585
ispartof Journal of English for academic purposes, 2019-03, Vol.38, p.25-35
issn 1475-1585
1878-1497
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2216273756
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Academic writing
Discourse analysis
Negotiation
Peer tutoring
Quantitative analysis
Scaffolding
Students
Tutoring
title ‘Can you talk me through your argument’? Features of dialogic interaction in academic writing tutorials
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T07%3A49%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E2%80%98Can%20you%20talk%20me%20through%20your%20argument%E2%80%99?%20Features%20of%20dialogic%20interaction%20in%20academic%20writing%20tutorials&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20English%20for%20academic%20purposes&rft.au=Wingate,%20Ursula&rft.date=2019-03&rft.volume=38&rft.spage=25&rft.epage=35&rft.pages=25-35&rft.issn=1475-1585&rft.eissn=1878-1497&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.01.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2216273756%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2216273756&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1475158518305010&rfr_iscdi=true